logo
Discovery of large 'bomber drones' causes concern among Thai security forces

Discovery of large 'bomber drones' causes concern among Thai security forces

KOTA BARU: Two large drones were discovered buried in the ground in Sadao district near Songkhla about 2.5km from the Malaysian border on June 12.
The discovery of the drones, which authorities confirmed had been modified to carry out aerial bombings, had raised serious concern among Thai security agencies.
According to a Thai security spokesman in an official Facebook posting, local authorities were focusing on two key theories following the discovery.
It is believed that the drones were either intended for a terror attack on an economic or security area, or used to protect cross-border smuggling operations, particularly along the Thai-Malaysian border.
The spokesman said the drones were found on June 12 at 7pm in Moo 2, Rai Ok village, Samnak Kham area.
"A joint team comprising soldiers from the 5th Infantry Task Force, local police, border patrol police, EOD units and forensic teams from Region 9 were deployed to the scene the next day.
"Initial inspection revealed that the drones had been modified for combat use, equipped with a 60mm mortar launch system with six tubes, as well as a separate launcher for improvised explosive devices.
"However, no explosives were found at the scene," said the spokesman.
The spokesman said a forensics team had collected evidence and latent fingerprints and sent the drones to the Sadao police station for further investigations.
Another Thai security force said the drones were capable of flying at altitudes of up to 800 metres, with a range of 8km to 10km, and could carry a payload of 10kg to 15kg.
"Their flight systems were found to include a GPS home-point locking system, allowing for precise launch and return coordination," said the spokesman.
Thai security agencies had started investigations on the origins of the attack drones and their investigations had found links to criminal groups.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cambodia seeks ICJ ruling over border tensions with Thailand
Cambodia seeks ICJ ruling over border tensions with Thailand

New Straits Times

time42 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Cambodia seeks ICJ ruling over border tensions with Thailand

BANGKOK: Cambodia said on Sunday it had asked the International Court of Justice to resolve its border disputes with Thailand, after a flare-up in their long-running row led the Southeast Asian neighbours to mobilise troops on both sides of the border. A Cambodian soldier was killed in a brief skirmish on May 28 in a confrontation over the 820-km (510-mile) frontier, parts of which are undemarcated and claimed by both nations. "Cambodia chooses a peaceful resolution based on international law through the ICJ mechanism for solving the border dispute," Prime Minister Hun Manet posted on his Facebook page. The post showed a picture of Deputy Prime Minister Prak Sokhonn holding an envelope that Hun Manet said contained a formal letter to the ICJ in The Hague, often called the World Court. The Thai Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Cambodia's move. Bangkok has previously said it has never recognised the court's jurisdiction and prefers to settle the disputes through bilateral mechanisms. Talks on border demarcation over the weekend between officials from both countries were inconclusive with both sides pledging to de-escalate tensions and continue dialogue. Cambodia said in a statement that it had proposed to Thailand the two countries should jointly bring the four dispute areas to the ICJ and that these areas should no longer be included in future bilateral talks on border demarcation. Cambodia also said that it would begin legal proceedings at the ICJ independently, despite Thailand's rejection of the court's jurisdiction. Thailand, on the other hand, made no mention of the four disputed areas or the ICJ, saying only that "both sides will continue discussions and joint implementation" of border demarcation talks. Thailand is set to host the next meeting in September. Hun Manet said the disputes at the four border areas, including the one where the fatal clash took place, are "complicated and have high risks of armed clashes and where bilateral mechanisms cannot solve." He did not disclose the contents of the letter, which were not visible in the picture. Cambodia has twice successfully sought ICJ resolutions, in 1962 on the ownership of the disputed Preah Vihear temple and in 2013, after it sought clarification of jurisdiction of the land around the temple. Although both governments have pledged to handle the issue through dialogue and to calm nationalist fervour, Bangkok has threatened to close the border and cut off electricity supplies to its neighbour. Phnom Penh announced it would cease buying Thai electric power, internet bandwidth and produce. It has also ordered local television stations not to screen Thai films.--REUTERS

NST Leader: Of private data and public use
NST Leader: Of private data and public use

