Car sharing giant Zoomcar says hacker accessed personal data of 8.4 million users
Indian car-sharing marketplace Zoomcar has revealed that a hacker accessed the personal data of at least 8.4 million customers, including their names, phone numbers, and car registration numbers.
The Bengaluru-headquartered company identified the incident involving unauthorized access to its information systems on June 9, per its filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The company stated that it became aware of the incident after some of its employees received external communications from a threat actor who claimed to have gained access to the company's data.
'Upon discovery, the company promptly activated its incident response plan,' said Zoomcar in its filing.
The company said there was 'no evidence that financial information, plaintext passwords, or other sensitive identifiers' were compromised in the breach.
Responding to the incident, Zoomcar said it implemented 'additional safeguards across the cloud and internal network, increasing system monitoring, and reviewing access controls,' without providing further details. The company also stated that it is engaging with third-party cybersecurity experts and has notified 'appropriate regulatory and law enforcement authorities and is cooperating fully with their inquiries.'
However, Zoomcar has not yet said if it has informed affected customers about the incident, and whether it has any information about the hacker.
TechCrunch has reached out to Zoomcar, asking these questions and more, and will update this article when the company responds.
Founded in 2013, Zoomcar allows customers to rent cars on a monthly, weekly, daily, and hourly basis. The company operates in 99 cities with over 25,000 cars and has more than 10 million users, per the data available on its investor relations website. In addition to India, the company operates in Egypt, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
In February, Zoomcar reported a 19% year-on-year increase in car rentals to 103,599 bookings. Contribution profit jumped over 500% to $1.28 million, while net loss stood at $7.9 million.
'To date, the incident has not resulted in any material disruption to the company's operations,' the company said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor Trend
an hour ago
- Motor Trend
2026 Kia EV4 First Drive: Let's Hope the Price Looks Better Than the Car
We've just had our first drive of Kia's new EV4 electric sedan, and we have plenty to say—but do our thoughts even matter? As an entry-level electric car, the EV4's success or failure will likely hinge on price. Unfortunately, we have no idea what the 2026 Kia EV4's price will be, and with tariffs and EV tax incentives up in the air, we suspect Kia doesn't, either. We drove the new EV4 in Korea, where it's already on sale with a base price of 42.6 million won—around $31,000—so keep that figure in mind as we tell you what we liked about the EV4, and what we didn't. The 2026 Kia EV4 offers a refined drive and solid range but suffers from cramped interiors and awkward styling. Its success hinges on pricing, estimated between $30,000-$38,000. Its competitive range and features could appeal if priced well for entry-level EV buyers. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next The Good, the Bad, and … the Ugly? We're of two minds when it comes to the 2026 Kia EV4: We love the way it drives, but the packaging and styling leave something to be desired. Mom taught us the best way to have your criticism heard is to begin with a compliment, so we'll lead with the good before we talk about where the EV4 gets it wrong. As an entry-level electric vehicle, the EV4's powertrain is modest, with a single 201-hp motor driving the front wheels. A dual-motor version will eventually join the lineup, though Kia has not said when. Kia estimates the front-drive EV4 will get to 60 mph in around 7.5 seconds, which seems like an unexceptional number, particularly by EV standards. But being electric, the single motor delivers its 209 lb-ft of torque punch the instant you call on it. And punch it does. There's no hesitation, no waiting for a downshift; you just point, and the EV4 shoots. A good portion of our drive was in Seoul's freeway traffic, which gives Los Angeles' epic rush hour a run for its money. The good news is the EV4 proved willing to dart into any gap we wished to call our own. This—and not the liberal agenda so many letter-writers accuse us of having—is why we're crazy about EVs. We like quick cars, and even slow EVs are quick. The EV4 is also remarkably refined thanks to a comfortable ride and quiet demeanor. Kia did not skimp on sound insulation—important in an electric car, where there's no engine note to hide road and wind noise—and the EV4 is commendably quiet. It's a bit of a brain-blender; you don't normally associate this level of refinement with an entry-level car. Curves and Range Kia had us head into the hills above Seoul to enjoy some great curvy roads, which we found plagued by 30-kph (18.6-mph) speed limits and drivers who obey them. Still, by letting the gaps open and taking advantage of a few obliging highway cloverleafs, we did get a basic feel for the EV4's demeanor. The steering is responsive if a bit heavy (better than being too light), and there's no shortage of grip combined with a commendable lack of body roll. We'll see how the EV4 does when we test it here at home, but given our experience with other cars based on the Hyundai/Kia E-GMP platform, we expect the numbers to be good. The EV4 will be available with two powerpack options, 58.3- or 81.4-kWh batteries; the former is expected to deliver 235 miles of EPA-rated range and the latter an impressive 330 miles. To keep the EV4's cost down, the car uses a 400-volt architecture instead of the 800-volt system in other E-GMP vehicles, which means longer fast-charging times: 10–80 percent in 29 minutes with the small battery and 31 minutes with the big battery. That's slower than 800-volt Kias like the EV6, which does the deed in 18 minutes or less, but on par with the bulk of lower-cost electric cars now on the market. Plug into your 240-volt home charger, and 10–100 percent should take five hours with the small battery and seven with the big one, an easy overnight powerup. Peter Schreyer, Please Call Your Office Here's what we didn't like about the 2026 Kia EV4. First, there's the strange styling. Granted, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so you might disagree, but