logo
PEPFAR disruption could kill half a million children by 2030, study finds

PEPFAR disruption could kill half a million children by 2030, study finds

Telegraph08-04-2025

The support PEPFAR funding provides includes life-saving antiretroviral treatments for those with HIV, as well as antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection. It also supports voluntary medical male circumcisions, the training of health care workers, and HIV prevention services for girls and young women.
On January 20, Donald Trump signed an executive order halting these life-saving efforts. The decision followed news that several nurses funded by PEPFAR had performed illegal abortions in Mozambique.
Prof Lucie Cluver, co-lead author of the analysis, from the University of Oxford, was a social worker in South Africa before PEPFAR was introduced.
'My work was with dying children and mothers and I had nothing to give them. Then PEPFAR came and everything changed – it was like seeing a continent come to life again,' she told the Telegraph.
But the suspension of PEPFAR has thrown efforts to end HIV and AIDS into jeopardy, she said.
'Losing stable, long-term support for PEPFAR programmes sets global progress to end HIV/AIDS back to the dark ages of the epidemic, especially for children and adolescents,' she said.
Prof Cluver said a colleague had recently returned from the rural Copperbelt in Zambia and told her it felt like the clock had been turned back 25 years.
'They were seeing children with sores on their faces and mothers dying again,' she said.
The impact of PEPFAR extends beyond HIV and AIDS prevention – it also also supports many programmes working to improve child health and eliminate sexual violence against girls.
If these programmes end, there is a risk that the children they help will 'slip through the cracks,' said Susan Hillis, a Senior Research Officer at Imperial College London and another of the report's co-authors.
'[Reducing] sexual violence is one of the most fundamental things PEPFAR has done,' Prof Cluver added. 'It's often how young girls are contracting HIV and those who have been victimised get mentorship, counselling and support. Losing it would be catastrophic.'
The researchers urged the US to support a five-year transition plan instead of stopping PEPFAR immediately, so that responsibility for its programmes can be taken on gradually by African governments.
'What is urgently needed now is a well-planned transition to expanded country-ownership of PEPFAR programmes that will offer stability for countries that currently rely on PEPFAR support,' said co-author Prof Chris Desmond, of the University of Kwazulu-Natal.
Prof Cluver told the Telegraph that, if PEPFAR is terminated, the country most affected will be the US itself.
'PEPFAR is so important to the way the US is viewed globally. It is the reason why the US has such strong trade and diplomatic relations with Africa. I hope they'll make the right choice.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariffs are already making your health insurance costs go up
Tariffs are already making your health insurance costs go up

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tariffs are already making your health insurance costs go up

Health insurance companies have begun informing states that tariffs will result in premium increases for individual and small group market enrollees in 2026. This comes amid congressional considerations of cuts to Medicaid and the expectation that they will end enhanced subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. A research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown, Sabrina Corlette, told Axios that there's a 'perfect storm of factors that are driving prices up.' Health insurance companies calculate their premiums ahead of each year, basing them on the expected prices and demand for goods and services. President Donald Trump's tariffs are expected to increase the prices of prescription drugs, medical devices, and other medical products and services. Some of those costs will eventually be paid by those enrolling in health coverage. Several health insurance companies responsible for plans for individuals and small groups have informed state regulators that tariffs are prompting them to raise premiums more than they would have otherwise for next year, according to Matt McGough, a KFF policy analyst. In a filing last month, the Independent Health Benefits Corporation told regulators in New York that it is set to raise premiums for its individual market enrollees 38.4 percent in 2026. Independent Health spokesperson Frank Sava told Axios that roughly three percent of that is directly due to tariffs, according to projections on how much tariffs are expected to increase the prices of drugs and the use of imported drugs. UnitedHealthcare of Oregon revealed in a filing that almost three percent of its planned 19.8 percent premium increase for small group enrollees next year is due to uncertainty about tariffs, specifically regarding how they're expected to affect pharmaceutical prices. McGough told the outlet that insurers 'don't have any historical precedent or data to project what this is going to mean for their business and health costs.' 'I think it really makes sense that they're trying to hedge their bets,' he added. While Trump has yet to put in place pharmaceutical tariffs, he told reporters Monday that they would be arriving 'very soon.' Insurers typically sign reimbursement contracts with hospitals that last several years; however, hospitals can request renegotiation if their costs increase due to tariffs, Corlette noted. Insurers are unable to change their premiums during the year. However, if health plans exceed their premium estimates in rate filings, they must reimburse enrollees the difference. Insurers have no way to compensate for unplanned costs afterwards. At the same time, some insurers have indicated that they're reviewing the effects of the tariffs, but they're not increasing their premiums because of them as of this time. "There is uncertainty around inflation and the economy due to possible tariffs however we did [not] put anything for this in this filing," Kaiser Foundation Health of the Northwest said in a report to the state of Oregon. McGough noted that state regulators can push back against the premium calculations put forward by insurers before they're made final. Insurers must disclose their 2026 Affordable Care Act marketplace plan rates to federal regulators by July 16. Proposed rates will be shared by August 1.

