
This hospital in Los Angeles helps babies struggling with mental health
A major initiative at Children's Hospital Los Angeles aims to address a critical but much overlooked need: mental health care for families experiencing the complex flood of joy, fear and upheaval during the first few years of a child's life.
Myriad issues can emerge or become exacerbated in a family after a baby is born, including maternal postpartum depression, sleep problems, attachment issues between caregivers and children, early signs of behavioural challenges, domestic conflict between parents and housing insecurity that often worsens as a family grows.
If a child also experiences a medical issue, including an extended hospital stay, a serious birth defect or a developmental delay, these problems can be compounded.
A US$25mil (RM110mil) gift from the Tikun Olam Foundation of the Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles will allow the hospital to expand mental health screening and services to as many as 30,000 children ages three and under who seek care at Children's Hospital each year, making it one of the first hospitals in the United States to provide universal infant-family mental health services.
Currently, the hospital provides these services to about 1,800 children each year.
The idea behind the programme is to provide attention and care that can strengthen the bond between parents and children during the baby's crucial early years – and help prevent problems from spiralling in the longer term.
These bonds are essential to a baby's healthy brain development in a period of rapid neuron formation and great sensitivity, said Melissa Carson, a paediatric psychologist at the hospital and co-director of the Stein Tikun Olam Early Connections Program.
Medical issues and family stressors – also called adverse childhood experiences – can disturb this process, but often aren't identified until preschool or later, when behavioural or other problems have spiralled.
'Just a little support at a critical moment can really prevent the need for much more intensive service later,' said paediatric psychologist Marian Williams, the programme's co-director.
Vicente plays with a train set in his bedroom. Photo: JULIANA YAMADA/Los Angeles Times/TNS
A window of opportunity
The hospital will also use the funds to train providers in infant and family mental health care and research the effectiveness of the programme in the hopes that the model will spread to other hospitals.
'We have this kind of window when you have a new baby. And there's also a window when you have a medical need,' Williams said. 'There's probably a lot of parents who will say, 'I don't really need you. I'm here because of a cut finger, and we're fine.' But I imagine there's going to be a lot more who say, 'Oh, wow. Since you asked ... .''
Many families probably could benefit from a handout or video about a common early childhood problem such as sleep issues, picky eating or excessive crying.
Some might want to join a parent group with others facing similar challenges, or benefit from a few home visits from a therapist who can help them adjust to life with a new baby.
But other families may need more intensive assistance, such as longer-term therapy. The hospital will also screen them for needed social supports such as housing, food, transportation and internet access, – the lack of which can contribute to a family's stress and a child's long-term mental health challenges.
What is infant mental health?
The term 'infant mental health' can be confusing. After all, it's difficult to believe that a baby could already be experiencing emotional difficulties.
But mental health care in the early years is laser-focused on supporting the developing relationship between the caregiver and child, which can set the trajectory of a child's life.
For an infant, a therapist might work with the parent to help them notice their baby's cues, find activities to help the baby explore their environment, and work on their own emotional regulation.
As a baby gets older, the therapist also uses play to help develop the bond and begin to treat the child more directly.
For families in the midst of a medical crisis, these early days and months can be particularly fraught, said Patricia Lakatos, a psychologist at the hospital who works with families of children who have been treated in the intensive care unit.
In the neonatal intensive care unit, parents are not only dealing with the day-to-day medical reality, but they're also 'grieving the imagined baby – the baby you thought you were going to have,' Lakatos said.
Her work is to visit the family regularly during their stay to help the parent work through their grief and understand how their baby communicates.
Stressful experiences can also affect the baby's well-being. A baby with traumatic medical needs, for example, may panic every time an adult tries to touch them.
Lakatos said she can read the signs of a struggling newborn in their eyes. Healthy babies, she said, 'have a bright, shiny look that tells you, 'I'm ready. I'm here. I'm curious and want to engage with the world.''
But babies who experience distress often have a 'dull, glazed look in their eye. You might try to engage them, and they're really not engaging with you.'