Kia thinks an unusual look will attract younger buyers. To us, however, the EV4's styling isn't as much unusual as it is unfortunate. The EV4 reminds us of the time, oh, 25 or 30 years ago, when designing unattractive cars seemed to be South Korea's national pastime. That era ended when Kia hired designer Peter Schreyer away from Audi. Schreyer has since moved to a new position in the Hyundai-Kia conglomerate, but the EV4 makes us think perhaps his work is not yet done. The EV4 is much better looking on the inside than the outside, but the cabin is not without sin. The dashboard design is sound, with a panoramic twin-screen arrangement we've come to know and love in other Kias, as well as crisp screens and high-quality (and rather imaginative) trim. Happily, Kia has given up on the silly idea of using the same set of buttons and dials for climate and stereo controls, as seen in several of its cars; as with the K4, the two systems now get separate controls. Praise be! The problem with the new EV4's interior is that it feels more cramped than a typical compact sedan, an issue stemming from the combination of a high floor and low roof. The former is due to the battery, which, as in most EVs, is located beneath the car. The latter is down to the aerodynamic shape, which yields a drag coefficient of 0.23, the same as a Tesla Model Y and 0.04 lower than a Toyota Prius. Look at the spec sheet, and you'll see the EV4 has only a smidge less headroom than a K4 sedan (a smidge, in this case, being just less than half an inch), but headroom is measured from the seat's hip point, not the car's floor. The EV4's seats sit closer to the floor than in most cars (though perhaps it would be more precise to say the floor is closer to the seat), which compromises the seating position. Allow me to switch from the royal we to first-person singular for just a moment: I'm 5-foot-6, midway between the heights of the average man and the average woman. The downside is I'm easy pickings in a bar fight; the upside is that I can find a satisfactory seating position in most cars. In the EV4, when I adjusted the seat to my preferred comfy leg-angle position, I found myself looking through the top of the windshield. When I dropped the seat to better center my view, I felt like I was sitting on the floor—but without enough room to stretch my legs out and still feel as if I was in the same zip code as the dashboard. Obviously, this is what driving is like for my 6-foot-plus colleagues, but I am not a tall man, and no car should make me feel like I am. I don't have these problems in a Tesla Model 3, which has a roofline 2.5 inches lower than the EV4's. Rest Your Elbow on the Diving Board There are other questionable design decisions, like how the EV4 utilizes the space between the front seats. This new Kia has a nice half-length padded armrest, which hinges upward to reveal … another armrest. At least, that's the best description I can come up with for the hard-surfaced panel underneath, other than an architect's model of a diving board. Why did Kia bother to hinge the padded part? Perhaps the designers thought someone might try out the armrest and think, 'Gosh, that's just a bit too comfortable.' ( Nota bene , Gen Z; not only does Kia think you have no aesthetic sense; the company also thinks you're masochists.) The diving board itself does not hinge upward, but instead slides forward and back, allowing EV4 owners to choose between blocking most or all the open storage cubby beneath it. It only blocks access, mind you; thieves can still see the contents from outside the car regardless of the diving board's position. The cubby itself is barely big enough to contain a box of tissues or a couple of phones, never mind a purse (even a small one) or the mind-boggling collection of hair clips, hair bands, pens, phone-charging cables, loose change, business cards, napkins (new and used), and half-eaten granola bars someone who will remain nameless but might be my wife stores in the center console of her Mazda. (Oops, first person again. Sorry.) Surely, most car owners would be better served by a simple box with a hinged, padded cover on it than this strange contraption fitted to the EV4. Now, we're not suggesting you judge the entire EV4 on its low roof or its silly center-console design; rather, we're trying to illustrate that function has taken a back seat here to fashion. Speaking of back seat, that, too, suffers from the EV4's high floor. Although Kia will no doubt brag about the legroom measurement, the seat is too close to the floor and there's no space to get your toes under the front seats, so it all feels less roomy and comfortable than a tape measure suggests. Priced Right, the EV4 Could Be a Winner What we have here is a strange-looking car with a cramped interior that offers a lovely, refined driving experience and useful long-range ability. Like many cars, it's an imperfect compromise, but we know buyers will put up with a lot for a bargain. As we mentioned earlier, the EV4's base price in Korea is $31,000, and a top-of-the-range GT Line model with the big battery, a sunroof, premium paint, Harmon-Kardon stereo, a comprehensive head-up display, and Kia's outstanding advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) lists for around $38,500. Were Kia to maintain that pricing in the U.S., the top-of-the-line EV4 would just undercut the brand's current entry-level EV, the Niro, and it would swoop in underneath the $33,000 Hyundai Kona Electric, a taller SUV without the EV4's interior space problems. (Kia is part of the Hyundai group, but the two brands operate as competitors.) $31,000 is a great price point for people who are already sold on EVs, those who understand that driving an electric car means never paying for gas or oil changes. (Your electricity bill goes up, of course, but likely nowhere near as much as if you were still paying for gas.) But for those considering an EV for the first time, a $30,000 price point might seem a bit steep considering how many good cars and SUVs start for less th $25,000. We often hedge our first drives by saying we must wait until we can test a car on our home turf, but in the case of the 2026 Kia EV4, our hedge must wait until we see pricing. That might not occur until close to the EV4's fourth-quarter 2025 on-sale date. We'll keep our fingers crossed, because the new EV4, for all its shortcomings, has great prospects as an entry-level EV. If Kia gets the price low enough, we expect to see a lot of these cars on the road.
