Thousands rally, march through Loop for national ‘Hands Off!' protest
Thousands rallied and marched around downtown Saturday afternoon to take part in a national day of action to say 'hands off' to President Donald Trump's administration.
So-called Hands Off! demonstrations were organized for more than 1,200 locations in all 50 states by more than 150 groups including civil rights organizations, labor unions, LBGTQ+ advocates, veterans and elections activists. The rallies appeared peaceful, with no immediate reports of arrests.
In Chicago, a flood of people swarmed Daley Plaza, with hundreds filling the surrounding streets by noon. The crowd then began an hourlong march making a loop around to State Street and then back to Daley Plaza.
People of all ages and backgrounds made up the protest in Chicago. Holding signs and posters seemed more common than not, with many expressing similar sentiments, like 'hands off' immigrants, reproductive rights, gun violence prevention, democracy, lgbtq+ rights and more.
The city's Office of Emergency Management and Communications said it does not provide crowd counts.
Anthony and Veena Claypool journeyed downtown with their 9-year-old twin sons from the Belmont Cragin neighborhood for the mass gathering. Both former public school teachers, the Claypools said they wanted to show up to set an example for their sons.
'One part of what we're doing is modeling what it means to stand up for all of our community members and to be upstanders, even though we feel generally protected in Chicago and Illinois, we are standing up for historically marginalized groups all over who don't have all the same privileges and accesses that we do,' Veena Claypool said.
Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf, she said one of her sons had asked her if she should be 'wearing that in the presence of police.'
'That is really concerning to me,' she said. 'My children are growing up in the era of protests, so they do have a fear of police. It doesn't mean we won't continue to exercise our rights and make our voices heard, especially for those who don't have the same luxury.'
Anthony Claypool said the government is 'on the precipice of a fascist takeover as billionaires are sitting in every important' Cabinet position. He said immigration enforcement has 'become completely unhinged,' intentional efforts are being made to alienate allies, hate crimes are on the rise and a lack of due process persists.
'Everything that the United States claims to be, they are undermining,' he said. 'I don't think it's ok.'
Photographer Bari Baskin and her mother, Sandra Baskin, a real estate agent, said they participated to 'resist the collapse of our democracy' and be a 'part of the power of the people.'
Bari Baskin said she marched in Washington, D.C., in 2016 and 'can't believe we have to do this again' but was 'encouraged' by the crowd size.
'Our numbers are bigger than those trying to destroy us,' she said. 'Joy is a form of resistance, and this turnout is giving me a lot of joy.'
Asked about the protests, the White House said 'President Trump's position is clear: he will always protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries. Meanwhile, the Democrats' stance is giving Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare benefits to illegal aliens, which will bankrupt these programs and crush American seniors.'
Erin Sinnaeve and her daughter Megan Sinnaeve traveled over an hour from Aurora to join the protest. Erin Sinnaeve, a veteran who worked as a nurse in the Navy, said she joined the day of action to protect the rights of her daughter and all children and ensure proper access to health care and education, as well as support veteran job security.
'It's better to be out here caring about the community than to be at home watching the news and getting stressed out,' she said.
Megan Sinnaeve, a college student, said she wanted to 'be here today for the people that can't be.'
