Sen. Joni Ernst responds to backlash from her sarcastic comments on Medicaid
DES MOINES, IOWA — United States Senator Joni Ernst is responding to backlash from comments made about Medicaid cuts at a townhall in Parkersburg; and to concern about a video she made over the weekend.
Sen. Ernst made the comment of 'we are all going to die', when discussing with constituents last week cuts to Medicaid that are in the current budget bill.
Ernst then took to social media on Saturday, saying that she wanted to 'sincerely apologize'. Ernst added in the video posted to social media that she thought everyone understood that everyone will perish from the earth. At the end of the video Ernst states that she was really glad that she didn't have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy, pushing people to turn their faith to God.
On Monday a spokesperson with Sen. Ernst gave WHO 13 News the following statement:
'While Democrats fearmonger against strengthening the integrity of Medicaid, Senator Ernst is focused on improving the lives of all Iowans. There's only two certainties in life: death and taxes, and she's working to ease the burden of both by fighting to keep more of Iowans' hard-earned tax dollars in their own pockets and ensuring their benefits are protected from waste, fraud, and abuse.'
Spokesperson for Sen. Joni Ernst (R)
The Iowa GOP Chair responded to the criticism of both the comments and the video:
'Anyone who knows Joni — especially the folks who heard her answer tough questions for over an hour — knows Dems and the Main Stream Media are purposefully replacing her core message because it helps their fear-mongering. But the fact is, without Senator Ernst taking a strong stand to protect the integrity of programs like Medicaid, Iowans would be worse off.'
Iowa GOP Chairman Jeff Kaufmann
The bill sits in the U.S. Senate chamber, after the U.S. House passed through the budget. That bill includes the cuts to Medicaid that are these comments are circling around.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
Sen. Ron Johnson rips into 'immoral' GOP spending bill: 'I can't accept it'
Republican Sen. Ron Johnson on Wednesday blasted President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" as "immoral" and "grotesque," and reiterated that he will vote against it unless his GOP colleagues make major changes. "This is immoral, what us old farts doing to our young people," Johnson said on CNBC's "Squawk Box" after sounding alarms that the massive tax-and-spending-cut bill would add trillions of dollars to national deficits. "This is grotesque, what we're doing," Johnson said. "We need to own up to that. This is our moment." "I can't accept the scenario, I can't accept it, so I won't vote for it, unless we are serious about fixing it," he continued. Johnson has been among the Senate's loudest GOP critics of the budget bill that narrowly passed the House last month. Johnson and other fiscal hawks have taken aim over its impact on the nation's debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated later Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Johnson has proposed splitting the bill into two parts, though Trump insists on passing his agenda in a single package. "The president and Senate leadership has to understand that we're serious now," Johnson said of himself and the handful of other GOP senators whose opposition to the bill could imperil its chances. "They all say, 'Oh, we can pressure these guys.' No, you can't." Republicans hold a narrow 53-47 majority in the Senate, so they can only afford to lose a handful of votes to get the bill passed in a party-line vote. "Let's discuss the numbers, and let's focus on our children and grandchildren, whose futures are being mortgaged, their prospects are being diminished by what we are doing to them," Johnson said. Johnson's comments came one day after Elon Musk ripped into the spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will lead to exploding deficits. The White House brushed aside Musk's comments. Johnson said that Musk's criticisms bolster the case against the bill. "He's in the inside, he showed ... President Trump how to do this, you know, contract by contract, line by line," Johnson said of Musk. "We have to do that." Johnson said that his campaign against the bill in its current form is not a "long shot," because he thinks there are "enough" Republican senators will will vote against the bill. "We want to see [Trump] succeed, but again, my loyalty is to our kids and grandkids," he said. "So there's enough of us who have that attitude that very respectfully we just have say, 'Mr. President, I'm sorry, 'one, big, beautiful bill' was not the best idea," he added.