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Norton Antivirus Review 2025: Solid Value for Fast, Effective Protection
CNET's expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise. 8.6 / 10 SCORE Norton Antivirus Buy at Norton Pros Resource-light Fast scans Performance optimization tools Superior VPN Cons No identity theft insurance No online account management/data visualization tools AI-heavy customer support Mediocre phone support Norton Antivirus 8.6/10 CNET Score Buy at Norton Founded in 1982, Norton is one of the oldest digital security companies on the planet, and it's long been on our list of the best antivirus tools. But has it earned that longevity? I spent one week analyzing Norton's offerings and testing its 360 Deluxe package to find out. Overall, I found its tools to be fast, effective and intuitive. I was also impressed with Norton's comprehensive privacy policies and security protocols. However, Norton doesn't offer some of the tools I enjoyed most when working with other security suites, like a digital footprint visualization or an online account manager. Norton antivirus features Norton's core antivirus software includes all of the features you'd expect from a premium antivirus tool, including real-time protection, manual scans, automated scans and scan scheduling. Every Norton plan also includes the Genie Scam Detector, an AI tool that scans text messages and web activity for signs of cybercrime, and a password manager. You'll also get 2GB of cloud backups, something not available through other antivirus companies I've researched. Norton also offers security packages with features like a VPN, dark web monitoring, privacy management and parental controls. The most advanced plans provide financial security protocols like identity theft protection, stolen wallet protection and credit monitoring. However, you won't get the identity theft insurance that competitors like Bitdefender and McAfee provide, making Norton an insufficient choice for people with significant assets. For the average person, however, Norton's cloud backups are more useful than high-level identity theft insurance. Overall features score Norton doesn't have an equivalent to McAfee's online account manager or Bitdefender's digital footprint visualization. This means it will only alert you to dark web activity, not potential risks from sites that are legitimate but not properly secured. These features are incredibly useful for people who've been online for a while and haven't always paid attention to their digital security. Norton's lack of a similar tool means I can only give it a 9 of 10 features ranking. Norton antivirus plans and pricing Norton has four cybersecurity plans: Plan Identity protection features Cloud backup space Who it's best for Price Norton Antivirus Plus Scam protection; password manager 2GB Average users with only one device to protect $30 for the first year; $60 per year after Norton 360 Standard VPN; dark web monitoring 2GB Average users with up to three devices to protect and/or significant concerns about dark web data breaches $40 for the first year; $95 per year after Norton 360 Deluxe Privacy monitor; parental controls 50GB Parents; users with four or five devices to protect; users with significant online privacy concerns $50 for the first year; $120 per year after Norton 360 with LifeLock Select Plus LifeLock Identity Theft Protection; stolen wallet protection; credit monitoring; credit alerts; $25,000 in stolen funds reimbursement 250GB Users concerned about identity theft; users with significant amounts of data to back up $100 for the first year; $190 per year after Norton doesn't offer family plans for its main antivirus. However, you can access family plans for LifeLock if you want to protect multiple members of your family from identity theft. Norton antivirus usability I set up an account with the Norton 360 Deluxe plan and tested Norton's usability in three key areas: account navigation, installation/setup for the primary antivirus and setup for additional tools like the VPN. Most of Norton's tools were fast to set up and easy to work with, even for folks who aren't technically inclined. Account navigation Norton's account dashboard is easy to navigate, with a block near the top offering to walk you through feature setup the first time you log in. You'll also see boxes with clear links to areas for managing the devices connected to your Norton account, Genie scam protection, dark web monitoring and other Norton tools. The customer service and community forum links are similarly noticeable, though a bit further down the page. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET The one thing I didn't see immediately was a link to billing management. Instead, I found access to the billing area in the My Account drop-down menu. Many tech companies, including other antivirus tools like McAfee, store their billing links in similar drop-down menus. However, it's not as straightforward as Bitdefender, which includes a prominent billing link in the sidebar of its account dashboard. Installation and setup Norton's installer downloaded and unpacked the core antivirus in around two minutes, then let me select the features I wanted to enable. Having these options at the outset gives you high-level control over how the antivirus operates and serves as an excellent reminder of everything Norton can do. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET Once installed, Norton directed me to run a Smart Scan. This made it easy to check my device's security and reminded me of Bitdefender's instruction to run a quick scan on installation. Of the antivirus tools I've tested, McAfee is the only one without a similar prompt after the initial setup. After the scan, Norton showed me its automated scan schedule and provided a link to change the scheduled time, something I had to hunt for in both Bitdefender and McAfee. This window also featured links for adding more devices and opening the password manager, simplifying the next steps in the process of securing my digital presence. I appreciated the level of guidance here, as it makes cybersecurity simple for people who aren't technically inclined. From there, Norton opened the main antivirus dashboard. Like the online account dashboard, this area is remarkably simple to navigate, with a large Run Smart Scan button in the center and a Control Panel for accessing other Norton tools on the right. The Control Panel can be switched out for an Alerts list, displaying notifications about completed scans and any security issues Norton finds. