Farage has brought ‘racism and hatred' to Hamilton by-election, says Swinney
Nigel Farage has been accused of 'racism and hatred' by John Swinney in the last weekend of campaigning before polls open in the Hamilton by-election.
The Scottish First Minster hit out at the Reform UK leader, claiming he was a 'real threat' ahead of voting in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on Thursday.
Criticism has been levelled at Mr Farage's party after a Facebook ad claimed Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was prioritising Pakistani people over Scots and included a section of a speech in which he encouraged more people from south Asian backgrounds to enter politics.
Addressing activists – including a number of MSPs, former MPs and candidates for the 2026 Holyrood election – in Hamilton on Saturday, Mr Swinney contrasted Reform UK with former minister Christina McKelvie, whose death prompted the by-election.
'This is a by-election that none of us wanted to be fighting, because it meant that we'd lost somebody we loved, Christina McKelvie, who was an individual that represented generosity, tolerance and inclusion,' he said.
'That was how she went about her work in this constituency and in Parliament, and that's the antithesis of what's been brought into this by-election campaign by the politics of Nigel Farage, who's brought racism and hatred right into the heart of this community, and it is repugnant.
'We are going to stand up to it in every way we can.'
In response to journalists, the First Minister said he was not concerned about defamation claims stemming from his allegations of racism against Mr Farage.
When the by-election was called, it was widely seen as a two-horse race between the SNP's Katy Loudon and Labour's Davy Russell, but recent weeks have seen a surge in fortune for Mr Farage's party.
Speaking to the PA news agency after his speech, the First Minister said it is 'very clear' that Labour is 'out of this contest' and it is now 'between the SNP and Farage'.
'I want to make sure that Farage's politics don't get any hold in Scotland, they are damaging,' he said.
In his speech, the First Minister repeatedly referenced Mr Farage, but when asked if he was increasing the chance of Reform gaining a foothold by paying the party's leader so much attention, Mr Swinney said: 'I've just got to make sure that people in this constituency are aware of the threat that Farage poses in this election.
'If Farage gets in here, then you know the agenda of NHS privatisation is what will follow, the agenda of undermining the Scottish Parliament will follow, because that's what he believes in.'
Elsewhere in Hamilton on Saturday, Reform UK's candidate Ross Lambie gathered activists ahead of a canvassing session, including some bussed into the constituency from the north of England.
Speaking to journalists, Mr Lambie was asked why the parties believed to be the frontrunners at the beginning of the campaign were spending so much time on Reform.
'They're doing their canvassing and they're getting the same results as we are, that's why,' he said.
He added: 'We are super proud that we're not being pigeon-holed with any particular voter and we're not being boxed into certain aspects of the community.
'We're getting votes from across the area.
'If you were to chat to these volunteers, you'll find some of them were SNP voters in the past, many of them were Labour voters, Conservative voters.
'So that's the thing we're most proud of, that we're breaking down those old barriers in Scottish politics.'
Mr Sarwar said Labour is still in the race for the seat in Thursday's vote.
'It's between ourselves and the SNP, every single vote is going to count,' he told PA on Saturday.
'That's why, if you want to beat the SNP, if you want a local champion, if you want to start that pathway to a new direction, the best way of doing that is to vote for one of your own – vote for Davy Russell.'
The Labour leader also accused the First Minister of 'talking up Reform for a very, very long time', an assertion Mr Swinney rejects, while saying he would 'call out Nigel Farage's poison'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'This Is Panic': Defence Secretary Forced To Deny Keir Starmer Is Rattled By Nigel Farage
A cabinet minister has been forced to deny that Keir Starmer is 'panicking' about the rise of Reform UK. John Healey defended the prime minister's decision to stage a hastily-arranged press conference specifically to attack Nigel Farage. The PM compared the Reform leader to Liz Truss over his spending plans, and also accused him of 'poisoning our politics'. On Sky News this morning, presenter Trevor Phillips told Healey: 'His speech had 1,100 words, 750 of them were about Nigel Farage. Why is he panicking?' The defence secretary replied: 'He's not panicking.' But Phillips went on: 'Why does the prime minister go into a hangar to talk about a bloke who's got five MPs on a week when the Russians are threatening, trade wars, all the rest of it. This is panic.' Healey said: 'He's challenging a party leader, Nigel Farage. He's challenging a party that did very well in the local elections, he's challenging a leader that is soft on Putin, that wants to sell off the NHS, that is making massive promises that he won't fund and can't deliver. 'Why the prime minister is saying this is that we are facing across the board, irrespective of party, a crisis of people's confidence and conviction that government can make a difference and anything can change the things that they see are wrong in this country.' He added: 'Keir Starmer is absolutely right to challenge Nigel Farage against these easy, soft solutions, and the promises that are false and he can never deliver.' Defence Secretary @JohnHealey_MP reaffirms Keir Starmer is "not panicking" when it comes to the rise of Reform UK, stressing it was "absolutely right" of the PM to challenge Nigel Farage in a speech on more: — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 1, 2025 The pair clashed as new analysis revealed Farage is on course for 10 Downing Street with a comfortable Commons majority. A calculation based on the most recent opinion polls suggests Reform UK would end up with 362 seats if a general election was held tomorrow. Labour would have 136 MPs elected, followed by the Lib Dems with 62 and the SNP with 38, the Electoral Calculus assessment suggested. In yet more bad news for Kemi Badenoch, the Conservatives would be the fifth-largest party with just 22 seats. The result would hand Farage a 74-seat majority, big enough for Reform UK to be able to govern without the need to rely on the support of other parties. Nigel Farage On Course For Commons Majority According To Latest Polls 'Dodgy Maths': Farage Slammed After True Cost Of 'DEI' Government Programmes Revealed Keir Starmer Says Nigel Farage Is Trying To 'Poison Our Politics'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Martial law fractured South Korea. Can this election heal the nation?