'It's through people and their civic duties that we are going to restore democracy,' she said. 'It's through civic engagement that change is going to happen. Through all these people from different backgrounds and generations, change will come.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
How Will Iran Retaliate for Israeli Attack?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran sent drones towards Israel in a swift initial response to the multiple strikes that targeted its armed forces and nuclear program, but much bigger retaliation can be expected. Israel put its forces on alert and put in place "a special state of emergency" with a warning that Israeli civilians should be prepared for missile and drone strikes. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed Israel would face a "severe punishment." Iran's response could not only target Israel but affect a much wider swathe of the Middle East and have a major impact on the global economy. These are some of the options that Iran already has prepared for striking back. 1. Drone and Missile Strikes These have already begun. Iran possesses thousands of ballistic missiles and an expanding fleet of drones, both of which play a key role in its strategy for retaliation. In April 2024, Iran carried out a direct attack on Israeli territory for the first time, launching more than 300 missiles and drones in response to Israeli strikes on Iranian positions. This action demonstrated Tehran's capacity for rapid and accurate retaliation. Although previous Israeli airstrikes have targeted Iran's missile infrastructure in an effort to limit its advancing military strength, Iran's defense minister has asserted that the country has restored and enhanced its defenses. As a result, Iran continues to maintain a powerful arsenal, including numerous missiles with the range to strike U.S. bases throughout the region, such as those in Iraq and the Gulf—escalating the risks associated with any potential confrontation. The United States has distanced itself from the Israeli attacks, however, potentially raising questions over whether it would be a target. People look over damage to buildings in Nobonyad Square following Israeli airstrikes on June 13, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. People look over damage to buildings in Nobonyad Square following Israeli airstrikes on June 13, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Photo by2. Proxy Forces Iran's network of proxy groups—which includes the Houthis in Yemen, Iraqi militias, Palestinian factions, and Hezbollah in Lebanon—is capable of carrying out rocket attacks, sabotage, and covert operations. Yet, Hezbollah's operational strength has been reduced due to recent Israeli military actions and severe economic sanctions, which have constrained its current effectiveness. Nevertheless, U.S. and Israeli intelligence continue to view proxy retaliation as the most probable and immediate reaction to any Israeli attack on Iran. In a recent Newsweek interview, a senior Houthi representative affirmed their willingness to back Iran in a conflict with Israel, underscoring Tehran's capacity to orchestrate a rapid, multi-front retaliation. 3. Choking Global Oil Iran has consistently issued warnings about its intention to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital passage through which close to 20 percent of the world's oil is transported each day. Earlier this year, commanders from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stated they are ready to use naval mines, missiles, fast-attack vessels, and submarines to threaten or temporarily block the strait if sanctions intensify or attacks occur. This ability to interfere with maritime traffic has the potential to significantly drive up oil prices and exert global economic pressure without initiating a full-scale conflict, demonstrating Tehran's leverage over this crucial energy corridor. World oil prices jumped more than 10 percent shortly after the Israeli strikes on Iran. 4. Cyber Warfare Iran's cyber operations, including those carried out by the IRGC-affiliated Mabna Institute, have targeted American and Israeli financial institutions, utilities, and military networks—inflicting both economic harm and symbolic blows while allowing for plausible deniability. Recently, Iran claimed to have acquired thousands of sensitive Israeli documents, reportedly containing information about Israel's nuclear program, which Iranian officials suggest could have implications for several countries. In addition, Iranian hackers have escalated their attacks on Israel's vital infrastructure, including water and energy systems, indicating an increased reliance on cyber warfare as a central form of retaliation. 5. Nuclear Escalation Although Iran says that it is not pursuing nuclear weapons, its officials have cautioned that ongoing external pressure or threats to the country's survival could prompt a move toward weaponization. Iran had already said it would accelerate enrichment of uranium after a vote of censure this week at the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Senior advisers to the Supreme Leader have indicated that if sanctions are reinstated or Iran perceives an existential threat, it might discard voluntary limits and rapidly increase uranium enrichment to weapons-grade levels—significantly heightening the nuclear risks in any potential conflict.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