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET You can also access Norton's full range of additional tools through the left sidebar. These include a wide range of antivirus scans (found in Security), a software updater (in Performance), the VPN (in Privacy)and dark web monitoring (in Identity). I appreciated the breadth of these tools, especially the number of scan types and the software updater -- features I didn't encounter in Bitdefender and McAfee. Additional tools Norton's cloud backup is also easy to set up. You can connect it to your device during the antivirus installation and select the folders you want it to back up, as well as the frequency of backups. Norton will automatically run backups on your selected schedule until it runs out of space. You can also manually back up files at any time from the Security window of the antivirus. You can set up the VPN during the antivirus installation process or enable it later through the Privacy window of the antivirus. Once activated, the VPN makes it easy to switch locations through both a search and a drop-down menu. Once I had the core program set up, I headed to the Norton account dashboard to test its other tools. I started with dark web monitoring, which was very simple to set up. All you need to do is give it the information you want tracked -- like your email address, phone number and mailing address -- and permission to search for that information. Norton will then continuously scan the dark web, alerting you to breaches as it finds them. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET You can also access parental controls through the website. I didn't test these since I don't have kids or devices I want to restrict, but the instructions were clear. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET Norton's other tools are run through either Norton's private browser -- a highly secure browser that automatically flags suspicious sites -- or browser extensions. Most of these, such as Norton Safe Search (which marks search listings for potentially harmful websites), don't require much configuration beyond the initial installation. Setting up the password manager is slightly more involved, as you'll need to create a master password and download a recovery key. You also must manually input your existing passwords or, if you're already using a password manager, go to the Settings page to access Norton's password import tool. This is pretty standard for password managers, though. The Genie Scam Protector is automatically enabled on Norton's private browser, which you can install on your computer during the antivirus installation process. You can also enable Genie scam protection on your phone through the Norton mobile app. Once set up, Genie will automatically scan websites you visit and texts you receive for signs of cybercrime. You can also scan specific emails, websites and other digital content with the Ask Genie feature to determine if something's a scam. Overall usability score Norton provides excellent guidance during the installation and setup processes for its online tools, plus intuitive dashboards for both the antivirus and your online account. The only things that could have improved my experience would be a clearer link to the billing area and a pop-up asking me to import passwords the first time I logged into the password manager. This results in Norton earning a 9 of 10 usability ranking. Norton antivirus performance I spent two full days running Norton while I performed common tasks like browsing the internet and editing images. I also tested Norton's dark web monitoring to see how quickly and effectively it found my data, then installed Norton's various safe browsing tools to see how much they affected my internet experience. I found most of Norton's tools to be both fast and effective, providing a pleasant and secure experience. Note: These tests were conducted on a Lenovo ThinkPad with an Intel i5 processor. Your results using this program may vary, especially if you're working with an older machine. Background performance Norton ran smoothly in the background while I performed a variety of simple tasks, including surfing the web with numerous tabs open simultaneously and simple image editing. Task Manager showed that Norton was only using around 0.2% of my CPU's processing power and 0.5% of my disk space for real-time protection, suggesting that you should be able to perform more advanced tasks like gaming or video editing without issue while Norton is running. Active scans Norton's initial Smart Scan used a mere 0.5% of my CPU's processing power and 1% of my disk space, making it far more efficient than the first scans I ran with Bitdefender and McAfee. The scan also took a mere two minutes -- one minute for the malware scan and one minute to scan my system settings for potential security issues. The scan identified two system settings issues that other programs didn't find. A full scan used between 1% and 2% of my CPU's processing power and 0.2% of my disk space. This made it easy to continue other tasks. I expected it to also mean a slow scan, but Norton finished the full scan in under 10 minutes -- slightly longer than Bitdefender's equivalent scan but much shorter than McAfee's. This is impressive considering both Bitdefender and McAfee used over 30% of my CPU's processing power and over 7% of my disk space. I ran two more full scans, both with similar results to the first. This shows that Norton has consistently low resource usage and fast scans. The quick scan also used minimal computer resources and wrapped up in roughly one minute. This held true for all three of the quick scans I ran, further proving Norton's efficiency. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET Other scan types, such as the software update scan and file manager scan (which finds files you can delete to improve your computer's performance), were also highly efficient, concluding within a couple of minutes. I was using them on a test machine with minimal programs installed, so they might take longer on your devices, but my experience suggests Norton's performance tools are fast and easy for anyone to use. Additional tools Next, I tested Norton's additional tools, starting with its performance optimization tools: the software updater, file cleanup and startup manager. All of these tools finished scanning within two minutes and provided specific suggestions for improving my device speed, complete with buttons to quickly update programs or adjust settings as recommended. I then moved on to Norton's various online tools, starting with dark web monitoring. The dark web monitoring found one dark web breach of my data within a few minutes, and while I assume it continued scanning, that was the only breach it found over several days. I was mildly surprised it didn't find more, but I can't be certain if that means it's ineffective or if my data is just better protected than I thought. Norton's Safe Search extension, which changes your default search engine from Google to Norton Safe Search, provided similar results to other search engines, with sponsored listings and regular listings. The big difference is that you'll see a green checkmark next to sites deemed safe and a red X beside results deemed unsafe. The password manager worked similarly to comparable tools, instantly filling in passwords when I opened familiar sites and suggesting strong passwords when I created accounts on new sites. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET Norton's private browser also had similar functionality to its competitors. As far as I could tell, the main difference was that it already had security tools like Norton's Safe Search extension installed. The Genie Scam Protector didn't make a notable difference in my experience with email or my phone. While I prefer this to the mildly obnoxious approach Bitdefender took -- marking every single email with a bright banner declaring it safe or unsafe -- I'm left with concerns about how effective it is. However, I can't confirm this in either direction, as I may simply not have received any scam emails during my test days. Next, I tested Norton's VPN to determine how it impacts browsing speed. I started by running Ookla speed tests three times without the VPN active to determine my average internet speed. These tests showed that my base internet had an average ping of 3milliseconds, download speed of 562.37 megabits per second and upload speed of 756.17Mbps. (Disclosure: Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.) I then enabled the VPN (set to my fastest server, which is in Canada) and ran three more speed tests. These tests had an average ping of 20.33ms, download speed of 545.86Mbps and upload speed of 843.14Mbps. This fascinated me because the ping was much slower than it was without the VPN, but the impact on download speed was minimal, and upload speed actually improved. I also didn't notice any change in speed while browsing the internet with the VPN on. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET I cycled through several popular server locations, running three tests in each, and netted the following averages: US UK France Germany Singapore Australia Ping (ms) 34 171.22 183 187 465.33 415.66 Download (Mbps) 529.06 172.57 381.09 158.39 209.98 256.53 Upload (Mbps) 855.91 550.03 411.25 363.9 203.47 226.44 These numbers show that Norton's VPN doesn't significantly slow your internet speed when you're using a server relatively close to your location. Both the Canadian and US VPN servers were notably faster for me than equivalent servers from McAfee and Bitdefender. This suggests that Norton's VPN is good if you use the server closest to you Go further away, however, and your internet can become painfully slow, something I experienced when surfing the web with the VPN set to Germany. This suggests that Norton's VPN may not be ideal if you're, say, a Canadian wanting to look like an Australian so you can access shows only available on Australian Netflix. If you really want to maximize your VPN speed, you'll want to separately purchase one of CNET's best VPNs. Overall performance score Norton's antivirus scans are much faster than the competition and also use less processing power than Bitdefender or McAfee's equivalent scans. The performance optimization tools -- which you won't get using McAfee or Bitdefender -- are also fast and effective, as are Norton's safe browsing tools. The VPN proved better than other antivirus tools' connected VPNs, resulting in only minimal speed loss when I used North American servers. However, the speed loss increased significantly when I switched to servers in Europe and other distant locations. I'm also not certain the Genie Scam Protector does its job well, though I may simply not have received any scam emails during my test days. This means I can only give Norton a 9 of 10 performance ranking. Norton antivirus security Next, I evaluated Norton's overall security practices. I did this by researching third-party test results for the encryption protocols it uses to protect information stored in tools like its password manager. I also analyzed Norton's privacy policies to develop an understanding of how the company uses customer data and looked for evidence of data breaches in the past five years. Norton's security proved to be very impressive, with excellent results in all third-party testing, comprehensive encryption protocols and the most