Democrat Hank Johnson draws Holocaust comparison while blasting deportations
House Judiciary Committee member Hank Johnson, R-Ga., made waves when he made allusions to the Holocaust while obliquely criticizing the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the arrest of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan.
Johnson was speaking during a Wednesday committee markup meeting when he began paraphrasing German preacher Martin Niemöller's confession as someone who once supported the Nazi Party until it was too late to object to its mounting atrocities.
"You know, first, they came for the Latinos outside of the Home Depots, trying to get work so that they could feed their families," Johnson began.
"And I didn't say anything about it because I'm not a Latino at the Home Depot."
"Then they came for the Hispanic-looking folks [with] hats backward with tattoos. And they deported them to El Salvador. And I didn't say anything about that because I don't wear my [hat] backward, and I don't have any tattoos, and I don't look like a Latino."
"Then they came for the Latinas at home, taking care of the children. They scooped up the Latinas and the children, some of whom were American citizens, one of whom was receiving treatment for cancer. They swept them up, took them off, and deported them. And I didn't say anything about it. Because I'm not a Latina. I'm not a little child who's an American citizen."
Johnson went on to make the same allusion to students protesting in support of Hamas on campus, who have been another target of the Trump administration.
"They sent jackbooted thugs wearing masks to pick them up, take them thousands of miles away and put them in a private for-profit detention center where they languish at taxpayer expense. And I didn't say anything about it because I'm not a student on a foreign visa," Johnson said.
He then noted how Dugan had been arrested for allegedly aiding an illegal immigrant in avoiding federal immigration authorities, saying he did not speak up because he was not a "White female judge."
"But then they came for me. And I looked around, and there was nobody left because I had remained silent," he said.
Johnson concluded by noting he paraphrased a poem from Germany, saying it "resonated back then as it does today."
"It's important that the people understand what is happening with our constitutional rights in this country. Everyone is entitled to due process, whether or not you are documented or undocumented, whether or you are a citizen or not. You're entitled to due process."
He said an amendment up for a vote in the markup sought to affirm that.
An amendment in the meeting record would have prohibited certain funds from being used to remove "an alien in violation of their rights under the Fifth Amendment."
It was voted down.
Fox News Digital reached out to Johnson for comment, as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, for response.
On X, the official House Judiciary Committee Republican account mocked Johnson's remarks, writing, "Wow, Hank Johnson just implied that all Latinos hang out at Home Depot."
Johnson's penchant for colorful remarks goes back more than a decade to 2010, when he warned then-Pacific Fleet commander Adm. Robert Willard during a House Armed Service Committee hearing on military-buildup plans that Guam could potentially "tip over and capsize" due to overpopulation.
Democrats have recently shifted their comments on Garcia's case more toward concerns about due process, after Tennessee police video showing a run-in with Garcia allegedly trafficking migrants was released.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israel says it hit Iran nuclear research facility, killed top commanders as both trade strikes
Israel on Saturday said it struck an Iranian nuclear facility in Isfahan and killed two top commanders as the clash between the two Middle Eastern countries expands and President Trump weighs direct intervention. Israeli Air Force fighter jets later in the day also moved to strike military infrastructure in southwestern Iran, according to an Israeli military statement. Saeed Izadi, leader of the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force and Behnam Shahriyari, commander of the Quds Force's Weapons Transfer Unit in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were pronounced dead by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) early Saturday. Israeli officials in a social media post said Izadi was 'one of the main orchestrators' of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack from Hamas. The IDF said Shahriyari was responsible for weapons transfer from Iran to proxies across the Middle East. Israeli officials said he was killed while traveling in western Iran. 'His elimination represents a severe blow to the ability of the terrorist organizations surrounding Israel to regroup and strengthen after being heavily damaged by the IDF during the war,' the IDF wrote. The IRGC has not confirmed the deaths but Akbar Salehi, Isfahan province's deputy governor for security affairs, did confirm damage to their nuclear site in Isfahan, per The Associated Press. Israeli forces, Salehi said, struck the site twice within 24 hours, crippling two centrifuge production sites as a part of their objective to eliminate Iran's nuclear development programs. Iran fired 40 drones overnight on Friday that were intercepted by Israel according to the IDF. 