logo
Man's 11-day crime spree targets police by spitting and threatening to kill staff

Man's 11-day crime spree targets police by spitting and threatening to kill staff

RNZ News09-05-2025

By Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter of
Photo:
123RF
A man with mental health issues exacerbated by a meth addiction carried out an 11-day crime spree that included threatening to kill a police station staff member and his family, spitting in a police officer's face, and frightening patients in a hospital waiting room.
Robert Paapu Te Haeata Andrews claimed his offending was linked to his poor mental health.
But Judge Tony Snell said in sentencing him in the Nelson District Court on Thursday that his use of methamphetamine made his issues worse and that the courts were running out of patience.
"You were quick to refer to mental health issues and you can use that as a shield to lower punishment, but you have reached a time when that's no longer effective.
"The protection of the community is paramount," Judge Snell said.
Andrews, 29, was sentenced to three months of home detention on charges he admitted earlier of threatening to kill, assaulting police, intentional damage and assault.
On the morning of Monday, October 20 last year, Andrews was at the Nelson Hospital emergency department, waiting to see a doctor.
He became frustrated and aggressive at the wait time, threw a pen at staff and started kicking the doors.
Security asked him to leave and locked the door behind him, but Andrews returned and smashed the security door by kicking and punching it.
Judge Snell said a statement from the hospital's security manager said the incident placed patients at significant risk, some of whom were children who were left shaken and afraid.
"It created fear among patients, who were people already in distress, seeking treatment," he said.
Police arrived and arrested Andrews, but a few hours later, while at premises that accommodate people in need, he started playing music "very loud" and became aggressive when asked to turn it down.
Andrews then went on a rampage, smashing items at the property before being told to leave and that the police were being called.
It angered Andrews further, who then chased someone, kicked him and tried to punch him.
The victim ran inside and locked the door while Andrew left on a bike. He returned minutes later and threw a rock through a glass door, which he then unlocked and entered the premises and again began throwing items around.
He was arrested in central Nelson and told police he'd "lost it" after waiting at hospital for eight hours, but he wasn't going to hurt anyone.
A week later, while Andrews was being moved to another cell at the Nelson Police Station after shoving a T-shirt down the toilet and flooding his own cell, he said he would "punch any staff member who tried to move him".
Less than an hour later, as a staff member went to check Andrews, he threatened to kill the staff member and his family.
"I'll find you when I get bail tomorrow. I'll track you down and find you. I will kill you and then I'll kill your wife and then I'll kill your kids," the police summary of facts said.
"I will kill all your family, I'm going to find you and kill you."
Andrews then shouted: "Do you know who I am? I'm a Killer Bee - I'm a gang member. We know where you pigs live. I'll pay someone who'll track you down, find your address and I will kill you."
About three minutes later, Andrews pressed his cell intercom and told the staff member, who recorded it on his cellphone, that he was "Robert Andrews, the great Mother F***er", in another tirade of threats.
He later said he didn't mean any of it, and that it was "fake" and "just acting".
"It may look like I'm going to do it, but I'm not going to do it," he said.
Judge Snell said the threat was made with gang overtones, family members were threatened and that he would get others to do it, which made it more serious.
The next evening, after Andrews had been released, he was drinking at a local hotel when he got angry at another patron and smashed a glass bottle on a table, but it didn't break so he used the bottle to smash a window.
Police arrived and arrested him.
While in custody on other matters, and while being moved from his court cell to a vehicle outside, Andrews started abusing police staff.
When the door of the vehicle was opened, he spat into the face of a police officer, hitting him in the eyes and the mouth with his spit, while threatening to "bash them all".
Judge Snell said the officer required health checks to ensure he had not contracted any infectious disease, which was an "unacceptable situation".
Andrews' sentence included six months of post-detention conditions and an order that he pay reparation totalling $1800 for the damage caused across three premises.
"It's fair that you pay that off. You should put people right for the harm caused," Judge Snell said.
*
This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former rogue cop John Dewar jailed for company thefts
Former rogue cop John Dewar jailed for company thefts

RNZ News

time41 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Former rogue cop John Dewar jailed for company thefts