Others have eyes that are 'wide open, almost like hyperalert,' she said. They're easily startled and may arch their back and splay their hands, as if to say, 'The world is stressful for me.'
But having a nurturing, supportive relationship with a caregiver helps buffer that stress.
Supporting this bond includes helping the parent notice the signs that the baby is ready to engage – even momentarily – or whether the baby's cues are telling them they need to 'soften my voice or just hold them and not try to look at them because that's too much stimulation.'
The ultimate goal is to help the caregiver find the joy and delight in the baby they have.
A photo of Blanco and her son Vicente as an infant hangs on the fridge at their home. Photo: JULIANA YAMADA/Los Angeles Times/TNS
For mother and baby
Stephanie Blanco of Mission Hills first learned she would be having a baby with major medical complications during an ultrasound early in her pregnancy. 'I didn't think I was going to be able to handle it, going through that,' she said.
But right away, she was referred to Children's Hospital's Fetal-Maternal Center, which specialises in pregnancies with complex medical conditions, where she met Lakatos.
Her son, Vicente Giron Sarria, had been diagnosed with facial deformities, and Lakatos began joining Blanco and her partner at every meeting with the craniofacial team.
'They would explain the problems to me, but you would go through so many emotions in that moment. So she would tell me, 'It's OK, I'm here,'' and ask her how she was feeling.
It was a moment of great tension and stress with her son's father as they navigated what their new life would look like. She wasn't sure they would make it as a couple. But Lakatos helped them process their feelings together, she said, and learn to communicate about the their son's health.
Vicente was born with numerous complications even beyond the predicted facial abnormalities, including the need to eat through a feeding tube, and spent about two months in the intensive care unit, where Lakatos visited the family every other day.
Lakatos taught her breathing exercises, helped her connect with her son and encouraged her to take some time for herself on walks around the hospital campus.
Blanco was able to bond with her baby. 'You're thinking, I can deal with this,' she said. 'He's my baby, and we're going to get through it. The love comes out.'
The challenges didn't end when Blanco and Vinny finally went home, and neither did Lakatos's support.
Vicente needed several surgeries, and Blanco had to learn how to feed him six times a day – including the middle of the night – through a gastronomy tube.
But Blanco and her partner, Jesse Giron, continued their visits with Lakatos for several more years.
Vicente was eventually diagnosed with nonverbal autism and a seizure disorder, and Blanco joined a support group for parents that Lakatos was leading.
Blanco said she is still processing life with a medically complex child who requires constant care at home.
'Every day is something new. Every day I learn something. Some days are harder than others.'
But she credits Lakatos and Children's Hospital Los Angeles with saving her life – and her relationship. 'If it wasn't for them and their kindness, their compassion and their guidance, I would be lost.' – Los Angeles Times/Tribune News Service
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
Israeli fire kills 41 in Gaza, many near an aid site, medics say
CAIRO: Israeli gunfire and airstrikes killed at least 41 Palestinians in Gaza today, most of them at an aid site operated by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the centre of the coastal territory, local health officials said. Medical officials at Shifa and Al-Quds Hospitals said at least 25 people were killed by Israeli gunfire as they approached the aid site near the former settlement of Netzarim, and dozens were wounded. The Israeli military said its forces fired warning shots overnight toward suspects who were advancing while posing a threat to the troops in the area of the Netzarim Corridor. "This is despite warnings that the area is an active combat zone. The IDF is aware of reports regarding individuals injured; the details are under review," it added. Later today, health officials at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip said at least six people were killed by Israeli gunfire as they approached another GHF site in Rafah further south, taking Wednesday's death toll to at least 41. A total of 163 people had already been killed and more than 1,000 wounded trying to reach the handful of aid sites operated by the foundation since it began work two weeks ago after a three-month blockade, according to Gaza's health ministry. The United Nations has condemned the killings. It said the blockade brought the Palestinian enclave to the brink of famine and that food supplies remain critically low. The foundation said earlier it was unaware of today's incident but that it is working closely with Israeli authorities to ensure safe passage routes are maintained, and that it is essential for Palestinians to closely follow instructions. "Ultimately, the solution is more aid, which will create more certainty and less urgency among the population," it said by email in response to Reuters questions. "There is not yet enough food to feed everyone in need in Gaza. Our current focus is to feed as many people as is safely possible within the constraints of a highly volatile environment." The U.N. and other aid groups have refused to supply aid via the foundation, which uses private contractors with Israeli military backup in what they say is a breach of humanitarian standards. Gaza health officials said 10 other people were killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in the south of the enclave. On Tuesday, when Gaza health officials said 17 people were killed near another GHF aid site in Rafah in southern Gaza, the army said it fired warning shots to distance "suspects" who were approaching the troops and posed a threat. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday there had been "significant progress" in efforts to secure the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza, but that it was "too soon" to raise hopes that a deal would be reached. Despite efforts by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar to restore a ceasefire in Gaza, neither Israel nor Hamas has shown willingness to back down on core demands, with each side blaming the other for the failure to reach a deal. Two Hamas sources told Reuters they did not know about any new ceasefire offers. The war erupted after Hamas-led fighters took 251 hostages and killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, on October 7, 2023, Israel's single deadliest day.


