logo
Bakery tourism: The pastry pilgrims who travel miles for croissants

Bakery tourism: The pastry pilgrims who travel miles for croissants

BBC Newsa day ago

Jessica Morgan-Helliwell admits she would rather meet her mates for a pastry than a pint. The 26-year-old is part of a growing number of people flocking to craft or artisan bakeries in pursuit of a flaky croissant."I do find myself these days more inclined to go for a coffee and a nice walk than going out and feeling a bit hungover the next day. I could be a pastry pilgrim," she said.Jessica and her mum, Louise, from Swansea, think nothing of travelling across the UK and beyond in pursuit of delicious bakes, photos and videos of which they then share online with their followers.
Data suggests they are not alone in their passion for patisserie.The UK's bakery market is one of the largest in the food industry, worth £5.74bn, according to the Federation of Bakers.Open University research suggests the number of small bakeries across the UK is on the rise, with nearly one in five founded since 2020.
The mother and daughter's love of socialising over pastries and breads runs in the family."Both my great-grandpa and my great-great-grandpa had their own Italian cafes. My great-great-grandpa's cafe was in Llanelli and was called Sartori's," said Louise, 48. The pair admitted there was "no limit" on how far they would travel to sample a delicacy. Jess said she recently drove more than an hour to one bakery just to buy a sandwich."We're going to Marrakesh [in Morocco] in a couple of weeks and the first thing that I've looked at is the eateries," she added.
At Pettigrew Bakery in Cardiff, David Le Masurier's team bakes and sells "thousands of pastries a day" to consumers like Jessica and Louise. David said he had "absolutely" seen bakery tourism positively impact his business, with international travellers building food spots into their trips, influenced by online trends and viral dishes. "They have done their research. They've gone onto social media, they've seen images. They've read reviews. They're getting tips off TikTok," he said."People are literally walking in with their phones, particularly if English isn't their first language, and they're holding up pictures or showing us reels and saying: 'I want this'."
Customers pay anything from £3.20 for a plain croissant to £4.50 for "limited edition" bakes - prices which David accepts are outside of the bracket of "everyday products". But he said between the ingredients, paying for his "quality" staff and making a profit, margins were "very small". "Wages have increased quite dramatically just recently and that does translate straight to the prices that we have to pass on to the customer," he said."Running a food business is incredibly challenging."So what is it about flaky baked goods that makes people part with their hard-earned cash?
The lipstick effect
Food and travel writer Ross Clarke said he believed that even in a cost-of-living crisis, people were inclined to splurge on small luxury items.It is a concept known as the lipstick effect, which suggests that people are more likely to spend on small luxury goods - like lipstick - during economic downturns."I think people are more inclined to maybe shell out £4.50 for a pain au chocolat if it's something special, because it's that little treat," he said.
Ross said food tourism was a global phenomenon, referring to Iceland's famous ice cream tours, known as ísbíltúr. "Gastro-tourism is booming, also eno-tourism, so wine," he said."People [are] going places purely for the food or the drink."What a lovely thing that you can go and support local businesses, hopefully, and eat in the great restaurants and try all of these amazing things."Wales is probably right up there with places that should push this as a big thing."French-born baker Astrid Roussel, who has lived in Newport, south Wales, for 17 years, said the local food scene had "changed massively" with people willing to pay for "craft" and "quality"."People love to take pictures of pretty flaky pastries," she said."Yes, £4 for a croissant is good money to pay but it's an affordable luxury."
Ms Roussel said when she first moved to Wales, finding good pastry was difficult."The quality of pastry I can get here now is better than in France," she said.Astrid said she was surprised by the number of people who travelled to south Wales for her baking workshops, which range from croissant-making to traditional French baguette classes."I had one woman come to my course from Canada. She was coming to Cardiff anyway but purposely picked when I had availability. I was like 'wow'!"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence
Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence

