Another session where it appears West Virginia lawmakers will do nothing for child care
Ellie O'Keefe stands in the West Virginia Capitol building in Charleston, W.Va. on Tuesday, April 8, 2025, to advocate for child care changes. (Amelia Ferrell Knisely | West Virginia Watch)
When Ellie O'Keefe moved to Oak Hill in Fayette County, West Virginia, she was surprised how difficult it was to find child care.
'I was very surprised, coming from a much more suburban area, to be faced by this lack of child care,' she said.
More than 25,000 children in West Virginia don't have access to child care, and more than 150 child care providers have closed their classrooms over the last year. There are also concerns about the state's long-term plan to fund its subsidy program that helps working parents pay for child care.
Parents, child care workers, the state's business leaders and some Republican and Democrat lawmakers have asked for bills and funding to address widespread issues.
Another legislative session is likely to end with no movement on the issue.
'Well, none of our bills made it through, so I think that says a lot about priorities,' said Pamela Shope, site director for Playmates Preschools and Child Development Centers, which operates six centers in Cabell and Wayne counties.
O'Keefe, pregnant with her second child, stood in the lower rotunda of the state Capitol on Tuesday for Child Care Day. A sticker on her T-shirt said, 'I am a child care voter.'
'Families are really struggling in ways they haven't in the past,' she said. 'It is another year where we've been told that this was going to be a priority, and nothing has really shifted.'
It feels like déjà vu for those hoping for changes after last year the Republican-led legislature failed to send a stack of child care-focused bills to the governor's desk for consideration. Lawmakers, at former Gov. Jim Justice's urging, did approve a Child Care Tax Credit in 2024, and it's available to families who already claim the federal child care tax credit.
'I'm disappointed,' said Del. Kathie Hess Crouse, R-Putnam, who sponsored several child care measures. She said the House of Delegates' focus on budget constraints had partially held up the measures. 'It's not over till midnight on Saturday, so there's always hope, but I won't be surprised if nothing happens.'
West Virginia has the nation's lowest rate of women serving in a legislature, which Crouse believes has impacted the House's action on child care.
'Unfortunately, the majority of the body are men, and they don't have to deal with these issues,' said Crouse, a mother who chose to leave the workforce to stay home with her children. 'I'm not saying they don't care about them. I just don't think they have the same pull and realize what it takes and what's needed.'
Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha, is a mom of two and at one time was the only mother of young children serving in the House. She has championed child care legislation during the last few years.
'I don't think we have any women who are chairs of major committees in the House, and it's obviously not a priority of this super majority,' Young said.
'Feels like another year with all the same excuses,' she continued. 'We still haven't done anything for child care.'
The West Virginia Chamber of Commerce has backed child care measures, saying it's necessary to improve the state's abysmal workforce participation rate. Others pushing for child care expansion point to the importance of early childhood learning and resources in a state with a high rate of poverty and babies impacted by the substance abuse crisis.
There were a number of child care measures introduced this year, particularly in the House.
House Bill 2731, sponsored by Crouse, would create the Employee Child Care Assistance Partnership, where the state would partner with child care employers to offset their employees' child care costs. The program is meant to help centers retain workers and keep classrooms open.
Shope said the measure would have 'a huge impact to help retain staff.'
The average annual cost of care at a licensed child care center in West Virginia is more than $6,000 per child.
'Child care is very expensive, and we do give our teachers and staff employee discounts … but it's still very hard,' Shope said, adding that employees at her centers can make too much to qualify for the state's child care subsidy program.
'We want to have the highest quality child care that we can provide for our families, and sometimes it's difficult to find a good, qualified teacher that wants to work in child care. We need all of the benefits that we can to get them to stay,' she said.
The bill remains parked in the House Health Committee with the legislative session set to adjourn Saturday.
Crouse also introduced legislation, House Bill 2730, to establish a pilot program where the state, an employer and an employee each pay one-third of total child care costs. It's known as a 'tri-share model' for child care. The program is currently being piloted in eight counties. The bill, which would have cost roughly $10 million, is unlikely to make it to the full House of Delegates for consideration.
