Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands.
Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'.
The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said.
He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday.
Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?'
Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.'
The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius.
As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms.
During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action.
Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?'
Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.'
Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?'
Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.'
SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not.
'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?'
Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years.
'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Michael Gove's ex-wife says she ‘definitely' had impact on politician's drug policies
Sarah Vine, the ex-wife of Lord Michael Gove, has revealed that the couple used to argue about the legalisation of drugs — a topic she believes she 'shifted' his opinion on. The life peer admitted in 2019 to using cocaine whilst working as a young journalist, something he says he 'deeply regrets'. Appearing on BBC Politics Live on Monday (23 June), Ms Vine was grilled on whether Lord Gove, whom she was married to from 2001 to 2022, changed any of his policies because of her. She replied: 'We had a lot of arguments about the legalisation of drugs, which I shifted him on a little bit. I take a very liberal view, I'm slightly more pragmatic, but he did listen to me on things.'
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Could Iran launch a cyber attack? What to know.
"Cyber attacks are pretty much standard fare in today's world of conflicts," said Anton Dahbura, executive director of the Johns Hopkins University Information Security Institute. "So cyber attacks are definitely on the menu of options." What retaliation from Iran could look like The cyber attack warnings come after President Donald Trump on June 21 ordered airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran officials have warned of retaliation after the airstrikes, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi saying his country would consider all possible responses. The first came on June 23, when Iran targeted a U.S. military base in Qatar. "We'll have to see" whether that response will be considered sufficient, according to Scott White, an associate professor and director of the cybersecurity program and cyber academy at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. If there is more to come, cyber attacks are one possible avenue for retaliation. Iran has proved willing to target countries with stronger cyber capabilities than itself, according to a 2024 threat assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The country has already launched cyber attacks against Israel, with U.S.-based cybersecurity firm finding a 700% spike in cyber attacks after Israel launched a missile strike targeting Tehran's nuclear program earlier this month. "Iran has a lot of people and organizations - both official organizations and proxy groups - that are dedicated to discovering cyber vulnerabilities and conducting cyber attacks," Dahbura said. It wouldn't be the first time the U.S. has faced such a threat. In 2016, seven Iranians with ties to the government and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were indicted for a series of cyber crimes conducted between 2011 and 2013, including attacks that prevented bank customers from logging into their accounts. One of the defendants also allegedly obtained operational information on a New York dam but was unable to control the system. Whether Iran is still in U.S. critical infrastructure systems is a harder question to answer, according to Jamil Jaffer, the founder and executive director of the National Security Institute at George Mason University and former associate counsel to President George W. Bush. "We don't have clear information from the U.S. government about where Iran is today on that, but the fact that they were trying earlier and were successfully able to get into some places is a sign that there are vulnerabilities they could exploit," he said. How big of a threat is this to Americans? The threat of disruptive cyber attacks has increased, but it's important to recognize that Iran has had "mixed results" with disruptive cyber attacks, according to a statement from John Hultquist, Google Threat Intelligence Group's chief analyst. "They frequently fabricate and exaggerate their effects in an effort to boost their psychological impact," Hultquist said. "We should be careful not to overestimate these incidents and inadvertently assist the actors." In 