Where you're most likely to be infected with deadly disease after Brit dies
Where you're most likely to be infected with deadly disease after Brit dies

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Where you're most likely to be infected with deadly disease after Brit dies

As the rare rabies virus that spreads to people from the saliva of infected animals claims the life of a UK woman, we take a look at where the disease can be found across the globe A Briton has died from rabies after being bitten by a stray dog in Morocco and travellers are now being warned by the UK Health Security Agency, known as the UKHSA, to be careful around animals when travelling to countries where the infection is prevalent. The deadly condition is passed on through injuries such as bites and scratches from an infected animal, with exposure treatment very effective if it is given woman who died was diagnosed in Yorkshire and The Humber, with health workers and close contacts being assessed and offered vaccination as a precautionary measure. Dr Katherine Russell, head of emerging infections and zoonoses at the UKHSA, offered reassuring words for anyone worried about infection. "There is no risk to the wider public in relation to this case," said the expert. "Human cases of rabies are extremely rare in the UK and worldwide there are no documented instances of direct human to human transmission." ‌ READ MORE: Brit woman dies from rabies after contact with stray dog on Morocco holiday ‌ Thousands of people do die each year from rabies, mainly in Asia and Africa, which makes up for 95 per cent of the human deaths around the world. Tragically, 40 per cent of fatalities involve factors to the prevalence of rabies in the two continents include inadequate vaccination programmes, a lack of access to healthcare due to poverty and high numbers of stray dogs. We take a closer look at the global spread... Asia Rabies is particularly prevalent in South Asia, with high incidence rates in countries including India, which is a significant global contributor to rabies deaths, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Africa Many African nations also experience high rates of rabies, particularly in rural areas. East and West Africa are considered high-risk, particularly for canine rabies. Countries like Ethiopia, Burundi, and Rwanda are countries specifically identified as rabies hotspots. Other areas While rabies is less common in Europe and North America, it still exists in certain wildlife populations. In the Americas, bats are the primary vectors of the disease while in Eastern Europe, there are sporadic cases involving red does not circulate in wild or domestic animals in the UK but some species of bats can carry a rabies-like virus. There were six cases of human rabies associated with animal exposures abroad reported over here between 2000 and World Health Organization says travellers visiting areas where rabies is prevalent should be aware of the risks and know what to do if they are bitten or scratched. Dr Katherine Russell advised: "If you are bitten, scratched or licked by an animal in a country where rabies is found then you should wash the wound or site of exposure with plenty of soap and water and seek medical advice without delay."

Australia makes world-first change to blood donation rules
Australia makes world-first change to blood donation rules

The Independent

time6 hours ago

  • The Independent

Australia makes world-first change to blood donation rules

Australia is set to lift its ban on sexually active gay and bisexual men from donating blood and plasma on 14 July, becoming the only country to remove all sexual activity-based restrictions for donating. The previous rules barred gay and bisexual men, and transgender women who have sex with men, from donating to decrease the risk of HIV transmission. Lifeblood, the national agency for donation services, estimates the change will allow over 600,000 more people to donate plasma. While people taking the HIV prevention drug PrEP can donate plasma, they are barred from donating blood. Those with HIV or with a partner with HIV are prevented from donating both blood and plasma. Lifeblood will implement gender-neutral assessments, asking all potential donors the same questions about sexual activity, regardless of gender or sexuality.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store