China Warns Neighbor for Welcoming US Missiles Onto Territory
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China issued a warning as U.S. and Philippine forces kicked off three weeks of joint military exercises.
For the first time, the drills will include an American ship killing missile system to strategic islands in the Luzon Strait, seen as a potential choke point separating the defense treaty ally from China-claimed Taiwan.
Newsweek reached out to the Philippine military and the U.S. Department of Defense for comment.
Why It Matters
The Philippines is part of the so-called First Island Chain, stretching southward from Japan to Indonesia, that Washington considers key to containing the Chinese navy in the event of a conflict, such as an invasion of Taiwan, which Beijing's ruling Chinese Communist Party claims, despite never having governed there.
During his visit to Manila, U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth, who pledged continued U.S. support amid "communist China's aggression," announced the Navy/Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction Systems [NMESIS] would be deployed as part of the annual U.S.-Philippine Balikatan drills, dubbed the "Super Bowl" of military exercises for its scale.
What To Know
The NMESIS will feature in simulated rather than live-fire drills, local media cited the U.S. Marines as saying. Still, it will increase interoperability between the allies' forces.
Missile launchers are being airlifted to "multiple" of the Philippines' Taiwan-facing Batanes islands, according, the U.S. 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment, which began operating the systems late last year, said in a statement.
"At present, the international community is facing the impact of unilateralism, protectionism, bullying and hegemony," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Monday, in a reference to U.S. President Donald Trump's effort to secure better trade terms through a broad offensive against China and scores of other partners.
The 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment receives the Navy/Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System from Marine Corps Systems (NMESIS) on November 26, 2024.
The 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment receives the Navy/Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System from Marine Corps Systems (NMESIS) on November 26, 2024.
Jacqueline C. Parsons/U.S. Marine Corps
The large-scale exercises and "deployed strategic and tactical weapons" have further "undermined regional strategic stability" and the "prospects for economic growth in the region," Guo said.
The official also reiterated Beijing's claim over Taiwan and warned: "those who play with fire will set themselves on fire."
China has pledged to eventually unify with Taiwan, through force if necessary, and continues to ramp up military drills around the island, including simulated beach landings.
The U.S., Taiwan's main arms supplier, maintains a decades-old policy of "strategic ambiguity" designed to keep Beijing uncertain about whether Washington would intervene in a conflict.
China has already repeatedly protested the U.S. Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system, which was deployed to the Philippines in the days leading up to the 2024 Balikatan exercise.
The Typhon can be armed with Standard Missile-6s and Tomahawk cruise missiles, whose 1,000-mile range puts much of China's eastern seaboard within reach.
What People Are Saying
Zhang Junshe, a Chinese military affairs analyst, told state media outlet Global Times: "By deploying two types of missile systems, the U.S. has established a comprehensive long-, medium-, and short-range strike network...covering China's southeastern coastal areas, the Taiwan Straits, the Bashi Channel, and the northern South China Sea...
"In the event of a conflict, these locations where missiles are deployed will inevitably become targets for counterstrikes. The Philippines' approach essentially amounts to opening the door to a predator and will only backfire."
What Happens Next
The Balikatan exercise will run until May 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Why the ‘TACO' Trade Is Tempting Investors Amid US-China Talks
On May 30, US President Donald Trump accused his Chinese counterpart, President Xi Jinping, of breaking a trade truce that brought down tariffs from extreme highs in early May. Investors saw the writing on the wall: tariffs would spike again, hurting the economy. Stocks fell more than 1%. But later the same day, Trump said he'd have a conversation with Xi, and optimism – and stock prices – were restored. When the call finally happened on June 5, the S&P 500 Index again briefly surged. The early months of Trump's second term have been marked by this pattern: The president threatens to impose sky-high tariffs and stocks tumble, then he relents and markets recover. Wall Street has learned to capitalize on this by buying into the S&P 500 when it first drops, anticipating the president will backtrack on tariffs and send markets higher.