The Sun
3 days ago
- The Sun
Gaza rescuers say Israel fire near aid centre kills 31
GAZA CITY: The Gaza civil defence agency said Israeli forces opened fire on people waiting to enter a US-backed food distribution centre on Wednesday, killing 31 and wounding 'about 200'. 'We transported at least 31 martyrs and about 200 wounded as a result of Israeli tank and drone fire on thousands of citizens... on their way to receive food from the American aid centre,' civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP. The Israeli army did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment. Restrictions imposed on media in the Gaza Strip and the difficulties of access on the ground mean AFP is not able to independently verify the death tolls announced by the civil defence agency. Bassal said thousands of Palestinians had been gathering since 2 am (2300 GMT Tuesday) in the hope of reaching the US and Israeli-backed food distribution centre. 'Israeli tanks fired several times, then at around 5:30 am intensified their fire, coinciding with heavy fire from drones targeting civilians,' he said. There have been a series of deadly shootings since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) first opened aid distribution points in the Palestinian territory on May 27, as Israel faced mounting international condemnation over the humanitarian conditions.


The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
This app is trying to change how people eat
Cheez-Its used to be one of Marissa Gradei's go-to snacks, in part because she thought of them as 'healthier' alternatives to other savory nibbles such as potato chips. That changed three months ago, when Gradei, 27, a social media manager in Fairfax, Virginia, started using a smartphone app called Yuka. The app prompts users to scan the bar codes of food and personal care items – in grocery stores and at home – and then offers a score out of 100 to indicate how 'healthy' it thinks the item is for you or the environment. Gradei's trusty snacks scored a 2 out of 100 – 'bad' for health, according to the app. She hasn't purchased any since. After the Yuka app launched in the United States in 2022, more than 20 million people have downloaded it – a figure that has more than doubled since January 2024. In a recent interview with CNN, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he and his wife 'consider it invaluable'. 'You can go into any grocery store, flash it at any product, and you can get a 'go' or a 'no',' he said. But can the Yuka app accurately portray how good a given food is for your health? And should you rely on an app to guide your food choices in the first place? We asked four nutrition experts. How does it work? The Yuka app originally launched in France in 2017 as a tool to help people quickly understand the healthfulness of certain food and personal care products. It expanded to the United States in 2022. After scanning a product's bar code, the app assigns the product a health value out of 100 – with 100 being the best – and a corresponding colour score of excellent (dark green), good (light green), poor (orange) or bad (red). To generate these scores for certain foods, the app uses an algorithm based on three criteria: the food's nutritional quality (60% of the score), the presence of additives and whether the app deems the additives risky (30%) and whether the food is organic (10%). Yuka uses a European labeling system called Nutri-Score to assess a food's nutritional quality. High protein and high fiber are good, for example; high amounts of sugar, sodium, saturated fats and calories are bad. The company has two full-time employees – one with a toxicology background and one with a food engineering and human nutrition background – who sort through the scientific research on about 600 food dyes, preservatives, thickening agents, artificial sweeteners and other food additives. They classify them as 'high risk', 'moderate risk', 'limited risk' or 'risk-free' based on their potential links to health conditions such as cancer, heart disease, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and infertility. The app is free, although it offers a premium version for between US$10 (RM42) and US$50 (RM211) per year, said Julie Chapon, one of Yuka's co-founders. The premium version includes extra features such as the ability to use the app when your phone is offline. The company does not promote the app through paid advertisements, or take money from food and cosmetics industries, said Chapon, who has a marketing and consulting background. Kennedy's endorsement has most likely helped with awareness, she said, but the app isn't affiliated with the Make America Healthy Again, or MAHA, movement. What do nutrition experts think of Yuka? The app has hit on a real hunger for more clear-cut nutrition information, said Dr Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food Is Medicine Institute at Tufts University. 