Hong Kong urges universities to facilitate students after Harvard ban
HONG KONG: Hong Kong's Education Bureau said that it had called on universities in the Chinese territory to attract top talent following a ban on Harvard University enrolling foreign students.
United States President Donald Trump's administration revoked Harvard University's ability to enrol international students and is forcing current foreign students to transfer to other schools or lose their legal status.
The ban, effective for the 2025 to 2026 school year, comes as the administration said Harvard fostered antisemitism and coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party. Chinese nationals make up about a fifth of Harvard's foreign student intake in 2024.
"The Education Bureau has promptly called on all universities in Hong Kong to introduce facilitation measures for those eligible with a view to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of students and scholars, and to attract top talent," the bureau said in an emailed statement.
The bureau has contacted the Harvard Club of Hong Kong to offer support for students who have been admitted to Harvard for further studies.
"We will continue to keep a close eye on the needs of students whose studies have been affected by the shifting global education landscape," it said, adding that it would consider support measures as part of the city's role as an "international education hub."
Hong Kong, a former British colony with a population of 7.5 million, has five universities in the top 100 of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings and was until recently regarded as one of Asia's freest academic arenas.
Schools and universities in the financial hub are now obliged to integrate national security and patriotic themes into their teaching, bringing them closer in line with education in mainland China.
Hong Kong's University of Science and Technology (HKUST) on Friday (May 23) announced an open invitation to international undergraduate and postgraduate students at Harvard University, as well as those holding confirmed offers to continue their studies at HKUST.
"The university will provide unconditional offers, streamlined admission procedures, and academic support to facilitate a seamless transition for interested students."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
12 minutes ago
- CNA
Can the US-China agreement to restore trade truce ease long-standing tensions?
Trade relations between the United States and China remain fluid, even as the world's two biggest economies have agreed on a framework aimed at reducing friction and reviving the flow of sensitive goods, said observers. Top officials from Washington and Beijing on Tuesday (Jun 10) agreed on the preliminary plan after two days of intense discussions in London. The framework builds upon the groundwork that the superpowers laid in Geneva last month to ease tariffs they had taken against each other's economies. But further details, including plans for a next round of talks, remain sparse. 'It's important to realise that this remains a very fluid, a very contentious relationship,' said Alex Capri, a senior lecturer at the National University of Singapore Business School. 'In the past, historically, negotiating a proper free trade agreement literally took years because there are so many moving parts. There are so many elements … and that takes a lot of time.' Capri expressed skepticism about the efficacy of short-term negotiations, saying these might not lead to long-lasting agreements. 'I think we'll continue to see more transactionalism, and we'll probably see more and more of these types of shorter, one-on-one type of meetings that remain a work in progress,' he told CNA's Asia First. But observers said they are cautiously optimistic about the positive shift in tone between the two global superpowers. 'It's unclear what has been agreed to besides a sort of pathway to a framework to implement a concept of a plan. So it's early days,' said trade and economic policy expert Deborah Elms. 'But I suppose that the good news is, both sides do seem to see that escalation is not in their interest, and they agree that negotiations or discussions are important pathways to get to some kind of resolution.' GROWING WEAPONISATION OF RESOURCES However, analysts highlighted how countries have been weaponising their strategic commodities to gain an edge. China's dominance in rare earth minerals and America's lead in semiconductor innovations have become geopolitical bargaining chips. 'That is something that's here to stay,' said Capri. 'I think it's going to be more and more the new normal to see a linkage between tariff discussions and discussions about strategic supply chains such as rare earth and semiconductors.' He added: 'We're looking at a very transactional world, certainly under the Trump 2.0 administration where tariffs, export controls, sanctions, all of these things are going to be lumped together now in trade-related and commercial discussions.' Although the initial focus was tariff reduction, experts cautioned that these strategic issues could derail momentum. 'Both sides have identified that they have some cards to play in this dispute, and both have shown a willingness to use those if the negotiations start to unravel,' said Elms, who is head of trade policy at philanthropic organisation Hinrich Foundation. 'The tariff discussion is only a small piece of what is now on the agenda,' she told CNA's Asia Now. 'There's a whole lot of things that you could put on the negotiating cards for both sides. All of them are difficult.' COMPLEX NEGOTIATION CHALLENGES The high-stakes issues require compromise from both countries, Elms stressed. 'There are lots of things that could go horribly wrong in these discussions, unless they keep to the sort of bedrock principle that we do not want to have an escalation of tension going forward.' Despite the complexity of factors now on the negotiation table, she said she believes the concerted effort on both sides in reaching a deal is encouraging. 'I think talking is always better than not talking, but the fact that it's proving difficult to get clear outcomes is a worry.' On Tuesday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove some of the recent US export restrictions. In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang noted that the framework would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders for review. 