Lawless: Inmate says police, prosecutors used bogus witnesses to falsely charge him
ELKHART, Ind. — Christopher Thomas left a trail of blood as he staggered and fell on the ground outside his motel room.
As he lay face down, wearing only a pair of shorts and a wristwatch, several more bullets pierced the left side of his head.
The former U.S. Marine who spiraled into crack addiction died from one gunshot wound to the chest and at least four to the head. Thomas had been a confidential informant for the Elkhart County Drug Task Force for 10 months leading up to his shooting Aug. 19, 1998. He'd helped narcotics detectives by conducting nearly 100 drug buys that incriminated dozens of cocaine dealers.
The murder of Thomas remained unsolved for several months. Investigators had no murder weapon, no fingerprints and no evidence pointing to a suspect. Early eyewitness descriptions of the gunman indicated only that he was a tall, thin Black man who wore dark clothing.
But in early 1999, Elkhart detectives zeroed in on two suspects. Police and prosecutors alleged that Reginald Dillard and Eddie Fredrick, two drug dealers from Michigan, carried out the murder under orders from a local kingpin who wanted Thomas dead for working with the police. A jury convicted them the following year.
Dillard proclaimed his innocence during his trial and at the sentencing hearing.
"We didn't kill the man," Dillard said. "I didn't kill nobody."
The witnesses, the police and the prosecutors all lied, he said. "Everybody."
The men both received the maximum sentence of 65 years in prison, where Fredrick died in 2005.
Dillard, however, is back in court armed with what he and a team of attorneys contend is new evidence the case against him and Fredrick was built on fabricated statements from fake witnesses.
Among their allegations, detailed in a 273-page petition challenging Dillard's conviction: The prosecution's star witness, a woman who said she saw the murder, was not there when Thomas was shot. Instead, they say, she was a false informant tapped to incriminate Dillard and Fredrick by a detective with whom she was having sex.
Prosecutors also arranged favorable plea deals for other witnesses in exchange for fabricated testimonies, Dillard and his attorneys allege. One of these witnesses now claims in an affidavit that he lied because detectives forced him to incriminate Dillard and Fredrick.
As investigators focused on the two men, they failed to investigate other potential suspects with motives to kill Thomas, Dillard's petition alleges.
One of those who was not investigated was a drug dealer who, days before Thomas was killed, called him a "marked man" for being an informant.
Another was a drug dealer whose wife told investigators she helped get rid of shell casings and gun parts tied to the murder weapon.
Elkhart police have used false evidence to convict innocent people before.
Elliot Slosar, a Chicago civil rights attorney who represents Dillard, has alleged the same types of misconduct — the use of fabricated testimonies, the reliance on jailhouse informants and the coercion or manipulation of witnesses — in several other cases.
So far, six people have had their convictions overturned in the Northern Indiana city of a little over 53,000. It's the highest per capita in Indiana and 5th in the country. Four of these people have reached multimillion-dollar settlements — totaling nearly $31 million — with city and county officials to resolve allegations they were framed by police and prosecutors.
A new IndyStar investigation revealed that a group of Elkhart police officers known as the Wolverines abused their power in the 1980s and 1990s, cloaking themselves in a code of silence and operating with impunity. The Wolverines climbed the ranks. Some became detectives. One of the former detectives Dillard accused of helping harass and coerce a witness into testifying was among the Wolverines.
Elkhart County Prosecutor Vicki Becker, a longtime prosecutor who was elected to lead the agency in 2016, declined to comment citing trial rules prohibiting attorneys from making public statements about pending cases. But she has previously rejected broad allegations of misconduct by Elkhart law enforcement. Becker was not one of the prosecutors in Dillard's murder case.
Slosar has three other wrongful conviction claims pending in Elkhart County courts. The four cases are set for a three-day hearing in Elkhart County beginning May 21.
"All these clients we have were framed by the same people in the same way," Slosar told a class last year at Notre Dame Law School, where he's an adjunct professor. These clients, he said, were "disposable in the eyes of the people who framed them."
Dillard, the oldest of five children from Detroit, dropped out of high school. He remembers telling an ex-girlfriend that he was "tired of being broke," so he turned to selling drugs.
In 1995, he began taking his business to Elkhart and later came to know and sell drugs to Thomas. Four years later, he was arrested for killing Thomas, a crime Dillard said he could not have committed because it happened when he was in Detroit.
