Trump says he will speak to Russia's Putin soon about ending war in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump speaking during a press briefing at the Nato summit on June 25, in the Netherlands. PHOTO: REUTERS
Trump says he will speak to Russia's Putin soon about ending war in Ukraine
THE HAGUE - US President Donald Trump said on June 25 after talks with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky that he is considering sending more Patriot missile batteries to Ukraine to help Kyiv fend off Russian attacks.
Mr Trump said the anti-missile systems are 'very hard to get' but that 'we are going to see if we can make some of them available.'
Mr Trump, at a press conference after attending the annual Nato summit, said Mr Zelensky wanted to end the war.
Mr Trump said he would speak to Russian President Vladimir Putin about it soon.
'Look, Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' Mr Trump said. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Singapore at the crossroads: Maintaining cohesion in a changing world
Singapore has a unique opportunity to leverage its extraordinary capacities for future-minded policymaking and intentional cohesion-building, says the writer. PHOTO: ST FILE Singapore's remarkable journey from a small island nation to a global economic powerhouse is a testament to its forward-thinking leadership and high levels of social cohesion. As the world grapples with the collapse of the rules-based order and democracies face challenges from polarisation, populism, and declining trust in institutions, Singapore finds itself at a critical juncture. The question now is whether it can continue to adapt successfully to both internal and external threats while maintaining the cohesion and future-mindedness that have been instrumental to its success. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
44 minutes ago
- Business Times
CEOs need to stop outsourcing politics
THE Israel-Iran war. The Trump tariffs. The Oct 7 attacks. The Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Covid-19 pandemic and the inflation that followed. 'Once-in-a-generation events' that could previously be written off as Black Swans are now occurring routinely. Many were caused by government actions, and all resulted in government interventions that are likely to have sweeping economic impacts. At least since the end of the Cold War, and likely since the end of World War II, few American chief executive officers outside the defence industry have been evaluated on or chosen because of their understanding of politics. Most have delegated their dealings with government and international relations to lobbyists tasked with pushing for lower taxes and deregulation. That's no longer possible. Just as no competent leader would outsource key decisions about finance, strategy or marketing, a successful CEO now needs to be hands-on when it comes to questions of global government and politics. Perfect case study The Trump administration's tariffs are a perfect case study in how the business world fails to understand the political one. President Donald Trump campaigned on promises to put a minimum 10 per cent tax on all imports and a 60 per cent tax on imports from China. In fact, supporting tariffs may be Trump's only consistent political position: In 1987 he took out full-page ads in The New York Times demanding high tariffs on imports from Japan. And while Trump didn't impose wide-ranging tariffs in his first administration, it was clear long before his 2025 inauguration that he would be far less constrained and better able to implement his wishes this time around. So we have a president with a life-long belief in high tariffs, elected on a platform of high tariffs, surrounded by an administration he had handpicked to give him total freedom of action, whose chief economic adviser is an advocate of high tariffs. But when he announced high tariffs, the shock produced some of the biggest stock market drops in American history. This isn't just about the market. The tariffs prompted China to retaliate by putting export controls on rare earth minerals. Rising tensions between the US and China and the latter's functional monopoly on rare earth minerals were both well-known, but too many American companies were caught off guard. Ford Motor Co, for one, might have stockpiled the materials to guard against the breakdown of the nations' increasingly strained relationship, but instead was forced to shut down a factory. Political foresight, on the other hand, can pay huge dividends. Apple gained some protection from this international conflict by moving part of its iPhone production from China to India. That's a process it began back in 2015 and accelerated as a safeguard against the continuing deterioration of the relationship between the two countries even before Trump returned to office. A decade later, Apple's leaders and investors are surely grateful it was ahead of the curve. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It's hard to explain companies' lack of preparation for such shocks as a product of anything other than an American business community trapped in an outdated political paradigm. US business has thrived in an environment where the government has typically shown deference to private sector interests and exercised limited intervention. That paradigm held for so long that it became as much of an unquestioned assumption as the law of gravity. Unlike gravity, though, it was an artifact of its time. That reality shattered with the 2008 financial crisis, which required the US government to deploy trillions of dollars to bail out the financial sector. The backlash left both major political parties far more open to market interventions – and far less likely to defer to business. Today, the three most popular American politicians currently in office are Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; all support increased regulation, taxes and government spending. (Trump, hardly a libertarian avatar, comes in fourth.) Adding to the importance of a deep understanding of government and politics is the