logo
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: My round? Sorry if I sound mean, but with beer at £5 a pint I fear it may now be every man for himself

JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: My round? Sorry if I sound mean, but with beer at £5 a pint I fear it may now be every man for himself

Daily Mail​6 days ago

Anyone conversant with pub culture will know the kind. This breed of drinker knows who they are too – shameless freeloaders. Some of them even admit as much with a chuckle.
They are Tam, perched on his stool at The Clansman in the Scottish sitcom Still Game – ever thirsty, ever eyeing opportunities for others to finance the quenching.
I've known many Tams and, on occasion, have become more fixated than I should in the course of an evening down the boozer on their modus operandi.
I can't let it go. How can they do this to their friends? Why so sleekit? Where is their sense of honour?
I am talking about the ones who disappear to the loo when they sense the next round of drinks is looming and return, minutes later, to find their next pint waiting for them. 'Oh, grand. Cheers everyone.'
The ones who quaff away for hours at their companions' expense and then, as expectant eyes turn to them, suddenly remember there's somewhere they have to be.
'Later, chaps. First round's on me next time.'
I've seen them finally cornered and marvelled at their gall as they ask if anyone can spot them 20 quid to get the next round in.
We have all met a character like Tam from sitcom Still Game, who constantly tries to avoid paying for a drink
I've watched that twenty cross the table – sometimes it has even come from my wallet – to land in the pub leech's paw, and I've known in that second the donor will never see it again.
The cardinal rule of my nights spent in licensed establishments was never to be that guy. Spend more than you planned if need be. Just avoid being thought of as him.
Drink with integrity. Take the hit on a round that wasn't strictly yours to get stung for rather than allow suspicions to ferment that you are not a team player.
I was aware, of course, that this plays straight into the freeloaders' hands. They stick close to people who don't want to be like them.
This certainly, was the game as I understood it two or three decades ago when my visits to pubs were more frequent and my staying power was at its peak.
Alas, today I am struggling with the rules. Do I even want to be a team player?
The average price for a pint of beer, we learn this week, has passed the £5 mark. And that's the cheap stuff. If your mates are on Peronis or Morettis or BrewDog's Punk IPA – as those I meet in pubs invariably seem to be – we are talking upwards of £6.
That £20 note was good for six drinks or more back when I was getting in the rounds. Today it will score you three Punk IPAs and you may as well put the few pennies change in the charity box, please, barman.
In the circumstances, are rounds even still a thing? Shouldn't it be every man for themselves? What is the modern etiquette now that the sums are getting serious?
I was wondering this even as I walked in the door of a Glasgow city centre watering hole a few weeks ago. Lots of people I knew were going to be there. There was an excellent chance – because I knew them to be kind-hearted souls – that someone would offer to buy me a drink within seconds.
What is the right answer? In truth, the situation requires more investigation, but pub environments, I find, are not conducive to the over-thinking of responses to simple questions like 'do you want a drink?'
But let us, in our sobriety, over-think it here. Now, you have very generously extended to me the offer of a drink. Let me tell you my problem with that.
I've only just arrived. For all I know, you are already in a round with six or seven people. If I accept your offer then I am – according to the etiquette with which I am familiar but, admittedly, may be out of date now – subsumed into this round, which entails certain obligations on my part.
In days gone by, this would not have worried me because I was either capable of drinking six or seven pints or past caring by pint four or five.
But you will accept that times have changed. You see before you today the enfeebled husk of the drinker I once was. Let me be brutally frank: I'm out of here after pint two or three.
I hope you are beginning to see my difficulty. Suppose for a moment I were to say yes. Half an hour from now, I would be dutybound to repay your kindness with my own offer of the refreshment of your choice from the bar.
But what if Tom, Dick, Harry, John, Paul, George and Ringo have empty glasses too? In the current climate, Peronis costing what they do, my tolerance for them being what is, I would find my presumed obligation to them, as fellow members of 'the round', vexatious.
And here, friend, is the other dimension to my quandary. Long ago, when I thought I knew my way around drinking culture, I made a promise to myself that I would never be that guy – the one that I am in grave danger of becoming if I accept your hospitality, keep my head down for round two and leg it as soon as that glass is drained.
So, you see, I am caught on the horns of a moral and financial dilemma. You ask me if I want a drink. I say that is far too complicated a question for a guy who has just walked in the door.
If I know anything about pubs, it is that the drinker you assaulted with this stream of verbiage would have started talking to somebody else – anybody else – five minutes ago.
So, actually, what I said was: 'No thanks, you're fine, mate. I'll get my own. I'm only staying for a couple.'
But might the dawn of the £5 and £6 pint be an appropriate juncture to give the more ponderous answer a fair hearing? Is the eyewatering expense of getting a round in – coupled with the collapse of my generation's ability to last the pace – forcing us to walk a pub protocol tightrope?
I cannot ever be Tam the sponger from Still Game and. Nor, I find, can I still be the willing dupe team player who says 'hey, who's counting anyway?' It turns out I am counting.
It was, then, with an every-man-for-himself bearing that I approached the bar and sorted myself out with a £6 Moretti. Did I feel good about it? Nope.
Did it seem churlish, petty, anti-social, an affront to the rich social culture, the sense of camaraderie that the pub round once engendered for me? Yup.
But, like I say, I no longer know how the game is played. And drink is too expensive – and I can hold too little of it – for occasional visitors like me to leave the pub with honour.
I skulked away after three or four, wondering if I should write to a problem page.
How does one negotiate a night in the pub? As the freeloader? The patsy? The standoffish loner? None of them work for me.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beauty fans race to Primark as they drop £4 dupe of popular £26 dry shampoo – and it's completely aerosol free
Beauty fans race to Primark as they drop £4 dupe of popular £26 dry shampoo – and it's completely aerosol free

The Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Beauty fans race to Primark as they drop £4 dupe of popular £26 dry shampoo – and it's completely aerosol free

HAIR SHARE Shoppers are hoping that the Primark one is just as good as its pricier counterpart PRIMARK is known for its epic beauty dupes. And it seems the store has done it again with a new arrival - a completely aerosol free dry shampoo. 4 A look at the new product was shared on the Inverness Beauty TikTok page, which posts the latest drops in the Primark beauty and hair departments. In the video, they showed the dry shampoo, which contains hyaluronic acid and "absorbs oils, sweat and volumises hair". It also costs £4 for 54g, compared to £26 for 56g of Aveda's much-loved Shampowder dry shampoo. "I hope it's like the Aveda one!!!" one person wrote in the comments section of the TikTok video. "Oooo a trip to Primark for me!" another added. "If you see this, I need to try it!" a third insisted, tagging a friend. Aveda's Shampowder shampoo has long been a favourite among beauty fans - particularly for the fact that it doesn't leave a white residue like its aerosol equivalents. "Perfect for absorbing excess oil, impurities and sweat with powerful plant powders, this dry shampoo powder instantly adds volume and texture to refresh style," Aveda say of the product on their website. And the reviews for the pricey product are overwhelmingly positive, with one person writing: "I have been using this product for a few weeks now, I wanted to test it on days where I really needed to rescue my hair! "I have dark brown hair and was worried at first that it comes out a white powder, but very pleased when I found it disappeared when it absorbed the oils. Primark adds brand new Sol De Janeiro dupes to its beauty aisles and they're perfect for keeping you smelling sweet on holiday too "I like that it isn't a spray but found the bottle a bit fiddly, took a little time to get used to." "Love this new dry shampoo format," another added. "It gives you good control over how much product to use vs an aggressive aerosol. "Please bring out a dark haired version!" "This is my new go-to dry shampoo!" a third commented. "I love the signature Aveda smell of the formula; it's gentle and pleasant. Top Primark summer buys IF you're looking for more Primark summer buys, then you've come to the right place. Shoppers have recently been raving about the new Miffy PJs from Primark. Others were desperate to nab the new leopard print nightwear. If animal print is your thing, you'll want to check out the new maxi skirts. The haltnerneck tops are perfect for summer. If you're on a budget, these trousers are identical to a pair from Zara, but without the hefty price tag. There's brilliant travel essentials for less than £10. And if you plan on heading to the beach, you won't want to miss these crochet bags. "The bottle and application method is so easy to use, it evenly distributes the product and works so well to absorb the excess oil and gives me volume to extend my wash day out by a day." Aveda isn't the only company to release an aerosol-free dry shampoo, however. Stacey Solomon's Rehab brand also has a powder-based formula, but it's still pricey at £24. Despite that, reviewers rave about the Essential Dry Shampoo, with some going as far to call it "one of the best dry shampoos" they've ever used. 4