This account of Thomas' murder, the ensuing investigation and prosecution, and the impact of the misconduct Dillard alleged is based on police reports, court depositions, trial transcripts, witness affidavits, personnel records, letters, notes and interviews.
Tricia Mock had been up for several days and nights, binging on alcohol and crack cocaine.
On the sixth night, Mock told police, she was in a drug house where she often saw Dillard and Fredrick. She'd known them for months. They saw her as their little money maker, she told police. She brought them people who wanted to buy drugs, or she gave them cash she'd made from prostituting herself in the streets. In return, they supplied her drug habit.
Dillard received a call at some point that night, Mock told police.
"It will be done tonight," she claimed to have heard Dillard tell the person on the other line.
Then, Mock said Dillard told her she was coming with him and Fredrick to carry out the task. They left the drug house in a blue sedan and arrived at Three Point Motel, where Thomas was staying.
By then, according to Mock, the two men had filled her in on the plan: The order to kill Thomas came from another drug dealer who'd called Dillard and wanted Thomas dead for working with the police. Mock's job, she said, was to lure Thomas to the door.
Fredrick and Mock got out of the car and walked to Thomas' room. After Mock knocked, Thomas cracked open the door but kept the chain attached, she told police. Fredrick, who Mock said was standing next to her, kicked the door open and walked in.
"Surprise," he told Thomas, according to Mock.
Thomas immediately bolted out of the room, leaving Fredrick and Mock inside. He turned left and then went back and ran in the opposite direction. That's when Mock heard the first gunshot, she told police. She assumed Dillard, who was outside, fired it.
Fredrick came out of the room and walked toward Thomas, who was lying face down on the ground, and shot him a few more times in the head, Mock told police. Then, they went back to the car and drove away.
Dillard and his attorneys allege Mock's account was pure fiction.
They point to two eyewitnesses who lived in trailers near the motel and had a view of Thomas' room from their windows. Both said they saw Thomas run out of his room, chased by a thin and tall Black man who shot him multiple times in the head. Both said the gunman ran off and didn't drive away in a car, as Mock told police.
Neither said they saw a woman that night. Neither were called to testify for the state.
Instead, Dillard and his attorneys allege, police and prosecutors settled on a false story made possible by a detective with a long history of troubling behavior.
To read the rest of this story, click here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Black America Web
35 minutes ago
- Black America Web
SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were ‘Too Many Black Girls'
Source: CHIP SOMODEVILLA / Getty On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by a Black dancer in Houston, Texas, who claims she has been discriminated against by several Houston clubs that place limits on how many Black women they will hire to perform. According to The Hill, professional dancer Chanel Nicholson filed her lawsuit in August 2021, claiming the clubs listed as defendants violated a federal law against racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts by limiting the number of Black dancers who could work the same shift as a matter of policy. For example, Nicholson said a manager at the club Cover Girls told her she could not perform at the venue in November 2017 because there were already 'too many Black girls' in the club. She also claimed that, in August 2021, she was told by the manager at a club called Splendor that the club was 'not taking any more Black girls.' Now, off the top, anyone who has been paying attention to the way the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has treated discrimination cases recently might assume Nicholson's suit was dismissed for one (or both) of two reasons: she's a Black woman who is a dancer — so the courts are simply not taking her seriously for reasons rooted in systemic misogynoir — or she's not a white person filing a suit over a DEI policy, as that's pretty much what one has to be to get a federal anti-discrimination claim to shake their way under the current administration. Both of these might have been the real reason the plaintiff's case was dismissed, but the reason a district court gave was that the statute of limitations was up — despite the appearance that it wasn't. From the Hill: Nicholson said she was denied work repeatedly due to the quota, including in 2014, 2017 and 2021. However, her case was dismissed by a district court that concluded the applicable statute of limitations clock began ticking in 2014; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the decision. She asked the justices to decide when the statute of limitations starts to run in a claim of 'pattern or practice' of racial discrimination. They declined to hear her case. So, how exactly do the courts simply decide the statute of limitations clock started in 2014, and ignore the alleged offenses that happened years later? Well, apparently, all but two justices, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, determined that the more recent discriminatory acts alleged by Nicholson were not acts that stood on their own, but 'continued effects' of past discrimination that is no longer actionable due to the statute. Brown Jackson wrote in her dissenting opinion that the court's decision to side with the district court 'flouts this Court's clear precedents.' 'We have long held that '[e]ach discrete discriminatory act starts a new clock for filing charges alleging that act,' regardless of whether similar instances of discrimination have occurred in the past,' she wrote. 