
GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy, who wavered over confirming RFK Jr., says he's 'lived up' to his promises on vaccines
Sen. Bill Cassidy helped clinch Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s bid to lead the Department of Health and Human Services months ago after securing commitments from Kennedy to, among other things, avoid undercutting public faith in vaccinations. Now, the Louisiana Republican says the secretary has 'lived up to' those promises — even as critics accuse Kennedy of trying to poison the well of faith in vaccines.
Ahead of Kennedy's Wednesday testimony in front of the Senate committee Cassidy chairs, the senator told NBC News that he has a 'good working relationship' with Kennedy. And asked whether the secretary has lived up to his commitment not to sow distrust in vaccines, Cassidy replied: 'All I'll say about the commitment is, so far, he's lived up to them.'
Later in the hearing, Kennedy, the former chair of an anti-vaccine group that has long spread unfounded claims about immunizations, sparred with Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., over vaccines. Murphy accused Kennedy of deciding to 'repeatedly undermine the [measles] vaccine with information that is contested by public health experts,' adding that 'if I were the chairman, [Cassidy], who believes in vaccines and voted for you because he believed what you said about supporting vaccines, my head would be exploding.'
'If I advised you to swim in a lake that I knew there to be alligators in, wouldn't you want me to tell you there were alligators in there?' Kennedy said in response to Murphy's criticisms.
The episode, and Murphy's repeated decision to invoke Kennedy's promises to Cassidy to argue he misled the committee about his stance on vaccines, highlights the tenuous truce Cassidy has carved out with Kennedy, particularly as the Louisiana senator faces the prospect of a primary challenge from his right flank in 2026. He has long been on tenuous political ground with Trump's MAGA movement, after voting to convict the president on impeachment charges following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
While Cassidy largely avoided the issue of vaccines and Kennedy's record during Wednesday's hearing, he did briefly step in "for the record" to note that Kennedy erred by saying that no vaccine besides the Covid shot had been tested against a placebo.
Cassidy, a medical doctor, publicly wavered over whether to support Kennedy's confirmation and spent much of Kennedy's confirmation hearing peppering him with questions about his record on vaccines. Upon announcing his support for Kennedy's nomination, Cassidy said Kennedy had made a series of promises to him, largely about protecting government work and public faith in vaccines.
Yet Kennedy has added to his record of vaccine-related controversies in his short tenure leading HHS. He falsely claimed during a CBS News interview last month that the measles vaccine's protection 'wanes very quickly' and that many vaccines on the market aren't 'safety tested' amid the recent outbreak of the virus. Those comments drew immediate rebukes from top public health officials.
HHS is embarking on a series of studies to investigate autism rates in children, a move that comes after Kennedy has spent much of his career questioning whether vaccines are to blame for the disorder, although decades of research have found no evidence of a link between vaccines and autism. It's unclear whether the study will look into those claims or not.
Meanwhile, widespread cuts across the federal government included more than $2 billion in cuts from grants to increase access to childhood vaccines for those who can't afford them.
Cassidy asked during Wednesday's hearing for assurances that various cuts across the federal government wouldn't hurt Americans and the nation's public health system.
He predicted that Kennedy would provide 'clarity' with his testimony, helping him 'gain the trust of the American people, putting their minds at ease.'
'People fear change even when it's from worse to better, but without a clearly defined plan or objective, people assume the worst. Much of the conversation about HHS's agenda has been set by anonymous sources in the media and individuals with a bias toward the president,' he said.
'Americans need direct reassurance from the president and from you, Mr. Secretary, that these reforms will make their lives easier, not harder. And that's why I've invited you: No one can make that case better than you,' Cassidy added. (Among the conditions Cassidy set forth when he said he'd vote to confirm Kennedy was that he would testify to Congress "on a quarterly basis, if requested.")
Vaccines weren't a major topic of conversation at the hearing until Murphy, the Connecticut Democrat, began to speak. He quickly accused Kennedy of not telling the truth to the committee and not following through on his promises to the Republican chairman, adding that Kennedy "constantly questioning the efficacy or safety of the vaccine results in less people getting the vaccine."
Kennedy replied by saying he promised the committee "radical transparency" and that he's "not going to tell people everything is safe and effective if I know that there's issues." Later, he answered a question from New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan by saying, "the best way to stop the spread of measles is vaccination."
Cassidy's support for Kennedy, which delivered the Trump administration a key early win as he assembled his Cabinet, comes as the Louisiana Republican is gearing up for a tough political fight and has faced criticism from the more conservative wing of the party.
State Treasurer John Fleming, who is running for Cassidy's seat in 2026, has criticized Cassidy for voting to convict Trump in the Senate following the House's 2021 move to impeach him. The Louisiana state GOP censured Cassidy for the vote at the time.
But Cassidy's political operation has signaled that it's gearing up for a tough race — it touted his first-quarter fundraising, which left him with a multimillion dollar cash-on-hand advantage over Fleming after the first quarter of 2025.