From Gaza to South Sudan, private firms deliver aid and face questions
By Aaron Ross JUBA (Reuters) -Fifty-kilo sacks of food hurtled out the open hatch of the cargo plane, scattering in the wind on their 1,000-foot descent to the northeastern flatlands of South Sudan. For the past three weeks, an American company run by former U.S. soldiers and officials has airdropped hundreds of tonnes of maize flour, beans and salt into one of the world's most desperate pockets of hunger. The campaign, which South Sudan's government says it is funding, has brought lifesaving aid to areas ravaged since February by fighting between the military and local militiamen. It also offers a window into a debate about the future of humanitarian aid in the wake of U.S. President Donald Trump's dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and cuts to aid budgets around the world. The South Sudan contract is one of a growing list of business opportunities for Fogbow, an outfit of about a dozen people that first distributed food last year in Gaza and Sudan. Fogbow president Mick Mulroy said the company - which is owned by a former U.S. diplomat, a Marine Corps veteran and an American businessman - now has five project requests in conflict zones in Africa and the Middle East. Mulroy attributed the rising demand to donors looking to support humanitarian projects but increasingly hard-pressed to find implementing partners due to aid cuts. "There's a substantial and growing need from people around the world at a time when we decided collectively to reduce the support," said Mulroy, who was a deputy assistant secretary of defence during Trump's first term. For some aid sector veterans, the demand for Fogbow's services points to a worrying shift toward a more politicised aid model that they say sacrifices humanitarian principles like neutrality and, by extension, its credibility with beneficiaries. In Gaza, a U.S.-backed outfit that Israel has authorised to distribute food in the Palestinian enclave, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), has bypassed the U.N.-led aid system and been accused by some critics of weaponising aid in service of Israel's war aims. Asked for comment, GHF said it had found a "better model" to ensure food was delivered in Gaza. "Bottom line, our aid is getting in and feeding people while aid from other groups is getting looted and not being delivered," it said in an email. Fogbow says it has no connection to GHF. But its operation in South Sudan is raising some of the same questions because it is working directly on behalf of a party to an active conflict. The campaign has been complicated by its association with the government: the aid comes in sacks marked "South Sudan Humanitarian Relief" and emblazoned with the national flag. Some people have refused the food because they don't trust the government, whose forces are bombarding parts of Upper Nile, according to two residents, opposition politicians and a U.N. source. "They expect people to take the food but we say 'no' to our people," said Manpiny Pal, a senior local government official in Ulang County, one of two in Upper Nile targeted by the airdrops. "We need the food of the U.N. How do we know if that food dropped has something in it?" said Pal, who is from the opposition SPLM-IO party. The United Nations' World Food Programme (WFP), which plans to distribute over 160,000 tonnes of food in South Sudan this year, said last month that no humanitarian aid was getting to the two counties by the usual river route due to the fighting. Asked if WFP had considered airdropping food there, a spokesperson said airdrops were a last resort because they cost up to 17 times more than deliveries by road or river. HUMANITARIAN PRINCIPLES Some veteran humanitarians have deep misgivings about Fogbow's model. Martin Griffiths, who served as the top humanitarian official at the United Nations from 2021 to 2024, urged against trying to reinvent the wheel. "The humanitarian community is large and amorphous. It is also careful. And finally it is experienced. This is a well to draw on and I wish this was done by Fogbow," Griffiths told Reuters. Michael VanRooyen, the director of the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, which researches humanitarian issues, said Fogbow and GHF were undermining an evidence and needs-based approach to aid. "These organisations are not humanitarian. They are agents of a government, intended to fulfill political and in some cases military purposes," he said. Fogbow officials say they are a logistics provider rather than a humanitarian organisation but try to align their projects with humanitarian principles. Chris Hyslop, Fogbow's humanitarian lead and a veteran of the U.N. system, said he had near-daily contacts with WFP to discuss drop locations and ask for input. He acknowledged complications from working directly with the government but said such concerns had to be weighed against the benefits of national authorities taking responsibility for their own people. The WFP spokesperson said that while the agency receives a daily update from Fogbow on drop locations to deconflict airspace, it has no involvement in the operation. South Sudan's government said it asked Fogbow, rather than WFP, to do the drops in order to expedite the rollout and show it was taking responsibility for its citizens. "Here is a government taking up responsibility as a core mandate of that government," said Chol Ajongo, the minister of presidential affairs. The government declined to say how much it was spending to distribute the 600 tonnes of food. Fifty-seven percent of South Sudan's more than 13 million people suffer acute food insecurity, according to the U.N., but the country has only received pledges covering 20% of its $1.69 billion in estimated humanitarian needs for 2025. 