Memorial Day Sale Still Live: Apple's Latest M4 iPad Pro Is Still $300 Off at Amazon, but Act Fast
Apple's latest M4 iPad is one of CNET's favorite tablets, and it's easy to understand why. It's gorgeous, has solid construction and speedy performance thanks to its M4 chip. Apple's newest release, the 11-inch iPad Pro with M4 chip is thinner, faster and smarter than it's predecessors, and its Memorial Day discount is still live on Amazon's holiday deal on Apple's fully-loaded M4 iPad Pro. That slashes price from $1,999 to just $1,699, which makes now the best time to grab this deal before it finally changes or sells out.
The 11-inch M4 iPad Pro is a sleek powerhouse with a swanky Ultra Retina XDR display for jaw-dropping clarity and entertainment on-the-go, Apple's lightning-fast M4 chip for serious multitasking and all-day battery life to keep up with everything from creative workflows to entertainment.
It's also built for Apple Intelligence, so you can expect AI-enabled feature additions for years to come. With up to 2TB of storage, you won't need to worry about space either, making it the perfect home for all your creative projects. Add the Apple Pencil Pro or Magic Keyboard, and you've got a full creative workstation or ultra-portable laptop alternative. Whether you're editing 4K video, sketching on the go or just streaming your favorite shows in stunning detail, the new iPad Pro can handle it all and it's rarely this affordable. Don't miss your chance to save on this remaining Memorial Day deal.
Why this deal matters
The Apple iPad Pro consistently ranks as the top tablet due to its extensive accessory ecosystem, tight integration with Apple products and a compelling app selection. This rare deal knocks off a cool $300 from Apple's latest and greatest tablet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP) Just Reported Yearly Earnings: Have Analysts Changed Their Mind On The Stock?
Last week saw the newest annual earnings release from NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP), an important milestone in the company's journey to build a stronger business. NetApp reported US$6.6b in revenue, roughly in line with analyst forecasts, although statutory earnings per share (EPS) of US$5.67 beat expectations, being 3.0% higher than what the analysts expected. Following the result, the analysts have updated their earnings model, and it would be good to know whether they think there's been a strong change in the company's prospects, or if it's business as usual. So we collected the latest post-earnings statutory consensus estimates to see what could be in store for next year. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Following the latest results, NetApp's 18 analysts are now forecasting revenues of US$6.78b in 2026. This would be a modest 3.1% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are predicted to increase 4.2% to US$6.07. In the lead-up to this report, the analysts had been modelling revenues of US$6.85b and earnings per share (EPS) of US$5.88 in 2026. So the consensus seems to have become somewhat more optimistic on NetApp's earnings potential following these results. See our latest analysis for NetApp There's been no major changes to the consensus price target of US$115, suggesting that the improved earnings per share outlook is not enough to have a long-term positive impact on the stock's valuation. It could also be instructive to look at the range of analyst estimates, to evaluate how different the outlier opinions are from the mean. The most optimistic NetApp analyst has a price target of US$135 per share, while the most pessimistic values it at US$100.00. Analysts definitely have varying views on the business, but the spread of estimates is not wide enough in our view to suggest that extreme outcomes could await NetApp shareholders. Of course, another way to look at these forecasts is to place them into context against the industry itself. The period to the end of 2026 brings more of the same, according to the analysts, with revenue forecast to display 3.1% growth on an annualised basis. That is in line with its 3.3% annual growth over the past five years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in a similar industry are forecast to see their revenues grow 5.6% per year. So although NetApp is expected to maintain its revenue growth rate, it's forecast to grow slower than the wider industry. The biggest takeaway for us is the consensus earnings per share upgrade, which suggests a clear improvement in sentiment around NetApp's earnings potential next year. Fortunately, the analysts also reconfirmed their revenue estimates, suggesting that it's tracking in line with expectations. Although our data does suggest that NetApp's revenue is expected to perform worse than the wider industry. The consensus price target held steady at US$115, with the latest estimates not enough to have an impact on their price targets. With that said, the long-term trajectory of the company's earnings is a lot more important than next year. We have forecasts for NetApp going out to 2028, and you can see them free on our platform here. You can also see our analysis of NetApp's Board and CEO remuneration and experience, and whether company insiders have been buying stock. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Wall Street might be missing on Nvidia