And his campaign released portions of an internal poll showing Cassidy well ahead of Fleming, although his favorability rating among likely Republican voters was below 50%.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
A new front opens in the immigration battle: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we have the latest on the fallout from a Democratic senator being forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference. Plus, Jonathan Allen explains how the GOP's megabill would provide a boost to President Donald Trump's deportation agenda. — Adam Wollner Padilla incident further escalates immigration showdown between Trump and Democrats Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., was forcibly removed from a news conference in Los Angeles after trying to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference related to immigration, Rebecca Shabad and Jacob Soboroff report. It marked the latest escalation in the battle between President Donald Trump and Democrats over the administration's deportation plans and the protests that have broken out in response. The incident: 'I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla said to Noem, which prompted several men to physically push him out of the room. Padilla's office shared a video of the incident with NBC News that shows the senator being taken into a hallway outside and pushed face forward onto the ground as officers with FBI-identifying vests told the senator to put his hands behind his back. The officers then handcuffed him. Speaking to reporters later Thursday, Padilla said he was receiving a briefing from military officials when he learned Noem was in the same building and decided to join her briefing. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, if this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' Padilla said. DHS responded on X, falsely claiming that Padilla 'interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself.' 'Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands,' DHS said, claiming that agents 'thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately. Secretary Noem met with Senator Padilla after and held a 15 minute meeting.' How Democrats responded: The incident provoked further outrage from Democrats. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., denounced the incident on the Senate floor. 'I just saw something that sickened my stomach — the manhandling of a United States senator. We need immediate answers to what the hell went on,' he said. Former Vice President Kamala Harris called the incident 'a shameful and stunning abuse of power.' How the GOP responded: Meanwhile, Republicans largely criticized Padilla. 'Padilla didn't want answers; he wanted attention,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said. 'Padilla embarrassed himself and his constituents with this immature, theater-kid stunt.' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called Padilla's actions 'wildly inappropriate,' saying they 'rise to the level of a censure.' But Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, called the episode 'very disturbing,' saying 'it looks like he is being manhandled and physically removed and it's hard to imagine a justification for that.' How the 'big, beautiful bill' would add fuel to Trump's deportation agenda Analysis by Jonathan Allen If you like the immigration showdown in Los Angeles, you're going to love the sweeping domestic policy bill pending before Congress. Though the measure would slash spending for many arms of the federal government, it would pour more than $150 billion into border security, interior immigration enforcement and deportations. That includes $75 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement alone. Drilling down, $8 billion is earmarked to hire 10,000 more ICE agents and support staff, and nearly $900 million more is tucked into the legislation to give bonuses to ICE recruits and agents who commit to remaining in their jobs for five years. The goal is about a 50% increase in the size of the agency. Trump allies expect that the money for ICE, which is conducting workplace raids like the ones at issue in Los Angeles, will enable the administration to ramp up its efforts to apprehend immigrants who are in the country illegally and try to follow through on the president's promise to deport people by the millions. 'If you want to do it at this scale — the scale required — you're going to have to have more people,' said Rachel Bovard, vice president for policy programs at the Conservative Partnership Institute, a nonprofit closely aligned with Trump's agenda. That's happening against the backdrop of the mess in L.A., where Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines in nesting-doll fashion to protect federal agents and property. The Guard is there to protect ICE from protesters — some of whom have been violent — and the Marines are there to protect the Guard. California officials have objected to the workplace raids and the president's decision to activate the Guard without the consent of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is suing to stop Trump. White House officials have threatened to arrest Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass if they break any laws in pushing back on the raids and military presence. The battle among politicians turned physical Thursday when Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., approached Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a news conference she was hosting in Los Angeles. Padilla was forcibly removed from the room, pushed to the ground and handcuffed by federal agents after he tried to ask Noem a question. There seems to be no end to the escalation. And while there's no way to predict the future, there may soon be enough money to ensure that it looks a lot like present-day L.A.


South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Mr Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Mr Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer when Representative Adam Smith asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Mr Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. Representative Mike Turner asked: 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' As Mr Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Mr Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Mr Hegseth responded. Time and again, officials pressed Mr Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a US ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the US, said on Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Mr Hegseth danced around the direct question from Mr Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Mr Smith said. Mr Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for US strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other US leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with representatives. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Mr Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed. That became a quick trap, as Mr Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Mr Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Mr Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Mr Moulton then asked Mr Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Mr Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president'.


Belfast Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Mr Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Mr Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer when Representative Adam Smith asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Mr Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. Representative Mike Turner asked: 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' As Mr Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Mr Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Mr Hegseth responded. Time and again, officials pressed Mr Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a US ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the US, said on Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Mr Hegseth danced around the direct question from Mr Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Mr Smith said. Mr Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for US strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other US leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with representatives. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Mr Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed. That became a quick trap, as Mr Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Mr Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Mr Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Mr Moulton then asked Mr Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Mr Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president'.