Satellite images show row of destroyed Russian bombers after Ukrainian attack
New satellite images show the extent of the destruction against one fleet of Russian bombers during Ukraine's 'Operation Spider Web' attack on the Kremlin's air bases over the weekend.
The images, shared by open source analysts, show nothing but dust and debris where more than a dozen of Russia's nuclear-capable bombers once stood on the runway at the Belaya airfield, one of at least four military bases struck by 117 Ukrainian drones on Sunday.
John Ford, a research associate at the California-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said the images supplied by Capella Space, a satellite company, confirm Ukraine's achievement in destroying the fleet based in the Irkutsk region.
Advertisement
5 Satellite images of the Belaya airfield in Irkutsk region shows the military base before and after the Ukrainian attack on Russia's bombers.
via REUTERS
5 Several of the heavy bombers at the airbase were blown to smithereens.
via REUTERS
The SAR images showed the remnants of at least two Tu-22 Backfires — the same type of supersonic aircraft that have been used to bombard Ukraine.
At least four strategic heavy Tu-95 bombers were also identified among the aircraft destroyed at the Belaya airfield.
Advertisement
'It is clear that the attack on this airbase was very successful,' Brady Africk, an open source intelligence analyst, told Reuters after studying the images.
'The aircraft targeted in the attack were a mix of Tu-22 and Tu-95 bombers, both of which Russia has used to launch strikes against Ukraine.'
5 Similar before and after satellite images were released of the Ivanovo air base.
2025 Planet Labs PBC/AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
5 Kyiv touted the assault that saw 41 of Moscow's nuclear-capable bombers hit on Sunday.
SECURITY SERVICE OF UKRAINE/AFP via Getty Images
Africk noted that the Belaya airfield is littered with flat decoy aircraft, none of which appeared to fool the Ukrainian drones deployed at the military base.
Similar satellite images were released of the attack on the Ivanovo air base, located 100 miles northeast of Moscow.
In total, Operation Spider Web hit 41 warplanes in at least 4 different airbases, according to Ukraine's intelligence agency SBU, with pro-Moscow military bloggers describing the attack as 'Russia's Pearl Harbor.'
Advertisement
5 Ukrainian officials dubbed the operation 'absolutely brilliant,' dealing a major blow to the bombers Moscow has been using to drop missiles over the border.
SECURITY SERVICE OF UKRAINE/AFP via Getty Images
Some 34% of Russia's Tu-95 bomber fleet, equipped to carry nuclear payloads, were reportedly wiped out, the SBU added.
Andriy Kovalenko, an official on Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council, said that at least 13 of the targets were fully destroyed, with the damage estimated to have cost Russia $7 billion in losses.
The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, said the daring attack will likely force Moscow to reconfigure its air defenses following the humiliating blow.
'The… operation will force Russian officials to consider redistributing Russia's air defense systems to cover a much wider range of territory and possibly deploying mobile air defense groups that can more quickly react to possible similar Ukrainian drone strikes in the future,' the ISW said.
With Post wires
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Escaping The Pig Butcher: Avoiding The Online Scam Stealing Billions
Pig butchering has conned billions of dollars from victims worldwide. The New York Post recently reported that the Cambodian-based Huione Group gang has reaped over $4 billion between August 2021 and January 2025. To some, pig butchering is nothing more than requesting a special cut at the meat market. Unfortunately, it's become a notorious form of cybercrime that causes complete financial devastation for its victims. Pig butchering (Sha Zhu Pan, which translates to 'killing pig plate') has a far more nefarious meaning. The Department of Financial Protection & Innovation defines pig butchering as a 'form of investment fraud in the crypto space where scammers build relationships with targets through social engineering and then lure them to invest crypto in fake opportunities or platforms created by the scammer.' Pig butchering has conned billions of dollars from victims worldwide. The New York Post recently reported that the Cambodian-based Huione Group gang has reaped over $4 billion between August 2021 and January 2025 alone. There are a few things to watch out for to avoid being lured into such extortion schemes. Often, they target seniors and other populations less familiar with cybercrime. According to The National Council on Aging, such scams often start with receiving a message out of the blue claiming to mistake you for someone else or having online profile pictures that look like a model. It's really important not to respond or send money to random people who contact you online, no matter how compelling their story is. Scammers are dependent upon gaining your trust, and a sympathetic or catchy story is a great way to do that. Another big warning sign is getting messages via SMS or social media that quickly redirect you to chat on another platform like Telegram or WeChat, which are less regulated and moderated. They might convince you to invest a small amount of money, which is then returned to you at a bigger profit. Before too long, the amounts of money being requested increase by leaps and bounds. A recent story out of Ohio details how an initial request for $10,000 quickly turned into a request for $500,000 to unlock any profits that were made. Even more appalling, the scammer requested the victim to 'go to a loan shark' to get the funds! In 2024, Meta removed 'over 2 million accounts' suspected of running crypto investment scams like pig butchering. Companies are starting to do more to combat pig butchering, but it's still a very real problem. A big step in their effort to keep people from falling for these scams is raising awareness through public posts broadcasting safety tips. They recently started rolling out warnings in Facebook Messenger and Instagram DMs tipping users off to 'potentially suspicious interactions or cold outreach from people you don't know', which is a good start. Banks are also beginning to require customers to acknowledge the dangers of scams when transferring money by ACH, Zelle, and wire. If you think you've been a victim of pig butchering, it's very important to both contact your bank and file a fraud report with the Federal Trade Commission. The sooner you report an incident, the more that can be done to help you potentially recover any lost funds. A recent blog from Norton advises victims to keep track of information, including 'messages, transaction records, and scammer contact information,' to better help authorities combat fraud. Although pig-butchering is an online scam that isn't going away anytime soon, the public can better protect themselves by being more aware of the warning signs and consequences of being involved in such a scheme. It reminds one of the classic saying, 'If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!'