Spending Review: Shaping Scotland's priorities for years to come
Spending Review: Shaping Scotland's priorities for years to come

BBC News

time11 hours ago

  • BBC News

Spending Review: Shaping Scotland's priorities for years to come

Increased spending for Scotland on defence, computing and the development of carbon-capture technology have been promised in the chancellor's Spending Reeves has found £250m for the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine base on the Clyde, £750m to bring the most powerful supercomputer in the UK to Edinburgh, and funding for the Acorn Project in St Fergus. Acorn would take greenhouse gas emissions and store them under the North Sea, in a process known as carbon capture and storage (CCS).The news comes as Reeves announces the budgets for all UK government departments over the next few years. Getting the review right is a tricky balancing can see ways that public funds could be used more efficiently or even cut. Everyone has their top priority for spending what happens if there's a root and branch review, with every spending line scrutinised, new priorities set and given more funds and others squeezed or cut?We should find out later. But it may not be as radical a review as sometimes presented as too much is already committed by contract or by government manifesto to make really radical changes. What spending is being reviewed? The clue is in the name. This is not about taxation, and it's not about balancing the books. That's for the Budget, and one of them is expected in autumn, to cover review takes the spending totals already set by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and chooses how to allocate the day-to-day spending (also known as current or revenue spending) for the next three financial also plans capital spending for four years on projects with a lifespan beyond the year, such as includes the spending in Scotland by Whitehall departments, such as work and pensions and defence. It does not include funds spent by Holyrood. How tight will it be for day-to-day spending? We already know, at least roughly, the total numbers the chancellor has to allocate. The increase in day-to-day spending is an average 1.2% per year over the three years to funds have been front-loaded by the Labour government. In other words, most of the extra spending it gets from big tax increases on business and the wealthy are being used to lift spending in its first two years. Then it gets every department were to retain the same share (which would suggest the review effort has been wasted), it would get the average we already know the defence budget is getting a significant lift, to confront growing challenges and new types of warfare. We also know the NHS requires more than a standstill budget to meet rising demands on it. And the Westminster government has committed to increasing the amount of childcare it provides. That implies an estimated cut of 1.3% in real terms for other items of government and justice have taken the brunt of such cuts in the five spending reviews since they started 27 years ago, though not in the one-year spending review carried out last big question about such cuts is whether they mean a reduced level of provision, or a challenge to get at least the current level of public service out of less sector productivity has gone backwards since the pandemic. There's a need and a big challenge to reverse that and it may need some spending to help the process happen, with perhaps more use of technology to replace civil servants. What's available for the longer term? Capital spending looks in an easier position, not least because Rachel Reeves' spending constraints allow her to borrow for that. She aims to match day-to-day spending with tax revenue, so it should not be funded by recent days, we have seen announcements to fund capital projects for defence, transport in the north of England and a large nuclear power station in capture and storage projects, to trap greenhouse gases, include the Acorn Project in a promise to spend "an initial £250m" over three years on the Clyde submarine base, "supporting jobs, skills and growth across the west of Scotland".A lot of the allocations are being attached to the government's top priority of economic growth, with an emphasis on spreading funds around the UK. Some of this spending precedes the announcement of an industrial strategy, in which the UK government intends to give added backing to industries of strategic importance such as steel, or those with the most growth potential, so there's lots about science and why Spending Review day starts with a further preview of the review: Edinburgh University is to get £750m allocated to a new super-computer, which is billed as the most powerful in the UK, and