Brazil Ex-president Collor De Mello Jailed For Corruption
Brazil's former president Fernando Collor de Mello was arrested and taken to prison Friday to begin serving a nearly nine-year sentence for corruption and money laundering, the latest former leader to face jail time.
Collor de Mello, Brazil's first democratically elected president after a decades-long dictatorship, resigned in 1992 after congress launched impeachment proceedings against him for allegedly taking bribes.
His arrest stems from a conviction over bribes taken two decades later while a senator, part of the sprawling "Car Wash" corruption scandal.
The 75-year-old was detained in Maceio city in northeastern Alagoas state, where he served as a senator and governor, a federal police source told AFP.
In 2023, Collor de Mello was found guilty of having received 20 million reais ($3.5 million dollars) in bribes while a senator between 2010 and 2014 to "irregularly facilitate contracts" between a construction company and a former subsidiary of Brazil's state oil company Petrobras.
On Thursday, a top court rejected his efforts to have the arrest order annulled.
His lawyers told local media that he was arrested before dawn as he was about to travel to the capital Brasilia to hand himself in.
He was incarcerated in an individual cell in a special wing of Baldomero Baldomero Cavalcanti de Oliveira prison in Maceio.
Collor de Mello is not Brazil's first president to fall foul of the law.
Four of the seven presidents who have led the country since the 1964-1985 military dictatorship have either been convicted, jailed or impeached.
In the latest case, far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered to stand trial over an alleged coup plot after losing the 2022 election.
Current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who served two terms between 2003 and 2010, was among dozens of top businessmen and politicians in Brazil and elsewhere in Latin America who were caught up in the tentacular Car Wash mega-probe.
The investigation uncovered a vast network of bribes paid by large construction companies to politicians in several countries to obtain major public works contracts.
Lula spent a year and a half behind bars before having his conviction overturned by the Supreme Court and winning a third term in October 2022.
Collor de Mello was heralded as a youthful, non-conformist figure, who promised far-reaching political and social reforms when he beat the leftist Lula to the presidency in 1989.
But his day in the sun did not last long.
Less than three years later he stood down as president as the impeachment process was nearly complete.
He returned to politics, after a period of ineligibility had expired, and in 2006 was elected senator for Alagoas, a seat he held until 2022.
In 2022, he campaigned for Bolsonaro who was seeking re-election but it was Collor de Mello's old adversary Lula who triumphed. Former far-right Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro (L) and ex-president (1990-1992) Fernando Collor de Mello (R) are allies against current leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
High Seas Treaty: UN's Guterres warns of 'wild west' – DW – 06/09/2025
UN chief Antonio Guterres has warned of peril as the world's oceans face "predatory" mining, masses of plastic waste and rising sea temperatures. Small nations have called for big ones to "prove" their commitment. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Monday told delegates at the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France: "The ocean is the ultimate shared resource. But we are failing it." The UN boss cited collapsing fish stocks, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, plastic pollution, destructive fishing and the quest for mineral riches at the ocean floor as key threats in his remarks. The conference was organized to ratify a treaty that would give nations the right to establish protected marine areas in international waters. Beyond providing sustenance and a habitat for local communities, sea creatures and organisms, oceans also absorb roughly 30% the globe's CO2 emissions. The High Seas Treaty, adopted in 2023, would allow countries to legally establish protection for roughly two-thirds of the world's oceans — where activities are largely unregulated today. Currently, only 8% of the world's oceans have marine conservation designations, although it is estimated that only 1% overall can be considered truly protected. Macron says High Seas Treaty a 'done deal' To go into effect, the High Seas Treaty must ratified by at least 60 countries. French President Emmanuel Macron told those gathered that 50 countries had ratified the treaty so far and another 15 had formally promised to, making it "a done deal." France's foreign minister said he expects implementation to take place by the end of the year. Macron also announced that France would partially restrict bottom-trawling — a destructive form of fishing — in half of the countries protected marine areas. But conservation groups blasted him for not going far enough to protect French waters. High seas treaty is 'a big deal': Oceanographer To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Guterres: Mining could turn seabed into 'wild west' The UN's Guterres began the conference by addressing a major threat facing the world's oceans — deep-sea mining. Guterres warned of the dangers of letting the ocean floor "become the wild west." The US, China and Russia, among others, are keen to exploit potential mineral wealth on and beneath the ocean floor. US President Donald Trump has moved aggressively on this front, fast-tracking US exploration in international waters and threatening to take territorial control of Greenland to get its share of Arctic rare earths. Macron is lobbying for a moratorium on deep-sea mining, calling it "an international necessity." "I think it's madness to launch predatory economic action that will disrupt the deep seabed, disrupt biodiversity, destroy it and release irrecoverable carbon sinks," he said. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva joined Macron in criticizing a "predatory race" among countries looking to extract critical minerals on the ocean floor. Deep-sea mining: New battleground for critical minerals To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video No US delegation present at ocean conference The US has also withdrawn from all international climate commitments and cut funding for climate and oceanographic projects under President Trump. Commenting on the fact that the US had not sent a delegation to the conference, France's Macron, said: "It's not a surprise, we know the American administration's position on these issues." "If they [the US] don't ratify it, they are not bound by it," said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance. "Implementation will take years but it is critical that we start now," said Hubbard, adding, "we won't let the US' absence stop that from happening." Small island nations call out the big fish Investment in ocean health totaled $10 billion (€8.8 billion) from 2015 to 2019. The UN estimates that investment needs to be $175 billion annually to meet conservation coals. The UN has announced it will introduce a new scheme to mobilize new and diverse sources of capital to finance an attempt to restore ocean health by 2028. Alongside political and business leaders, ocean experts, conservationists and activists, the Nice conference was also attended by representatives from numerous small island nations facing rising seas, marine trash and decimated fish stocks. Climate change – Fiji is running out of time To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although the conference will not produce any legally binding agreement, those engaged in its implementation are pushing ahead. Samoa, for one, led by example this week, announcing the creation of nine marine parks protecting 30% of its waters. As large nations haggle over the price of protecting the oceans, President Surangel Whipps Jr of the low-lying Pacific nation of Palau, called them out: "We say to you, if you are serious about protecting the ocean, prove it." Edited by: Zac Crellin
DW
13 hours ago
- DW
What does Trump's new travel ban mean? – DW – 06/09/2025
President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries, now in effect, aims to protect the US from "foreign terrorists." What are the reasons and who is exempt? This time, it's not a new executive order but a presidential proclamation that has caused a worldwide stir. The policy signed by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday is entitled "Restricting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats" and takes effect on June 9. Like executive orders, presidential proclamations are one of the instruments with which a US president can implement the administration's will, particularly regarding national security and immigration. Unlike laws, these documents do not require the approval of Congress. However, they must be based on powers granted by law. In terms of content, Trump's new proclamation ties in with previous travel bans imposed during his first term as president, which the Supreme Court upheld in 2018. Which countries are affected? The proclamation bans entry to the US for all nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, regardless of their reasons for travel, unless the State Department deems their entry into the US to be in the national interest. In addition to these 12 countries, people from seven additional nations will face partial restrictions: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Stricter visa checks and restrictions will apply, but these will also be case-dependent. A wealthy businessperson might be allowed to enter, while tourists or students could face higher hurdles. Trump issues travel ban for people from 12 countries To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump cites Boulder, Colorado attack In a video published on social media, Trump cited the June 1 attack in Boulder, Colorado as his reason for the order, saying it "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted." He also said nationals from certain countries posed "significant risks" of overstaying their visas. An Egyptian man has been charged with injuring several people when he hurled Molotov cocktails at a demonstration in Boulder calling for the release of Hamas-held hostages in Gaza. According to the US Department of Homeland Security, he had overstayed his tourist visa. Egypt is not listed in Trump's newest proclamation. In the proclamation, the Republican president argues that the countries affected by the new travel ban do not provide enough information on their nationals to assess potential security risks. Some of the countries listed — Iran and Cuba, for example — have been designated by Washington as "state sponsors of terrorism." This new ban will tighten up already existing measures. The Trump administration has criticized the fact that some countries do not take back their nationals when the US requires them to leave. However, critics have speculated that the ban has political and economic reasons, pointing out that Saudi Arabia and other countries, with which the Trump family has close business ties, will not be affected. Trump said other countries could be added to the list in future Image: Leah Millis/REUTERS Who will be exempt from new restrictions? Green Card holders dual nationals with a US passport athletes and coaches participating in "major" competitions in the US Afghan nationals, who worked for or on behalf of the US government or ISAF, with Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) Iranian nationals with immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran foreign diplomats and representatives of international organizations on official visits to the US close relatives of US citizens (parents, children, spouses) adopted children of US citizens certain foreign national employees of the US government who have served abroad for at least 15 years those who were granted asylum or admitted to the US as refugees before the ban came into effect If not exempt, nationals from the banned countries will no longer be able to enter the US from June 9 for business trips, educational travel or family visits. The decision is also likely to have economic repercussions. The poorer countries on the list in particular, such as Haiti and Yemen, have benefited from trade ties with the US, as well as remittances sent by people living and working in the US. Human rights groups have slammed the travel ban as being racist and discriminatory, pointing out that refugees and asylum-seekers from conflict regions will now lose access to protection programs in the US. Harvard students from China, Taiwan in limbo To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trumps targets Harvard University Trump also announced specific measures to block new foreign students from attending Harvard University, whom he accused of developing "extensive entanglements with foreign countries, including our adversaries" and flouting "the civil rights of its students and faculty." "I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University," Trump stated in his proclamation. Initially, entry to almost all foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in educational programs at Harvard will be suspended for six months. The suspension period could be extended. The US State Department will be directed to examine whether to revoke the existing visas of students at the university. In a statement, Harvard said this was "yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights." Earlier this year, Harvard President Alan Garber wrote that the university, which is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, would not "surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights." This article was originally written in German.