return of militarised competition between major states. The globalisation that flourished after the fall of the Soviet Union has been rocked by surging competition between the US and China and the hostility between Nato and Russia that culminated in the invasion of Ukraine. Economics and globalism no longer dependably trump national security. Instead, trade barriers, export controls and concerns over the countries' ability to domestically produce defence-critical materials take precedence over free markets and corporate profits. Adapting to new reality But the way we train and select American business leaders hasn't kept pace with this new reality. Of the top 10 US business schools, only Harvard Business School and the Stanford Graduate School of Business require MBA candidates to take a course on government and politics. (I teach a required course on the topic for Executive MBA candidates at the Yale School of Management.) According to one analysis, only eight of the 2021 Fortune 500 CEOs had an undergraduate degree in political science; few, if any, have experience in senior political office. Universities, boards and CEOs all need to adapt to this new reality. Business schools need to make politics just as central to their curriculum as every other mission-critical skill. Even more importantly, boards need political sophistication within their own ranks and to make it a key part of their evaluations of future chief executives. Meanwhile, current CEOs must move up the learning curve fast. The political world isn't waiting on them anymore. BLOOMBERG The writer writes about corporate management and innovation. He teaches leadership at the Yale School of Management and is the author of Indispensable: When Leaders Really Matter
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Sixteen deaths recorded in Kenya protests, most killed by police, Amnesty Kenya says
A Kenyan man holding a spent bullet as firefighters battle to put out building fires in the central business district of Nairobi, Kenya, on June 25. PHOTO: EPA Sixteen deaths recorded in Kenya protests, most killed by police, Amnesty Kenya says NAIROBI - Sixteen people died during nationwide anti-government protests in Kenya on June 25, most of them killed by police, the head of Amnesty Kenya said, a year after deadly demonstrations against a tax Bill culminated in the storming of Parliament. Thousands of Kenyans took to the streets to commemorate 2024's demonstrations, in which more than 60 people died, with police firing tear gas and water cannons to disperse them in the capital Nairobi, according to local media and a Reuters witness. Some protesters clashed with police, and 16 people were 'verified dead as of 8.30', Amnesty Kenya's executive director, Mr Irungu Houghton, told Reuters, adding that the figures were verified by the global rights watchdog and the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR). 'Most were killed by police,' Mr Houghton said, adding that at least five of the victims had been shot dead. The government-funded KNCHR earlier said eight deaths had been reported across the country, all 'allegedly from gunshot wounds'. 'Over 400 casualties have been reported, including demonstrators, police officers and journalists,' KNCHR said, in a statement shared on its official X account. The watchdog noted heavy police deployment and 'allegations of excessive use of force, including rubber bullets, live ammunition and water cannons, resulting in numerous injuries'. Kenyan police spokesperson Muchiri Nyaga declined to comment on the statements by Amnesty Kenya or KNCHR. State-funded body Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) said in a statement at least 61 people were arrested during the protests. An official at the capital's main Kenyatta National Hospital said the facility had received dozens of wounded people. '107 admitted, most with gunshot injuries,' the source said, referring to rubber bullets and live rounds. He added that no deaths had been reported at KNH. National electricity provider Kenya Power said one of its security guards was shot dead while patrolling its headquarters in Nairobi. People running away from a police water cannon, amid protests in Nairobi, Kenya, on June 25. PHOTO: REUTERS Large crowds were seen earlier heading in the direction of State House, the president's official residence, in scenes broadcast by Kenyan channel NTV before it and another broadcaster KTN were pulled off the air after defying an order to stop live broadcasts of the demonstrations. Both channels resumed broadcasts later on June 25, after a court in Nairobi suspended the order issued by the Communications Authority of Kenya. Anger against police Isolated clashes were reported in the port city of Mombasa, according to NTV, with protests also in the towns of Kitengela, Kisii, Matuu and Nyeri. Although the 2024 protests faded after President William Ruto withdrew proposed tax hikes, public anger has remained over the use of excessive force by security agencies, with fresh demonstrations this month over the death of a blogger in police custody. Six people, including three police officers, were charged with murder on June 24 over the killing of 31-year-old blogger and teacher Albert Ojwang. All have pleaded not guilty. Mr Ojwang's death has become a lightning rod for Kenyans still mourning those who perished at the 2024 demonstrations, blamed on security forces, against a backdrop of dozens of unexplained disappearances. 'We are fighting for the rights of our fellow youths and Kenyans and the people who died since June 25... we want justice,' Mr Lumumba Harmony, a protester, told Reuters in Nairobi. The unprecedented scenes on June 25, 2024, showing police firing at protesters as they broke through barriers to enter Parliament, created the biggest crisis of Mr Ruto's presidency and sparked alarm among Kenya's international allies. REUTERS Firefighters battling to put out a blaze that is said to have started after teargas cannisters fired by police exploded, in Nairobi, on June 25. PHOTO: EPA Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