'The public is really confused about what defines a healthy food,' he said. And it can be valuable for people to use their smartphones to help them make better food choices, said Lisa Harnack, a professor of public health nutrition at the University of Minnesota. Anyone can flip over a product and read its nutrition label, she said, but for the average person, it can be burdensome to try to parse the healthfulness of dozens of foods at a time. Scanning a product and glancing at its ranking and color score is much simpler. That said, some experts worry that labelling food as either 'good' or 'bad' can lead to disordered eating. 'I don't like that,' Elaine Siu, a dietitian at the City of Hope cancer center in Duarte, California, said of the labeling system. Instead, she said, people should focus on following a balanced diet overall. This typically involves eating plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean sources of protein and healthy fats. And keep in mind that your nutritional needs will vary depending on your health and activity levels, she said, which the Yuka app can't account for. Siu, for instance, advises cancer patients on how to eat. Many are undernourished and could benefit from consuming more calories. But the Yuka app deducts points for high-calorie foods. Several of Siu's patients have refused to drink the nutrition shakes or eat the protein bars she has recommended, she said, because the Yuka app has scored them poorly. Is its rating system trustworthy? The Nutri-Score system that Yuka uses to assess a food's nutritional quality is an 'OK' system, Mozaffarian said. He said he doesn't agree with the idea of penalising foods for calories, since many high-calorie foods can be nutritious. The app labels many nuts and nut butters, for instance, as 'too caloric'. And, Mozaffarian said, it's problematic that Yuka doesn't distinguish between natural sugars and added sugars – the latter of which are most concerning for health. Because there's still a lot we don't know about how food additives affect us, Mozaffarian said, it's 'a little excessive' to devote 30% of the score to their presence. Much of the research Yuka uses to assess the risk level of additives are either observational studies – which can't demonstrate cause and effect – or animal studies that use much higher doses of those additives than what you'd find in food. Animal study results also don't always translate to humans. Siu said she was surprised to see monosodium glutamate, or MSG, categorised as 'high risk'. Although some limited studies have linked the ingredient to conditions such as heart disease and Type 2 diabetes, the amount we normally consume in food has not been shown to cause harm, she said. Siu said she recently used the app on a package of seaweed sheets that contained just 10 calories per serving, and it ranked the product as 'too high' in calories. 'The scoring system is very questionable,' she said. Of the four experts we consulted, none agreed with Yuka's decision to include a food's organic classification in its scoring system. There's no proof of any nutritional benefit from eating organic foods relative to conventionally grown foods, said Melanie Hingle, a professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Arizona. What's the bottom line? The experts largely agreed that it could be beneficial to limit highly processed foods, to which the Yuka app typically gives low scores. Eating unprocessed, whole foods – such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes and whole grains – is associated with reduced risks of various chronic conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and some cancers. But you don't necessarily need an app to help you do that. And whole foods typically don't have bar codes you can scan anyway. 'Ideally, the app would include foods that don't come in packages,' Harnack said. 'If these types of foods are missing, it might be easy to overlook some of the best choices in the supermarket.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.