By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Former Rotorua top cop John Dewar in the Hamilton District Court today when he was jailed for 26 months. Photo: Photo / Open Justice Former rogue cop John Dewar has been sent back to prison after a jury found him guilty of stealing $113,000 from a finance company he was the boss of. It's been 18 years since Dewar was last jailed and that was for attempting to cover up rape allegations laid against cop colleagues Clint Rickards, Bob Schollum and Brad Shipton. The trio was eventually cleared of raping Louise Nicholas, but Schollum and Shipton were convicted for raping a 20-year-old, in Mt Maunganui in 1989. Dewar - a top cop in Rotorua when he left in 1999 - was jailed for four-and-a-half years, reduced from an initial six years - for the attempted cover-up. Justice Rodney Hansen found at the time that he would suffer undue hardship as a former high-ranking policeman. On Monday, Dewar was back before Judge Noel Cocurullo in the Hamilton District Court for sentencing on three charges of theft by a person in a special relationship and three charges of obtaining by deception from a finance company he helped set up in 2015. Dewar was the brains, while his fellow shareholders provided the financial backing of the company. The name of the company and its directors are permanently suppressed. A jury spent eight days hearing evidence last month relating to Dewar's offending between 2015 and 2019 when he stole about $113,000 to help pay off a personal loan, buy weed killer, a spray unit, a toastie machine maker, and Hush Puppies shoes. Part of his defence was that he was never told not to act in the way he did. But the jury didn't buy it and instead found him guilty. Crown solicitor Jacinda Hamilton said Dewar had "blatantly abused a position of trust and confidence by engaging in calculated and dishonest conduct that caused significant loss to a company with whom he was in a management position". Dewar had significant commercial experience but had "deliberately ignored his obligations of trust and confidence to the other directors and did so largely for his own financial gain". "Mr Dewar is clearly a competent and capable man ... but here he acted in what can only be described as a calculated way. "He breached the significant trust imposed on him." Hamilton said it was a "classic illustration of the old adage, a leopard doesn't change its spots". "This man cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of those he is entrusted to act for. "And perhaps worse, he maintains a firm belief that he is entitled to act as he has. "It is my submission, there is a level of arrogance and entitlement in all of that." She said the Crown's estimated loss of $150,000 was conservative, as at trial, company directors had claimed it was more than $220,000. Hamilton said there were no mitigating features of Dewar's offending despite his relinquishing his shareholding in the company, which had since been sold. She called for him to be jailed. Dewar defended himself at trial, but had lawyer Louis Wilkins at his side offering advice when needed. Yesterday, Wilkins did all the talking for Dewar and tried his best to keep him out of prison. He sought a lower starting point of 30 months' prison, then argued there were minimal aggravating features present in Dewar's offending, namely sophistication and the amount stolen. "Some of the offending in this case is of such a low level, namely, the purchase of household items and gardening supplies and the like. "It's not especially sophisticated. Cashing cheques is not a sophisticated enterprise." Wilkins said the thefts involved a "fairly low-grade series of transactions". "Degree of trust is an aspect, but the attempts at concealment were either non-existent or very minor. "It appears that the moment any investigation began, it unravelled things fairly quickly." Wilkins urged the judge to hand down a home detention sentence, citing Dewar's myriad of health issues. As for his previous conviction, that stemmed from offending "a lifetime ago," he urged the judge not to take that into consideration. However, Hamilton took umbrage with that comment and reminded Judge Cocurullo that Dewar was jailed in 2007, and about eight years later, he began reoffending. Judge Cocurullo agreed that Dewar enjoyed a high level of trust and autonomy and that he brought the skillset to allow the company to operate. At trial, Dewar claimed he'd been made a scapegoat, and told the jury that while he was "clumsy" and "chaotic" at his book-keeping, he wasn't a criminal. "This may well be speculative ... but it seemed to me that your contention of being clumsy, disorganised and a little chaotic, flew in the face of the quite careful way you organised your approach in the defence of yourself," the judge told him today. "I suspect that was there for the jury to see, notwithstanding the fact that on a significant number of occasions there were rulings of mine to keep the trial on track." The judge noted a sense of sadness from several of the victims who felt "somewhat betrayed" by his actions. "That there had been a solid friendship in many respects, they had been duped by your conduct." Judge Cocurullo took a starting point of three years' imprisonment and agreed to issue an uplift for his previous conviction. He then allowed a 15 percent discount for offering up his shareholding as reparation, and a further 12 percent for medical issues before coming to an end jail term of 26 months. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

Elderly man fears police are 'framing him' over West Coast cold case killing
Elderly man fears police are 'framing him' over West Coast cold case killing

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Elderly man fears police are 'framing him' over West Coast cold case killing