2019, during testimony before Congress, former Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats said Iran was attempting to deploy cyber attacks that would enable attacks against critical infrastructure in the U.S. and allied countries, and was capable of "localized, temporary disruptive effects." In other words, as of 2019, Iran didn't have the ability to pull off nationwide or large-scale, disruptive attacks, according to Jaffer. "But could they do something that has significant effects? It's certainly possible," he said. "So then they have to calculate, if we do this, what is the U.S. response going to look like?" White said Americans should be cognizant of potential attacks, and those who work in sectors like energy, health care or banking should be aware that their company may be targeted. The Food and Agriculture Information Sharing and Analysis Center and the IT Information Sharing and Analysis Center earlier this month encouraged companies to prepare for the likelihood of increased cyber attacks, noting that state-sponsored actors, hacktivist groups and cybercriminals have previously launched attacks against U.S. organizations during periods of heightened conflict. But experts told USA TODAY that everyday cyber criminals are likely the bigger concern for most Americans. "Iran is not as much of a threat as the guys that are trying to get money out of people's bank accounts," Dahbura said. "That's what people should be worried about, realistically." How can consumers protect themselves from a cyber attack? "Iran has always been a major threat to critical infrastructure in this country," said Scott Augenbaum, a retired FBI agent, cybercrime prevention trainer and author of The Secret to Cybersecurity. The U.S. government works closely with all sectors to keep them informed, Augenbaum told USA TODAY, but cybercriminals often also go after the end users, or consumers. All cyber threat actors are going to step up "because they love chaos and so many of us are in a state of worry right now," Augenbaum said. On Friday, 16 billion usernames and passwords were also found on the dark web, which gives cybercriminals more information, he said. Additionally, "hacktivists" who are aligned with one side or the other also often get very active during times of heightened conflict, said Vahid Behzadan, an associate professor of cybersecurity and networks, data and computer science and electrical computer engineering at the University of New Haven in West Haven, Connecticut. Those attacks can range from denial of service attacks to targeted phishing attacks, Behzadan said. While individuals may think they are just going about their lives, Behzadan said, anyone can be targeted. "Your device on its own can be exploited or leveraged" in an attack, he said. Worries grow: Gen Z, Iran and the mass panic happening on TikTok While there may be worries that a cyber attack could affect access to banks or financial institutions, Behzadan said there are often protections in place should a bank account be compromised. Augenbaum said all consumers should make sure they are digitally protected. Here are five things to protect yourself: Freeze your credit. With so many leaked usernames and passwords on the dark web, Augenbaum said people should freeze their credit with all three credit bureau agencies. A credit freeze prevents new credit from being opened unless the credit freeze is lifted or thawed. Be careful of fake emails or texts. "You're not going to get an email from an Iranian threat actor saying 'click on this link,' " said Augenbaum. "It might look like it's coming from Social Security. It might look like it's coming from the IRS. It might look like it's coming from your bank or credit card and they want you to click on a link that could infect your computer with malware and steal usernames and passwords." Be wary of telephone calls that appear to be from an authority figure. Often, the cyber criminal will try to tell you that you've done something wrong and will be arrested. Make sure the real number for your bank or financial institution is in your phone and if you see any suspicious activity or get an unsolicited email, text or call, phone the number you have. Be vigilant with your social media accounts. Hackers may try to take over your social media accounts or get you to click on malicious links. Use a password manager program. Don't use the same password for multiple accounts. Use a password manager, which can help you keep track of your passwords safely. User two-factor authentication. Asking for a second type of approval, like a text message or an authenticator app, offers more protection to accounts. Additionally, Behzadan suggests making sure your operating system software updates are updated, backing up important data in the event cloud storage sites are attacked and also making sure any smart devices on your home network have updated software.
