US foreign policy no basis to detain Columbia protester Khalil, judge rules
NEW YORK (Reuters) -The Trump administration cannot use U.S. foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge ruled on Wednesday, but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release.
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday at 9:30 EDT (1330 GMT) to give the administration the chance to appeal.
Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of U.S. immigration law granting the U.S. secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests.
"The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm."
The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to U.S. foreign policy.
Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana.
Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept U.S. college campuses after Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault.
The Hamas attack killed 1,195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
An Israeli attack on Iran could send oil prices above $100 as tensions mount
Beset by near-universal bearish outlooks just a month ago, oil prices could spike to more than $100 a barrel in the event of an Israeli attack on Iran, some analysts are warning. Crude prices spiked as much as 5% overnight — before paring gains — on fears of military escalation between Iran and Israel as President Donald Trump announced the withdrawal of some U.S. personnel from embassies and bases across the Middle East. The front-month August contract for global benchmark Brent crude was trading at $69 per barrel at 3:20 p.m. ET on Thursday, while the front-month July U.S. WTI contract was at $67.7 per barrel. "They [U.S. military personnel] are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we will see what happens... We have given notice to move out," Trump told reporters on Wednesday. The Pentagon has ordered the withdrawal of troops and non-essential staff from embassies in Baghdad, Kuwait and Bahrain. The jury is still out as to whether the moves are a pressure play ahead of upcoming U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, or whether the U.S., Israel and Iran are truly on the verge of conflict. The geopolitical risk premium is "already at least partially reflected in current oil prices," according to J.P. Morgan's global commodities research team, citing Brent crude trading at just under $70 a barrel, already above its model-derived fair value figure of $66 for June. "This suggests an elevated 7% probability of a worst-case scenario, where the price reaction is exponential rather than linear, with the impact on supply potentially extending beyond a 2.1 mbd (million barrels per day) reduction in Iranian oil exports," the bank's research team wrote in a note published Thursday. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Israel appears ready to attack Iran, according to reports citing U.S. and European officials, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pressing Trump to allow strikes. But the American president said in late May that he had warned Netanyahu against attacking Iran while negotiations with Washington were under way. U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is currently set to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of negotiations. Strait of Hormuz in focus Oil traders are focusing on the potential of a wider conflict shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which 20% of the volume of the world's total oil consumption passes daily. The British Navy on Wednesday issued a rare warning to ships in the region, saying it had "been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners." It urged caution for vessels transiting "the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz." Beyond that, J.P. Morgan warned, "a more general Middle East conflagration could ignite retaliatory responses from major oil producing countries in the region responsible for a third of global oil output." "Under this severe outcome," the bank's analysts wrote, "we estimate oil prices could surge to the $120-130/bbl range." Even before the latest uptick in tensions, some oil industry watchers were already making bullish calls despite a flood of announced OPEC+ supply coming onto the market, and lower global growth and demand forecasts due to trade and tariff tensions. Josh Young, founder and chief investment officer at Houston-based Bison Interests, told CNBC in late May that physical markets are more tightly supplied than previously thought, and with several oil rigs in the U.S. shale patch coming offline just as the U.S. summer driving season begins, markets should be preparing for Brent crude at $85 a barrel. "The pure inventory versus consumption would indicate $85 [per barrel], which is way higher than where we are right now. It's almost uncomfortable to say that, but that's the current price implied by inventories," Young told CNBC's Access Middle East. He cited his forecast figure as "fair value," arguing that "typically, you go from too cheap to too expensive. So I don't think we should be ruling out $100 oil this year. And I think if there is a geopolitical risk, it could get even higher." Without the geopolitical risk premium — namely, a conflict with Iran — Young still sees crude coming up to the $80 to $85 per barrel range, particularly in the event of trade deals being reached and Trump's tariffs being lowered. The outlook is boosted by this month's forecast from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which sees a decline in U.S. oil production for the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic due to slower drilling activity and a declining rig count. Such bullish forecasts are certainly not the norm, however. Without a military attack on Iran, J.P. Morgan's base case for oil "remains in the low-to-mid $60s oil for the remainder of 2025, and $60 in 2026." Goldman Sachs also maintains an oil price forecast in the $50 to $60 per barrel range for this and next year, despite noting an improving demand picture, downside risks to U.S. supply and geopolitical tensions. The recent rise in inventories due to OPEC+ output increases, "supports our cautious oil price forecast, with Brent expected to average $60 for the rest of 2025 and $56 in 2026," the bank's commodities team wrote. "However, small misses in OPEC+ supply suggest that lower-than-anticipated spare capacity represents an upside risk to our price forecast."