The body of David Robinson, 25, was found on a remote West Coast beach in December 1998. Photo: Supplied An elderly man says he is being treated as the prime suspect in the decades-old cold case killing of David Robinson. The body of Robinson, 25, was found on a remote West Coast beach near the small town of Ross on 29 December 1998. Local pensioner Mark Walsh, 84, told RNZ he fears police are "trying to frame me for a murder I didn't have anything to do with". He says police have got a statement from him, carried out a forensic search of an old school hall beside his home and seized his .22 calibre rifles. He says he's "completely innocent," and will not be engaging with police any further. Walsh said there was "no doubt" police thought he was responsible for Robinson's death. "We're old age pensioners who aren't breaking any laws, and never have. We just mind our own business up until now." Walsh said he was "absolutely worried sick" over the ordeal. "I'm 84 years old. I couldn't sleep at night for weeks after what they've done to me, and nor could my wife. It's upset both of us terribly." He said he now had nothing further to say to police. Police believe Robinson was shot with a .22 calibre firearm about 10 days before his body was found. In February, police announced they had reopened the decades-old investigation into Robinson's death . This included speaking to people in the Kakapotahi area. The remaining couple still living in the area from 1998 are Mark Walsh and his wife Jill. Speaking with RNZ, Walsh said detectives spoke with the couple when the case reopened, and then returned a few weeks later asking if they could make a statement. "I thought, well that's funny. That's usually a person who's a suspect who makes a statement, but anyway Jill and I had nothing to hide, so we went ahead and made statements." Following the statements, Walsh's brother visited the couple from the North Island. While he was there they decided they would get rid of some belongings from inside an old school house bordering his property that a neighbour was going to pull down. "We were starting to clear the carpet out, and I was burning what I could of it and one of the other neighbours wanted the floorboards he was taking, he was down there removing them," he said. While they were clearing out the building, police turned up with a forensics team. "[They said] Oh no, no. Stop, stop. We want to do forensic tests on that'." Walsh said if police had called him in advance and told them they wanted to test inside the building, he would not have started clearing it out. "They weren't very happy about what had happened... but it was their fault. They could have told us, instead of storming in," Walsh said. A few weeks later, about five police officers "stormed" Walsh's house and went through all the couple's belongings. "They said 'we want your .22 rifles'. So I let them have them, and away they went." Walsh said that after the search, he received a call from Greymouth police asking him to visit the station for a video recording. "I said 'no, I'm not talking to you about anything anymore, ever it's over'. That didn't impress them one little bit." Walsh said he was "completely innocent". "I've never even seen that bloke that got murdered. How could I kill him if I've never seen him? He was down on the beach, and we're up here. If he had been walking around here... he would've stick [sic] out like balls on a bulldog. We never saw him." He said two women had told police they heard a "bang go off" while they were at a meeting near his property at the time Robinson was murdered. He said the women "wouldn't know what they had for breakfast yesterday", and questioned how they would be able to recall something from 26 years ago. "It's pointless saying I didn't do it, because that's the last thing they're going to believe, isn't it?" he said. "Every criminal says that whether they've done it or not, so it's a stupid thing to say." Asked if it may be a bad look for him to not engage with police any further, he said he believed anything he did or did not say was "going to look bad". "They're trying to make a case against me. It wouldn't make any difference whether I talked to them or not. They tried to build a case against me, and all not talking to them is going to do is slow them down," he said. "I tried to help them as much as I could. And look what happened. They shit on me for it." Asked if there was any possibility that something might have happened that he could not recall, Walsh replied: "After what's been happening I've gone over the whole thing in my mind, and I have had a few ideas, but I just can't repeat them." Pressed further he said: "I'm not going to say anymore about it. "I've told the police everything that I know." He said his only crime he had committed "is that I still live here". "I haven't done anything. I've had nothing to do with it. The only thing I've had to do was talking to the police, and I made a big mistake doing that." He had a message for police. "Start looking for some real criminals and stop interfering with ordinary people who are minding their own business." In response to Walsh's comments, a police spokesperson said as the investigation into this matter was ongoing, police were unable to comment further. Detective Inspector Geoff Baber earlier said the reopening of the investigation had resulted in new leads, including a new sighting. A witness had told police they had seen Robinson on a street corner at the northern end of Bold Head Road near Kakapotahi, the day before he died. That person also reported seeing Robinson in the passenger seat of a green four-wheel drive around the same time. He said the sighting occurred just before a gunshot was reported to have been heard by several people in the Kakapotahi settlement, in mid-December. "Nobody has been able to tell us who fired that shot and what the shot was fired for, so the timing of it is significant for us and then obviously the way and manner in which David was killed just adds to the puzzle, which unfortunately there are still pieces missing." Baber said the investigation had already been progressed further than it had previously. Robinson's mother was being kept up to date with the investigation, and was involved in the process. "David lived an itinerant lifestyle and didn't have a lot of contact with family... but they still want to have answers, just as much as we do and talking to the community it is quite clear they still want the answers too." He was confident the case could be solved. "There are people who know what happened, they are either involved with the killing or have heard some things... and I would very much like those people to come forward and talk to police and let us know what happened. "It is very important for the community as a whole, it's a big question mark over that part of Westland and we'd like to shut the book on it if we can." Since the investigation was reopened police had received a number of firearms from individuals who owned them in the Kakapotahi area at the time. They were now conducting forensic examinations on these firearms to rule out those not used in his murder. Anybody who may have information that could help the police investigation has been asked to email them through the cold case form on the police website, or call 105 and reference the case number 231129/2221. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Government warned corruption and 'insider threats' increasing in New Zealand
Government warned corruption and 'insider threats' increasing in New Zealand

