Europe's top rights court rules against France in racial profiling case
PARIS, June 26 (Reuters) - Europe's top human rights court ruled on Thursday that French police had carried out discriminatory checks on a Frenchman of African descent, the first such verdict in a case of racial profiling brought against France.
The French government "failed to provide objective and reasonable justification" for the police carrying out three identity checks on Karim Touil within the space of 10 days in 2011 in the city centre of Besancon, the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said in its ruling.
The court ordered France to pay Touil 3,000 euros ($3,512) for violating articles 14 and 8, on discrimination and the right to a private life, of the European Human Rights Convention.
However, for five other applicants in the case, also young men of African descent, the court found there was no discrimination due to lack of evidence, noting that the ID checks had mostly taken place "against a backdrop of tension".
While welcoming Touil's successful claim, Lanna Hollo, a rights advocate with French organisation RECLAIM, who has been involved in the case for 13 years, said the court's reasoning risked reinforcing discrimination in certain zones.
"It fails to sufficiently protect all people in all parts of the territory - especially those living in France's poorer neighbourhoods with high visible minority populations," she said.
In recent years the court has issued rulings against Germany and Switzerland over discriminatory police checks.
A study published on Tuesday by France's human rights watchdog found that young Black men or those perceived as Arab or North African were four times more likely to be stopped by police and 12 times more likely to undergo "extensive" checks, involving being body-searched or taken to the police station.
($1 = 0.8542 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer loyalists vent fury at rebel 'pr**ks' who forced benefits U-turn as Labour threatens to descend into civil war
Keir Starmer is wrestling to restore his grip on Labour today as loyalists vent fury at rebel 'pr**ks' who forced his latest U-turn. Tensions are running high after a massive revolt saw the PM offer major concessions to salvage flagship legislation on health and disability benefits. Sir Keir was left personally begging MPs to back the government after more than 120 MPs vowed to kill the plans in a crunch vote on Tuesday. A deal announced after midnight includes guarantees that existing claimants will not lose money. It is expected to wipe out around £3billion of the £5billion savings the Treasury had hoped to get from the reforms - hardening fears that Rachel Reeves will have to hike taxes again in the Autumn. There have been claims of shouting matches between whips and rebels, with much fury targeted at Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and 'over-excitable boys' running No10. Some critics have even demanded 'regime change', eliciting an humiliating public denial from the PM that he might have to quit after failing to 'read the room'. A Cabinet source told MailOnline that No10 had been wrong to sell the plans initially as a package of cuts, even though polls showed that was popular with the public. 'They should have stressed to MPs it was the only way ensure the welfare state still exists in a few years,' the source added. Rachel Reeves was already struggling to balance the books with the economy stalling and the previous U-turn on winter fuel allowance One Labour veteran told MailOnline that new MPs had proved harder to talk around. 'There are some who think this is going to be their only term in government now, so why give up on principles,' they said. Government insiders were taken aback by the intensity of the revolt, but voiced optimism that the situation was now back under control. Acknowledging tempers had frayed, they suggested both sides had been engaging constructively by last night. 'It's the Parliamentary Labour,' one added. 'It has cleared the air.' Underlining the animosity that had erupted in recent days, a Cabinet source told the Times: 'I cannot express the disdain I have for these stupid pr**ks who knocked a few doors and think they're JFK because Keir ran the best election campaign in 30 years.' Another Downing Street insider reportedly said: 'It's deeply unserious stuff from deeply unserious people. They are sounding the death knell of the Labour Party and they don't even realise it.' Despite the sound and fury in Labour ranks, the concessions look like being enough to prevent a disastrous defeat for the government at second reading. However, the changes are estimated to wipe more than £3billion off the £5billion savings by the end of the Parliament. That would be made up of £2billion for Personal Independence Payment (Pip) and another £1billion for the Universal Credit tweaks. Ms Reeves was already struggling to balance the books with the economy stalling and the previous U-turn on winter fuel allowance. Ruth Curtice of the Resolution Foundation think-tank suggested Ms Reeves will not be able to find the money in existing budgets. 'That leaves only extra borrowing - which the Chancellor doesn't have much space for unless she were to change her own fiscal rules - or tax rises,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Asked if that effectively meant there would be tax rises, Ms Curtice said: 'Yeah. Unless the government were to get better news on the economy the next time the OBR does a forecast... but when we look at everything that's happened in the world since they last did that in March our estimate is that they will actually get bad news from the OBR as well.' Challenged how the costs would be covered, health minister Stephen Kinnock told Times Radio: 'The full details around what we are laying out, what I've summarised really today, is going to be laid out in Parliament, and then the Chancellor will set out the budget in the autumn the whole of the fiscal position and this will be an important part of that. 'But forgive me, I'm not in a position to set those figures out now. 