logo
Debate complicates Maine legislation for text, app notification for crime victims

Debate complicates Maine legislation for text, app notification for crime victims

Yahoo27-03-2025

Mar. 27—Maine law enforcement officials and victim rights advocates say they want a modern, electronic system for notifying victims when a defendant is getting released from jail, but they disagreed this week on whether a proposed bill is the right approach.
"There is no question that our archaic system of phone calls, or letters, is insufficient," Penobscot County Sheriff Troy Morton told a legislative committee Wednesday. "The question is, when will Maine catch up with the rest of the country?"
The debate played out during a public hearing on a legislative proposal to enable county sheriffs, who run the jails, to offer victims electronic notifications of releases. Penobscot and Somerset counties are already testing these program, and Aroostook County and Two Bridges Regional Jail are preparing to join.
Under state law, all jails must directly notify victims of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking when a pre-trial defendant has been bailed out, and send a notice via first class mail when a convicted person's release date is scheduled.
Bill sponsor Sen. Anne Carney, D-Cape Elizabeth, said LD 981, would allow sheriffs' offices to choose whether to implement an electronic system in addition to, or in lieu of, a written notification or phone call.
"One of the scariest things for a victim of crime, whether it is an assault, burglary or something else, is not knowing when the perpetrator is incarcerated and when they might be returned to the community," said Carney.
But victim rights advocates, who generally support the idea, are still concerned about the national platform sheriffs want to use, which other states have stopped working with as new providers hit the market. At least one state has complained of privacy concerns and reports of outages.
They're also worried that without guaranteed funding and support from all counties, the system will fall apart once its up and running. (It's a competitive year for the state budget and federal funding for victim advocacy continues to drop.)
PRIVACY CONCERNS
Penobscot County is testing out a system now through VINE, short for for Victim Information and Notification Everyday, Morton told lawmakers. And it's not just serving victims; Morton said family members of those who are incarcerated can sign up out of concern for defendants' wellbeing.
"It is so much more than I thought. It wasn't just about victims and witnesses of domestic violence," said Morton.
Equifax, which runs VINE, said they covered the initial start-up costs of the pilot programs in Maine.
Equifax's Northeast Government Relations Director Julie Hart told lawmakers Wednesday that VINE is the nation's largest victim notification provider, serving 47 states. She said users can sign up for notifications by phone, text or email regarding a specific case at VINElink.com. There's a 24/7 support line for user issues, she said, and anyone can use the website to search for updates on a case without creating an account.
But the Maine Coalition to End Domestic Violence — one of the state's largest advocacy organizations for victim rights — still has questions about whether the VINE system can meet the state's legal standards for ensuring victim notification.
The coalition said they enthusiastically support the idea, but not the legislation. Receiving a "passive" app-based alert or a text is not the same as reaching a victim over the phone or speaking with them face to face, said policy director Andrea Mancuso, who urged lawmakers not to abandon traditional phone and mail methods.
"They can't be confident that the victims actually received a notification," Mancuso told lawmakers.
She shared concerns about the counties' ability to maintain the electronic notification system.
The bill includes a one-time $575,000 price tag, which Morton said would be enough to cover the cost of launching VINE in each county. But Mancuso and others are concerned that counties won't be able to pay for the service after the initial setup, saying jails already lack the staff and funding to meet current legal requirements for victim notification.
"There's no agreement about how we're going to sustain this long term," Mancuso said. "We have questions about what that means for crime victims, if they sign up for electronic notification ... and then a year, months down the road, the county is no longer sustaining that electronic notification. What happens then?"
ANYONE CAN SIGN UP
She and the Maine Department of Corrections urged lawmakers to look at the handful of states that have cut ties with VINE over those issues.
Although no state was mentioned by name, the Oregon Department of Corrections in 2023 told state lawmakers there that VINE's system costs were increasing faster than what the state could pay, all while the state struggled with increasing technological glitches and "hundreds of notifications" getting lost.
The Oregon department said VINE's parent company Appriss, which Equifax acquired in 2021, was sharing user data in 2019 with other Appriss platforms.
An Equifax spokesperson said in an email Thursday that they "never have, and never will use or disclose victim data for any purpose other than victim notifications." They do offer other services for law enforcement and state agencies that may use "public incarceration data," but the spokesperson said they only use that data if approved by the state.
Despite VINE's reassurances, the DOC's Government Affairs Director Sam Prawer asked lawmakers to consider adding data protections to the proposed law.
He asked lawmakers for more time and discussion on the bill. A work session has yet to be scheduled.
VINE doesn't ask for registrants to submit their names, Hart told lawmakers, another feature that some have taken issue with.
Legislative Coordinator Peter Lehman, from the Maine Prisoner Advocacy Coalition, suggested a defendant's "enemies" could sign up for release notifications. Lehman questioned the fairness of allowing unrelated people to receive notifications, especially if the defendant was being held before trial.
"Does the pilot program have waivers?" Lehman asked. "We're also, remember, talking about notification of people who often are pre-trial. They're not even convicted of anything. We're talking about jails. We're talking about people who we don't know what's going to happen. To have sort of a universal notification system about them seems inappropriate."
Hart did not address Lehman's concerns at the hearing.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban and instead suggests broadening it — despite Trump's threat
New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban and instead suggests broadening it — despite Trump's threat