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Government warned corruption and 'insider threats' increasing in New Zealand

Associate Minister of Police Casey Costello. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government has been warned that corruption and "insider threats" are increasing in New Zealand, despite the country's longstanding reputation as a country largely free of it. An advisory group says the country is poorly prepared to tackle the increasing threat and recommends developing a national anti-corruption strategy and modernising the Crimes Act, which the Minister responsible says is key. The Ministerial Advisory Group on transnational and organised crime was set up in February to provide independent advice and recommendations to improve the cross-government response to what Associate Minister of Police Casey Costello described as " an increasing threat ." Previous reports have said New Zealand was "losing the fight" against organised crime, and specified a need for police to have greater financial powers to fight it . The third report has stated New Zealand's "lucrative market" and established crime networks have made the country "more susceptible than ever" to corruption and insider threats. It also pointed to the "deteriorating situation in the Pacific" as making the region more vulnerable. It defined corruption as the "abuse of access or authority to advance the objectices of organised crime". "It is a critical enabler of organised crime, particularly at national borders. It grants criminal networks access to protection, sensitive information, and operational impunity. "This is a real and increasing threat," the report said. The group was told by enforcement agencies about "trusted insiders" at ports and airports helping to retrieve concealed shipments of illicit drugs before customs inspections. "That information is consistent with an unpublished global report which estimates that 70 percent of maritime seizures worldwide involved links to trusted insiders." It raised a specific concern in the Pacific where exposure is increased due to expansive maritime borders, strategic trade corridors and growing cross-border flows of goods and people. A brick of cocaine seized by Customs last week in the Port of Tauranga. Photo: Supplied / Customs "When individuals in border security, customs, or immigration are compromised, criminal groups can exploit these weak points to smuggle drugs, weapons, other illicit goods, and people with minimal detection. "Bribery, coercion, and cronyism can transform ports, airports, and checkpoints into open channels." If corruption was left unchecked, the report warned it could erode the integrity of New Zealand's institutions and undermine its collective security. "We are already seeing increasing pressure on Pacific nations which have limited capacity to detect, investigate and prosecute organised crime threats. "The financial incentives offered by organised crime groups can be tempting - especially for those working in jobs with useful access, but low pay, in New Zealand and within the Pacific." The advisory group reports to Costello who told RNZ she was not surprised by the contents of the report, except to learn that New Zealand was the only Five Eyes member who did not have an anti-corruption strategy. She did however believe New Zealanders might be shocked to learn corruption was getting worse, "we've kind of considered ourselves as a little bit of a haven". The report specified New Zealand's "reputation as a country largely free from corruption has long been a source of national pride and international credibility". But also pointed this had led to a "degree of inertia," referencing Julie Haggie, chief executive of Transparency International NZ, who said in the report "New Zealand's response to increasing corruption pressures over several years has been lacklustre and complacent". A corporate team during Transparency International Papua New Guinea's 2018 Sir Anthony Siaguru Walk Against Corruption. Photo: TIPNG "New Zealand is poorly prepared to deter and tackle the increasing threat of corruption, but that is not to say nothing is being done," said the report. Costello said the report was not suggesting organisations were corrupt, but the ability for organised crime to target individuals was there. "That's where we see that familial or cultural pressures, that ability to have control over individuals, and that's not just in the drug world." She said New Zealand was not out of control, but the country needed to shift the way it was doing things, strengthen legislation and put clear strategies in place. Costello believed bringing the Crimes Act up to date to deal with corruption was one of the key recommendations. She said work being done at the moment was bringing agencies together to have consistency around sharing information. Another recommendation was to have a centralised agency that would have oversight across all agencies. "Whether that's in the public service commission, or whether it's in police or SFO [Serious Fraud Office] or a new agency, it's having that one oversight so that we work more cooperatively." In regards to the Pacific, she said it was important New Zealand supported its economic growth and viability. "When people are poor, then the amount of money you need to corrupt someone is relatively low. "Leaning in more to support those economies to help them not just gain knowledge, but actually keep these systems in place. "How do they optimise their control of their border so they're collecting excise, that they're optimising the revenue they can get from legitimate business, as well as ensuring that they aren't corrupted." She said the reports were about making New Zealanders more aware about organised crime and an appreciation of the challenges that it presents. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store