Atlantic
23 minutes ago
- Atlantic
When Pete Hegseth's Pentagon Tenure Started Going Sideways
Things were going fine for Pete Hegseth, right up until a chance encounter with the world's richest man. His pursuit of Donald Trump's agenda at the Pentagon had made him a star among the president's advisers. The former Fox News host had moved swiftly to roll back diversity initiatives in the military and to expand U.S. troops' role in halting immigration at the southern border. His willingness to challenge Republican orthodoxy on foreign policy and punch back at critics was seen as an asset as Trump began his second term. But then, in mid-March, Hegseth bumped into Elon Musk in a White House hallway, and extended an ill-fated invitation to the tech titan for an exclusive military briefing. 'Up until then, DOD had been the golden child,' one person familiar with Hegseth's office told us. When Trump learned about the proposed briefing the night before it was scheduled to take place, he was displeased. Although Hegseth denied a New York Time s report that the March 21 meeting would focus on plans for potential war with Beijing, Trump told others that any presentation on China would be inappropriate for Musk, who has extensive business interests there, according to people familiar with the president's reaction. The very idea that top officers would brief the businessman in the Tank—the secure Pentagon conference room where the military brass assembles for visits by the commander in chief—added to an unwelcome perception that Musk wielded outsize government power. In a call hours after the Times story appeared, Trump made clear to Hegseth that the briefing was 'a bad look' for the administration, according to individuals with knowledge of the call. When Hegseth visited the White House the next day to debut the Air Force's newest fighter jet, Trump again conveyed his displeasure. 'This is crazy and stupid,' Trump said of the briefing, one of these people told us. 'Why would we even do this?' Jonathan Lemire: Why Trump is standing by Hegseth, for now Trump reserved most of his ire for Musk and did not express anger toward Hegseth personally, White House officials told us. Yet the Musk episode, and Trump's response to Hegseth, details of which have not been previously reported, represented a turning point for the new Pentagon chief, according to people familiar with his tenure who spoke with us on the condition of anonymity. Since then, a series of embarrassing revelations, including Hegseth's disclosure of military attack plans on the messaging app Signal, have fueled turmoil and suspicion at the Pentagon's highest levels. They have also intensified public scrutiny of Hegseth's judgment and deepened questions about his ability to deliver on the president's military priorities, including pushing back against China and demonstrating American strength, which the president believes was eroded by his predecessor. 'Things were heading in the right direction,' the person familiar with Hegseth's office added. 'But then the leaks and Signalgate just really fucked up Pete.' Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the department's senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseth's fixation on stopping leaks. White House officials say that Trump continues to support Hegseth—the defense chief's job is '100 percent safe,' one told us. This official also noted that in addition to having Trump's affection, Hegseth is personally liked by both Vice President J. D. Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told us that the entire administration remains 'fully behind Secretary Hegseth's mission to prioritize our warfighters, eliminate terrorists, and restore common sense at the DOD.' But scores of congressional Democrats have called on Hegseth to resign. One Republican, Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska, has suggested that he be fired. Musk's Pentagon visit originated from a conversation in Musk's sparsely furnished office that followed their impromptu meeting in a White House hallway, when Hegseth suggested that Musk come over to the Pentagon to talk with senior military leaders. The defense chief later authorized the meeting to be held in the Tank. Several people told us that Hegseth's invitation came at a moment when the Defense Department, like other agencies across the government, was facing the prospect of cuts by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. While Hegseth has touted DOGE's steps to reduce the number of federal contractors and other personnel, DOD was not driving the process. The invitation represented a chance for Pentagon leaders to help steer DOGE's direction in cutting one of the world's largest bureaucracies. (A representative for Musk did not respond to multiple requests for comment.) Tom Nichols: Pete Hegseth's patriotic duty is to resign Just three days after Musk's Pentagon visit, Hegseth's judgment again came into question when Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of The Atlantic, revealed that he had been added to a high-level Signal chat about plans to bomb Houthi militants in Yemen. Although then–National Security Adviser Michael Waltz had inadvertently invited Goldberg to the thread, it was Hegseth who escalated the exchange by posting details of an imminent attack on Houthi targets, including the precise times when U.S. jets would be flying over their targets in Yemen. Current and former officials have said that such advance attack information would typically be highly classified because of the danger its disclosure could pose to pilots. A cascade of other revelations followed, including stories detailing the unusual role that Hegseth's wife, Jennifer, has