New York Post

time4 days ago

  • New York Post

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban and instead suggests broadening it — despite Trump's threat

New York education officials won't rescind the state's ban on Native American mascots and team names, despite threats from the Trump administration that it risks losing federal funding. Instead, New York officials suggested in a letter to the US Department of Education on Thursday that they could broaden the state ban to include names and mascots derived from other racial or ethnic groups that the department deems offensive. The federal agency last week determined New York violated Title VI of the federal civil rights law by issuing a statewide ban on the use of Native American mascots and logos. Advertisement 3 The Massapequa Chiefs logo is seen in the school gym during a press conference and visit with U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon at Massapequa High School in Massapequa, N.Y. on Friday, May 30, 2025. Heather Khalifa for the NY Post The department's civil rights office found the state ban is discriminatory because names and mascots that are still permitted are also derived from other racial or ethnic groups, such as the 'Dutchmen' and the 'Huguenots.' New York officials said they're willing to work with federal officials to 'reach a resolution as to the appropriate standard,' wrote Daniel Morton-Bentley, legal counsel for the state education department. Advertisement Morton-Bentley also noted in his letter that the federal government's current stance in support of keeping Native American team names and mascots runs counter to the agency's previous stance on the issue — not to mention those of the US Commission on Civil Rights, tribal leaders, state governments, and professional organizations that have long deemed them harmful and offensive. What's more, a federal judge in New York earlier this year dismissed a lawsuit brought by some local districts that have refused to comply with the state mandate to rid their schools of offensive Native American mascots and team names, Morton-Bentley wrote. 3 President Donald Trump attends a meeting with the Fraternal Order of Police in the State Dinning Room of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. AP The education department and its civil rights office, he argued, is 'not a court of last resort for unsuccessful litigants.' Advertisement Spokespersons for the federal education department didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon last week visited Massapequa, a Long Island town that refuses to get rid of its Native American chief mascot, and was among the local districts that unsuccessfully challenged the state in federal court. 3 A person lies on the grass in front of Massapequa High School, in Massapequa, N.Y., Friday, April 25, 2025. AP McMahon said she would give New York ten days to sign an agreement rescinding the ban and apologizing to Native Americans for having discriminated against them and attempting to 'erase' their history. Advertisement New York school districts have until June 30 to commit to replacing offensive Native American mascots or team names, or risk losing state funding. They can be exempt from the mandate, however, if they reach an agreement with a local Native American tribe. The state education department said as of Thursday, three districts have sought and received extensions as they work to comply with the mandate. Massapequa was not among them.

