
Scotland 'will send its rubbish to be dumped in England': Up to 100 truckloads will be driven across the border when landfill ban is brought in, experts say
As many as 100 truckloads piled with rubbish will have to travel from Scotland to England each day to be dumped due to a new landfill ban, experts are warning.
The Scottish government is set to bar 'black bag' waste from being buried at landfill sites from this December 31 onwards - but analysts say the country lacks enough incinerators and other facilities to cope with the knock-on effects.
Almost all domestic and commercial waste will be covered by the new restrictions which have been mooted by SNP ministers for years but only now being brought in.
The ban was initially scheduled for 2021, only to be delayed amid the Covid-19 pandemic and warnings firms were not yet ready.
But now critics say there has been insufficient progress in terms of how Scotland will deal with its landfill once the new system sets in - meaning rubbish will have to be diverted to England as well as Scandinavia.
Waste management industry veteran David Balmer, of consultants ERS Remediation, told MailOnline there were worries Scotland could be left with 'rubbish piling up in the streets like in Birmingham '.
The West Midlands city has become a byword for dumped garbage in recent months, with p iles of waste littering the streets during a long running bin workers' strike.
'Black bag' waste from households and companies should no longer be buried in landfill, according to the Scottish government ban coming into force on December 31.
Up to 100 waste trucks each day could need sending from Scotland to England, experts say
The BBC's Disclosure programme has now suggested that up to 100 daily truckloads of waste could need moving from Scotland into England as a result.
The proportion of household waste that is recycled across Scotland currently stands at 43.5 per cent, according to the latest official government figures - only marginally up on 41.6 per cent back in 2013.
The most recent equivalent figures elsewhere in the UK are 44 per cent for England, 51.1 per cent for Northern Ireland and 64.7 per cent for Wales.
Among the materials which will now be ruled out of landfill disposal in Scotland are non-recyclable municipal waste, food, paper, textiles and wood.
Supporters of the restrictions highlight how braking down such rubbish produces greenhouse gas methane, about 28 times more hazardous than carbon dioxide.
But experts say the country does not yet have enough energy-from-waste incinerators up and running, with eight operational at the moment but applications for planning permission for others still pending.
Campaign group Zero Waste Scotland forecasts a 'capacity gap' amounting to a surplus 600,000 tonnes of rubbish in the first year following the new ban.
Local authorities and commercial waste firms in Scotland have been contacting counterparts in England to secure 'bridging contracts', the BBC reported.
That could see Scottish excess waste sent across the border to landfill sites in English locations such as in Cumbria, Northumberland and Manchester.
Ms Balmer has suggested that between 80 and 100 truckloads each day, seven days a week, could be needed to transport waste from Scotland to England ahead.
He told MailOnline today: 'The problem is that not all the facilities we need have managed to get to completion before the new ban is implemented - not necessarily the fault of contractors or councils, it's just the system the UK has.
'But now Scotland finds itself with especially unenviable problems - nowhere for all its rubbish to go except down to England, and that then adds more stresses to England's own system.
'The last thing anyone wants to see is waste piling up in the streets, like in Birmingham - hopefully not, but we're working through what the scenarios could be. We're probably looking at about 18 months to two years to catch up.'
Meanwhile, other experts have cautioned that sufficient transport might not even be available either.
Alasdair Meldrum, director of waste management consultants Albion Environmental, said: 'We've probably not got the trucks and vehicles to actually move it.
'You've got the environmental impact of all that transport. It's nonsensical, but the people who have invested in incinerators are saying, "We've invested all this money because of the ban". So, we're stuck in a really hard place.'
Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government has also indicated a desire for a similar block on biodegradable waste in landfill, but no such measures for south of the Scottish border have yet been tabled.
Colin Church, chair of an independent review looking at incineration in Scotland, told the BBC that a shift towards incinerators was the correct choice.
He said: 'It's probably the best thing that we can do with waste, with our current levels of technology, and so capturing some energy from that is a good idea.'
Yet eco-groups have warned that council deals guaranteeing waste be sent to incinerators could distract from better investment in recycling.
Kim Pratt, from campaigning organisation Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'Incineration in Scotland is out of control.
'There have been incinerators built in Aberdeen, in Falkirk - there's one this year that's going to be built in North Ayrshire as well.
'All of these incinerators have communities locally who are opposing them.'
And waste campaigner Laura Young said: 'One of the worries is these are expensive facilities - expensive to run, big contracts involved in this - and it means that we need to utilise them. We built them so we need to use them.'
The Scottish government has pointed to anti-waste measures such as bans on single use vapes, new charges due to be levied on disposable cups and a proposed deposit-return initiative for cans and plastic bottles.