played in his work at the Pentagon, where she has attended meetings with foreign officials and issued orders related to her husband's media appearances. News reports also revealed that Hegseth gave his younger brother a senior Pentagon role and authorized the installation of a makeup studio at a cost of thousands of dollars. Current and former officials told us that Hegseth has since threatened to polygraph numerous senior officials, including the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He has also overturned decades of tradition in the military's relationship with the press, ousting media outlets from their long-standing Pentagon workspaces in favor of Trump-friendly voices and ending reporters' access to most of the building. When The Atlantic interviewed Trump in the Oval Office in late April, the president said he'd had 'a talk' with Hegseth about the various embarrassing reports, predicting, 'I think he's gonna get it together.' Yet the Musk and Signal episodes reveal what some individuals familiar with Hegseth's tenure described to us as his tendency to use his position heading the world's most advanced military as a 'flex.' He attempts to impress others with his access to sensitive information and his power to direct American forces, even if it means a little indiscretion along the way, they said. 'He's got this $180,000 Ferrari. That's the Pentagon for him,' another person familiar with Hegseth's office told us. 'And he likes to show it off.' Hegseth created further controversy after he elevated Ricky Buria, a Marine who'd been serving as a military aide when Hegseth took office, to a senior role and sought to name him as chief of staff. Buria often made demands of more senior officers, and his sudden promotion to a senior political position rubbed many in the rank-conscious military the wrong way. Trump personally blocked Buria from the chief-of-staff job because of his ties to Lloyd Austin, Joe Biden's Pentagon chief, White House officials told us. People familiar with Pentagon staffing told us that the White House had explored hiring at least four replacements for Joe Kasper, who had abruptly left the chief-of-staff job in April to take a new role in the department, but that none had worked out. The chief Pentagon spokesperson, Sean Parnell, said in a statement that personnel changes are a 'natural and necessary feature of any highly effective organization.' 'Americans outside the beltway don't care about 'palace intrigue' or sensationalized mainstream media gossip,' Parnell said. 'They care about action.' In response to suggestions from the White House, the Pentagon has in recent weeks begun to slowly expand its media engagement beyond MAGA-friendly outlets, taking reporters from several mainstream print-news organizations on Hegseth's travels to Latin America and Asia. Kingsley Wilson, Hegseth's Pentagon press secretary, told us that Hegseth's travels have involved bringing along journalists from 'a wide range of outlets.' Hegseth, however, has stuck to a rote playbook in responding to unfavorable news: attempt to discredit the media, then pivot to his efforts to rebuild the military and restore the 'warrior ethos' he says was lost under Democratic leaders. 'This is what the media does,' he told reporters during a family Easter event at the White House, children in party attire looking on from behind. He gestured at the journalists assembled before him, calling them 'hoaxsters.' 'They try to slash and burn people and ruin their reputations. It's not going to work with me.' Jason Dempsey: Hegseth has all the wrong enemies Trump has stood by his Pentagon chief, suggesting that he admires the combative approach Hegseth takes in attacking administration detractors. He is a 'tough cookie' who 'went through a lot,' the president said late last month. Trump also spent significant political capital pushing through Hegseth's nomination—Vance had to cast the tiebreaking vote after the Senate deadlocked on confirmation at 50–50—and is reluctant to abandon him now, especially because it might look like giving the media a scalp. That support will be tested next week, when Hegseth begins a series of hearings on Capitol Hill convened to address the administration's budget requests. Hegseth is sure to face difficult questions from Democrats, including on his handling of sensitive information, the upheaval in the Pentagon's upper ranks, and his firing of senior military officials. Those officers include the second-ever Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the first female Navy chief, both of whom Hegseth previously suggested were promoted because of their race and gender, respectively. Top Republicans, meanwhile, are unhappy with an administration spending proposal that they say doesn't include enough money for defense. Many at the Pentagon question how long the president's backing for their boss will last. During his first term, Trump cycled through four defense secretaries and four national security advisers. He also voiced support for Waltz until the former national security adviser was pushed aside last month and asked to take a less powerful role, at the United Nations. Although the president appears to appreciate Hegseth's pugnacious public style, he may require more from his defense secretary over time, as the administration faces pressure to deliver on a set of complex and interlocking goals, including fixing a byzantine military-procurement system, reviving a diminished defense industry, and strengthening America's response to China's military rise. Fighters endear themselves to Trump, one person told us, 'but you can't have a one-dimensional game. At a certain point, it's going to get old.'