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Iran's exiled 'crown prince' calls for supreme leader's exit
Pahlavi said during a press conference in Paris on June 23 that he was ready to help lead Iran "down a road of peace and democratic transition" and he claimed, without providing specific evidence, that he had seen credible reports that Khamenei and other senior Iranian regime officials were preparing to flee with their families as the United States has joined Israel's bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities. What is Iran's next move? World awaits response to U.S. bombing "The military is fractured," Pahlavi said. "The people are united. The foundations of this 46-year tyranny are shaking. This is our Berlin Wall moment. But like all moments of great change, it comes with great danger." Pahlavi added he had a "direct message" for Khamenei: "Step down, and if you do, you will receive a fair trial and due process of law." He said he was setting up a new "secure platform" for dissidents and internal opponents of the regime to coordinate their efforts to put the country on the path of a "free and democratic" future. Khamenei's office could not be reached for comment. It was not also clear whether Pahlavi had specific crimes he wanted to see Iran's supreme leader stand trial for or if it was a generalized comment about Iran's leadership. Still, while Pahlavi has plenty of admirers in the Iranian diaspora who support a return to the monarchy, it is uncertain how popular he is inside the country. Iran: 11 facts about the country following US strikes on three of its nuclear sites And almost everything he said in Paris he has said variations of for several decades. In fact, most Iranians are not old enough to remember life before the 1979 revolution. Those that do look back eitherwith nostalgia for the pre-revolutionary era, or recall deep inequality and oppression. Pahlavi senior was a U.S.-backed dictator who used secret police and torture on his opponents. He died of cancer in Egypt in 1980. According to his official biography, published in 1963, Khamenei himself was tortured by the shah's henchmen at age 24 when he served the first of many prison terms for political activities. Iran's opposition beyond 'crown prince' Apart from Pahlavi's monarchists, the other main opposition group outside Iran is the People's Mujahideen Organization, also known as the MEK. The MEK was founded in the 1970s, led a bloody guerrilla campaign against the shah, but lost a power struggle with Iran's Islamists after the shah was toppled. Mini-skirts and hijabs: After a rights crackdown, a new look at Iran, through its movies Many Iranians have not forgiven the MEK for siding with Iraq during Iran's war with that country from 1980-88. Human rights groups and even a U.S. government research document from 2012 have accused the MEK, which now has its headquarters in Albania, of abuses and displaying cult-like behavior. This behavior, which the MEK vigorously denies and its senior leadership told USA TODAY emanates from a vicious "disinformation campaign" by Iran's clerical rulers, ranges from torture and forced celibacy to holding members against their will. The MEK are the main force behind the so-called National Council of Resistance of Iran, which like Pahlavi has cultivated close ties with some Western politicians and operators including Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York and lawyer for Donald Trump. Many have reportedly been paid large sums to make speeches at MEK events. Giuliani made an appearance at one such MEK rally in Poland in 2019. At a Paris forum on June 20, the council's leader Maryam Rajavi reiterated her opposition to any return of the monarchy, saying "neither the shah nor the mullahs." Rudy Giuliani's side project: bashing Iran, in Poland Within Iran, opposition groups are also fragmented and have coalesced around specific issues. Iranian demonstrators in 2009 flooded the streets over what they saw as a stolen presidential election. In 2017, running street protests focused on falling living standards. In 2022, it was women's rights that were the trigger. Iran's mostly Sunni Muslim Kurdish and Baluch minorities have also chafed against rule from the Persian-speaking, Shi'ite government in Tehran. These groups regularly organize protests in western Iran, where they form a majority. Many women in Iran???????? grudgingly accept strict rules that dictate how they must live. Many also risk imprisonment and take off their head scarves in a cat-and-mouse game with the authorities. My report from Iran Full series: — Kim Hjelmgaard (@khjelmgaard) August 31, 2018 Since the start of Israel's air war on Iran, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has used a string of media appearances to endorse the idea of regime change in Iran. Trump, too, has speculated on the idea. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump said in a social media post June 23. (White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later clarified that Trump, in his post, was not saying the U.S. would help change Iran's regime militarily, but encouraging the Iranian people to change their regime by themselves.) Gen Z, Iran, misinformation: the mass panic happening on TikTok Still, some Iranian activists involved in previous bouts of protest inside Iran say they are unwilling to help unleash mass unrest, even against a system they hate, with their nation under attack by the U.S. and Israel. One of them even made her feelings clear from an Iranian prison. "Do not destroy my city," Narges Mohammadi, Iran's most prominent rights activist and a Nobel Peace Prize winner, said in a social media post on June 17 as Israel called on Tehran's residents to evacuate parts of Iran's capital. "End this war." Contributing: Bart Jensen, Reuters