extensive privacy policy I've seen when analyzing antivirus suites. I was also impressed by its quick, thorough response to the data breach it experienced in 2022. Antivirus AV-Test, one of two industry-gold-standard testing facilities, has given Norton's antivirus a 6 out of 6 security ranking in every test over the last decade. This is far longer than the three years of perfect security scores Bitdefender earned, or even the five years of perfect security scores given to McAfee. In 2024, Norton also received a three-star Advanced Plus malware protection award from AV-Comparatives, the other industry-gold-standard lab, with a 99.96% online protection rate. The offline detection rate -- which measures how effectively the software identifies malicious software on physical devices like USB keys -- is lower, but still high at 97.7%. This shows that Norton's coverage is comprehensive on a level similar to other top antivirus tools like Bitdefender and better than McAfee, which had 99.96% online protection but only 79.3% offline detection. Security for additional tools Norton's password manager uses the same AES-256 encryption protocol that most password managers use. This protocol is internationally recognized for its ability to prevent malicious actors from intercepting data stored in the cloud. This data will only be decrypted when accessed through one of your synced devices or with your master password. You can also set up two-factor authentication, requiring the program to send a code to your phone before you can log in. Norton's cloud backup systems also use the AES-256 encryption protocol. Cloud backups are connected to the password manager's vault, meaning you can only access those files on a device authorized with your master password. Norton's VPN is a no-log VPN, which means the company doesn't keep your usage data, such as the websites you visit or the files you download. The VPN also encrypts all information sent to and from your browser while you're using it. Norton doesn't store encryption keys, ensuring complete privacy. Norton's VPN also goes through regular third-party audits from VerSprite and biannual transparency reports. This indicates that Norton is deeply committed to user privacy, more so than McAfee or Bitdefender. Privacy policy and data breaches Norton has extensive privacy policies for each software type, plus a global privacy statement that applies to most of its products. I focused on analyzing this global privacy statement. I also reviewed the transparency statements for Norton's desktop security products, Norton 360 mobile apps, password manager and VPN. Norton's global privacy statement states that it processes extensive device, security and personal data for the purpose of training and improving its software. It clarifies that Norton software will only collect as much data as needed to detect, block or report cybersecurity threats. Norton says it will remove personal identifiers from this data unless it's required to keep those identifiers to address cybersecurity threats or comply with the law. Norton says it will share your data with its business partners for the purposes of advertising and delivering associated services, processing data analytics, troubleshooting and improving its cybersecurity processes. It will also share your data with legal authorities if requested to do so. However, it's worth noting that Norton's protocols for erasing VPN data and ensuring that only you can decrypt password manager data mean it has less to share than other companies, like McAfee. Norton further states that its social media monitoring service uses APIs from several platforms and that it may share some data with them. I'm not thrilled with the limited information about what data Norton will share with these companies, but I appreciate that it provided a list of platforms it shares information with. This means you'll know which companies may receive your data, something that's not clear in McAfee's data exceptions for social media platforms. Norton has experienced one data breach in the past five years, when the password manager was targeted by mass login attempts. Norton immediately reset passwords for 925,000 potentially affected accounts and retested its security systems to ensure they were still working effectively. Based on these tests, Norton stated that its systems weren't compromised, and the attack likely began when malicious actors gained some users' credentials on the dark web and leveraged those credentials to attack other accounts. Overall security score Norton's antivirus protection, security protocols and privacy policies are more robust than many of its competitors, including popular companies like McAfee. Norton also told its customers about its 2022 data breach quickly and clearly, providing steps its users could take to protect themselves while also taking steps to improve protections on its end. However, the existence of this data breach means I can only give Norton a 9 of 10 security ranking. Norton antivirus customer service Norton offers self-serve customer support through a community forum and knowledge base. You can also get 24/7 support via live chat and phone. There's no email support, but Norton's Contact Us page includes social media accounts on Facebook and Twitter. I found this interesting because, while most corporations have customer care accounts on social platforms, those accounts are typically for damage control rather than a recommended point of contact. Support tickets, which are effectively email, are recommended far more often and are available with both Bitdefender and McAfee. I spent about an hour exploring the knowledge base to determine its effectiveness and accessibility, then reached out to customer support to get a feel for how helpful Norton's customer support team is. The experience wasn't as pleasant as working with Bitdefender or McAfee support, but it was still pretty solid, especially when contacting Norton via live chat. Knowledge base Norton's knowledge base is