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

NST Leader: Of private data and public use

WHENEVER the government says it is collecting personal data, Malaysians get the jitters. Can't blame them. One thought that crosses the mind of some people is: is Big Brother keeping watch on us? The other and more common concern is about leakages, of which there have been far too many without any serious consequences to those who were responsible. Understandably, the recent announcement by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil that Putrajaya is collecting phone call data from telecommunication companies for policymaking brought back the old anxiety, especially when they learnt that discussions between the government and the telcos have been going on since 2023. Phone call data is itself a fear-generating phrase. Does it mean data on all calls one makes are collected? Early communication would have helped allay the people's fears, but transparency isn't Malaysia's strong point. Putrajaya has to work hard on it. The government must understand people's fears. Every day, people are bombarded with numerous anonymous calls and text messages. Neither the telcos nor our regulators seem to be able to put a stop to such an invasion into our private world. Some even know the names of the phone owners. How did they get access to the names and phone numbers? Can't blame the people for suspecting it to be an inside job. People do recognise the government's need to work with personal data to deliver their services efficiently and effectively in this highly digitalised world. But their concern is how the personal information is collected, stored and shared. Not just telcos collect personal data, but all manner of companies do that. The important thing is robust oversight by regulators. Making the non-compliant accountable is critical. Since 2017, only about 20 companies have been compounded or fined for personal data breaches under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA), some even for processing personal information without consent or permits. Thankfully, the amended PDPA that came into effect in January comes with a bigger bite. Data controllers and data processors face a fine of up to RM1 million or imprisonment of up to three years or both for non-compliance. As under the unamended act, gathering evidence remains a huge challenge as the lawbreakers delete the data once non-compliance is detected. Some have described the hunt for evidence as a cat-and-mouse game, only more vicious. So where does this leave the people whose personal data has been made public by unlawful means? The tort of invasion of privacy, which is a well-developed civil remedy in several common law countries, isn't recognised in Malaysian jurisprudence. A court or two appeared to have thought it was a recognised tort, but higher courts have overruled such judicial activism. Perhaps the answer lies in the statutory introduction of the tort. Some will argue that there is no need for one because the PDPA is there, but they forget that it doesn't address civil remedies. Until such time when invasion of privacy does become a recognised tort in Malaysia, either through the courts or statutory introduction, people must seek recourse through other torts such as breach of confidence or negligence.

'A test of faith': Pilgrims recount harrowing haj ordeal after alleged scam
'A test of faith': Pilgrims recount harrowing haj ordeal after alleged scam

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

'A test of faith': Pilgrims recount harrowing haj ordeal after alleged scam

SEPANG: "This is all Allah's will. You must accept it. "The greater the hardship, the greater the reward." Those were reportedly the words of a prominent religious figure used to pacify 49 Malaysian haj pilgrims as the promised smooth pilgrimage turned into a harrowing and perilous ordeal in Saudi Arabia. The group, who arrived at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) today, alleged they were deceived by a local haj agent claiming to offer legitimate packages. Instead, they say they were forced to endure extreme hardship, including trekking through deserts and climbing rocky hills to enter Makkah without valid documentation. Speaking to reporters at KLIA Terminal 1, a 63-year-old trader from Batu Pahat, Johor, said the ordeal began after their initial six-day stay in Madinah. "Things were still manageable in Madinah. "But once we were moved to Makkah, everything changed. "We had to walk through deserts and climb hills. It was dangerous," he said. The pilgrims claim they were smuggled into the holy city via unofficial and hazardous routes to avoid detection by Saudi authorities, as none of them possessed valid haj visas, a violation of Saudi law that could carry serious legal and safety implications. It was reported that the victims allegedly crammed in small rooms and asked to pay an additional RM9,000 to retrieve their belongings despite already having paid RM30,000 each for the haj package. Another victim, a 64-year-old lecturer and wife of the Johor trader, described how food was scarce and the group was left to ration minimal meals. "We shared one fried egg and two small fish between five people. "Two pieces of chicken were divided among seven. "When we asked why, the organiser told us to accept our fate and place our trust in God," she said. Forty-eight of the 49 pilgrims returned to Malaysia via Turkish Airlines flight TK60. One individual is believed to have continued their travels to Switzerland. Police said three reports have been lodged by the victims' families and investigations are underway to identify those behind the suspected scam targeting pilgrims. – Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store