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
All eyes on Germany's Merz ahead of White House meeting with Trump
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is scheduled to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House on Thursday in his first visit to the US capital since becoming chancellor a month ago - in what is likely to be the toughest test of his young tenure yet. Trump is scheduled to receive the German leader at 11:30 am (1530 GMT), followed by a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office and a working lunch. Previous visits to the Oval Office by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa were marked by controversies, and the way Merz handles the situation is likely to set the tone for future German-US relations. The meeting is expected to focus on efforts to end the war in Ukraine, NATO's response to growing external threats, and the trade dispute between the United States and the European Union. Merz has already made it clear that he is not travelling to the US capital begging for support but as a confident representative of European positions. The chancellor has only briefly met Trump once before, many years ago in New York. However, since taking office four weeks ago, he has spoken with Trump several times about Russia's war against Ukraine - both individually and in larger groups with other European leaders. The two now address each other by first names and are in regular contact via text messages. Merz spent the night at Blair House - the president's guest house - after arriving in Washington. He is due to spend only about 17 hours in the US capital and also plans to visit the Capitol, the seat of the two chambers of Congress. In keeping with tradition, Merz left a book at Blair House - a collection of letters from German immigrants published by Walter Kamphoefner in 1988 titled "News from the Land of Freedom. German Immigrants write home." At the encounter in the Oval Office, which is open to the press, Trump's closest advisors are likely to be present as well. However, Vice President JD Vance is expected to be absent after playing a leading role in the dressing-down of Zelensky in front of rolling cameras in February Vance, as well as US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio - whose participation has been confirmed - have attacked Germany and other European allies over what they say are restrictions on free speech and the marginalization of far-right parties including the Alternative for Germany (AfD). Merz, whose conservatives came out first in February's elections ahead of the AfD, has repeatedly made it clear that he rejects the US meddling in Germany's domestic politics. In June, Merz and Trump are scheduled to meet twice more: at the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada in mid-June and at the NATO summit later that month in The Hague.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court makes 'reverse' discrimination suits easier
By Andrew Chung WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court made it easier on Thursday for people from majority backgrounds such as white or straight individuals to pursue claims alleging workplace "reverse" discrimination, reviving an Ohio woman's lawsuit claiming she was illegally denied a promotion and demoted because she is heterosexual. The justices, in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, threw out a lower court's decision rejecting a civil rights lawsuit by the plaintiff, Marlean Ames, against her employer, Ohio's Department of Youth Services. Ames said she had a gay supervisor when she was passed over for a promotion in favor of a gay woman and demoted, with a pay cut, in favor of a gay man. The dispute centered on how plaintiffs like Ames must try to prove a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex - including sexual orientation. Ames challenged a requirement used by some U.S. courts that plaintiffs from majority groups must provide more evidence than minority plaintiffs to make an initial - or "prima facie" - claim of discrimination under a 1973 Supreme Court ruling that governs the multi-step process employed to resolve such cases. These courts include the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against Ames. They require majority-group plaintiffs to show "background circumstances" indicating that a defendant accused of workplace bias is "that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority." Jackson, writing for the Supreme Court, said that both the language of Title VII and the court's precedents make clear that there can be no distinctions between majority-group and minority-group plaintiffs. "By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' - without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group - Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone," Jackson wrote. Ames, 61, sued in 2020 seeking monetary damages. She argued that she was discriminated against in her department's 2019 employment decisions because she is heterosexual in violation of Title VII and that she was more qualified than the two gay people given the job positions instead of her. "I was straight and pushed aside for them," Ames told Reuters in February. The 6th Circuit said Ames could not satisfy the "background circumstances" requirement by showing that a gay person made the employment decisions in favor of gay people. The two people who had authority in those personnel decisions, the 6th Circuit noted, were straight. Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost's office in court papers defended the employment actions concerning Ames as part of a Department of Youth Services restructuring and said department leaders felt she lacked the vision and leadership skills needed for the newly created job for which she applied. On his first day back in office in January, Republican President Donald Trump ordered the dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion policies in federal agencies and encouraged private companies to follow suit. The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund and other civil rights groups told the Supreme Court in a legal filing that Ames was asking the justices "to interpret Title VII in a way that ignores the realities of this country's persisting legacy of discrimination in evaluating disparate-treatment claims." These groups said the "background circumstances" inquiry lets courts account for the reality of historical and present-day discrimination "against certain minority groups like Black and/or LGBTQ people, and the virtual absence of widespread discrimination targeting certain majority groups like white people and straight people." The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on February 26.