clearly laid out, with a prominent search function and buttons for common question categories. However, I encountered a couple of annoyances, starting with the search function's insistence on answering every question with AI rather than linking to articles. The AI pulled information from Norton's existing support articles, so it was correct, but it took longer than simply providing links. Moreover, the inability to opt out of this may be frustrating for people concerned about AI's environmental impact. Screenshot by Dianna Gunn/CNET I also disliked Norton's insistence on opening a new tab for every article I wanted to view. I can't imagine a context where this is actively helpful for a knowledge base, and if you keep a collection of tabs open like I do, it just adds clutter. That said, the articles themselves were easy to navigate, providing step-by-step instructions and using minimal jargon. Every article I opened included a video, making Norton's knowledge base extremely accessible to those who prefer learning through video -- something I can't say for competitors like Bitdefender and McAfee. Direct communication Norton's live chat is hidden on the Contact Uspage, which you can only access by scrolling to the bottom of the knowledge base, and you must specify the type of help you need before you'll see your contact options. To open an actual chat, you also need to fill out a form with your name, email address and phone number. This was annoying since I was already logged in, but not as frustrating as realizing that 'Kate,' who responded to the live chat about 30 seconds after I opened it, was a chatbot, not a person. My annoyance grew when I typed 'speak to a person' and the bot told me it didn't understand the question. I only managed to connect with an agent after telling the bot repeatedly that my problem wasn't resolved. This was even more frustrating than trying to speak to a person through Bitdefender's live chat. The good news is that, when I finally got the bot to transfer me to a rep, it only took two minutes for me to connect with a live person. The rep was knowledgeable about advanced topics related to VPN privacy and consistently responded to my queries within one or two minutes. The whole conversation wrapped up in roughly five minutes, making it both fast and effective. Next, I called Norton. Again, I had to go through several steps to get the contact number, including filling out a form with my personal information and my issue, on top of needing to sign in to view the contact number. Like Bitdefender and McAfee, Norton seems determined to make sure you'll only contact them directly as a last resort. The phone line connected me to another bot, which attempted to solve my problem on its own. I had to ask to speak to a person twice and tell the bot about the issue I wanted resolved before it passed me on to a person. The whole bot interaction only took about two minutes, but it was frustrating to once again struggle to reach a human. The phone representative struggled to answer my questions, repeating basic information about how VPNs work instead of answering my specific queries about Norton's VPN. While this may be due to the nature of my requests -- which probably aren't very common -- I was still disappointed, especially considering how quickly I got high-quality answers via live chat. However, I got my answers eventually, and the conversation only took around 10 minutes -- longer than my conversations with McAfee or Bitdefender support, but still reasonable. Overall customer support score Norton has an excellent knowledge base, but its seeming determination to prevent me from speaking with a human was frustrating. I was also disappointed by my experience with phone support, which was reasonably fast but required me to repeat my questions three times before I got answers. Between these frustrations and the lack of email support, Norton only earns an 8 of 10 customer support ranking, lower than the support rankings for both McAfee and Bitdefender. Norton antivirus value Finally, I considered Norton's value by comparing it to other top antivirus tools. Here's a quick overview of what I found: Basic plan cost Mid-range suite cost and devices Most expensive suite cost and devices Standout security features Norton $30 for the first year; $60 per year after $50 for the first year; $120 per year after; coverage for five devices $100 for the first year; $200 per year after; coverage for 10 devices Genie Scam Protection; cloud backup; LifeLock identity theft protection; $25,000 ransomware insurance Bitdefender $25 for the first year; $50 per year after $90 for the first year; $160 per year after; coverage for five devices $150 for the first year; $250 per year after; coverage for five devices Scam protection; digital footprint visualization; identity theft insurance of up to $2 million McAfee $40 for the first year; $120 per year after $90 for the first year; $200 per year after; coverage for unlimited devices $200 for the first year; $280 per year after; coverage for unlimited devices Scam protection; online account manager; identity theft insurance of up to $2 million Using this information, we can draw a few conclusions: Norton's starter plan is average , costing slightly more than Bitdefender but less than McAfee. , costing slightly more than Bitdefender but less than McAfee. Norton's higher-tier plans are more affordable than the equivalents offered by Bitdefender and McAfee. However, these savings are likely due to the lack of identity theft insurance, which may make Norton less appealing to those with significant assets to protect. than the equivalents offered by Bitdefender and McAfee. However, these savings are likely due to the lack of identity theft insurance, which may make Norton less appealing to those with significant assets to protect. Norton's lack of online account management and data visualization tools makes it less than ideal for people who've spent a long time using the internet without proper security