'We've been able to take out a large amount of their launchers, creating a bottleneck — we're making it harder for them to fire toward Israel,' an Israeli military official told AP on the condition of anonymity. 'Having said all that, I want to say the Iranian regime obviously still has capabilities.' The escalation of tensions comes as Trump still weighs his options on U.S. involvement, but has warned Iran not to attack American troops. Citizens are also being evacuated in Israel, per US officials. ''Operation Exodus'' is helping US citizens evacuate Israel. We can't part the Red Sea, but are parting the 'Red Tape' to help people who wish to leave,' U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee wrote in a Saturday post on X. Foreign leaders gathered in Geneva to seek to assist in quelling the violence in the region via diplomacy on Friday, however, talks quickly reached a stalemate as Iranian leaders pushed for consequences on Israel. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again and once aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters. The United Nations issued a Friday release after the meetings in Geneva condemning Israeli attacks while denouncing the strikes as a violation of international law. Israel first hit Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13, prompting tensions to escalate in the region as US nuclear talks with Iran collapsed. Iran's Health Ministry spokesman Hossein Kermanpour said in an online interview with NewsNation, The Hill's sister station, on Friday that since strikes began, over 3,000 Iranians have been injured, 90 percent of whom are civilians. He said at least 400 people have been killed. The spokesperson added that the youngest injured is a 4-year-old boy, and the youngest victim is a two-month-old baby. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Could the Israel-Iran war lead to regional peace?
In Middle Eastern politics, hidden agendas, unintended consequences and surprise outcomes are the rule, not the exception. That's why what began as a catastrophic Israeli failure on Oct. 7 may yield not only an end to Iran's nuclear ambitions but to progress in the region and an end to the tragedy in Gaza. There are at least two ways to view Israel's attack on Iran. Critics would argue Israel has not been transparent about its intelligence, its coordination with the U.S. or its true aims, and that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu —who is a defendant in an Israeli criminal corruption trial — is playing politics and can never be trusted. But another interpretation holds that Israel seized a historic opportunity to neutralize a threat that the world's powers have long failed to confront. For decades, Iran's clerical regime has pursued a nuclear program under the guise of civilian energy while bankrolling terrorism and proxy wars abroad. Its proxy militias have undermined a broad swath of the region: Hezbollah has dominated Lebanon and embroiled it in unwanted wars with Israel, while also propping up the murderous Assad regime in Syria; the Houthis have caused the deaths of 400,000 in Yemen, attacked Saudi Arabia and ruined Egypt's Suez Canal revenue; the web of Shiite militias has undermined the sovereignty of Iraq; Hamas, in massacring 1,200 people in Israel, launched a war that has brought devastation upon Gaza. Moreover, there is absolutely no civilian purpose to Iran's insistence on enriching uranium at the 60 percent level, which is near-weaponizable and has been confirmed by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel's concerns about Iranian leaders' statements that the Jewish State must disappear are not paranoia. The Islamic Republic's insistence on the right to do all this — while grievously oppressing its own people, whom it governs through fear — has been a thorn in the side of the region and the world for decades. So far, Israel has executed its campaign at an astoundingly high level. Israeli jets have controlled Iran's skies, shattered nuclear infrastructure, eliminated part of the Iranian military's missile capabilities and assassinated a shocking number of senior security and nuclear figures. The success has been so dramatic it appears to be tempting the Trump administration into reconsidering its initial position of implausible deniability. It is well within President Trump's brand to jump on a winning bandwagon and then take credit for it — which would imply increased American involvement quite soon. One path might be a U.S. operation to take out Fordow, the key Iranian enrichment site, which is so deep underground that only U.S. bunker busting bombs can destroy it. This is, plainly, what Israel wants. That would also, of course, risk catastrophic escalation, with possible attacks by Iran on American bases in the region, or a rocket that causes major loss of life in Israel turbo-charging the war, and other dangerous scenarios in between. Then again, it could also enable the U.S. and Israel to declare victory and end the war. Down another path lies a renewed U.S. push for negotiations, which Iran has signaled it would welcome — this time from a position of greater leverage, with the Iranian regime having been thoroughly humiliated. Iran would probably face an ultimatum to not only hand over its enriched uranium but end the production of long-range missiles and foreswear any further interference in the internal affairs of Arab countries. In all the scenarios, there is now an increased possibility of a collapse of Iran's theocratic regime. The most likely scenario here is not millions in the