Calgary homeowner livid after city proposes bylaw change mid-fight
Evgeny Zhuromsky has lived in his home in the southwest community of Windsor Park for 10 years. Zhuromsky, pictured with his wife Elena Petrenko, is fighting a rowhouse development next door in court, and was frustrated to learn that the city released a development permit while he has a provincial appeal underway — and is proposing to change the bylaw altogether. (Karina Zapata/CBC - image credit)
When Evgeny Zhuromsky won the right to appeal a major infill development next door, he thought he finally had a chance.
He figured the company developing a nine-unit row house on his next-door neighbour's land would be forced to pause until he finally got his day in court.
Now the rules could change.
Calgary city council is being asked to vote Tuesday on a bylaw change that would allow homebuilders to proceed with a project even if it's before the Alberta Court of Appeal. And Zhuromsky feels it's desperately unfair.
"Residents of Calgary … are penalized for not following or breaking bylaws, like, for example, if you over park or do not shovel your sidewalk on time," said Zhuromsky.
ADVERTISEMENT
"That's a double standard because they require you and me and all Calgarians to follow bylaws and they allow themselves not to."
Construction has begun on the rowhouse development directly next door to Evgeny Zhuromsky's house. It will include five units and four secondary suites — unless Zhuromsky wins his appeal. (Karina Zapata/CBC)
Zhuromsky lives in Windsor Park, one lot in from the corner. He lost his appeal to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, then won the right to have his appeal heard at the provincial court. But the developer has already dug a hole and started laying the foundation for the row house next door after the city recently released the permit, despite Zhuromsky's appeal.
These developments are happening across the city , one year after city council passed blanket rezoning last spring. They're mainly being built in inner-city neighbourhoods like Bowness, but they're starting to pop up in established communities farther from the city centre, too.
Many are being appealed to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, a quasi-judicial board that can revoke individual city permits. But that process can take months, and it's even longer if it's brought to court. And for developers, that means costly delays.
ADVERTISEMENT
That could change if council approves this move on Tuesday. But lawyers warn that will make it much more expensive and difficult for Calgarians who want to stop a development that affects them.
Delays cost up to $500 a day
The designer of the row house development, Designhaus Studio, declined to comment on behalf of its client, Best Investment Group, since the case is before the courts.
The Calgary Inner City Builders Association, a group of more than 200 developers, didn't know about the proposed bylaw change. But chair Shameer Gaidhar has had concerns about the cost of appeals for a long time.
Shameer Gaidhar is the president and CEO of Millenium Plus Homes. He's also the chair of the Calgary Inner City Builders Association. (Bryan Labby/CBC)
He said the appeal process is important — Calgarians deserve that right. But it costs an average of $200 to $500 per day when a project sits empty, he said.
"It costs money for the appellant, it costs money for the developer. In the end, there's a cost. That cost gets passed on to the end user. Let it be the renter, let it be the buyer. Whatever it is, someone has to pay for it. So we're eroding affordability," said Gaidhar.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gaidhar said he needs to learn more about the bylaw change before commenting on what it means for developers.
Councillors, city decline to comment
Ward 11 Coun. Kourtney Penner, whose ward includes Windsor Park, wouldn't comment on the situation because it's related to Zhuromsky's appeal before the courts.
Coun. Sonya Sharp's ward is hot with development. Her team reached out to city administration to get clarity on the bylaw change, however they couldn't give an answer — but indicated all councillors would receive an update ahead of the public hearing. So the Ward 1 councillor declined to comment.
The city also declined to comment on the particular part of the proposed bylaw change that would allow development permits to be released, even when a provincial appeal is underway.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The City of Calgary believes that Calgarians are an important part of building a great city. Throughout the planning process Calgarians can provide feedback and comments for consideration. More information on how Calgarians can get involved in the planning process can be found in the Community Involvement Toolkit. "
'A disastrous effect'
Randi Collins, a Calgary lawyer whose specialty includes real estate, said as the land use bylaw stands today, the city can't release development permits while a provincial appeal is underway. But she said it's well within the city's right to change its bylaw.