Del. Bob Fehrenbacher, R-Wood, who serves on the House Finance Committee, said there wasn't one single thing that had derailed child care measures this session.
'I do think there are some tax considerations, you know, with the structural deficit, but there are some of the options that I think would be OK. Let's get started on this,' he said. 'Yes, there may be some tax implications, but there also ought to be some benefits, such as more people being in the workforce.'
Fehrenbacher sponsored multiple bills aimed at tackling the state's child care issues, including a measure that would increase the tax credit for employers providing child care for employees. His child care bills weren't considered by House committees.
'Frankly, I'm disappointed,' he said.
While the House budget increases funding for child care in fiscal year 2026, Young is concerned that the state's subsidy program is facing a July 1 funding cliff, which she said could result in thousands of children being removed from the program. During House budget negotiations last week, she tried to amend the budget bill to include around $32 million for the child care subsidy program. The House voted down her amendment.
'[It] means we'll have more parents out of the workforce. It means we'll have more centers closing,' Young said.
Fehrenbacher said testimony from Department of Human Services Secretary Alex Mayer led him to believe the program will be funded throughout the year, but there's still a question mark about the long-term funding amid the state's child care issues.
'We need other options. So, things like the tax incentives for an employer or the tri-share model are things that are out there that I think could have helped give us options,' he said.
O'Keefe hopes the state will work to address the affordability of child care.
'We're looking for the best opportunities for our children. We're looking for the freedom to be able to go to work,' she said.
'Just because you don't see these parents coming to the Capitol doesn't mean that they don't want to speak up … They often are not able to come to this stage because they're working and because they have child care,' O'Keefe continued. 'Their voices deserve to be heard.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON (AP) — As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences.' As of Friday afternoon, Musk was holding his fire, posting about his various companies on social media rather than torching the president. Trump departed the White House for his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, without stopping to talk to reporters who shouted questions about his battle with Musk. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.' — Associated Press writers Leah Askarinam and Kevin Freking contributed to this report. Seung Min Kim And Chris Megerian, The Associated Press
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas bill allocates $13M for animal spay and neutering services
The Brief The budget passed by the Texas Legislature allocates $13 million to a pilot program to spay and neuter cats and dogs. Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to approve this funding. This builds off of recently passed legislation, Senate Bill 1568, which created specialty license plates to fund animal sterilization. Texas lawmakers passed a budget that sets aside $13 million for animal spaying and neutering services in order to limit the spread of infectious diseases. If approved by the governor, the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) would lead a statewide pilot program over the next two years. What we know The program was created in an effort to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases such as rabies, toxoplasmosis, and leptospirosis. These diseases, which can be transferred from animals to humans, can cause adverse side effects in people. What they're saying Shelby Bobosky, executive director of the Texas Humane Legislation Network (TLHN), said the pilot program is a crucial step forward in protecting both animals and people. "Shelters, veterinarians, and local communities have long struggled with limited resources to manage stray and feral animal populations," she said. "This funding is not only indispensable, but it also reflects a clear understanding by the Legislature that animal welfare is a vital part of our public health infrastructure." Bobosky believes the effort will help to tackle Texas' pet overpopulation problem while working to improve community health. The backstory The pilot program is a continuation of previous legislation the TLHN led: Senate Bill 1568, which passed on May 24, 2025. This bill, authored by State Senator Judith Zaffirini, a Democrat from South Texas, created specialty license plates to promote public participation in animal sterilization. The new license plates would include the phrase "Spray. Neuter. Adopt." The sales of this license plate would support the Animal Friendly Account to help fund programs and organizations that support animal sterilization in order to reduce stray populations. What's next If signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott, the DSHS will begin forming the plans and procedures to implement the pilot program over the upcoming months. The TLHN plans to work with animal shelters, veterinary professionals, rescue organizations, and local municipalities to collect feedback to share with the DSHS. The Source This information was gathered from Texas Policy Research, as well as a news release sent by the Texas Humane Legislation Network.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maryland must tackle interconnected land use, housing, transportation, economic challenges