It said the 'vast majority' of councils had measures in hand ahead of the landfill ban.
The government also insisted it would 'work closely with local authorities and sector bodies to monitor and review any related issues which may arise as the date of the ban approaches'.
The ruling authority added: 'Any export of waste should only ever be viewed as a short-term solution.'
A spokesperson for campaign group Zero Waste Scotland said: 'The Scottish Government's ban on biodegradable municipal waste to landfill has potential to help Scotland reduce our contribution to the climate crisis, as well as help drive up reuse and recycling.
'Tackling our throwaway culture is a priority for Zero Waste Scotland, and we will continue to work with the Scottish Government to evolve a circular economy in which goods and materials are valued and kept in high-value use.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Casey report forces Starmer's hand on issue that has haunted Labour for decades
Louise Casey's decision to recommend a national inquiry into grooming gangs has forced Keir Starmer's hand on an issue that has haunted the Labour party for decades. The failings of UK institutions to protect young girls from widespread abuse by gangs of men will remain high on the political agenda for another three years. A 197-page report produced by Lady Casey has called for wholesale changes to rape laws; requested that criminal convictions applied to abuse victims be quashed; and suggested that five existing local inquiries into grooming gangs be coordinated by an independent commission with full statutory inquiry powers. But it is the issue of the ethnicity of the perpetrators that will resonate as the most explosive political issue arising from its pages. Casey could only find data from three forces, but, using publicly available material from the police and reports, concluded that suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. The impression remains that Casey's conclusion – that a three-year, time-limited national inquiry must be launched – has caught the prime minister on the hop. Once again, he was forced into what appears to be a damaging U-turn. Some Labour MPs have said that a prime minister more attuned to his 'red wall' backbenchers would have ordered an inquiry after taking office in July, and claimed credit for grasping an issue that the Tories ignored for years. Instead Starmer in January refused to endorse demands led by Elon Musk who was backed by the Tories, Reform and some Labour backbenchers for a national inquiry into grooming gangs. . Launching another inquiry comes with some jeopardy for Starmer. It will likely be seized upon by the far right and used to galvanise activists such as Tommy Robinson. Casey's report calls for a radical improvement in the collection of data, particularly around ethnicity, because two thirds of police forces have failed to record the ethnicity of perpetrators. Casey argues that there is enough evidence from just three forces to show 'disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects'. She also claims there are a 'significant number of perpetrators of Asian ethnicity identified in local reviews' and 'high-profile child sexual exploitation prosecutions' to warrant further inquiries. There are concerns that community tensions may increase after the identification of 'men from Asian ethnic backgrounds' as groomers, at a time when there has been a record rise in anti-Muslim incidents across the UK. Police continue to worry that there could be a repeat of last summer's riots, which were inspired by far riot conspiracy theories around immigration and the identity of the Southport killer. It could also risk smearing Asian and Pakistani males as potential paedophiles, despite evidence to the contrary. The available data is patchy, but a November report by the child sexual exploitation taskforce suggested that a higher proportion of perpetrators of all forms of child sex abuse are white. Asked by the Guardian if highlighting the issue of ethnicity could lead to civil unrest, Casey said that new data must be investigated. 'If good people don't grip difficult issues, in my experience bad people do,' she said. The inquiry itself will examine the policies and decisions made by social workers and youth workers employed by predominantly Labour councils. Questions will be raised about what local MPs – often Labour MPs – knew, and why they failed to expose it. The worth of launching another expensive inquiry into child sex abuse has already been questioned by some of those who initially exposed grooming gangs. A seven-year national statutory inquiry, the independent nquiry into child sexual abuse, chaired by Prof Alexis Jay, covered the time period investigating abuse in children's homes, the church and Westminster and scrutinising institutional responses to child sexual exploitation – including grooming gangs. It involved more than 7,000 victims and survivors of child sexual abuse, including through the Truth Project, which gave survivors the opportunity to share their experiences and put forward suggestions for change. Nazir Afzal, the prosecutor who helped to jail members of the Rochdale grooming gang, said he has 'pragmatic doubts' about launching another national inquiry, adding that they were costly and lengthy, and could not bring people the accountability they wanted. He said: 'People want accountability. I'm not sure people's expectations will be realised. Only criminal investigations can bring real accountability. That's what needs to happen. Not just for those who offended, but also those who stood by and didn't do what they were meant to do. 'Unfortunately my experience with national inquiries is that they take forever and don't deliver accountability.' In the UK, the NSPCC offers support to children on 0800 1111, and adults concerned about a child on 0808 800 5000. The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac) offers support for adult survivors on 0808 801 0331. In the US, call or text the Childhelp abuse hotline on 800-422-4453. In Australia, children, young adults, parents and teachers can contact the Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800; adult survivors can seek help at Blue Knot Foundation on 1300 657 380. Other sources of help can be found at Child Helplines International