Keir Starmer has refused to give a date for the UK to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence, saying he would not indulge in 'performative fantasy politics', as he prepared to launch the government's strategic defence review. Speaking at a defence facility in Scotland, the prime minister said his commitment to hit 2.5% of GDP on defence spending from 2027 showed he was serious about the issue, but that he could not go further without fiscal certainty. 'I am not, as the prime minister of Labour government, going to make a commitment as to the precise date until I can be sure precisely where the money is coming from, how we can make good on that commitment, because I don't believe in performative fantasy politics, and certainly not on defence and security,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Pressed again on the date, Starmer said: 'We had a commitment for 2.5% by the end of this parliament. We pulled that right forward to 2027. We showed that when we say there's a new era of the defence and security of our country, is our first priority – as it is – that we meant it. We take the same approach to 3%. 'But I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air until I'm absolutely clear that I can sit here in an interview with you and tell you exactly how that's going to work.' The defence review will say Britain must be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat. The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which currently may only last days in a crisis. Asked about this, Starmer said: 'We have to recognise the world has changed, and if the world has changed, we need to be ready. What I would say, by way of reassurance, is if you want to deter conflict, then the best way to do that is to prepare for conflict.' Questioned on whether this could involve, for example, British troops being sent to defend attacks on countries adjoining Russia, Starmer replied: 'I very much hope not. And in order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses. 'We've seen what's happened in Ukraine just over three and a half, three years ago, those tanks rolled across a border, something I think all of us thought we wouldn't really see in our lifetimes – the invasion of a European country. Russia has so shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace. We have to be ready.' The review is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments. The defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, would have to wait until after the next election. Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to 70,860, below the government's target of 73,000.

Nuclear jets, home guard and tensions over spending: What we know about Starmer's defence review
Nuclear jets, home guard and tensions over spending: What we know about Starmer's defence review

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Nuclear jets, home guard and tensions over spending: What we know about Starmer's defence review

One of Sir Keir Starmer 's first acts as prime minister was to order a 'root and branch' review of Britain's armed forces. The prime minister said the UK's military capabilities had been 'hollowed out' during 14 years of Conservative rule, warning that an urgent revamp was needed with the country facing an increasingly dangerous world. And 10 months on, Sir Keir will on Monday unveil the outcome of the so-called strategic defence review. The Independent looks at what we know about the defence review and what to expect. Led by Lord Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary and secretary general of Nato, it brought together experts from the military, industry and academia. Lord Robertson was tasked with considering 'the threats Britain faces, the capabilities needed to meet them, the state of UK armed forces and the resources available'. Announcing the review, Sir Keir said: 'We live in a more dangerous and volatile world. My government will forge a new clear-eyed approach to our national defences, equipping us to tackle international threats head-on while keeping the British people safe and secure.' It was desperately needed, with Russia's invasion of Ukraine highlighting the importance of new technologies such as drones in warfighting, while parliament's defence committee warned last year Britain would not be prepared to fight an all-out war. Alongside this, Donald Trump has been pressuring Sir Keir to hike Britain's defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP years earlier than planned, as the president seeks to wean Europe off dependence on the US for military support. And, adding to the urgency of an overhaul is Sir Keir's planned peacekeeping force, which would see thousands of troops sent to Ukraine in the event of Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin agreeing to a ceasefire. Ahead of the long-awaited review's publication, some insights have emerged, giving the public a taste of what to expect when it is fully unveiled. The UK is to expand its conventionally armed, nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet, replacing seven boats with up to 12. They will be built under a joint deal with the US and Australia, known as Aukus. A separate fleet of nuclear-armed submarines will also receive a £15bn boost from a previously announced warhead programme, which ministers have put a price tag on for the first time. On Sunday the defence secretary John Healey also appeared to confirm reports he wants to purchase fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, saying he could not comment on private discussions. Another key part of the review is a cyber command to counter a 'continual and intensifying' level of cyber warfare. Mr Healey has also announced plans to invest more than £1 billion into a new 'digital targeting web' to be set up by 2027, to better connect weapons systems and allow battlefield decisions targeting enemy threats to be made and executed faster. He said the intensity of the cyber attacks the UK is seeing from Russia has stepped up, adding that 'cyber is now the leading edge, not just of defence, but of contests and tension between countries'. Cyber experts are also expected to be sent to the frontline alongside regular forces, in a move designed to modernise the military. The review is also expected to put forward plans to establish a new home guard to protect key British infrastructure from attacks by hostile states and terrorists. The new force drawn from the civilian population would be sent to guard sites such as airports, power plants and coastal hubs where undersea internet cables join the shoreline. Ministers will also spend an additional £1.5 billion fixing up the military at home amid claims years of neglect have led to troops quitting. At the same time, another £1.5bn will be used to build at least six munitions and weapons factories, as part of an attempt to be ready for potential future conflicts. The review is also expected to warn of an "immediate and pressing" threat by Russia and draw heavily on the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. Despite some welcoming the early announcements and leaks, experts have raised concerns throughout the process of the review about delays caused by growing global tensions, whether it is ambitious enough, and whether Sir Keir's commitment to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence would be enough. Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think tank, said: 'The long-awaited strategic defence review can lead to significant change in the Armed Forces if it moves beyond previous platitudes and half-implemented ideas on innovation to rebuild the foundations of defence while also making recommendations for the big choices on technological transformation.' The strategic defence review is the latest overhaul of Britain's defence outlook, following an integrated review of security, defence, development, and foreign policy in 2021, which was then refreshed in 2023 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Britain should ditch ‘distorting' stamp duty, says Reagan's economic tsar
Britain should ditch ‘distorting' stamp duty, says Reagan's economic tsar