Traffic on the Capital Beltway near the American Legion Bridge. Surveys show Marylanders want housing near jobs, but state policy doesn't always make that easy. (Photo by Dave Dildine/WTOP) Maryland is well-known for innovative state policies and reforms, including smart growth, but the state missed key opportunities this year to build on that legacy. While approving a half-billion-dollar package to close a major transportation funding gap, the legislature (primarily the Senate) failed to adopt bills that would ensure the funds shift the state in a new direction toward abundant and affordable housing and transportation choices. Maryland's land use, high housing costs, transportation challenges and economic doldrums are interconnected. They require new approaches, not just patching budget holes to fix. Homes are expensive in part because Maryland communities allow too little housing near transit, services and jobs. This contributes to sprawling, car-dependent development, further fueled by too much public spending on oversized roads and highways. The result is long commutes, more driving to reach stores and services, and higher transportation costs for families. The average new car in the U.S. costs almost $50,000, and last year 17% of American drivers said they had to take on a second job to help pay for their car. Instead of funding more of this status quo, Maryland needs to help families stay here, with affordable access to opportunity. Fostering walkable, vibrant activity centers with good transit and a range of housing types and prices near jobs will help current residents and also attract the next generation of skilled workers and industries. Maryland Matters welcomes guest commentary submissions at editor@ We suggest a 750-word limit and reserve the right to edit or reject submissions. We do not accept columns that are endorsements of candidates, and no longer accept submissions from elected officials or political candidates. Opinion pieces must be signed by at least one individual using their real name. We do not accept columns signed by an organization. Commentary writers must include a short bio and a photo for their bylines. Views of writers are their own. The House of Delegates passed several valuable smart growth bills: Transit-oriented development (House Bill 80) to remove obstacles to building housing and mixed-use development near rail stations; Transportation and Climate Alignment Act (House Bill 84), ensuring the state's transportation investments support its climate change goals while giving residents more travel options; Metro Funding Modification Act (House Bill 467), fixing dedicated state capital funding for the D.C.-area Metro system to account for inflation; and Gov. Wes Moore's Housing for Jobs Act (House Bill 503), which would have required the state's job centers to address housing needs, although it was watered down into largely a study bill. Unfortunately, the Maryland Senate did not advance any of these bills to a vote. The Senate, to its credit, did pass: Split-rate property tax enabling legislation (Senate Bill 472) that would allow local governments to create tax structures that capture the value of land near assets like rail stations while incentivizing new development, though the House did not pass it; and Accessory dwelling unit bill (House Bill 1466) that will require local governments to allow construction of a smaller independent home on a lot with a single-family detached house. The House concurred with the final bill and the governor signed it. We know that legislators had a lot on their plates, with a sizable budget gap and chaotic federal backdrop. However, most of the smart-growth bills that didn't pass would have cost little or nothing to government coffers – and would actually save the state money over time through reduced infrastructure and service costs. Realizing this vision provides interconnected benefits. For example: Smart growth has been key to attracting and retaining Fortune 500 firms like Marriott and Choice Hotels in transit-oriented locations. Maryland families on average would save over $3,000 per year in transportation costs if the state provided more opportunities for transit, walking, biking and accessible living. State-owned transit-oriented development sites could support 5,000 new housing units in the Baltimore region and 2,600 new housing units along the MARC Penn Line. These Penn Line sites could generate $800 million in new state and local revenue. Marylanders want these opportunities; 76% support more homes in job-rich areas. Before the next General Assembly session, the Moore administration can make progress: The Maryland Department of Transportation can adopt changes to its Chapter 30 project prioritization process to better maintain existing infrastructure, recognize good land use planning as a transportation solution, and ensure affordable and sustainable travel choices for residents. The Department of Housing and Community Development can provide further analysis on the state's housing shortage and the benefits of new homes in accessible locations. It could also work with local governments to improve land use review to reduce time and complexity, allowing more new homes to be built faster in transit-accessible locations. During the 2026 session, the General Assembly will have the opportunity to pass legacy-making legislation ahead of the elections. Gov. Moore, with the support of state senators and delegates, can help Marylanders address the everyday needs of housing and transportation in lasting ways, which also help the state's finances, climate resilience, and economic opportunity.