Britain asks to rejoin EU pet passport scheme
Britain has asked to rejoin the EU's pet passport scheme during the Brexit reset negotiations, The Telegraph can reveal.
An estimated quarter of a million UK pet owners took their cats and dogs on holiday with them to the EU each year before Britain left the pet passport at the end of the Brexit transition period in Jan 2021.
It is now far more difficult, time consuming and expensive for British pets to travel to the EU and Northern Ireland under post-Brexit rules that also apply to assistance dogs.
UK officials have pushed for British cats, dogs and ferrets to regain EU freedom of movement in negotiations over a new Swiss-style veterinary deal to boost trade.
'We have always been clear that that kind of agreement can bring all kinds of benefits,' a Government source told The Telegraph ahead of Monday's UK-EU summit in London where the reset deal is set to be announced.
The Government is expected to cave to EU demands for a long-term deal on fish in a concession to secure the agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) rules, paving the way to rejoin the pet passport scheme.
A deal making it easier for young EU citizens to live, work and study in the UK for a limited period is also thought to be close.
Labour has said it will listen to 'sensible proposals' on youth mobility in separate reset negotiations after previously ruling it out. EU capitals also want the UK to rejoin the Erasmus student exchange scheme.
Britain becomes 'rule-taker'
The SPS deal will mean Britain aligning with EU rules on plant and animal health and following European Court of Justice decisions on them.
'Dynamic alignment' makes the UK a rule-taker, which has agreed to change its laws to match the EU's even though it no longer has a say in their drafting.
The EU pet passport is a simple, single document that is valid for life, provided rabies vaccinations are kept up to date.
The current arrangements mean that owners must get an animal health certificate from a vet no more than 10 days before departure every time they wish to travel to the EU.
That is only granted to a dog if it is treated for tapeworm between one and five days before travel. Dogs, cats and ferrets must also be vaccinated for rabies but have to wait at least three weeks after the first jab before going on holiday with their owners.
The same restrictions apply to British dogs, cats and ferrets travelling to Northern Ireland because of the region's Brexit deal that sees it continue to follow EU rules to prevent a hard Irish border.
On June 4, those rules will be replaced by lighter touch regulations as part of the Windsor Framework deal but that could now be supplanted by UK membership of the EU pet passport scheme, which will allow onward travel into the Republic of Ireland.
'Dogs are part of the family'
Pet travel blogger Rachel Spencer, 49, from Lymm, Cheshire, said: 'Dogs are part of the family and you want to give them the best life, to spend as much time as you can with them and taking them on holiday is such a wonderful thing to do.
'Having to leave them behind is distressing, it's hard to relax on holiday and frustrating when just a few years ago under the old pet passport scheme it was relatively easy to take them with you.'
Ms Spencer owns a pet-friendly holiday cottage in Robin Hood's Bay and said she had seen bookings double in the last two years as pet owners opted for staycations rather than leave their animals behind.
'Ultimately though, we want our pets to be free to go where they like and experience different places and have adventures. So to have freedom of movement for dogs again would be really positive for pet owners.'
Only Swiss-style alignment allows for membership of the EU pet passport scheme, which is a kind of health certificate.
It is not possible under the current arrangements for non-EU countries without a bespoke veterinary deal, like Britain.
It would also not be offered under the mutual recognition deal the EU has with New Zealand where the two regulatory systems are seen as reaching the same goal by different means.
Before Labour took power, Brussels consistently rejected British requests for a New Zealand-style deal that does not involve abiding by the decisions of the European Court of Justice.
EU officials have dangled rejoining pet passports as an incentive to past Tory governments to ditch New Zealand and go Swiss.
A Swiss deal will also dramatically cut post-Brexit border checks on agrifood. The Telegraph revealed it will also end EU bans on British fresh sausages, mince and live bivalve molluscs like oysters, clams, scallops and mussels.
Experts believe the SPS deal will only have a negligible impact on economic growth, adding on rough estimates, perhaps 0.1 per cent to UK GDP.
It could also weaken stricter UK animal protection laws, lead to new restrictions on certain fertilisers and slow moves in England to allow the gene-editing of crops.
The European Commission has refused to comment on the negotiations before Monday's summit.