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's funding threat

time4 days ago

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's funding threat

NEW YORK -- New York education officials won't rescind the state's ban on Native American mascots and team names, despite threats from the Trump administration that it risks losing federal funding. Instead, New York officials suggested in a letter to the U.S. Department of Education on Thursday that they could broaden the state ban to include names and mascots derived from other racial or ethnic groups that the department deems offensive. The federal agency last week determined New York violated Title VI of the federal civil rights law by issuing a statewide ban on the use of Native American mascots and logos. The department's civil rights office found the state ban is discriminatory because names and mascots that are still permitted are also derived from other racial or ethnic groups, such as the 'Dutchmen' and the 'Huguenots." New York officials said they're willing to work with federal officials to 'reach a resolution as to the appropriate standard,' wrote Daniel Morton-Bentley, legal counsel for the state education department. Morton-Bentley also noted in his letter that the federal government's current stance in support of keeping Native American team names and mascots runs counter to the agency's previous stance on the issue — not to mention those of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, tribal leaders, state governments, and professional organizations that have long deemed them harmful and offensive. What's more, a federal judge in New York earlier this year dismissed a lawsuit brought by some local districts that have refused to comply with the state mandate to rid their schools of offensive Native American mascots and team names, Morton-Bentley wrote. The education department and its civil rights office, he argued, is 'not a court of last resort for unsuccessful litigants.' Spokespersons for the federal education department didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon last week visited Massapequa, a Long Island town that refuses to get rid of its Native American chief mascot, and was among the local districts that unsuccessfully challenged the state in federal court. McMahon said she would give New York ten days to sign an agreement rescinding the ban and apologizing to Native Americans for having discriminated against them and attempting to 'erase' their history. New York school districts have until June 30 to commit to replacing offensive Native American mascots or team names, or risk losing state funding. They can be exempt from the mandate, however, if they reach an agreement with a local Native American tribe. The state education department said as of Thursday, three districts have sought and received extensions as they work to comply with the mandate. Massapequa was not among them.

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds
New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds

NEW YORK (AP) — New York education officials won't rescind the state's ban on Native American mascots and team names, despite threats from the Trump administration that it risks losing federal funding. Instead, New York officials suggested in a letter to the U.S. Department of Education on Thursday that they could broaden the state ban to include names and mascots derived from other racial or ethnic groups that the department deems offensive. The federal agency last week determined New York violated Title VI of the federal civil rights law by issuing a statewide ban on the use of Native American mascots and logos. The department's civil rights office found the state ban is discriminatory because names and mascots that are still permitted are also derived from other racial or ethnic groups, such as the 'Dutchmen' and the 'Huguenots." New York officials said they're willing to work with federal officials to 'reach a resolution as to the appropriate standard,' wrote Daniel Morton-Bentley, legal counsel for the state education department. Morton-Bentley also noted in his letter that the federal government's current stance in support of keeping Native American team names and mascots runs counter to the agency's previous stance on the issue — not to mention those of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, tribal leaders, state governments, and professional organizations that have long deemed them harmful and offensive. What's more, a federal judge in New York earlier this year dismissed a lawsuit brought by some local districts that have refused to comply with the state mandate to rid their schools of offensive Native American mascots and team names, Morton-Bentley wrote. The education department and its civil rights office, he argued, is 'not a court of last resort for unsuccessful litigants.' Spokespersons for the federal education department didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon last week visited Massapequa, a Long Island town that refuses to get rid of its Native American chief mascot, and was among the local districts that unsuccessfully challenged the state in federal court. McMahon said she would give New York ten days to sign an agreement rescinding the ban and apologizing to Native Americans for having discriminated against them and attempting to 'erase' their history. New York school districts have until June 30 to commit to replacing offensive Native American mascots or team names, or risk losing state funding. They can be exempt from the mandate, however, if they reach an agreement with a local Native American tribe. The state education department said as of Thursday, three districts have sought and received extensions as they work to comply with the mandate. Massapequa was not among them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store