Trump accuses Harvard of ‘judge shopping' and threatens to send $3 billion in federal grants to trade schools
President Donald Trump on Monday again trained his ire on Harvard University, accusing the school of 'judge shopping' during its legal battle with the administration and threatening to cut off $3 billion in federal grant funding over the university's handling of anti-Israel protests.
'I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land,' Trump wrote on social media. 'What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!'
Trump's newest threats come as Harvard begins its spring commencement week in the shadow of a months-long feud between the Ivy League school and the Trump administration over antisemitism, federal funding and the First Amendment.
In its latest move, the Trump administration banned Harvard University's ability to enroll international students – a decision swiftly halted by a federal judge hours after the nation's oldest and wealthiest university filed suit. The president has also threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status.
Now, the university's future ability to enroll international students – which make up about 27% of the student body – will depend on how the case plays out in court, with the litigation adding to the piling docket of legal battles for the administration. A hearing in the case is expected to take place Tuesday.
Harvard also sued Trump last month over the administration's freezing of $2.2 billion in federal funding after the university wouldn't agree to policy changes demanded by the White House.
That case, along with the lawsuit over international students, has been assigned to US District Court Judge Allison Dale Burroughs.
This isn't Burroughs' first high-profile case involving Harvard University. As a federal judge in 2019, she upheld the Ivy League's admissions process in an affirmative action case – a decision the US Supreme Court later overturned.
She ruled that while Harvard's admissions process was 'not perfect,' she would not 'dismantle a very fine admissions program that passes constitutional muster, solely because it could do better.'
As a federal district judge, she's also put guardrails on the Trump administration before in cases related to his 2017 travel ban targeting predominantly Muslim countries, international students during the coronavirus pandemic, and the Department of Energy's recent cuts to federal research funding.
In his Monday post, Trump also took aim at the bipartisan practice of 'judge shopping,' where plaintiffs file cases outside their obvious court of jurisdiction in an effort to be assigned a judge who may have a more favorable review of the litigation compared to a random assignment. Members of both parties have used the practice to further their policy goals.
'The best thing Harvard has going for it is that they have shopped around and found the absolute best Judge (for them!) - But have no fear, the Government will, in the end, WIN!' Trump wrote Monday.
CNN has reached out to Harvard for comment.
But Harvard, a Massachusetts-based school, would be expected to bring any lawsuits in Boston's federal court. Still, the district has no Trump appointees, and the federal appellate court overseeing New England is perceived as a tough venue for the president's more hardline, politically sensitive cases.
This week, Trump also sent shockwaves through campus when he demanded the 'names and countries' of the thousands of international students at Harvard University.
'We are still waiting for the Foreign Student Lists from Harvard so that we can determine, after a ridiculous expenditure of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, how many radicalized lunatics, troublemakers all, should not be let back into our Country. Harvard is very slow in the presentation of these documents, and probably for good reason!' Trump said on social media.
Harvard already shares a list, as of October 2024, of the countries where its thousands of foreign students are from, with the most students coming from China, followed by Canada, India, South Korea and the United Kingdom.
Harvard and the Trump administration are scheduled to meet in court on Thursday and argue their cases to Burroughs, who will decide whether to extend her decision to block the government's actions by issuing a preliminary injunction.
At the same time as the scheduled hearing, nearly 9,000 degree candidates are due to be celebrating commencement on Harvard's campus, just 6 miles from the federal courthouse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Elon Musk and Donald Trump May Bury the Hatchet
Good morning. Elon Musk and Donald Trump may be coming to their senses. 'America First' is turning into 'America the Avoidable.' And not even the legacy of Trump's mother can save Harris Tweed. Listen to the day's top stories. Keep calm and carry on. Signs are Donald Trump and Elon Musk may be heading toward a detente, but nothing is for certain quite yet. Musk has signaled he's open to cooling tensions and backed off on a threat to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. White House aides have scheduled a call with the Tesla CEO to broker peace, according to Politico. Here's a timeline of their very public spat.


CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: What exactly is Trump's new travel ban about? Not national security
Any reasonable American could objectively ask what exactly President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which affects a dozen countries, is about. Is it about protecting Americans from 'murderers,' as Trump said Thursday, or punishing small countries for a modest number of students who overstayed their visas? The drive for Trump's first-term travel ban in 2017 and 2018 was clear. He was seeking to deliver on an ugly campaign promise to ban all Muslims from entering the US. That morphed, over the course of years as the administration adapted to court cases, into a ban on travel to the US by people from certain countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. It was only by agreeing to ignore Trump's anti-Muslim 2016 campaign statements and focus solely on the security-related language in his third attempt at a travel ban that the US Supreme Court ultimately gave its blessing to that ban. '… We must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. Trump is using that authority again in his second term. But this time, as he said Thursday in the Oval Office, the ban is about removing 'horrendous' people who are in the country now and about keeping murderers out. The data suggest the travel ban will primarily affect students and businesspeople from countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as well as the Middle East. It was an attack on Jewish community members in Colorado by an Egyptian national that convinced Trump to speed up plans to ban people from a dozen countries from entering the US, restarting the travel ban policy he pioneered during his first term. But Egypt is not on the travel ban list. Neither is Kuwait, the country where Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack, lived before coming to the US. 'Egypt has been a country we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump told reporters Thursday. Instead, the travel ban includes countries that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who assembled the list, feel don't have things under control. That includes places like Equatorial Guinea in Africa and Burma, also known as Myanmar, in Asia. Neither is a nexus of terror threatening the American homeland. Trump's order announcing the travel ban explains that these countries have high rates of students and other travelers overstaying their visas in the US. It points to a report of DHS 'overstay' data from 2023 to argue that for more than 70% of people from Equatorial Guinea with US student visas, there is no record of them leaving the US when their visa ended. In real numbers, that equals 233 people with student visas. The numbers are similarly small for other African countries. 'They're just throwing things at the wall,' said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato institute and a Trump immigration policy critic. 'There's not really a coherent philosophy behind any of this,' Bier added. The reinstated travel ban does include countries associated with terrorism, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, all of which were also included in Trump's first-term travel ban. But it's worth noting that no immigrant or traveler from one of these countries has launched a terror attack on the US in recent years, according to a review by the Washington Post during Trump's first term. A man from Sudan killed one person at a Tennessee church in 2017. 'The president claims that there is no way to vet these nationals, yet that is exactly what his consular officers and border officials have successfully done for decades,' Bier said. The man responsible for the ISIS-inspired truck bomb in New Orleans in January, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, was a Texas-born Army veteran and US citizen. The new travel ban also includes Afghanistan, which could jeopardize many Afghans related to those who aided the US during its war there, as Shawn VanDiver, president of the aid organization #AfghanEvac, told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday. 'There are 12,000 people who have been separated through the actions of our government, who have been waiting for more than three and a half years,' he said. The Trump administration recently paused the processing of student visas, interrupting the plans of thousands of people to study in the US. In the Oval Office, Trump said he was not interested in banning students from China. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly, we want to have foreign students, but we want them to be checked,' Trump said, suggesting there will be even more strenuous background checks in the future. The existence of the travel ban list could also factor into tariff negotiations the Trump administration has taken on with nations across the world, as well as its effort to countries nations to take back migrants it wants to deport. 'It's about power and control and manipulating both the US population to suppress dissent as well as trying to manipulate foreign relations with these countries by getting them to do whatever he wants in order to get off the disfavored nation list,' Bier said.


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Rise Ahead of Jobs Report; Musk Signals Cooling of Trump Feud
US equity futures rise as investors await the latest reading on the US economy via the jobs report. The world's richest man signaled a cooling of his feud with the world's most powerful politician after Elon Musk and President Donald Trump hurled insults and accusations at each other on social media. Monica Defend of Amundi projects a cooling of the job market and a slowdown in the US economy. Veronica Clark of Citi says there's an upside risk to an increase in the unemployment rate. 'Bloomberg Brief' delivers the market news, data and analysis you need to set your agenda. (Source: Bloomberg)