'The fact that both sides have to fly back to present whatever was discussed in person to their leaders tells you something about the negotiating leverage that the teams had on the ground,' said Elms. 'In other words, they weren't authorised ahead of time to accept an agreement. I think that it shows you how complicated these talks will ultimately be.' IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES Observers warned that countries lacking strategic resources may find themselves increasingly sidelined in global trade discussions. 'Unfortunately, for the middle-tier countries that don't have that same kind of bargaining power … those countries are going to have less choice,' said Capri. 'They're going to be pushed into positions where they're not going to be able to leverage a lot of things like the bigger countries when it comes to negotiating a trade deal, whether it's over tariffs or whether it's over access to supply chains.' He highlighted the importance of strategic alliances, encouraging smaller countries to join minilateral agreements to gain negotiating leverage. 'What's in the best interest of middle-tier countries is to build as many relationships as possible, to forge as many minilateral agreements,' said Capri. 'Smaller countries are going to be looking to position themselves and connect themselves with as many opportunities as possible.' Meanwhile, some countries are racing to strike a deal with the US before President Donald Trump's 90-day pause on his sweeping tariffs expires on Jul 9. Without agreements in place, countries may once again face the duties temporarily imposed on Apr 9. 'In any case, these are short deadlines for very complicated negotiations with an awful lot of trading partners,' said Elms. 'Ultimately, the decision maker is Donald Trump himself, and his capacity to manage all of these decisions is also time-limited. He only has so many hours in a day in which he could actually get into the details or even sign off on an agreed upon commitment.'
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Russia says it is ready to remove excess nuclear materials from Iran
MOSCOW - Russia said on Wednesday it was ready to remove nuclear materials from Iran and convert them into fuel as a potential way to help narrow differences between the United States and Iran over the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme. Tehran says it has the right to peaceful nuclear power, but its swiftly-advancing uranium enrichment programme has raised fears in the West and across the Gulf that it wants to build a nuclear weapon. The fate of Iran's uranium enrichment is at the heart of the disagreement between Washington and Tehran: U.S. President Donald Trump says that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, while Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says Iran cannot abandon enrichment. President Vladimir Putin told Trump in a phone call that he was ready to use Russia's close partnership with Iran to help with negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme, the Kremlin said last week. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, who oversees arms control and U.S. relations, told Russian media on Wednesday that efforts to reach a solution should be redoubled and that Moscow was willing to help with ideas and in practical ways. "We are ready to provide assistance to both Washington and Tehran, not only politically, not only in the form of ideas that could be of use in the negotiation process, but also practically: for example, through the export of excess nuclear material produced by Iran and its subsequent adaptation to the production of fuel for reactors," Ryabkov said. The United States wants all of Iran's highly enriched uranium (HEU) to be shipped out of the country. Tehran says it should only send out any excess amount above a ceiling that was agreed in a 2015 deal. Russia, the world's biggest nuclear power, does not want to see Iran acquire nuclear weapons, but believes it has every right to develop its own civilian nuclear programme and that any use of military force against it would be illegal and unacceptable. Moscow has bought weapons from Iran for its war in Ukraine and signed a 20-year strategic partnership deal with Tehran earlier this year. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Japan remains cautious on tariff impact in June econ report
TOKYO :Japan's government reiterated its warning on the risks from U.S. tariffs on economic growth, saying in a monthly report on Wednesday that the potential impact on corporate profits needed attention. The economy faces pressure from U.S. import levies of 24 per cent from July unless officials can negotiate them down. Japan's government is also seeking an exemption for its carmakers from a separate 25 per cent import tariff on vehicles. Japan's gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2 per cent in the January-March quarter, even before U.S. President Donald Trump announced his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2. "The economy is recovering moderately, while uncertainty is arising from U.S. trade policies," the Cabinet Office said in its monthly report for June released on Wednesday, keeping the assessment unchanged for a third month. In addition to tariffs, the report maintained its reference to "the effect of continued price rises on household sentiment and consumption" as another negative risk to the economy. It also noted that corporate profits were recovering, citing first-quarter business statistics, but added a fresh reference to the potential impact of trade disruptions. "With some firms withholding financial forecasts amid uncertainties surrounding U.S. tariffs, their impact on earnings may come to light only in the data for the April-June quarter or beyond," an official at the Cabinet Office told a press briefing. While no significant impact from U.S. tariffs on Japan's export volumes has been seen so far, trade trends from May onwards required attention, the official added. On wages, this spring's pay negotiations probably led to an average raise of more than 5 per cent, exceeding last year's, although smaller firms lagged bigger companies, the official said, based on the national labour group Rengo's data. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said earlier this week that his ruling party would pledge to achieve growth of more than 50 per cent in Japan's average income by 2040 in campaigning for the upper house elections next month.