Decoding a public company's earnings report in the 24 hours after its release could be maddening. Here's why. A company that beats on sales and earnings estimates could see its stock pounded after one slip of the tongue from a CEO or CFO on the earnings call (which you can now listen in on with Yahoo Finance). Look at the 20% plunge Gap's (GAP) stock took on Friday after the company reported across-the-board beats but issued a tariff warning many should have seen coming. Gap CEO Richard Dickson made a compelling case on the state of the business on Yahoo Finance. A company that misses on sales and earnings estimates could see its stock price skyrocket as analysts and investors reason 'bad news' like this was 'priced into the stock' months ago. What was not priced in? The positive hype about future growth on the earnings call. Maddening. I have generally been on the side of the fence that says companies don't deserve passes for missed numbers or bad quarters that weren't properly guided. The numbers are the numbers. You assess them, crunch them, ponder them further, repeat this process 75 more times, and make a decision on the stock. It's not rocket science. To that end, I don't believe AI chip darling Nvidia (NVDA) fully deserves the free pass it got this week for a confusing quarter that was un-Nvidia-like. It reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.81, compared to estimates of $0.93, though the company posted a second (adjusted) EPS figure of $0.96 after excluding "H20 charge and related tax impact." In other words, the $0.96 figure represents what Nvidia would've made had its China business not gone poof courtesy of Trump's chip export control — a reality that does not exist. Nvidia has earned a legion of fans on Wall Street through years of strong execution and fundamentals. Analysts have been quick to 'exclude' the fall of its once lucrative China business. Every single research note after the results was chock-full of "let's blow more smoke for the Nvidia bulls." Price targets were hiked. All the Nvidia positives were bolded in the PDF docs. Sure, CEO Jensen Huang made a point to mention on the earnings call that demand for its AI chips remains strong. Profit margins will likely trend back to historically normal levels later this year, CFO Colette Kress said. But in my view, the earnings still fell far short of a consensus figure — and one that investors have little visibility into this round. The uncertainty of the China impact led analysts to estimate figures that included and didn't include the H20 loss. What made up the final consensus estimate? It's anybody's guess. And how do you ignore a giant chunk of Nvidia's sales in China simply vanishing? How do you completely wipe that out of your forecast model and think earnings power will still be the same? That loss will put pressure on all other areas of the operation to accelerate in the near term, medium term, and long term. I dig what Jensen said about the potential for robotics. I'm just not sure it's going to drastically drive Nvidia's business in the next eight quarters like the China business would have. Am I off the mark here? Should one only look at the many positives of Nvidia all the time? I am curious. Get at me on X @BrianSozzi. I always enjoy hearing new perspectives. I want to conclude by saying I don't hate Nvidia. It's more of a challenge to you to always question the "consensus" view on a stock. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Hailey Bieber's billion-dollar deal is about more than just beauty
This week, E.L.F. Beauty acquired model and mega influencer Hailey Bieber's beauty brand Rhode for $800 million in cash and stock, with another $200 million dependent on growth. Rhode, which launched just under three years ago and has just 10 products, reported net sales of $212 million at the end of March. Bieber will stay with Rhode as the chief creative officer and as a strategic adviser to both E.L.F. and Rhode. The deal shocked much of the cosmetics world. Alexis Androulakis, a beauty industry veteran and one of the creators behind @thelipsticklesbians on TikTok, posted an incredulous video reacting to the sale. 