6 fallen firefighters from Texas will be honored this weekend. Here's who they are
This weekend, the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation will honor 70 firefighters who died in the line of duty in 2024.
The 44th National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend will also honor 70 more firefighters who died in previous years. In total, six were from Texas.
'Each of these 140 firefighters made the ultimate sacrifice in service to others – a profound sacrifice that defines true heroism,' Victor Stagnaro, CEO of the NFFF said in a release. 'Memorial Weekend is a time for our nation to come together to honor their bravery, to stand beside their families, and ensure their legacy lives on in every community they so selflessly served.'
Six Texas firefighters are being honored during this year's National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend:
Lieutenant Charles "Buddy" Freeman II, of the Montgomery County Fire Department Emergency Services District, died on Sept. 29, 2023. He had responded to a possible carbon monoxide leak on July 9. The following morning, he suffered a heart attack and later died from complications following multiple heart surgeries, according to the U.S. Fire Administration. He did not return to duty after the hazardous materials incident.
Firefighter and Paramedic G. Wade Cannon, of the Flower Mound Fire Department, died in 2022 from colon cancer.
Firefighter Marcelo "Ox" Garcia III, of the Houston Fire Department, died on Nov. 6, 2023, after a wall collapsed on him while he was battling a fire at a vacant warehouse.
Assistant Chief Scott Glass, of Perryton Fire and EMS, died on Oct. 20 from a head injury caused when he was struck by a 5-inch hose that whipped unexpectedly while being charged with water during a structure fire.
Safety Officer Daniel R. "Dan" Potts Sr., of City of Whitney Fire and Rescue, died in 2023 from a heart attack while responding to an early-morning structure fire. He passed away before reaching the scene.
Chief Zebulin Earl "Zeb" Smith, of the Fritch Volunteer Fire Department, died in March 2024 from a heart attack while battling a structure fire. He had been fighting wildfires for nine consecutive days during a weeks-long wildfire outbreak that scorched much of the same area. It was the largest wildfire in state history.
There will be two events open to the public at the National Emergency Training Center in Emmitsburg, Maryland: a candlelight service on Saturday, May 3, and a memorial service on Sunday, May 4, when flags will also be at half-staff to honor those individuals. Both events will be streamed live.
The candlelight service will be held from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. CT on Saturday, May 3, 2025.
A memorial service will be held from 9 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. CT on Sunday, May 4, 2025.
The NFFF will live stream both events on their website (firehero.org), YouTube channel, and Facebook page.
Even if you can't make it, there are ways to pay tribute to this year's honored firefighters.
Light the Night for Fallen Firefighters (April 27 - May 4): Light your homes, businesses, landmarks or fire departments with red lights.
Bells Across America (May 3-4): Sign up to ring bells across the country.
Sound the Sirens (May 4): At noon, many fire stations will sound their sirens in honor of fallen firefighters.
Sign the Remembrance Banner: You can pay tribute to a specific firefighter or share a story.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: These 6 fallen Texas firefighters will be honored this weekend
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
As King Charles prepares to put on a united front with his family at this year's Trooping the Colour, the monarch and estranged son Prince Harry are nowhere near ending their rift. "There is no turning back," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital. "King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication," she shared. "Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." King Charles, Prince Harry's Painful Feud 'Damaging' Monarch's Reign As Gutted Son Remains Furious: Expert "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it," Fordwich added. Fordwich's comments came shortly after insiders told People magazine that the monarch, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, is hesitant to reconnect with his son. Many royal observers believe it's the monarch who should take the first step in igniting a royal reconciliation. Read On The Fox News App "The underlying issue is trust," royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the outlet. "The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders told the outlet that the king, 76, isn't surrounded by palace aides urging him to reconcile with his son. Meanwhile, William is said to have "no interest" in extending an olive branch. "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'" royal author Valentine Low told the outlet. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY Fordwich claimed that Harry has crossed such a deep line in Charles's eyes that it's been difficult for the king to forgive his son. Sources close to Harry previously claimed to People magazine that Charles won't respond to his letters or phone calls. "It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, 'Spare'], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him," Fordwich claimed. "The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son." Harry's troubled relationship with his family and the U.K. establishment has played out in public for years – in books, interviews, TV programs and the courts. Harry and his wife, Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. That same year, they moved to California. Since the couple's royal exit, they have aired their grievances and made blistering allegations against the royal family. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir, "Spare," was stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations. Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Harry's rift with his family burst into the open once more with a raw interview he gave to the BBC in May after losing a court case over his security. In a long and at times emotional conversation, Harry said he wanted reconciliation. He admitted that his father, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, won't speak to him. "Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have." "The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them," said Fitzwilliams. "Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them." Low told People magazine that despite Harry's call for peace on the BBC, his comments were seen as another blow to the royals. During the interview, Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said, "I don't know how much longer my father has." "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," said Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royals take great pride in protecting their public image. They've maintained the late Queen Elizabeth II's motto of keep calm and carry on. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "The royals play a positive role to the cameras," he explained. "[But] behind the scenes, they allegedly are constantly bickering with each other… King Charles has a past reputation for not making advances on difficult decisions." A source recently claimed to Us Weekly that William was "absolutely appalled" by Harry's comments to the BBC about their father's health. The insider claimed that the 42-year-old feels like Harry stooped "so low." Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that William is fiercely protective of Charles. The source also told the outlet that it's unlikely that the feuding brothers will reunite while their father is still alive. "The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting]," said the insider. "I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation." Despite infrequent updates from the palace about his health, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. During his sit-down with the BBC, Harry held out little hope of another meeting with his father. "The only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases," he said. Fitzwilliams said that Charles must address his ongoing rift with Harry, 40, as it remains a dark cloud over his reign. "We are now less than a fortnight away from Trooping the Colour, which celebrates the monarch's birthday," he said. "King Charles can surely congratulate himself on negotiating a year where he has worked so hard and achieved a great deal despite battling cancer." "The one area that remains problematic is the rift with the Sussexes. He has only seen Prince Harry once after his diagnosis and then fleetingly." Back in 2024, Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," claimed to Fox News Digital that the king is still unable to forgive his son for casting Camilla as the villain in "Spare." "I think people have to realize that the one thing that Charles finds unforgivable is criticism of Camilla," said Andersen at the time. "There's no criticism of Camilla," Andersen claimed. "And unfortunately for Harry… Harry said some pretty devastating things about her. He made it clear that he felt she was… the villain in the piece. I think that still bothers the king, and I don't know that it will be easy for him to [forgive]. I don't think they'll ever forgive Harry for that." WATCH: PRINCE HARRY'S JABS AT QUEEN CAMILLA UNFORGIVABLE FOR KING CHARLES: EXPERT "[He's] on his own," Andersen added, referring to the Duke of Sussex. In televised interviews to promote the book, Harry accused his stepmother, 77, of leaking private conversations to the media to burnish her own reputation. He accused members of the royal family of getting "into bed with the devil" to gain favorable tabloid coverage, singling out Camilla's efforts to rehabilitate her image with the public after her longtime affair with his father. "That made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press," Harry told CBS ahead of his book launch. "There was open willingness on both sides to trade information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street." The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reside in the wealthy coastal city of Montecito with their two young article source: King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry Is ‘Damaging' King Charles' Legacy Amid Reports the Monarch Is a ‘Sick Man'
Who's going to make the first move? Several Royal experts have weighed in on the topic of if Prince Harry will reconcile with King Charles after his bombshell BBC interview. Though Prince Harry put the offer to reconcile with his father in front of the public, there's still hesitation on Buckingham Palace's side. 'The underlying issue is trust,' Sally Bedell Smith told People. 'The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation.' More from StyleCaster Harry Changing His Last Name Would've Been a 'Slap in the Face' to Prince Philip-It's a 'Public Rejection' of Charles' Family 'Sick' King Charles Faces Devastating News Amid Reports He 'Refused' Chemotherapy 'There is not a good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'' says Valentine Low. The Royal expert also explained that if Charles did reverse the decision on the security appeal that it could 'potentially damage [Charles'] legacy.' However, Low is certain that they could separate what's left in the public and private eye. 'This is a family rift rather than a constitutional rift — it's what happens to families. Both sides have to reach a point where they realize they can't carry on as they are.'Prince Harry told the BBC that the King 'won't speak to me because of this security stuff', but that he did not want to fight anymore and did 'not know how much longer my father has'. The stakes are even higher since Charles' cancer diagnosis. 'If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with,' says Catherine Mayer. A source said that Charles' health is in steady decline. 'Charles is indeed a sick man, and he does have cancer,' an insider told NewsNationNow. 