logo
Cancer care in the UK ‘at breaking point', experts warn

Cancer care in the UK ‘at breaking point', experts warn

Independent14-04-2025

Cancer care in the UK is at a 'critical breaking point,' several experts have warned, calling for radical action to tackle deepening financial pressures.
The group says that a National Cancer Director with a dedicated office should be introduced to take a data-driven approach to improving cancer care systems in the UK. Writing for The Lancet Oncology, the group of authors criticises the previous Conservative government for '14 years of gross mismanagement.'
Responding, Labour says it is determined to drive down waiting times for cancer patients, pointing to its upcoming National Cancer Plan to improve the current care system.
Mark Lawler, professor of Digital Health at Queen's University Belfast and lead author, said: 'The urgency is clear: in my mind, we are already in the midst of a cancer crisis, precipitated by 14 years of gross mismanagement of cancer by the previous administration and the collateral impact of Covid and national lockdowns on cancer services and cancer patients.
'Now, more than ever, we must learn from each other, acknowledge the scale of the challenge, and implement data-driven solutions and achieve efficiencies, some of which may be contentious in the short term, but are essential for long-term cancer control within financial constraints.'
The comment article highlights several policy recommendations which the authors state will improve survival and quality of life for people with cancer.
Among the issues highlighted is the abolition of NHS England, which the authors said marks a 'seismic shift' in UK healthcare governance.
The authors warn that the 'greatest risk lies in reactive, short-term, ill-informed decision-making' by the Government, which they state could further reduce UK cancer survival rates, deepen health inequalities and escalate inefficiencies.
Professor Pat Price, from Imperial College London, who is chairwoman of Radiotherapy UK, said: 'Delayed cancer treatment has become the deadly norm in this country, and we won't reverse it unless we commit to doing things differently.
'If we keep doing the same things, with the same voices in the room, we're going to continue to face some of the worst cancer outcomes in Europe.
'In the massively overlooked area of radiotherapy cancer care, for example, nearly two-thirds of cancer patients are waiting too long for their cancer treatment.
'Too often, we see cancer policy take a tunnel-vision approach, only focusing on areas like early diagnosis and completely overlooking the fact that we need to actually treat patients if we want to improve survival.
'The international environment, domestic funding pressures and a lack of policy priority to take the action needed could eclipse attempts to reverse the poor cancer outcomes the country faces.
'If we want to stop cancer patients in this country from dying needlessly, the promised cancer plan has to be radical. It needs to be data-driven.
'And it needs to ensure that, if money is tight, we're spending it on the things that are proven to improve cancer outcomes.'
Professor Richard Sullivan, director of the Institute for Cancer Policy, King's College London, said: 'We need to get real.
'The evidence is irrefutable – we need to recognise the impact that the global insecurity we are currently experiencing will have on health systems.
'If defence spending goes up, as it certainly will, health expenditure will suffer. And the recent bombardment with tariffs from the new US government will only make matters worse.'
Another issue highlighted by the research team is the need to cut consultation by the current Government, which they said is delaying the development of a new national cancer strategy.
Professor Lawler said: 'We cannot continually consult our way out of a crisis – the evidence we and others have provided is irrefutable.
'We have more than enough data intelligence – what we need to do is act on this evidence as a matter of urgency.
'At the turn of the century, Denmark had worse cancer outcomes than the UK.
'But by prioritising cancer at the very top of the Danish health agenda, they now have among the best improvements in cancer outcomes in Europe. We need to 'do a Denmark'.
'If we don't act urgently and boldly 'follow the data', we'll forgo our precious opportunity and remain rock-bottom in the competition against cancer, our deadly enemy.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said the Government had 'inherited a broken NHS where too many cancer patients are waiting too long for diagnosis and treatment'.
The spokesperson said: 'We are determined to drive down waiting times and our Plan for Change is already getting patients seen and treated faster, with 80,000 more diagnosed or ruled out with cancer between July and January.
'The NHS exceeded its faster diagnosis cancer target for the first time in February amid record demand – almost four-fifths of people received a definitive cancer diagnosis or all-clear within four weeks.
'This is just the start: our National Cancer Plan will set out further how we will improve cancer care to bring this country's cancer survival rates back up to the standards of the best in the world.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Campaigners urge MPs to vote down assisted dying bill over anorexia ‘loophole'
Campaigners urge MPs to vote down assisted dying bill over anorexia ‘loophole'