'I think that is very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the budget in the autumn.' Unveiling the concessions overnight, a spokesperson for Number 10 said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I deeply regret ‘island of strangers' speech, says Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer has said he 'deeply' regrets saying that Britain risked becoming an 'island of strangers' because of mass immigration. The Prime Minister said it 'wasn't right' to use that 'particular phrase', despite No 10 previously insisting that he stood by his words. He said neither he nor his speech-writers had been aware that the remarks could have been interpreted as an 'echo' of the language of Enoch Powell. The comments made by the Prime Minister last month drew a fierce backlash from Left-wing critics, who accused him of 'reflecting the language' of the politician's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Sir Keir told The Observer: 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell. I had no idea – and my speech-writers didn't know either. But that particular phrase – no, it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth – I deeply regret using it.' Earlier this month, the Prime Minister suggested that he regretted the speech, admitting that he could have been more articulate. He insisted the message he was 'trying to get across' was supposed to have been about bringing people together. Sir Keir delivered the controversial speech last month while announcing a new programme of immigration restrictions. He said: 'Let me put it this way – nations depend on rules, fair rules. Sometimes they are written down, often they are not, but either way, they give shape to our values, guide us towards our rights, of course, but also our responsibilities, the obligations we owe to each other. 'In a diverse nation like ours ... we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.' Sir Keir said very high levels of immigration in recent years had caused 'incalculable' damage to the UK. It drew a furious backlash, with John McDonnell, the former Labour shadow chancellor, accusing the Prime Minister of 'reflecting the language of Enoch Powell'. Zarah Sultana, the suspended Labour MP, called the speech 'sickening'. Powell, the former Conservative cabinet minister who died in 1998, said in his 1968 speech that the native British population had 'found themselves made strangers in their own country' because of immigration. Despite the backlash, No 10 refused to retract the remarks. Addressing the reaction linking Sir Keir's words to those of Powell, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'We completely reject that comparison.' Asked to confirm that the Prime Minister stood by his comments, he said: 'Yes.' Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, also argued that what Sir Keir had said was 'completely different' to Powell. She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't think it is right to make those comparisons. It is completely different and the Prime Minister said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath, talked about the diverse country that we are and that being part of our strength.'
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Undercover with Palestine Action: ‘Damage as much as possible'
It was only 24 hours after the home secretary had announced that Palestine Action will be proscribed as a terror group when its latest training course got under way on Zoom. The host, dressed with a keffiyeh wrapped around her face, told the group of a dozen new members and an undercover Times reporter that this was a 'critical moment in every sense' as she opened a 'crash course on direct action'. She admitted that she and her Palestine Action 'comrades' were 'all flummoxed at the moment' and 'things are a little intense' following the government's decision to add them to a list of terrorists alongside Al-Qaeda and Isis. • Pro-Palestinian protesters clash with police in London — as it happened But the woman, who did not give her name for 'security reasons' and only showed her face after each attendee introduced themselves and agreed to show themselves on camera, said Palestine Action's sustained action of vandalism and criminal damage against companies 'complicit' in Israel's war crimes will be 'continuing as normal'. And then began a two-and-a-half-hour webinar talking through the new members how they could take part in direct action themselves. The session, a daily webinar it hosts as part of a recruitment drive ahead of the group formally being proscribed as a terror group next week, revealed a secretive organisation paranoid about the threat of undercover police, where information given to those taking direct action is on a 'need to know basis' — one of the ten commitments all members must sign up to. Guidance says what activists should do during and after arrest, then through their trial and how to recruit fellow prisoners if they are thrown in jail. A list of the different criminal offences they could expect to be charged with was shown on screen along with their maximum sentences. They ranged from crimes such as locking-on offences, aggravated trespass and obstruction of a highway to the 'high-level' offences such as criminal damage over £5,000 or non-domestic burglary. • Cost of damage by Palestine Action could hit £55m The more serious offences were lauded by the Palestine Action host, making clear that activists are encouraged to cause maximum damage. 'We hope you'll be causing damage of over £5,000,' the host told the group. But she urged attendees not to be put off by the threat of the maximum sentences they could face from the offences, which carry up to ten years in prison. Serious charges were often diluted or dropped altogether by police and prosecutors, she said. Palestine activists tend to get off lightly at sentencing, she claimed as she ran through a series of recent cases in which her 'comrades' had avoided lengthy sentences or been acquitted by the jury altogether. 'We're seeing people not get charged with the things that they should get charged with,' she said. Jury trials offered the best chance to avoid punishment, the host said, because 'the public is on our side'. 'Remember that being acquitted can happen and we're seeing it happen now. If you get a jury that decide, 'OK, smashing up a rooftop was a fair response to a genocide', then you may well be acquitted by that jury.' The host said her 'favourite case of all time' was the 'absolute legend' who walked into the aerospace company Arconic's factory in Birmingham, causing £500,000 of damage on his own, and was acquitted at trial. • Palestine Action group shows no signs of slowing down Other Palestine Action activists lauded during the session who escaped punishment were the 'Leicester two', who were charged with criminal damage of over £5,000 and faced a maximum sentence of ten years in jail after their protest at an Elbit Systems factory in Leicester shut it down for six days. Both were acquitted at trial. Those who are sent to jail are referred to as 'political prisoners' by Palestine Action and there are currently 19 of the group's activists in jail. 