The Financial Times reported on Thursday that EU capitals are putting Brussels under pressure to drive a harder line in the talks to secure more concessions on fish and Erasmus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump warns China ‘not easy' as trade talks enter second day
7:34AM Good morning Thanks for joining me. Donald Trump said it was 'not easy' dealing with China but insisted he had received 'good reports' about trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing officials in London. Here is what you need to know as talks enter a second day. 5 things to start your day Apple's AI event falls flat as iPhone maker struggles | Investors sent shares downwards as Apple unveiled minor upgrades Thames Water lenders demand reprieve on fines in £17bn rescue deal | Ofwat urged to consider 'regulatory reset' after struggling utility giant hit with record penalty Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes | Fresh pressure on Rachel Reeves as retail sales rise just 1pc Miliband warned carbon capture project faces collapse without £4bn injection | Fledgling green tech has already received almost £22bn in public subsidies SNP ferry scheme suffers fresh blow after rain causes ship to flood | Glen Rosa is already behind schedule and £100m over budget What happened overnight Asian shares were mixed on Tuesday as investors kept an eye on the China-US trade talks that might help stave off a recession. A second day of talks was planned after US and Chinese officials met in London for negotiations over various issues. The hope is that they can eventually reach a deal to reduce painfully high tariffs against each other. Most of the tariff hikes imposed since Donald Trump escalated his trade war are paused to allow trade in everything from tiny tech gadgets to enormous machinery to continue. In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 gained 0.2pc to 38,177.71, while the Kospi in South Korea jumped 0.3pc to 2,865.24. Hong Kong's Hang Seng fell 0.2pc to 24,127.30 and the Shanghai Composite index was down 0.5pc to 3,384.47. In Taiwan, the Taiex surged 2.1pc to 22,242.14. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 advanced 0.8pc to 8,587.20. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat, at 42,761.76, the S&P 500 rose 0.1pc, to 6,005.88. and the Nasdaq rose 0.3pc, to 19,591.24. In the bond market, the yield on benchmark 10-year US Treasury notes fell to 4.478pc from 4.494pc late on Sunday.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years
Public sector employment has surged to the highest level in 14 years as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil a £300bn spending spree this week. Almost 6.2m people were employed in the public sector in March, official figures show, 35,000 more than a year earlier. This is the highest number of public sector employees since December 2011. The figures from the Office for National Statistics came ahead of Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday, which is expected to offer big increases to defence and health while squeezing other departments. The Chancellor has raised departmental spending by nearly £400bn since Labour won the election. It comes as economists have warned more tax rises are 'inevitable' in autumn. The figures from the ONS also show that the number of civil servants is the highest since 2006, at 550,000, rising by 6,000 from a year earlier. This helped to push the total figure of central government workers to a record high of 4m, up by 93,000 from a year ago. The ONS said the rise was driven by the NHS, the Civil Service and some local authority schools becoming academies, which changes how their staff are classified in the numbers. While public sector hiring surged, the jobs downturn across the economy deepened as firms grappled with big tax and minimum wage hikes. The number of vacancies fell from 760,000 on average across February to April to 736,000 for the three months to May.
Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Reeves forced into U-turn over pensioner fuel payments
The U-turn, when it came, was even bigger than expected. Rachel Reeves decided to clear the decks before the spending review by announcing that nine million pensioners would receive winter fuel payments this winter. It was a move born of political necessity and that has little fiscal logic. When the chancellor announced that she was stripping ten million pensioners of the winter fuel allowance next year, she argued that it was fundamental to restoring economic stability. 'This is not a decision I wanted to make,' she said. 'Nor is it one that I expected to make. But these are the necessary and urgent decisions I must make. It is the responsible thing to do to fix the foundations of our economy and bring back economic stability.' On Tuesday, economists point out that the fiscal circumstances are, if anything, significantly worse. The reversal means that a policy intended to save £1.5 billion will now save only £50 million this year, at the expense of huge reserves of public goodwill and political capital. It will only add to pressure on the already ailing public finances. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the decision meant there would have to be tax rises or more cuts to welfare in the autumn budget. 'To suggest the fiscal situation has got a lot better flies in the face of reality,' he said. 'If they are saying this means there will not be any additional borrowing then it follows, as sure as night follows day, that this will mean they will need to raise the equivalent of an additional amount of tax.' It also means that Reeves has crossed another line. She had insisted that she would never make an unfunded spending pledge, arguing that to do so would be 'desperate and reckless'. That is exactly what she has now done, and the detail of how the about-turn will be paid for will be confirmed in the autumn budget. After the announcement on Monday, Reeves found herself trying to argue that she had been right in scrapping the universal payments in the first place while simultaneously trying to justify the change in position. It was not an easy circle to square. The decision was the result of a recognition in both No 10 and No 11 that cutting the allowance had been a mistake, although Reeves would not acknowledge that on Monday. During the local elections in May, Labour activists found the issue of winter fuel coming up again and again on the doorstep. Polling found that the decision was one of the main reasons voters deserted the party, whether they moved to Reform UK or to the Greens. • What to expect in Rachel Reeves's spend, spend, spending review Discussion about a reversal began in No 10 almost immediately, but was denied for weeks by the government. By the time Sir Keir Starmer was confronted over the 'toxic' policy by a succession of angry MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party three weeks ago, it was clear that the position was beginning to shift. However, concern that there was a lack of detail about what would replace the previous policy quickly made clear that the government could not wait long before setting out a replacement. Ministers were determined to introduce a means test to avoid paying 'a few hundred pounds to millionaires', and officials struggled to graft one on to ageing computer systems in the Department for Work and Pensions. Eventually, it became clear that HM Revenue & Customs would have to be used, clawing payments back from wealthier pensioners through the tax system. This meant that a wish to base payments on household incomes had to be abandoned, as the system assesses only individual incomes. Ministers picked a relatively high income, covering three quarters of pensioners, to make sure that no older people in poverty would lose out even at the cost of hundreds of millions of pounds. Theoretically, this means that the pensioner partner of a millionaire will receive a winter fuel payment of £100 if they have an income below £35,000 themselves, but ministers decided that this was a price worth paying for a rapid solution. For ministers who have spent months defending hugely unpopular cuts, there has been frustration about how much political capital was wasted for such tiny sums of money. • Rachel Reeves's winter fuel cut reversal is a sign of desperation Much of the blame is being pinned on Reeves. It was she who chose to press ahead with a cut long recommended by Treasury advisers but rejected as politically toxic by a succession of previous chancellors. Starmer nodded the decision through, however, despite the clear risk of a severe political backlash. He is said to have been surprised by the scale of the reaction. Ministers will be hoping that the turnaround is enough to quell public anger, which led Labour to slump in the polls. Sharon Graham, head of the Unite union, one of Labour's biggest donors, put it bluntly. 'While this is an important step forward, questions will be asked about how this disastrous decision was made in the first place — the damage may not easily be reversed,' she said. 'Leadership is about choices and the choice to pit workers against pensioners was simply wrong.'