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Campaigners urge MPs to vote down assisted dying bill over anorexia ‘loophole'

People with anorexia could be allowed to die by assisted death under a proposed Bill, more than 250 campaigners have warned, urging MPs to vote down the legislation when it returns to the Commons. A letter to MPs, signed by 268 people who have suffered with eating disorders, warned: 'If this bill had been law during the years many of us were struggling, we would have used it to end our lives.' Campaigner Chelsea Roff, founder of eating disorder organisation Eat Breathe Thrive, warned that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) bill contains ' dangerous loopholes that have enabled suicidal women with anorexia to die by assisted death' in other countries around the world. Only those diagnosed with terminal conditions would be covered under the assisted dying legislation, proposed by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater. But anorexia - which is primarily a mental health condition - can lead to lethal physical symptoms, including malnutrition, which campaigners say makes it difficult to entirely exclude it from the Bill. There are also concerns over the recent use of the term 'terminal anorexia', a diagnosis that has been used by medical professionals to describe patients who they do not believe can recover. The term – which has been widely criticised - was introduced in a case series published in the Journal of Eating Disorders, which described the deaths of three individuals with anorexia. The authors argued that those diagnosed with this condition should be 'afforded access to medical aid in dying in locations where such assistance has been legalised — just like other patients with terminal conditions'. It comes after a recent study found that individuals with eating disorders have died by assisted death in three US states - California, Colorado and Oregon. The legislation in each of these states limit eligibility to individuals diagnosed with a terminal illness. But pro-assisted dying sources said the definition of terminal illness in the bill is most similar to the laws in Australia, where there have been no cases involving eating disorders. The letter urges MPs to vote against the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as it returns to the Commons, warning that, in its current format, it is not safe for those affected by eating disorders. 'Eating disorders are amongst the most deadly mental illnesses', the letter warns. 'Despite eating disorders being a treatable illness, too often people are being failed by the system. Many people with eating disorders wait months and even years for treatment; they have to fight for access to basic care and support.' Labour MP Richard Quigley, whose own child has been in and out of hospital with anorexia for the last four years, echoed these warnings. While he said he is not opposed to assisted dying in principle, he argued that mental health care in the UK is not yet good enough to ensure the legislation is applied safely. 'Anybody that's experienced services will know that CAMHS (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services), only scrapes the surface. 'You might get six sessions of therapy... but the system seems to be designed around pushing you out back into the world, rather than putting their arms around you until you're fully rebuilt. And sufferers end up relying on each other, which isn't the best form of treatment', he said. But despite his concerns, Mr Quigley also said he is glad the country is having a conversation about assisted dying. 'It is one of those very emotive issues. Everybody who wants it to take place has got a very harrowing story about somebody they've seen die under difficult circumstances. And everybody that doesn't want it has got an equally harrowing story of somebody that survives two three years after', he said. 'But from personal perspective, both eating disorders and mental health, it's very very difficult to make it fit. There's too much evidence from other countries that already allow assisted dying showing that people with mental health issues - and especially eating disorders - can elect to end their lives early.' Anorexia is a psychiatric disorder that can lead to severe physical deterioration and is known as the most lethal psychiatric disorder – with suicide being the second leading cause of death in anorexia. Individuals with anorexia are up to eighteen times more likely to die by suicide than their age-matched peers. 'With any other illness the patient wants to work with you. But with eating disorders, they actively work against you', Mr Quigley said. 'I'm just very much worried that we don't understand mental health well enough for it to be included in this bill, but I don't know how you'd exclude it. That's the problem', Mr Quigley said. A number of amendments were proposed as part of an attempt to ensure people with eating disorders were excluded from the Bill when it was at committee stage, but each of them were rejected. Labour MP Naz Shah, whose amendment was rejected last month, is tabling two amendments at the bill's third reading, one which will exclude people who have voluntarily stopped eating or drinking from the bill, and another which will exclude people are taking 'any action intended to bring about a state of terminal illness'. While sources close to Ms Leadbeater said she would be supporting the first amendment, both Ms Shah and eating disorder campaigners are clear this would not be enough to prevent those with eating disorders from being included in the legislation - as the decision to stop eating is not a 'voluntary' one for those with eating disorders, it is the result of a psychiatric condition. Ms Roff said she fears that, without appropriate amendments, a 'person with anorexia, in a moment of despair, might be given a lethal prescription rather than the treatment [they] desperately need.' 'That would be a terrible tragedy, mirroring what we have already seen happen in at least sixty known cases abroad, including three U.S. states where assisted death is only legal for terminally ill people. A third of these women never reached their thirtieth birthday', she said. A spokesperson for Ms Leadbeater said: 'It's an old story. This issue has been debated at great length in Committee and Kim is now supporting Naz Shah's amendment 14 that excludes from eligibility somebody who has voluntarily stopped eating or drinking. 'This, along with the existing safeguards in the Bill, would rule out people with anorexia falling under the cope of the Bill. 'To be eligible a person must have 'an inevitably progressive illness or disease which cannot be reversed by treatment'. Anorexia is not inevitably progressive and can be reversed.' But Ms Shah told The Independent: 'I have no idea what the amendment will actually be, and [Ms Leadbeater] is only accepting one, not the other, therefore I can't support the bill. The process is ultimately flawed'. She said it is 'categorically untrue' that the bill excludes people with mental illness.