'WE'RE GONNA TRY SOMETHING DIFFERENT' Fogbow's leaders express respect for the U.N. and traditional non-governmental organisations and say they would be happy to work as contractors within the existing system. But they also think they can do better. Fogbow CEO and co-owner Brook Jerue said the company's previous work had shown the advantages of its military background and willingness to innovate. In Gaza, Fogbow advocated for sending food on barges across the Mediterranean from Cyprus to avoid bottlenecks at land crossings. Many humanitarians opposed the idea, arguing it would ease political pressure on Israel to open land routes. "The humanitarian community was super upset with us because they were all pushing for land crossings, and we were just like, 'hey, we're gonna try something different'," said Jerue, a former U.S. Marine Corps pilot. Fogbow dropped its barges plan when then-U.S. President Joe Biden decided in March 2024 to deliver aid through a U.S. military-built floating pier. Fogbow went on to deliver 1,100 tonnes of flour through the U.S. pier and an Israeli port with funding from Qatar, Jerue said. Later last year, it used profits from the Gaza operation to finance airdrops into Sudan's remote South Kordofan state before USAID offered to provide funding, Jerue said. The State Department declined to comment on that operation. A spokesperson said the U.S. was not involved in the aidrops in South Sudan but voiced support for "burden-sharing among capable nations". WAR AND SUSPICION Fogbow's model is facing its sternest test in Upper Nile's Ulang and Nasir Counties, which the U.N. on Thursday said are at risk of famine in the coming months after fighting this year forced more than 100,000 people to flee their homes. Each morning and afternoon, a cargo plane carrying 16 tonnes of food leaves the capital Juba for one of two drop sites. The food is collected by workers from an independent local NGO and then distributed. While the aid has reached around 30,000 people, the government-led campaign has faced resistance rooted in accusations of abuses by the military, including allegations made by local residents - and supported by Human Rights Watch - that government planes have dropped incendiary weapons. The government denies this and says it does everything possible to minimise harm to civilians. The SPLM-IO has accused the military of coercing displaced civilians to return home to collect the food. Local residents have also questioned the decision to drop food into Nasir, a military garrison town largely deserted by civilians after heavy fighting in March, as opposed to areas with high concentrations of displaced people. The government denied any coercion but acknowledged the drops into Nasir were intended to encourage people to return and show it could provide for them. "For you to claim the legitimacy and the representation of the people of South Sudan, you must have presence in all those places," said Ajongo.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Houthis condemn Israeli strikes on Iran, blame US for escalation
Sanaa (dpa) — Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi militia strongly condemned the Israeli airstrikes that targeted Tehran and other Iranian cities early Friday, calling the attack 'illegal and unjustified.' In a sharply worded statement, the Houthis described the strikes as part of a 'new episode in the chain of Zionist arrogance,' allegedly backed by direct US involvement. The militia accused Washington and its allies of systematically escalating tensions against the Islamic Republic through both diplomatic pressure and military action. 'This brutal aggression follows a campaign of unjust sanctions and hostile policies, under the guise of international institutions like the IAEA,' the statement said. The Houthis framed the assault as an attempt to punish Iran for its steadfast support of the Palestinian people and resistance movements in the region. They expressed confidence that Tehran would not waver in its backing for the Palestinian cause, despite pressure or sacrifice. 'We are certain that Iran will remain a pillar of support for the oppressed and continue to confront what is considered the crime of the century,' the statement read. Offering condolences to the Iranian people and leadership, the Houthis also voiced confidence in Iran's ability to respond to any violation of its sovereignty. The group held Israel and its 'international partners, foremost among them the United States,' fully responsible for the consequences of the attack. 'Igniting fires in the region will only burn the fingers of those who lit them,' the pro-Iranian militia warned.