'Because the Fifth Circuit's contrary ruling was patently erroneous, this Court should have granted Nicholson's petition and summarily reversed the judgment.' Jackson's opinion focused on the allegations from 2017 and 2021, arguing that both alleged 'discrete' instances of discrimination occurred within the four years before Nicholson filed her lawsuit, making the 5th Circuit's claim that the statute of limitations was up 'patently erroneous.' 'To conclude that Nicholson's claims are time-barred because there were earlier instances of discriminatory treatment, as the Fifth Circuit did, impermissibly inoculates the clubs' more recent discriminatory conduct,' Jackson wrote. 'If sustained discriminatory motivation is all that is required to transform recent, racially discriminatory acts into the 'continued effects' of earlier discriminatory conduct, then past discrimination could inexplicably prevent recovery for later, similarly unlawful conduct.' It really makes no sense for a court to conclude that different acts of racism committed by different people at different times are all part of the same 'continued effects' of the first act of racial discrimination. It's almost as if racial discrimination is treated like a trivial thing until white people are filing suits over diversity efforts. We're just basically repackaging white supremacy — that's how we're making America great again. SEE ALSO: Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America? Op-Ed: Misogynoir Is Why Many Black Women Don't Care That Telvin Osborne's Killer Won't Be Charged SEE ALSO SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were 'Too Many Black Girls' was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mob brutally attacks teen at Palmdale concert, family seeks hate crime charges
Family members are demanding justice and hate crime charges after a high school student was brutally beaten by a mob at an impromptu Palmdale rock concert. Video of the violent attack, which has since gone viral, shows 17-year-old Elijah Green curled up on the dirt while a group of at least four people, believed to be adults, repeatedly stomp on, kick and punch him while others are heard supporting the fight from out of frame. Audio from the footage also captures the offenders using racial slurs amidst the physical assault. 'We were in the hospital watching the video,' said Elijah's mother, Roneika Green, during a Monday morning news conference. 'No mother should have to watch their child being stomped like this.' The incident allegedly happened last month after some people in attendance claimed Elijah had touched a woman inappropriately the night before. However, Roneika denies that, and instead said her son tripped and leaned against the woman to try to break his fall. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department provided KTLA with a statement regarding the night of the attack that read in part, 'Palmdale Station is aware of an assault with a deadly weapon that occurred on the above date at an impromptu concert at the intersection of Old Harold Road and Firethorn Avenue.' LASD said detectives have been assigned to the case and are in 'extensive contact with the victim and his family.' Officials did not explicitly say the victim's name or age, or provide further information about the report of an assault with a deadly weapon. Najee Ali, a local civil rights activist and Senior Organizer with Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches, said Elijah's family reached out to him to serve as their spokesperson and advocate. 'The racially motivated assault of Elijah Green is one of the most horrifying hate crimes against a young Black person I've ever witnessed,' stated Ali. 'This is L.A. vs Hate, and we are calling for a unified response from every community organization and leader who stands for justice.' While the extent of Elijah's injuries were not explicitly stated, Ali's statement included a quote from Roneika, saying, 'As a mother, watching my son get nearly beaten to death by a racist mob—while no one helped him—is something I'll never forget.' Officials said this is an active investigation. 'The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department take any allegation of hate crimes seriously, and all cases will be thoroughly reviewed by the District Attorney's Office in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department,' read the department's statement. Authorities urge anyone with information to contact the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Palmdale Station Detective Peirson at 661-272-2477. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
MPD seeks critically missing boy, last seen near 28th and Clarke
The Brief Police are looking for a critically missing Milwaukee boy, 9-year-old Uzziah Franklin. He was last seen Monday morning, June 2, near 28th and Clarke. Anyone with any info on where Franklin could be should call MPD at 414-935-7232. MILWAUKEE - The Milwaukee Police Department needs your help in finding a critically missing boy, 9-year-old Uzziah Franklin. What we know According to the Milwaukee Police Department, Uzziah was last seen on Monday, June 2, 2025, at about 9:20 a.m. He was last seen leaving school in the area of 28th and Clarke. Uzziah is described as a 9-year-old male, Black, standing around 4'6" feet tall and weighing around 68 lbs. He has brown eyes and short hair. FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android He was last seen wearing a white t-shirt and blue jeans. What you can do Anyone with any information on Franklin's whereabouts is asked to call Milwaukee Police Department District 3 at 414-935-7232. The Source The Milwaukee Police Department