DW
13 hours ago
- DW
What does Trump's new travel ban mean? – DW – 06/05/2025
President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries aims to protect the US from "foreign terrorists." What are the reasons and who is exempt? This time, it's not a new executive order but a presidential proclamation that has caused a worldwide stir. The policy signed by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday is entitled "Restricting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats" and takes effect on June 9. Like executive orders, presidential proclamations are one of the instruments with which a US president can implement the administration's will, particularly regarding national security and immigration. Unlike laws, these documents do not require the approval of Congress. However, they must be based on powers granted by law. In terms of content, Trump's new proclamation ties in with previous travel bans imposed during his first term as president, which the Supreme Court upheld in 2018. Which countries are affected? The proclamation bans entry to the US for all nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, regardless of their reasons for travel, unless the State Department deems their entry into the US to be in the national interest. In addition to these 12 countries, people from seven additional nations will face partial restrictions: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Stricter visa checks and restrictions will apply, but these will also be case-dependent. A wealthy businessperson might be allowed to enter, while tourists or students could face higher hurdles. Trump issues travel ban for people from 12 countries To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump cites Boulder, Colorado attack In a video published on social media, Trump cited the June 1 attack in Boulder, Colorado as his reason for the order, saying it "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted." He also said nationals from certain countries posed "significant risks" of overstaying their visas. An Egyptian man has been charged with injuring several people when he hurled Molotov cocktails at a demonstration in Boulder calling for the release of Hamas-held hostages in Gaza. According to the US Department of Homeland Security, he had overstayed his tourist visa. Egypt is not listed in Trump's newest proclamation. In the proclamation, the Republican president argues that the countries affected by the new travel ban do not provide enough information on their nationals to assess potential security risks. Some of the countries listed — Iran and Cuba, for example — have been designated by Washington as "state sponsors of terrorism." This new ban will tighten up already existing measures. The Trump administration has criticized the fact that some countries do not take back their nationals when the US requires them to leave. However, critics have speculated that the ban has political and economic reasons, pointing out that Saudi Arabia and other countries, with which the Trump family has close business ties, will not be affected. Trump said other countries could be added to the list in future Image: Leah Millis/REUTERS Who will be exempt from new restrictions? • Green Card holders • Dual nationals with a US passport • Athletes and coaches participating in "major" competitions in the US • Afghan nationals, who worked for or on behalf of the US government or ISAF, with Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) • Iranian nationals with immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran • Foreign diplomats and representatives of international organizations on official visits to the US • Close relatives of US citizens (parents, children, spouses) • Adopted children of US citizens • Certain foreign national employees of the US government who have served abroad for at least 15 years • Those who were granted asylum or admitted to the US as refugees before the ban came into effect If not exempt, nationals from the banned countries will no longer be able to enter the US from June 9 for business trips, educational travel or family visits. The decision is also likely to have economic repercussions. The poorer countries on the list in particular, such as Haiti and Yemen, have benefited from trade ties with the US, as well as remittances sent by people living and working in the US. Human rights groups have slammed the travel ban as being racist and discriminatory, pointing out that refugees and asylum-seekers from conflict regions will now lose access to protection programs in the US. Harvard students from China, Taiwan in limbo To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Harvard University targeted Trump also announced specific measures to block new foreign students from attending Harvard University, whom he accused of developing "extensive entanglements with foreign countries, including our adversaries" and flouting "the civil rights of its students and faculty." "I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University," Trump stated in his proclamation. Initially, entry to almost all foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in educational programs at Harvard will be suspended for six months. The suspension period could be extended. The US State Department will be directed to examine whether to revoke the existing visas of students at the university. In a statement, Harvard said this was "yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights." Earlier this year, Harvard President Alan Garber wrote that the university, which is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, would not "surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights." This article was originally written in German.