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain should ditch ‘distorting' stamp duty, says Reagan's economic tsar

Britain should ditch 'distorting' stamp duty charges that 'lock people in their homes', Arthur Laffer has urged. The economist behind the Laffer curve said property transaction taxes are such a big problem in the national tax system that the UK would be better off with an American-style annual property wealth tax. Mr Laffer, who has served as adviser to both former president Ronald Reagan and president Donald Trump, told The Telegraph that the UK would be better off if homeowners paid annual property taxes as they do in the US instead of stamp duty. He said: 'The [annual] property taxes in Britain are low, but the transaction tax is very high. The US is the reverse. We have property taxes everywhere, which is a wealth tax, and we don't have transaction taxes on houses. 'All property taxes do in Britain is lock people into their homes that they can't get out. It just distorts the whole tax system in Britain, it's just awful. 'It is one of the very biggest problems in Britain's tax system.' Mr Laffer is most famous for conceiving the Laffer Curve, an illustration of the concept that increasing tax rates can eventually lead to lower revenue because the higher taxes trigger so much behavioural change. Stamp duty is widely hated by economists and consumers alike because it makes it increasingly difficult to move home and makes the housing market inefficient – which in turn takes a toll on productivity. In America, by contrast, homeowners do not pay large taxes when they purchase their homes but instead pay an annual tax based on a percentage of their property's value. Mr Laffer said: 'Income tax is a problem in Britain, but these transaction taxes are big stuff too.' Stamp duty is taxed in bands that are not adjusted to account for house price growth, meaning homeowners get dragged into higher tax brackets as house prices rise. Since the tax bands were last adjusted in 2014, the average London house price has climbed by 30pc. Over the same time period, the stamp duty bill on the average home in the capital has surged by 54pc. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast in March that the Treasury's tax take from property transactions will nearly double from £15bn in 2024-25 to £26.5bn in 2029-30. Trump's tax cuts will 'save us from a disaster' Mr Laffer was an adviser to Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and says he has met with the US president several times since he took office earlier this year. He said he has told the Mr Trump that he should scrap US corporation tax on profits and replace it with a value added tax on sales. Although Mr Laffer is i n favour of Mr Trump's tax bill, he said the president should go further with measures to boost the economy. The biggest measure in the bill will be an extension to the tax cuts that Mr Trump introduced in 2017 and are due to expire this year. Mr Laffer said: 'I know they talk about it as being a tax cut. It's not. It's just making Trump's tax cuts permanent. 'If it were not passed, there would be a huge increase in taxes across the board, which would be very detrimental. The bill going through the Senate right now does not create something wonderful but it saves us from a disaster.' Mr Laffer said that America should establish a free trade agreement with the UK, and that Ireland should leave the EU to become part of the trading bloc too. 'You're gonna hate me for this, but I think it should be with Ireland too. I think they should get out of the EU and should become part of the sort of the US/ UK/Ireland group. I think that would be a terrific free trade group.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store