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats challenge Trump on immigration enforcement
Democratic state leaders are pushing back against the Trump administration's policies and threats this week. The big picture: As protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids escalate nationwide, particularly in California, lawmakers are seizing the moment to challenge the administration's bluff about not cooperating with Trump's enforcement policies. Trump and members of his administration have threatened to arrest any government officials who stand in the way of the president's policies, especially when it comes to immigration. The president's border czar Tom Homan said he wouldn't rule out arresting Democratic officials who impede law enforcement or harbor undocumented immigrants. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) dared Homan to do so, and Trump suggested the governor indeed be arrested amid an escalating feud. Yes, but: Arrests aren't the only concern facing Democrats. In the latest flareup, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was physically removed from a Los Angeles press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday as he said he tried to ask a question. Padilla's encounter follows another between three House Democrats from New Jersey and ICE agents last month, which ultimately resulted in the indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) McIver is charged with three counts of "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers." The New Jersey Rep. said she plans to plead not guilty and called the charges a "brazen attempt at political intimidation." State of play: President Trump has doubled down on his sweeping immigration crackdown, deploying 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to California this week amid fiery demonstrations against federal immigration raids. Newsom, along with other Democratic city and state leaders, have fiercely opposed the military's deployment to quell protesters. Still, Trump has sent troops into the state. Meanwhile, Trump vowed that protests responding to his multimillion-dollar military parade in D.C. this weekend will be met with "very big force." Zoom in: Democratic lawmakers have for months been challenging the administration's policies — on everything from immigration to tariffs. A coalition of 20 Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the administration last month over threats to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding if they don't follow his immigration enforcement polices. This week, the focus has been on the administration's hardline immigration policies. During an hours-long congressional hearing Thursday, three governors cast the administration's immigration policies and response to protests as undemocratic while Republican lawmakers grilled them on state-level enforcement. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Homan could "try" to arrest them over their disconnects on the issue. Zoom out: Congresspeople are not the only ones challenging the administration, with a battle at play between the executive and judiciary. Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan, who was charged in April by the FBI with allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest, has painted her case as a broader defense of the judiciary's independence from the Trump administration. Meanwhile, LA Mayor Karen Bass and other Democratic regional leaders at a Wednesday briefing called for the ICE raids to end, as demonstrations continued across the country.
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Protests ignite after U.S. customs detains Palestinian men at SFO
Two Palestinian men had their visas revoked by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at San Francisco International Airport Wednesday and remain in federal custody, according to Supervisor Bilal Mahmood. Driving the news: An East Bay Jewish congregation had invited Eid Hthaleen and Ouda Alhadlin, two community leaders in the occupied West Bank, to participate in an interfaith speaking tour. The men's detention comes as the Trump administration escalates immigration raids, cracks down on nationwide protests and tries to deport some pro-Palestinian protesters. State of play: The two men arrived on a flight from Jordan around 1pm Wednesday and were denied entry with "no cause given" despite holding valid visas, according to Mahmood. Both were scheduled to speak at the Kehilla Community Synagogue to help fundraise for children's programming in the West Bank. Members of the synagogue raised the alarm after the two men failed to meet them at the airport, Mahmood told Axios. Mahmood visited SFO Wednesday night after a call from the public defender's office, "knocking on doors" and staying until 2am in search of answers. A CPB official eventually confirmed to him that they are holding both men and plan to return them to the Middle East as early as Thursday afternoon. What they're saying: CPB did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. The latest: The synagogue quickly rallied supporters Thursday morning. Roughly 100 protesters stationed themselves at SFO's international terminal, chanting "Let them go" and holding signs that said "Jews say stop the genocide of Palestinians," Mission Local reports. The Bay Area branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations also organized a City Hall demonstration Thursday with other faith leaders to demand the men's release. "We don't know what conditions they're in or if they've been given any food," Mahmood said. Zoom in: Mahmood called their detention an unconscionable act of censorship and discrimination, especially when Hthaleen and Alhadlin are part of a "humanitarian mission" to bridge the gap between Palestinians and Jews.