among the most powerful in the world. It will be available for research into numerous projects such as personalised medicine, sustainable air travel or climate reinstates a project that was cancelled last summer by Rachel Reeves, because it had not been funded by the outgoing Conservative government. What decisions will directly affect Scotland? Much of the state pensions and welfare budget is distributed throughout the UK by the department for work and pensions. But that share has been falling as Holyrood takes on devolved to universal credit would be felt in Scotland. That includes changes to the two-child limit on state pension's triple lock of at least the rate of average pay increase, of price inflation or 2.5%, is being retained and that also covers there are cuts in civil service numbers, that could apply to those who work in Scotland for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, for HM Revenue and Customs and for the Department of Work and there is also a plan to push many more civil service jobs out of London, so there could be gains for Scotland from relocations. How will this affect Holyrood's budget? Many of the changes in day-to-day spending, or capital spending on transport for instance, directly affect other parts of the UK, and in some cases only formula for spending should then apply a share of that change to the block grant passed from the Treasury to Holyrood – whether an increased share or a proportionate the health service gets a boost, above the rate of increase in other departments, that will be a positive for Holyrood as well. But if justice takes a hit, a proportionate share of that will be passed on to Scottish will then be free to allocate the block grant as they wish, so they can pass on the health spending at the same rate as England, or apply that money to another recent years, more and more spending has gone into the new Holyrood welfare budget, so that £1.5bn is being spent each year on making welfare more generous than in the rest of the of that has been to mitigate decisions taken on welfare by the Westminster government. And there could be relatively good news for Holyrood from two decisions in the spending review which have already been the cut in pension-age Winter Fuel Allowance brings a share to Holyrood of the necessary funds to make that happen – somewhere around £125m. That eases the pressure on Shona Robison, Holyrood's finance secretary, as she decides how to use the resources she gets. And if Rachel Reeves follows through on the commitment to increase the level of state childcare support, that will also ease Holyrood's budget challenge, as it has already found funds to increase childcare. A share of that new-found money for England will be added to Holyrood's block grant, but need not be spent that Robison has put off decisions about her medium-term plans until she sees Rachel Reeves' spending review and the impact it has on Holyrood's day-to-day and capital Scottish finance secretary is due to update MSPs by the end of June on how she uses it, including a priority list of capital include high-profile road upgrades in the Highlands and Aberdeenshire, and the stalled programme for building NHS National Treatment faces competing demands to improve the buildings and IT in public services and, on the other hand, improving economic infrastructure such as roads and rail, with a more direct impact on economic also has the challenge of either cutting some public services or reforming them in such a way that they can be provided more spending review may be of major significance for public services for years to it may be replaced by annual budgets, as we've seen in the past, making different decisions depending on funds available and political announcement in the Commons later is only the start of the process of putting those funds to work.

Ministers stall plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort
Ministers stall plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort

BBC News

time15 hours ago

  • BBC News

Ministers stall plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort

The Scottish government has stalled plans for a controversial holiday park at Loch had previously been set to give permission for the development, overturning the national park authority which said it did not comply with environmental and nature conservation park operator Flamingo Land believed it would be given the go-ahead to build a £40m resort called Lomond Banks, featuring a waterpark, monorail, hotel and Scottish government's Minister for Public Finance, Ivan McKee, has now said he will recall the plans because "the development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park". This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store