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Should Get The Hint That Xi Just Isn't That Into Him
China's President Xi Jinping (R) and U.S. President Donald Trump. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKIFRED DUFOUR/AFP via Getty Images Xi Jinping probably doesn't know whether to be flattered or aggrieved by Donald Trump's late-night rantings about the Chinese leader. Sounding more like a jilted ex than a head of state — or a force to reckon with in negotiations — the U.S. president complained Xi is proving 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Trump, on social media, sounded sincere enough — as if it just dawned on him that Beijing might not be interested in a bilateral trade deal after all. All this raises almost too many questions to pose here. One: Doesn't Trump recall Xi giving him the talk-to-the-hand treatment the first go around from 2017 to 2021? Another: What about Xi's energy, circa 2025, makes Trump think Xi is anxious for another go? Trump, like any wistful ex, is keeping his options open. He prefaced his 2:17 a.m. Washington-time rant with 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but…' It's time that someone on Trump's staff had the courage to tell him that perhaps the most powerful Chinese leader in many decades just isn't into him and his trade tactics. On one level, Xi can be excused for lacking the bandwidth to deal with Trump World's chaos right now. Even before the Trump 2.0 era started on January 20, Asia's biggest economy was grappling with a massive property crisis that's generating deflation. Xi's Communist Party was already facing weak domestic demand and record youth unemployment. Back in November, when Team Xi assumed Kamala Harris would be the next president, Beijing was struggling to stop the national birthrate from falling. It was mulling ways to address a rapidly ageing population. It was devising bigger social safety nets to encourage China's 1.4 billion people to save less and spend more. Pre-Trump 2.0, Beijing was in the throes of trying to reduce several trillions of dollars of local government debt. Before the latest Trump tariffs, Xi's government was working to shift its growth model away from exports and runaway investment to domestic demand-led growth. It was working to reduce the dominance of inefficient state-owned enterprises. It was endeavoring to increase the use of the yuan in global trade and finance. Team Xi is also contending with a notable increase in in-person protests. Especially factory workers getting stiffed as export growth slows. Now, Trump's tariffs, volatility in the dollar and bedlam in the U.S. Treasury market are sending intensifying headwinds China's way. So, yes, a busy time to be the leader of a giant, unbalanced economy directly in the Trumpian crossfire. And the White House thinks now is a good time to drop everything and do a hasty bilateral trade deal? Trade agreements are wildly complicated affairs in the best of times, taking several months, even years. Hence, Xi's strategy of slow-walking the process, one that's worked so far. Delaying talks is all the more rational given the decent odds U.S. courts will ultimately rule against Trump's claim that presidents have tariff powers. Trump, of course, is desperate for a trade deal, any deal, to try to convince Americans that, see, the tariffs are working. His splashy signing ceremony with London doesn't count, since the U.S. has a trade surplus with the United Kingdom. Japan hasn't been as pliant as Trump seemed to expect. And new South Korean President Lee Jae-myung is more Seoul's answer to Bernie Sanders than a kindred spirit keen to work with Trump World. Europe isn't exactly fertile ground for a win. Why would Trump be threatening 50% tariffs on the EU if concessions were forthcoming from the 550-million-person market? The U.S. Trade Representative sending reminder letters to trading partners so they don't forget about the upcoming deadline for talks is telling in itself. If White House phones were ringing with good offers, such embarrassing letters wouldn't need to be sent. Also, if Trump really believed Xi is ready to make big concessions, why would his team risk a deal by going after Chinese students with a ban on visas? China, meanwhile, knows how news this week that it may place an order for hundreds of Airbus aircraft, not Boeing, will have Trump fuming. Little about the last couple of weeks suggests these two economic giants are about to sit down for nuts-and-bolts trade negotiations in good faith. Trump's late-night post might've been his way of reminding Xi that the two men were supposed to catch up via phone this week. They did indeed talk on Thursday. But it still seems like high time Trump took the hint that Xi just isn't that into his trade deal.