Glenrothes dad's paternity leave campaign after son's traumatic birth
Glenrothes dad's paternity leave campaign after son's traumatic birth

The Courier

time2 hours ago

  • The Courier

Glenrothes dad's paternity leave campaign after son's traumatic birth

A Glenrothes dad is campaigning for better UK paternity leave following the premature birth of his son. Ryan Connolly and wife Claire welcomed baby Lewis in April last year. He was almost four weeks early and there were complications which saw Claire need emergency surgery. She remained in hospital for several days. Yet, despite the seriousness of the situation, Ryan was only entitled to two weeks leave from his job as an IT project co-ordinator. The 30-year-old said: 'In one of the most important and vulnerable moments of our lives, I don't think it's too much to ask that families are given the time and support to actually be a family.' According to MPs, the UK's paternity leave system is among the worst in the developed world. However, Ryan is supporting the Dad Shift campaign, which aims to change that. He has now spoken of Lewis's traumatic birth, and the days following, as part of that campaign. Ryan said: 'Lewis arrived unexpectedly early—at 36 weeks and 3 days. 'He was born a petite, albeit healthy, 5lb 10oz with a big cry and passed all his checks. 'But Claire's placenta didn't detach as it should have. 'After several failed attempts to remove it, she had to undergo emergency surgery. 'I was left, quite literally, holding the baby while she was taken to theatre. 'Although the operation went well, Claire suffered significant blood loss and needed a transfusion. 'She later had to have a second procedure before the bleeding was finally brought under control.' The new dad added: 'I'll never forget sitting there holding our day-old son, watching monitors as his mum's blood pressure dropped and her skin turned grey from blood loss.' Claire, 31, spent three full days in hospital with Ryan and Lewis at her side. Meanwhile, at night Ryan would go home and try to ready the house for their new baby. 'The whole time, I was painfully aware I was already on day three of my two-week paternity leave,' the Glenrothes dad said. 'We hadn't even made it home yet to adjust, to heal, to simply be together – and I can't help but think how many other dads are in the same position?' Eight European countries, including France, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands, offer a minimum of four weeks paternity leave. And Glenrothes and Mid Fife MP Richard Baker has joined forces with Ryan and other local dads to push for improvement. The Labour MP said: 'Dads shouldn't have to choose between being present for their newborn and keeping their household afloat. 'Even taking those two weeks off comes at a financial cost.' According to a recent survey by Dad Shift, 70% of 1,911 respondents said they did not feel psychologically ready to return to work when they did. An additional survey saw 86% of 1,565 respondents say current paternity leave limitations also negatively affected their partner's health and wellbeing. The UK Government says it is carrying out a review to see how it can best support working families.