'The resistance goes further than just the action,' the Zoom attendees were told. 'The resistance continues right the way through to the trial. If you end up in prison, on remand, you can take the resistance into prisons.' Activists on the course were told how Palestine Action criminals continued their resistance in prisons, recruited fellow prisoners and were hailed as heroes. The host quoted one Palestine Action activist who declared: 'I am bringing the intifada into the prison.' 'We've seen prisoners being released from prisons and you've heard the entire inside of the prison shouting, 'Free Palestine!'' the host claimed. One of those hailed as 'heroic' for spending time inside was Francesca Nadin, who describes herself as a former 'political prisoner' and spoke at the Glastonbury Festival in the Greenpeace area on Thursday. She said that 'everyone who goes to prison becomes more radicalised' and going to prison was 'not the end of the world'. Those on the course were asked to share their 'barriers' to taking direct action and were told that 'comrades' would contact them on Signal after the session to help them overcome their concerns. A couple expressed concerns about being sent to prison and the impact it would have on their lives, their health and mental wellbeing. An American said she feared how it would impact her ability to extend her visa in the UK. Another said they feared having a criminal record as it would show up in DBS checks, to which the host explained how she had feared the same when she first took part in direct action. She said it was a 'really valid' concern and something that was raised constantly by potential recruits. • Palestine Action leader ordered to attend court on terrorism charge But she claimed it had helped, not hindered, her career working with vulnerable people. 'I've always been lucky enough that I've worked for private people or companies or clients or whatever and as soon as I've told them why it is that I've got a conviction, they're like, 'Please come work for us more'. So it's different for everybody's circumstances.' A large chunk of the course focused on legal advice, albeit unofficial, and guidance on how to behave during and post-arrest. A slide setting out guidance advised members to 'never talk to police' before outlining the items to take and those to avoid taking during direct action. Among the few items activists were told to take: a book. 'It's crazy what books they allow in,' the host said. She told of how one had taken in a book titled How to Blow Up a Pipeline, a book advocating direct action, which argues that climate activists should abandon their longstanding commitment to absolute non-violence. It was made clear that Palestine Action would not be able to cover legal fees, nor be able to offer formal legal advice. But the group offers a lot of advice on how to exploit the use of legal aid. Those who do not qualify are urged to either self-defend or crowdfund, which Palestine Action helps publicise through its social media accounts. The host claimed that almost all crowdfunding campaigns raise the necessary funds to cover the legal defence. Members were told throughout to remember Palestine Action's fundamental belief that 'we are literally the people that are upholding international law'. 'We all know that. We're not guilty and that's why we plead not guilty. We're not the guilty ones.' What Palestine Action does offer is a comprehensive support network. A 'station support' team is dispatched to greet activists when they are released from police custody with instructions on how to get their personal items back and help with getting them back home. The support continues throughout any court trial, Palestine Action supporters attending court hearings and trials. 'You'll have people that come and wave a flag and show support and knit you little Palestine flag hearts and stuff like that,' the host said. 'It's a really beautiful community of people that really support Palestine Action and show up day after day after day to support people that do direct action. It's a real family.' • Watch: Palestine Action saboteurs storm Israeli arms giant's UK site These supporters act voluntarily and nobody is paid, Palestine Action said. The group accepts donations on its website and has an online shop but insists that all legal costs are covered through crowdfunding campaigns. A crowdfunding campaign launched to fight the government's plans to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation has raised £150,000 within four days. In response to Yvette Cooper's announcement, Palestine Action this week said her statement had made 'a series of categorically false claims'. It added: 'This is an unhinged reaction to an action spraying paint in protest at the UK government arming Israel's slaughter of the Palestinian people. We are teachers, nurses, students and parents who take part in actions disrupting the private companies who are arming Israel's genocide, by spray-painting or entering their factory premises. It is plainly preposterous to rank us with terrorist groups like Isis, National Action and Boko Haram.' This week, Areeba Hamid, Greenpeace UK's co-executive director, said the move to proscribe Palestine Action 'would be a grave mistake'. Following its break-in at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last Friday, which was swiftly followed by the home secretary's proscription announcement, the group has identified three further RAF bases suitable for action: RAF Barkston Heath and RAF Cranwell in Lincolnshire and RAF Valley in North Wales, the Telegraph reported. As the webinar drew to a close, after nearly two and a half hours, the host claimed that the government's move to proscribe Palestine Action had sent membership soaring. 'I especially want to thank you all for coming to this group tonight, because I know that this potential threat of proscription is probably going to put a lot of people off,' she said. 'But we've actually seen support go through the roof and I think that you guys are extra, extra-legends for coming along tonight and basically putting your finger up against the government who are trying to silence us.'