'If you had told me that Rhode would be the first to sell out of all the brands on the docket for sale right now, I would have told you you're out of your mind.' The brands she is referring to, including Glow Recipe, Makeup by Mario, and One/Size, have been in the industry longer, are selling more products and, depending on your chosen metric, are more successful. Companies up for sale aside, Rhode is far from the only beauty line fronted by a celebrity. Rhode's success is due, in equal part, to celebrity, marketing and status. From social media metrics alone, Bieber's influence is clear: some 55 million followers on Instagram and 15 million on TikTok. She is as true a celebrity as we have in 2025. She is married to a generation-defining pop star, has a gaggle of high-profile friends, stylist-curated fashion, and enough celebrity feuds and marriage issues to keep her relevant. Tarang Amin, the CEO of E.L.F. Beauty, told The New York Times that it was Bieber's influence and loyal, younger fan base that made Rhode so attractive. 'I have not seen another brand where there are communities waiting, or a pop-up event in L.A., willing to camp out overnight for 14 hours in line — not just for product, but to buy into the entire lifestyle.' It should be mentioned that Rhode — and this deal — does not exist without Glossier, which the brand emulates in aesthetic and product. Founded in 2014 by Emily Weiss, Glossier was the beauty brand of the mid-2010s. Before it emerged, makeup trends tended heavier: cut-crease eye shadow looks and high-contrast contour made popular by Kim Kardashian and YouTube tutorials. Glossier's ethos, 'skin first, makeup second,' was almost shockingly antithetical at the time. None of the limited products initially offered, like the Perfecting Skin Tint, offered full or even buildable coverage. Glossier felt both revolutionary and exclusionary enough to be aspirational. If you had acne, hyperpigmentation or rosacea, Glossier products where simply not for you. Like the 'clean girl' beauty trend, you could only be a Glossier girl if you already had perfect skin. And thanks to that concept, centering the health of your skin and your so-called 'natural beauty' is commonplace in today's beauty market, including at Rhode, which sell-defines as a skin care company. Weiss' marketing strategy, 'born from content; fueled by community,' quickly made her products status symbols as she pioneered influencer marketing. Tubes of Balm Dotcom lip balm and the pink plastic bubble pouches the products came in were intentionally displayed on brunch tablescapes and wellness posts all over Instagram. Instead of leaning into hard sells and traditional ad campaigns, Glossier centered the ever-online young woman consumer. Bieber, incredibly social media literate with a lucrative awareness of her own influence, has made quick work of elevating Rhode products to status symbols and selling, as E.L.F.'s Amin said, a lifestyle. Whereas Glossier sold an idea, Bieber can sell that and something more material: the promise that buyers might achieve even a whiff of her very aspirational life. One of her earliest examples of the power of her own influencer marketing was the Rhode Lip Case, a silicone iPhone case with a built-in slot to hold a Rhode Peptide Lip Treatment or Tint. A week or so after posting a selfie featuring the case and allowing acolytes to debate whether the phone case would ever be available to the public, it launched on the Rhode website for $38, including a lip gloss. Bieber has since posted numerous selfies with different colored glosses, all with a similar effect: sales, and lots of them. Part of the E.L.F. Beauty deal includes a partnership with Sephora, which will make this the first time Rhode products will consistently be available in stores. For beauty brands, an in at Sephora is huge — although it doesn't mean you've made it. Bieber has deliberately limited Rhode's brick-and-mortar exposure, with one of her most successful pop-ups to date her Coachella photo booth. Branded with both Rhode and Kendall Jenner's 818 Tequila logos, the booth allowed patrons to walk away with strips of well-lit photos, a small bottle of tequila and their choice of a Rhode lip product. According to Shop Drop Dail, a website that covers branded concepts, the photo booth 'quickly became one of the most talked-about experiences of the festival, generating over 2.5 million impressions on social media.' It's a true indicator of Bieber's success in employing gentle exclusivity and perceived closeness to celebrity to sell her products. I had a dermatologist friend once advise me never to use makeup or skin care by a brand that also makes handbags. I've applied the same mandate to celebrity lines. I've only ever tired Rhode's Glazing Milk, a watery pre-makeup layer that claims to provide hydration, and a swipe of a co-worker's Lip Tint. They were both fine, but I didn't buy them after that limited exposure. But even if Rhode didn't end up replacing legacy products that I've long pledged allegiance to, I am still very much aware of the brand. That is what is most remarkable. Bieber should be commended, not for Rhode's products, but for her ability to capture the zeitgeist, burst through a deeply saturated market, and surpass even other celebrity-fronted brands. I'm open to Rhode, but for now, I'll probably stick with what I've got. This article was originally published on