Denbighshire's Prosperous Business Fund Opens for Second Phase Applications
Denbighshire's Prosperous Business Fund Opens for Second Phase Applications

Business News Wales

time5 hours ago

  • Business News Wales

Denbighshire's Prosperous Business Fund Opens for Second Phase Applications

Businesses in Denbighshire are being invited to bid for a share of a £1 million fund. This is the second round of the Prosperous Denbighshire Business Fund being distributed by regeneration agency Cadwyn Clwyd. It follows an initial fund worth £1.3 million that benefited almost 100 companies across the county. Now an extra £1 million is up for grabs in grants of up to £35,000, with the closing date for applications on Thursday, July 31. Smaller grants of up to £2,000 are also available and Cadwyn Clwyd are expecting a similarly high level of interest this time round. Funding from the first tranche of cash helped save a 150-year-old village chemist shop in Dyserth which has seen its business boom thanks to a computerised appointment booking system. Pharmacist Ravi Kiran Palutla developed an on-line appointment booking system for Dyserth Pharmacy which allows customers to book in-person consultations so Ravi can then prescribe medicines and treatments or, where appropriate, refer patients to a doctor's surgery. The computerised appointment system has driven customer numbers up by 44 per cent and seen appointments soar from 20 a month to 300. The system was paid for by a £1,897 grant from the Prosperous Denbighshire Business Fund. Ravi added: 'A grant of just £1,897 enabled me to update the website to make it more functional and install a computerised booking system and the difference it has made has been amazing. 'The population of the Dyserth area is about 2,000 and for me to have a viable business I need a patient base of 4,000 plus and the computerised system has allowed me to build that. 'Because the appointments are made online we don't have the pressure of taking phone calls and making bookings so we have been able to develop new services. 'These range from treating migraines, chest and urinary infections, providing morning after contraceptive pills and giving Covid vaccines which have brought us patients from as far afield as Dolgellau and Criccieth. 'We are already doing virtual travel consultation securely via the internet. This reduces the need for the patient to travel twice to the pharmacy, once for consultation, second for vaccine administration. We will be developing a private phlebotomy business soon. 'I know health authorities in Wales are looking at what we have done and at the possibility of rolling it out across the country and it is the Prosperous Denbighshire Fund that has made all this a reality for us. 'We will be doing it at a smaller scale in Denbighshire pharmacies first which will then give us the opportunity to learn from the implementation. The learnings will be useful for the national project yet to come in the next 18 months. Cadwyn Clwyd Business Partnership Officer Donna Hughes said: 'It is remarkable the difference it has made to Ravi's business and to access to healthcare in North Denbighshire. 'He was in the first phase of the Prosperous Denbighshire rollout which can pay up to 70 per cent of the value of a project to a maximum of £35,000 of a £50,000 scheme. 'The success of what Ravi has done just shows that this kind of funding can do wonders for a business. 'It opens up tremendous possibilities and that's why we're delighted to be able to offer a further £1 million in grants which also include smaller schemes of between £1,000 and £2,000. 'The first phase proved hugely popular which was shown by the number of grants we were able to make and it also shows the need and the effectiveness of this kind of support for local people to build businesses with all the benefits that has for them and the communities in which they live.' The money comes from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, administered by the UK Government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store