protocols. You'll be protected from viruses, yes, but your credentials and personal information may still be at risk from accounts or websites you don't even remember visiting. and data visualization tools makes it less than ideal for people who've spent a long time using the internet without proper security protocols. You'll be protected from viruses, yes, but your credentials and personal information may still be at risk from accounts or websites you don't even remember visiting. Norton's maximum device coverage is middling. Its 10-device limit is significantly higher than Bitdefender's five-device limit, but not as impressive as McAfee's unlimited device coverage. Overall value score Overall, Norton provides solid value for the average person, but there's a reason why it's more affordable than alternatives: It simply doesn't provide the same level of protection. Users with a lot of data to clean up or assets to protect are unlikely to get the level of security support they need from even the most expensive Norton plan. This means I can't give it more than an 8 of 10 value ranking. Norton: Is it right for you? Before you make a purchasing decision, let's revisit Norton's rankings in each of our review categories: Features: 9 of 10 9 of 10 Usability: 9 of 10 9 of 10 Performance: 9 of 10 9 of 10 Security: 9 of 10 9 of 10 Customer support: 8 of 10 8 of 10 Value: 8 of 10 Altogether, these subrankings earn Norton an overall ranking of 8.6 out of 10. Norton is a good choice for many users thanks to the software's intuitive interface and excellent performance, but its imperfect customer service and lack of advanced security tools like identity theft protection mean it's not a perfect solution for everyone. In fact, both Bitdefender and McAfee earned higher rankings (9.5 and 8.8, respectively), largely thanks to their better customer support and additional privacy/identity protection tools. In other words, Norton's great if all you want is an antivirus tool with a few additional features to enhance your device's performance. If you want more robust protection features, or you're particularly concerned about the quality of your security suite's customer service, you may want to make the slightly larger investment of purchasing Bitdefender (our top-ranking antivirus) or McAfee.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hyundai set to debut ambitious high-performance electric sedan. Will the Ioniq 6 N make a big statement?
Hyundai Motor North America is producing some of the most competitive electric vehicles on the market. Between the Ioniq 5, 6, and 9 models, the South Korean automaker has something for families of all sizes. Additionally, the brand has been working on developing more performance-oriented models. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has garnered plenty of attention due to its impressive specs. It has racetrack capability, according to Hyundai. Now, the automaker is preparing to debut an even more ambitious project: a high-performance electric sedan. The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N will "disrupt the high-performance EV segment to deliver exciting driving experiences" said Joon Park, Vice President and Head of Hyundai's N Management Group. The company aims to build on the momentum created by the shock and awe of the Ioniq 5 N's incredible performance. Though Hyundai is keeping plenty of details regarding the new electric vehicle under wraps, there are several clues about its performance and appearance that auto enthusiasts can derive from the Ioniq 5 N. The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N starts at $66,200. It produces a whopping 641 horsepower and 568 pound-feet of torque. The high-performance EV accelerates from 0-60 miles per hour in just 2.8 seconds according to testing by MotorTrend. The Ioniq 6 N will boast impressive performance specs, taking cues from its larger cousin, the Ioniq 5 N. Furthermore, the 6 N will be a lighter vehicle as a sedan, so it could be quicker than the larger Ioniq 5 N SUV. Expect the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N to feature a bold exterior styling with N-badging and performance parts including tires and brakes. The Ioniq 6 N is also likely to have a significantly higher starting price than the base model. Hyundai's 2025 Ioniq 6 electric sedan starts at $37,850 and tops out at $51,100 for the Limited final configuration. The 2025 Ioniq 5 Limited costs $54,300 compared to the Ioniq 5 N's $66,200-sticker price. If there is a similar price difference of $11,900 between Limited and N trims for the Ioniq 6, the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N could cost around $63,000, making it slightly more affordable than the larger Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. A starting price north of $60K is hardly considered affordable to the average driver, even compared to rising new car prices (nearly $50,000 according to CNBC). That said, the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N is anything but average. Hyundai's upcoming high-performance EV is more than just a niche performance trim to fill a gap in the company's portfolio, it's a statement. Hyundai is proving that it can produce more than just practical all-around electric vehicles like the base Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 6 models. It has nailed the basics based on several awards for its EV nameplates. Now, the South Korean automaker is aiming to earn style points, and target market share once dominated by Tesla's performance models. Electric vehicles were once considered impractical. Today, automakers are proving these vehicles can function as daily drivers and even track-ready performance models, capable of breaking acceleration records. Hyundai is helping to change the narrative surrounding EVs from inconvenient and lackluster to capable and exciting with models like the Ioniq 6 N. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Hyundai's Ioniq 6 N disrupt the EV game? Here's what to know