'He also refused chemotherapy and decided on a less invasive treatment. While Harry and his dad aren't speaking, Harry would be aware of all of this via back channels.' However, an anonymous royal aide disclosed a positive health update for King Charles. He is dealing 'incredibly well' with cancer, per The Telegraph. 'The thing you learn about this illness is that you just manage it and that's what he does. Medical science has made incredible advances and I genuinely see no difference in him. As long as you just do what the doctors say, just live your life as normal as possible… that's exactly what he is doing.' They also revealed that the Monarch 'has dealt with his illness in a very human way, and the way he's engaging with the public at a very human level. I think we now have a clear idea of what the Carolean age looks like and what it stands for – now and hopefully for many years to come.' Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Queen Camilla Reportedly 'Stays Out' Of Prince Harry And King Charles' Rift After Duke Labeled Her A 'Villain'
Queen Camilla is reportedly distancing herself amid escalating tensions between King Charles and Prince Harry, intensified by the duke's bombshell BBC interview and memoir "Spare." Sources also recently shared that Charles lacks trusted advisers who can encourage reconciliation, while Prince William reportedly opposes mending ties. Prince Harry has since been urged by royal commentators to keep a "dignified silence," warning his public comments damage trust. Queen Camilla is avoiding the growing tensions between King Charles and his estranged son, Prince Harry. According to palace insiders who spoke to People Magazine, the 77-year-old queen "stays out of" the ongoing family feud, especially after coming under heavy criticism in Harry's explosive memoir "Spare." In the book, the Duke of Sussex described his stepmother as "dangerous" and "the villain," accusing her of leaking stories to the media to protect her public image. Additionally, sources suggest the rift between Harry and his family recently intensified following a BBC interview in which Harry's remarks were seen as damaging to any remaining trust between him and his ailing father. Although the interview may not have been intended as a direct attack, royal commentator Valentine Low noted, "it would be seen as one." She added that "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Sally Bedell Smith also noted that both Charles and Prince William "don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Catherine Mayer, author of "Charles: The Heart of a King," echoed this sentiment, warning that "If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with." According to People, Charles isn't expected to make the first move to reconcile with Harry largely because he's not surrounded by advisers pushing for reconciliation. Royal commentator Valentine Low shared that the monarch lacks a "good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move.'" Further complicating the situation is William, who, after being heavily criticized in Harry's memoir "Spare," reportedly has no interest in repairing their relationship. Sources suggest that the Prince of Wales is firmly against any efforts to reconnect. Meanwhile, royal commentator Joe Little believes Harry's chances of mending his fractured relationship with the royal family may be slipping away, and suggests the Duke of Sussex would be better served by keeping a "dignified silence." Speaking to the PA news agency via the Mirror, Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine, described Harry's remarks about Charles' health in the BBC interview as "quite alarming," especially given Harry's admission that he hasn't spoken to his father in some time. "From what Harry is saying, despite admitting that he has not spoken to his father for some time, I thought it sent out a bit of a mixed message, really," Little said. "Is Harry suggesting that the King isn't as well as we are led to believe?" Joe Little further criticized Harry's continued tendency to air grievances publicly rather than resolve them privately. "I think for somebody who is seeking reconciliation with his father, his brother, and his family, his royal family as a whole, I think the very last thing that he should have been doing was talking publicly," Little argued. He added that Harry's repeated public disclosures have made it difficult for the royal family to place their trust in him again. "There is a great deal to be gained by maintaining a dignified silence — sadly, as we know from past events, this isn't Harry's way of doing things," he noted. Little concluded by suggesting that "Maybe lessons just haven't been learned from previous occasions where also silence would have been the very best thing to maintain." Meanwhile, Harry is reportedly exploring the possibility of legally changing his surname to "Spencer," his late mother Princess Diana's family name, in a dramatic symbolic gesture to further distance himself from the royal family. According to the Daily Mail, the Duke of Sussex is believed to have consulted his maternal uncle, Earl Spencer, about the idea during a recent visit to the UK. While the conversation was said to be amicable, sources claim the Earl ultimately advised Harry against "such a step." The change would have meant abandoning the royal surname Mountbatten-Windsor, the name currently used by both of Harry's children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Though Buckingham Palace has remained publicly silent on the matter, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Express that the idea "deeply hurt" Charles. Quoting Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet," Fitzwilliams emphasized that "someone's family name is a pivotal and public link to the other family members." "This news will be deeply hurtful to King Charles, especially as it would have been a very public renunciation of the Royal Family only a relatively short time after he (Charles) had become king," Fitzwilliams explained.
