US judge in Huawei criminal case questions Trump order against law firm
The judge overseeing the U.S. criminal case against Chinese telecom Huawei said at a hearing that President Donald Trump's executive order stripping security clearances from lawyers at Jenner & Block could be a hurdle for the company's defense in the case.
U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly in Brooklyn questioned prosecutors about the status of Jenner lawyer David Bitkower at the Wednesday hearing, warning that a security clearance would be necessary for the defense team.
The judge asked what both sides were doing to address the problem.
"It's an issue in terms of the right to counsel, it's an issue in terms of trying the case," Donnelly said. "We've got a trial scheduled for January, and if you've got to get people cleared, I think it's an issue."
A Justice Department lawyer said the government would work to facilitate a security clearance for a different member of Huawei's defense team.
Later on Wednesday, a lawyer representing Jenner in its lawsuit in Washington, D.C., seeking to strike down the Trump executive order said the clearance of one of the firm's attorneys had been suspended. The letter did not name the lawyer.
Jenner is among four law firms targeted by Trump's executive orders, based on their ties to lawyers or cases that the president said did not align with his administration's priorities. The other three firms are WilmerHale, Perkins Coie and Susman Godfrey.
A judge in Washington is poised to rule soon in Jenner's lawsuit seeking to permanently block Trump's order against it.
The Jenner filing and the exchange in the Huawei case showed the continued effects of Trump's executive orders against prominent law firms, even as judges have so far sided with the firms in lawsuits challenging the orders.
Huawei and Jenner declined to comment. Bitkower did not respond to a request for comment. Other lawyers representing Huawei at law firms Sidley Austin and Steptoe did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
A spokesperson for the Eastern District of New York's federal prosecutor office in Brooklyn did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Jenner and Bitkower, a former senior federal prosecutor who is now a leader of the firm's investigations and defense group, are defending Huawei against criminal racketeering and trade secrets claims filed by the Justice Department in a superseding indictment in 2020.
Huawei has denied the allegations and argued the government was treating the company "as a prosecutorial target in search of a crime."
Trump's executive orders against Jenner, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie and Susman Godfrey sought to suspend security clearances held by lawyers at the firms, restrict their access to government officials and cancel federal contracts held by their clients.
Jenner in a court filing on April 8 said that Trump's order "suspends all of Jenner's security clearances, including those required for the representation of clients in their most sensitive matters."
WilmerHale said in a court filing this week that security clearances for two of its lawyers had been suspended after Trump hit the firm with an executive order. The firm did not name the attorneys.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Singapore exploring 'worst-case scenario' solutions for its Harvard students: Vivian Balakrishnan
SINGAPORE: Singapore is trying to find solutions to deal with the "worst-case scenario" where Singaporean Harvard University students are not able to physically study in Boston, Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan said on Saturday (Jun 7). His ministry will continue to seek clarification on international student visas with the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security, he told reporters, though he made no promises that the matter would be resolved in time. Dr Balakrishnan on Saturday completed a four-day working visit to Washington DC. This was the first ministerial visit to the US since both countries elected new governments. Harvard's ability to enrol international students was thrown into turmoil last month after the US government said it would block the university from accepting foreign students, affecting study plans. Though all Singaporean students are set to be affected by the visa issue and possible delays in processing their applications, those studying at Harvard have the "greatest concern", and Singapore's ambassador to the US, Mr Lui Tuck Yew, has held a virtual townhall with them. "We are also trying to find solutions to deal with the worst-case scenario where they would not be able to physically study in Boston," Dr Balakrishnan said, adding that the ministry has some ideas about how to help the students deal with that "without impairing their academic and professional progress". Those who are not in the US yet and have not secured visas may need to have backup plans, he said. "But my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed." A court on Thursday ruled that the government cannot enforce US President Donald Trump's latest move to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, following legal action by the university. Beyond Harvard, Reuters also reported last month that the US ordered its consular offices to stop scheduling new visa interviews for students and exchange visitors. "I am not in a position to give any guarantees that this will be resolved in time," said Dr Balakrishnan, when asked about contingencies being planned for Singaporean students. He noted that it is already June, and the academic year in the US usually begins in August. "We will have to watch this space, but rest assured that we will continue to do our best to try to at least get clarification, get certainty ... (and) thereafter, give our students specific advice," he said. Dr Balakrishnan said he hoped that there will be clarifications from US authorities in the next few days, but that these are domestic political issues. "The situation confronting our students is not confined to Singapore, but indeed to all international students," he said. "It is not directed at us. Nevertheless, you can become affected as collateral damage." He added that it is in the interest of both countries keep opportunities open to Singaporeans who want to study and even work in the US. "I hope we will be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States." "NO HURDLES" Dr Balakrishnan also said there were no challenges in interacting with his US counterparts during his trip. "There were no hurdles or impediments interacting with the Americans ... We got along in our own usual direct and constructive manner," he said, adding that there was no anxiety on that front. "The anxiety is that we have reached the end of a world order that has prevailed for 80 years, and we are now in a period of transition to a new world order." Singapore has benefited from open trade and free flow of investments and the multilateral rules-based order, he said. "That is clearly changing, and the time of greatest danger is the interregnum – the transition period from one world order to the next. That is why this is a time where we need to be alert, we need to keep our eyes and ears open, and we need to respond promptly and quickly to changes." It is also important to interact frequently, candidly, openly and constructively, especially with a superpower which is of "great strategic importance to us", he said. In response to a question on how tariff discussions are going, Dr Balakrishnan said it will take time because the US is looking for multiple rounds of negotiation with its trading partners. Based on conversations with senators and members of Congress from the two major US political parties, there is still a recognition that trade, investment, intellectual property protection, reliability and supply chain security are vital issues, he said. "Do not just look at the headline numbers of what the tariffs are, but rather think about the primary considerations and anxieties of policy makers across the whole world," he said. Negotiators from different countries have to exercise discretion and care in how they seek to preserve and protect their national interests.
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Iran says US travel ban shows 'deep hostility' for Iranians, Muslims, World News
Iran on Saturday (June 7) blasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed "deep hostility" toward Iranians and Muslims. "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law," a senior foreign ministry official said in a ministry statement posted on the X social media platform. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday at 12.01am. The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists", was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. [[nid:718841]]
AsiaOne
3 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries, World News
Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday (June 5) at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the US starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the US Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to US citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the US a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the US Afghans who worked for the US or US-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the US expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her US visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Ban to take effect Monday Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbour a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to co-operate on visa security, have an inability to verify travellers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12.01am. Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of US citizens and athletes travelling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the US to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement. [[nid:718800]]