If it's approved, Collins said anyone who wants to stop a development from going ahead would have to go through another complicated and costly process: going to court and obtaining an injunction.
"It is actually a disastrous effect, in my opinion," said Collins.
"Essentially, the average person is going to have little recourse without expending large sums of money and navigating a very difficult legal system to do anything about it, which is concerning."
An example of row housing in Calgary. These are popping up across Calgary when corner lots become available for redevelopment. (Robson Fletcher/CBC)
Collins said it speaks to a larger issue.
"Sometimes if the municipality is on board with a development, there's going to be little that you can do about it," she said.
"Municipal governments actually have quite a lot of rights and a lot of power, and the court system does hesitate to intervene unless there's a clear abuse of that power. So it's unfortunate for the average person."
Running out of time
It's been a long, difficult and expensive process for Zhuromsky to fight his next-door development, and he feels like he's running out of time.
The cost engineer in the oilpatch, who's lived in his home in Windsor Park for 10 years, is still waiting for a court date to be set so his appeal can be heard. Until then, all he can do is watch construction proceed.
"[The developers] aren't doing anything that they're not supposed to be doing. It's the City of Calgary that … allowed them," said Zhuromsky.
While he considered applying for an injunction, he just doesn't think it's practical. So he's hanging on to hope that he'll win the appeal.
"I hope that if I win and they have to reapply, they will change the design so the structure that they are building now as we speak is per the municipal development plan, is complementary, sensitive and compatible with the rest of the community."
In the meantime, he plans to attend the public hearing on Tuesday to ask city councillors to say no to the change.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Students face tough job market this summer
Statistics Canada said student unemployment was at a three-year high heading into the summer job season. CBC's Jayden Dill spoke to young people and employers about the search for work.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
SIMS: CBC set to get more money and power
Canada's government news organization is set to get fatter and more powerful. In the middle of the election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed to pay the CBC more money, waving around about $150 million in fresh taxpayer cash. CBC covered that big scoop with a headline calling the CBC 'underfunded.' Think about that scene. Imagine being a CBC employee asking questions at a news conference during the election, with Carney saying that, if he won, the CBC would get more money, while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said he would defund the CBC. The CBC covered this funding story in the middle of the election. That's a conflict of interest so big it would dwarf Godzilla. Journalists should not be paid by the government and that scene in the election is a perfect illustration of why. In the speech from the throne, the Carney government announced: 'The government is determined to protect the institutions that bring these cultures and this identity to the world, like CBC/Radio-Canada.' To get an idea of what that protection could look like, consider the federal government report delivered on Feb. 20, before the election. Former heritage minister Pascale St-Onge said the government should nearly double the amount of money the CBC gets from taxpayers every year. 'The average funding for public broadcasters in G7 countries is $62 per person, per year,' St-Onge said. 'We need to aim closer to the middle ground, which is $62 per year per person.' If the government funded the CBC that way, the CBC would cost taxpayers about $2.5 billion per year. That amount would cover the annual grocery bill for about 152,854 Canadian families. St-Onge also pushed for the CBC mandate to be expanded to 'fight against disinformation.' 'I propose to anchor in CBC-Radio Canada's mandate its role in helping the Canadian population fight against disinformation and understand fact-based information,' St-Onge said. Carney's Liberal party platform pledged to 'fully equip them ( CBC) to combat disinformation, so that Canadians have a news source they know they can trust.' What does this mean? Will the CBC play a role as an official 'fact-checker' in Canada, or is this just clunky language urging the CBC to be more fact-based? What is clear is that the federal government is planning to hand the CBC more money and enshrine its funding into law, taking it out of the annual budget vote and clouding transparency. CBC hasn't improved its accountability after years of scrutiny from Canadians. Former CEO Catherine Tait was being paid about half a million dollars per year. New CEO Marie‑Philippe Bouchard has started her new role where Tait left off, as she is also set to be paid between $478,300 and $562,700. After years of criticism over executive bonuses, the government media company finally said it would get rid of the bonuses but hike the salaries of the executives instead. With so many Canadians struggling to pay for the basics, the CBC needed to read the room and end the bonuses and knock the CEO down a few levels in pay. Taxpayers are forced to spend a lot of money on the CBC, but only a tiny fraction of them choose to watch it. For CBC News Network's flagship English language prime-time news program, the audience is 1.8% of available viewers, according to its latest quarterly report. That means more than 98% of TV-viewing Canadians chose to watch something else. The CBC is a waste of taxpayers' money. Nearly nobody is watching it and it is a severe conflict of interest for journalists to be paid by the government. The CBC doesn't need more money from taxpayers; it needs to be defunded and raise money based on its work.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Feds announce up to 6,000 more Canada Summer Jobs as youth struggle to find work
Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu announced Friday afternoon the federal government is creating up to 6,000 more spots in the Canada Summer Jobs program for young people — a move that comes as many struggle to find work. "This is late breaking news, but I think super important to be able to help with the sort of urgency this summer," Hajdu said in an interview with CBC's The House airing Saturday morning. According to a news release, the federal government is reallocating $25 million from Employment and Social Development Canada to create the extra 6,000 jobs. The release also said CSJ was "on track" to create 70,000 jobs for youth this summer. The unemployment rate for people between 15 and 24 years old has steadily ticked upward, according to Statistics Canada. In January 2023, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in this age group was 10 per cent. In May 2025, it was 14.2 per cent. Mel Purchase, a 19-year-old from Alliston, Ont., said she's been driving around submitting her resumé to temp agencies "and just hope for the best, and hope they can figure something out to help me." Purchase said her ideal job would be working in a factory to build toward her dream career in welding, but "every single person is looking for work." She told The House she's trying to stay positive, but "it's a little bit stressful trying to figure everything out and trying to plan, especially because of just how expensive everything is and once again, the entire hiring crisis." "It sucks. Just trying over and over and over again to get a job or just any sort of income is very hard," Purchase said. Hajdu said the government is looking to build projects across Canada quickly, which requires more tradespeople. Because of that, it will be "heavily investing" in opportunities for young people to improve their skills if they're interested in going into the trades. Canada Summer Jobs provides wage subsidies to support employers in creating summer work experiences for those between the ages of 15 and 30 years old. Riley Locke, a 25-year-old graduate student at Toronto Metropolitan University, told The House he needed to complete a summer internship between the first and second year of his master's in urban planning, but the experience was "frustrating." Locke, who submitted hundreds of applications since January, spoke with host Catherine Cullen a week before he finally landed a job. In a follow-up interview, he said he's relieved but "it's hard not to feel like it's pretty much just luck of the draw." "I had my fair share of really stressful days where I had received a rejection email," Locke said. Ilona Dougherty, co-creator of the Youth & Innovation Project at the University of Waterloo, said Purchase and Locke's experiences of sending out countless resumés with no luck is exactly what she's been hearing for well over a year. "Unfortunately, young people are the canary in the coal mine," Dougherty said. She added there's currently an "incredibly complex economic situation" on top of other challenging factors like increasing use of AI and a large number of temporary foreign workers. Locke said the job application process can sometimes feel demeaning and dehumanizing because some companies use AI to sort through applications. He added it becomes a "guessing game" to figure out "whether I need to be writing for a human or writing for a robot." Dougherty said Canada needs to "fundamentally rethink what entry-level jobs are going to look like for young people" if it wants a workforce that is not economically disengaged in five to 10 years. "AI is a train barrelling down the tracks, but we're certainly not going to stop it. We need to make sure young people are prepared," Doughty said. She also referenced a New York Times guest essay from a LinkedIn executive who wrote that AI is breaking the "bottom rung of the career ladder." In late May, Conservative MP Jamil Jivani launched a petition to end the temporary foreign worker program and cited youth unemployment as one reason why. Dougherty said the situation is "a lot more complex than [Jivani] presents it to be," but she added there is evidence that wages depress when companies rely on temporary foreign workers rather than paying a young Canadian. "It's not just about stopping immigration of all kinds and this will magically fix the problem. But certainly we have to make sure that companies are paying proper wages for those entry-level roles. That's absolutely critical," she said. "We need to really take this seriously and invest in young people.… It's up to the adults. This is not the young peoples' fault, and we need to fix the problem."