13 minutes ago
Trump to shore up support among Senate GOP at White House meeting
Senate Republicans will try to chart a path forward for the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" during a series of meetings on Wednesday -- including one where the President Donald Trump will work to shore up support for the megabill that advances his legislative agenda Republican members of the powerful Senate Finance Committee will go to the White House to meet with Trump at 4 p.m. Wednesday, multiple White House and Hill sources confirm. The Finance Committee is responsible for writing the tax policy components of the bill, including the extension of the Trump 2017 tax cuts, a key priority for the package. The House-passed legislation also boosts spending for the military and border security -- while making some cuts to Medicaid, SNAP and other assistance programs. It could also add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, according to a new analysis out Wednesday from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The Senate Finance Committee's Republican members are expected to attend the meeting, including Majority Leader John Thune and GOP Whip John Barrasso, who are both on the panel. Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, who is at odds with the White House and is pushing for deeper cuts than those in the bill the House sent to them, is expected to be at the meeting as a member of the committee, too. Appearing on ABC News Live Wednesday, Johnson attacked the bill, saying it "doesn't meet the moment." Senate Republicans are separately expected to meet behind closed doors as a conference on Wednesday to discuss the parameters of the bill as a group. Thune has so far not made clear what his strategy will be for moving the package through the upper chamber. As things currently stand, Thune can only afford to lose three of his GOP members to pass the package, and right now, he has more members than that expressing serious doubts about the bill. Trump's meeting with the committee is an opportunity for the president to attempt to sway those senators who have concerns about the bill. Earlier this week, Trump worked the phones and took meetings with many of those senators including Republican Sens. Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, Rick Scott and Johnson. Trump also met with Thune to talk through moving the House-backed bill through the Senate as expeditiously as possible. Lawmakers aim to send a bill to Trump by the Fourth of July. "At the end of the day, failure is not an option," Thune said at a news conference Tuesday, adding that he thinks the conference can meet the timing goal. a post on X Tuesday. Musk even chastised those who supported the bill.
Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses Democratic committees' lawsuit over the Federal Election Commission's independence
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block President Donald Trump's administration from implementing an executive order that Democratic Party officials claim could undermine the independence of the Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali in Washington ruled late Tuesday that there's insufficient evidence that the Republican administration intends to apply a key portion of Trump's executive order to the FEC or its commissioners. 'This Court's doors are open to the parties if changed circumstances show concrete action or impact on the FEC's or its Commissioners' independence,' the judge wrote. The Democratic Party's three national political committees sued after Trump signed the executive order in February. The order was intended to increase his control of the entire executive branch, including over agencies such as the FEC, a six-person bipartisan board created by Congress to independently enforce campaign finance law. The Feb. 18 order said the officials at those agencies 'must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected President' and demanded that no executive branch employee advance a legal view that contradicts the president or the attorney general. Trump issued the order after he abruptly got rid of FEC Chair Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat who said her ouster did not follow legal protocols. The FEC is just one of several independent agencies Trump has sought to control and targeted with firings. The plaintiffs — the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — asked the judge to rule that a law insulating the FEC from partisan control is constitutional. They also asked for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Trump administration from applying part of the executive order to the FEC and its commissioners. 'Americans are legally guaranteed fair elections with impartial referees — not a system where Donald Trump can dictate campaign rules he wants from the White House,' the plaintiffs wrote in a statement. 'Democrats will use every tool at our disposal, including aggressively confronting Trump's illegal actions in the courts, to defend Americans' right to free and fair elections.' But government attorneys told the judge that the Trump administration has no plans to apply the executive order to the FEC. The judge said he can't conclude from the text of the executive order alone that Trump or Attorney General Pam Bondi are on the verge of taking such an 'extraordinary step.' The order doesn't single out the FEC and applies broadly to all executive branch employees, the judge concluded. 'The Court does not doubt that the committees would have cause for profound concern were the FEC's independence to be compromised,' he wrote. 'Given the FEC's central role in overseeing parties and campaigns, a compromise of its independence would pose an immense threat to our democratic elections, for all the reasons Congress established the FEC's independence in the first place.' The portion of the executive order challenged by the lawsuit has raised particular concern among campaign finance watchdogs, who call it a conflict of interest. Congress created the FEC in 1974 after the Watergate scandal with the goal of having it operate independently. 'This was not a hypothetical concern,' plaintiffs' attorney David Fox said during an April 9 hearing. 'And it's not a hypothetical concern today.' Justice Department attorney Jeremy Newman said the plaintiffs' concerns are based on mere speculation that the FEC may take a regulatory action that they oppose. 'There is no live controversy here,' Newman told the judge. 'The commission is conducting its business as it was two weeks ago, two months ago, two years ago,' FEC attorney James McGinley said during the hearing. Trevor Potter, a former Republican FEC commissioner and founder of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, said the FEC is responsible for enforcing the law against the president 'as both a candidate and as a holder of federal office.' 'It is crucial that the agency retain its independence from the White House, so it is able to hold the president — any president — and their political party accountable,' Potter said in a statement. ___ Swenson reported from New York.