streets but a palace coup by the military or security agencies — not unlike what happened in Romania in 1989 and Egypt in 2011 (events fancifully remembered as simply 'revolutions'). The chances are not yet high, but these things percolate below the surface. It could happen both if the ruinous war goes on or if Iran endures a humiliating surrender — which is what Trump seems to be aiming for now. And if Iran is thusly defanged, the consequences for the region could well be transformative. For starters, it would be the nail in the coffin for the 'axis of resistance.' In recent months, Lebanon finally formed a government that seems determined to disarm Hezbollah. Shorn of any Iranian support, the militia may have little choice but to comply — which may also unblock massive assistance earmarked for the economically desperate country from Gulf states. It would also free Iraq of the interference of the Shiite militias which Iran has backed and guided, enabling a measure of democratic progress in that country. In Yemen, expect a counteroffensive by the internationally recognized government to retake the heart of the country, lost to the fanatical Houthis. That would also enable a full resumption of maritime trade through Suez, hugely aiding Egypt. The main benefit could be in Gaza, where over 50,000 people, including tens of thousands of civilians, are believed to have died in Israel's ham-fisted effort to dislodge Hamas — which, despite huge degradation, somehow still holds on and has over 50 Israeli hostages, dead and alive. But if Hamas is stripped of Iranian backing, Arab states may finally feel emboldened to pressure the group into surrendering. Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar could unite to compel Hamas to cede control to the Palestinian Authority, which would be bolstered with Arab security forces on the ground. Palestinians in Gaza, exhausted and bereft of hope, would support that move, creating yet more pressure for Hamas to lay down its weapons, hand over the hostages and accept exile for its remaining leadership. Of course, Israel too would need to be compelled. Netanyahu has been resisting versions of this scenario for fear that his coalition's far-right flank — which yearns to reoccupy Gaza and build settlements for Jews there — would bolt and bring him down. But the equation after a huge success in Iran, especially one partly owed to the U.S., is different. Netanyahu, too, would have to play along. And Israelis overwhelmingly favor an end to the war and any scenario that returns the hostages. That is especially true if the new landscape includes an expansion of the Abraham Accords — with a host of countries no longer fearing Iran, whose central foreign policy was cementing opposition to the existence of Israel. That applies not only to Saudi Arabia, but also notably to Syria — whose new leadership is headed by former jihadists desperate for global legitimacy and investment. Syria's new leader, Ahmad al-Sharaa, has been remarkably silent about the war and has put out feelers to Israel. Under such a spectacular regional realignment, Netanyahu would not need to worry about his government falling; the moderate opposition would give him a parliamentary umbrella. In the elections that must by law be held next year, he might actually become electable again. Netanyahu has been a divisive, polarizing leader. But history is full of examples of hardliners who changed course: Nixon going to China, de Klerk dismantling apartheid, Sadat flying to Jerusalem. And as for Trump? He might win his Nobel Peace Prize after all. Considering that it will have begun with a historic massacre committed by Iranian-backed Hamas, that may be the most unintended consequence of all. Dan Perry led Associated Press coverage in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, including the Israel and Iran bureaus. He publishes Ask Questions Later on Substack.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vance: Trump ‘may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment'
Vice President Vance weighed in Tuesday as the Trump administration debates its next steps in the conflict between Israel and Iran. In a lengthy post on the social platform X, Vance laid out the administration's issues with Iran enriching uranium and argued the president has shown 'remarkable restraint' thus far. 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president,' the vice president wrote. 'And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' Vance continued. 'And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.' He said Trump had in recent months 'encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians' to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Vance also argued Iran had enriched uranium 'far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose.' The post marked Vance's most extensive comments at a precarious moment in the conflict in the Middle East. The vice president was one of several top officials expected to meet with Trump in the Situation Room on Tuesday. Trump departed the Group of Seven meeting in Canada late Monday, one day earlier than expected, because he wanted to be back in Washington as Israel and Iran traded missile strikes. The president said during the flight back to Washington he was looking for 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire, a real end.' He later described what he was seeking as a 'complete give-up' by Iran. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