The striking feature of this election has been the leading opposition candidate, Lee Jae-myung, campaigning in a bullet-proof vest. At a recent rally, he was escorted to the podium by close protection officers, ready to shield him with their ballistic briefcases. He then addressed the crowd from behind bullet-proof glass, under the gaze of rooftop watchers. This is not South Korean politics as usual. But South Korea has not been itself lately. It is still recovering from the martial law crisis last December, when the president, Yoon Suk Yeol, tried to orchestrate a military takeover. He failed, because of resistance from the public and politicians, and was impeached, triggering this snap election to choose his successor. But the chaos Yoon unleashed that night has festered. While stuck in limbo, without a president, the country has become more polarised and its politics more violent. At street protests earlier this year it became commonplace to chant for various political leaders to be executed. And since launching his presidential bid, Lee has been receiving death threats, and his team say they have even uncovered a credible plot to assassinate him. This election is an opportunity to steer South Korea back onto safer, more stable ground, and heal these fractures. Given this, the ruling party was always going to struggle, marred by President Yoon's self-defeating coup. But rather than break away from the disgraced former president, the conservative People Power Party (PPP) has chosen a candidate who repeatedly defended Yoon and his actions. Kim Moon-soo, Yoon's former labour minister, was the only cabinet member who refused to stand and apologise during a parliamentary hearing into martial law. He said sorry only well into his campaign, after he had won Yoon's public endorsement. This has turned the election into more of a referendum on martial law than anything else. Given most of the public overwhelmingly rejected the move, it has also virtually gilded the path for the opposition leader Lee, who famously livestreamed himself scaling the walls of the parliament complex, to get inside and vote down the president's order. Now the Democratic Party politician portrays himself as the only candidate who can ensure this never happens again. He has said he will change the constitution to make it more difficult for future presidents to declare martial law. "We must prevent the return of the rebellion forces," Lee urged voters at his recent rally from behind fortified glass. Such promises have pulled in people from across the political spectrum. "I didn't like Lee before, but since martial law I now trust and depend on him," said 59-year-old Park Suh-jung, who admitted this was the first time she had attended a political event. One man in his 50s said he was a member of another smaller political party, but had decided to back Lee this time: "He is the only person who can end Yoon's martial law insurrection. We need to stop those who destroyed our democracy." Most recent polls put Lee about 10 points ahead of his rival Kim, but he was not always so popular. This is his second time running for president, having lost out to Yoon three years ago. He is a divisive character, who has been embroiled in a series of court cases and political scandals. There are many who do not trust him, who loathe him even. Kim, hoping to capitalise on this, has branded himself "the fair and just candidate". It is a slogan his supporters have adopted, many seemingly backing him not for his policies, but because he is not Lee. "I don't like Kim but at this point there's no real choice. The other candidate has too many issues," said one elderly woman who is planning to vote for him. Kim has charted an unusual political path. As a student who campaigned for workers' rights, he was tortured and imprisoned under South Korea's right-wing dictatorship in the 1980s but then moved sharply to the right himself. He was picked by the party base, many of whom are still loyal to Yoon. The party leadership, realising he was not the best choice, tried to replace him at the last minute with a more moderate, experienced politician, only to be blocked by furious members. This has left the party weak and divided, with many suspecting it will splinter into rival factions after voting day. "Haven't we already imploded?" one party insider said to me recently, their face crumpled in their hands. "This is a miserable campaign." "Choosing Kim is the biggest mistake the conservative party have made in this election, and they do know that. They will have to be held accountable for this decision," said Jeongmin Kim, the executive director of Korea Pro, a Seoul-based news and analysis service. Lee has seized this opportunity to hoover up centrist votes. He has shifted his policies to the right, and even claimed his left-leaning party is, in fact, conservative. This, despite his reputation as a staunch leftist. He grew up in a slum outside Seoul, working in factories rather than attending school, and is someone who has previously quoted US senator Bernie Sanders. But gone are his previous pledges to introduce a universal basic income. This time, he is courting South Korea's powerful conglomerate businesses, the chaebols. He has even incorporated the conservative colour red into his own blue logo, and hits the campaign trail wearing red and blue trainers. He has rebranded his foreign policy too. Typically, his Democratic Party is cautious about Korea's security alliance with the US, preferring to prioritise relations with China and North Korea. But Lee is casting himself as a "pragmatist" who can adapt to a changing security environment. "The US-Korea alliance is the backbone of our national security. It should be strengthened and deepened," he said in a recent televised debate. All this has left voters and diplomats here unsure of what he really stands for, and what he will do if elected - though this seems to be the point. Ms Kim, Korea Pro's analyst, believes his makeover is more genuine than might appear. "He was already high up in the polls, so he didn't need to work hard to win votes," she said. "I think he is playing a longer game. He wants to be a popular leader, someone who can be trusted by more than half of the country." Bringing the country together will be the biggest challenge for whoever wins. When people vote on Tuesday, it will be six months to the day since they came out onto the streets to resist a military takeover. After months of chaos, they are desperate to move forward, so the country can start addressing pressing issues that have been on hold, including tariff negotiations with US President Donald Trump. But more than anything they hope this election can restore their own confidence in their democracy, which has been badly shaken. At a baseball game in the capital Seoul last week – arguably the only place where Koreans are as tribal as they are about politics – both sides were united, acutely aware of this election's importance. "I'm really concerned about our democracy," said Dylan, a data engineer. "I hope we have the power to save it and make it greater than before. My vote is a piece of power." "The next president needs to show people clearly and transparently what he is doing," said one man in his mid-20s. "We need to watch him carefully." If Lee is to win, and by the margin the polls suggest, he would have a solid mandate, as well as control of parliament, giving him three years to implement major political reforms. That could be good for rebuilding South Korea's stability but would come with its own challenges, said the political analyst Ms Kim. "If Lee wins, he will have a lot of power. {Given how Yoon behaved} he will need to be very responsible when using it." The unravelling of Yoon Suk Yeol: South Korea's 'stubborn and hot-tempered' martial law president What you need to know ahead of South Korea's snap presidential election How political chaos helped forge South Korea's presidential frontrunner They helped oust a president - now South Korean women say they feel invisible again
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chinook families to launch legal action against MoD
Families of those killed in an RAF Chinook helicopter crash in 1994 have said they are launching legal action against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for not ordering a public inquiry. Four crew and 25 passengers were killed when the helicopter went down in foggy conditions over the Mull of Kintyre in Scotland. The helicopter was carrying leading security personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness. The families of the victims want a High Court judge to review information which they say was not included in previous investigations. They believe it will offer new information on the airworthiness of the helicopter. All 25 passengers - made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army - were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members. The families of the victims, who have formed the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK government's human rights obligations. In a letter to the government, the group said: "The investigations conducted to date, whether considered individually or in combination, have failed to discharge the investigative duty." Thirty-one years after, the group have also called for the release of documents that were sealed at the time of the crash for 100 years, as revealed in a BBC documentary last year. The solicitor representing the families said there is enough evidence to convince the families that there was "a failure by the MoD to apply appropriate safeguards in order to protect the passengers and crew". Solicitor Mark Stephens added: "In fact, they were put on board an aircraft that was known to be positively dangerous and should never have taken off. "That is why we are seeking a judicial review into the government's failure to hold a public inquiry - which the families have sought for more than a year." After the crash, pilots Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK government 17 years later. A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out "numerous concerns" raised by those who worked on the Chinooks. The MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declared the Chinook Mk2 helicopters "unairworthy" prior to the crash. Esme Sparks, who was seven years old when her father Major Gary Sparks lost his life, said: "We don't want to have to take legal action against the government and MoD but we do want and need answers surrounding the circumstance of this crash. "We want to know who or what is being protected? Who made the decision to let this helicopter take off? What is being hidden? In our view, a public inquiry is key." The MoD said that records held in The National Archives contain personal information and early release of those documents would breach their data protection rights. An MoD spokesperson said: "The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died." Chinook crash families call for release of 100-year sealed file Grief and pain 30 years after Chinook disaster RAF Chinook: Anger over lack of 30th anniversary memorial