The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Fast-food chain from the US that's ‘better than KFC' to open TWO more locations in weeks – check if they're near you
A POPULAR US fast food chain is set to open more branches in the UK after its debut store found success in London. The brand is expanding its presence in Britain's major cities after its debut store went down well with customers. 2 Dave's Hot Chicken is now set to launch stories in Birmingham and Manchester following its success in the capital. The chain opened its first-ever British restaurant on Shaftesbury Avenue, London on December 7. Following a strong reception in London, it is set to spread its wings across the country. Steve Holmes, CEO of Azzurri Group, which owns the chain, said seven new locations will open by the end of the year. "We've had queues at the London site three to four months after opening," he said. "The volumes are still phenomenal. "Dave's gave us the opportunity to move into a new segment with a young consumer, a fast growing part of the market, and a different proposition." The new site in Birmingham will take over a site on New Street that was previously operated by ASK Italian. An outlet in Manchester is expected to open shortly after that. Dave's Hot Chicken was founded in 2017 in the US by Dave Kopushyan, Arman Oganesyan and Tommy Rubenyan as a late-night pop-up. It now has more than 200 sites across America. The brand is aiming to open as many as 60 venues across the UK and Ireland over the coming years. Jim Attwood, Dave's Hot Chicken UK managing director, said in January: "From an operational simplicity perspective Greater London is easier initially. "At some point we're going to have to launch in another city though. "And if we're confident, which we are, then we should take that step sooner rather than later." US FAST FOOD EXPANSION INTO THE UK Dave's Hot Chicken is far from the only American chain looking to make the transition across the pond. The burger joint Wendy's is already a hit in the US with over 6,000 restaurants. Now the chain that "blows McDonald's out of the water" has plans to open 400 locations. The chain returned to the UK high street in 2021 after a 20-year hiatus. Wendy's is most famous for its square-shaped hamburgers, which are designed to maximise the amount of meat in every bite. Fast food giant Chick-fil-A is set to bring its beloved chicken sandwiches to our high streets next year. The Sun exclusively revealed the exact locations of their first five permanent UK restaurants. Tex-Mex brand Velvet Taco will also make its UK debut next spring. Popeyes entered the UK market in 2021 and has proved to be a hit with ravenous customers ever since. In just 30 months, the brand opened over 38 restaurants across the UK. It has plans to reach the 60-restaurant milestone by the end of 2024. Shake Shack, which started out as a hotdog cart, recently opened its first restaurant inside a UK train station. Brits commuting in St. Pancras International Station can now grab their favourite burgers before jumping onto their train. The new spot marks the fast food giant's 16th location in the UK since it was launched in Covent Garden in 2013. While most of Shake Shack's UK sites are based in London, bosses have expanded into other locations in recent years, including Essex, Oxford, and Cardiff. Shake Shack's humble beginnings trace back to a New York hot dog cart helmed by Randy Garutti. Wingstop currently operates 39 sites across the UK and will open 15 more in 2024. Lemon Pepper Holdings, which runs the fast food chain's UK portfolio, said the move would create up to 750 jobs. The US hospitality brand said it is its biggest year of expansion since launching Wingstop in the UK six years ago. Dunkin' Donuts, which currently has 30 stores in the UK, hopes to open 30 new branches over the next couple of years as part of a major expansion plan. The chain is huge in the US, with almost 9,500 stores spread across the country. It sells a range of doughnuts, other sweet treats, and hot and cold drinks.


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer insists he will not ‘massage the figures' as he vows to shut all migrant hotels properly
Keir Starmer has insisted that the Home Office will not be buying up hotels and changing their use to 'accommodation centres' in a bid to ensure he keeps his pledge to end the use of asylum hotels by 2029. Speaking to journalists accompanying him to the G7 in Canada, Sir Keir insisted that there would be no attempt to 'massage the figures' on the pledge to stop using taxpayer-funded hotels to house asylum seekers. The issue was raised after the promise to stop paying for hotels was made in the spending review by chancellor Rachel Reeves. It comes as the prime minister held talks with his Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni to discuss imposing sanctions on people smugglers. Despite increasing numbers of asylum seekers making the dangerous journey across the Channel in small boats, the move to ban migrant hotels is expected to save at least £1bn, according to Treasury estimates. Sir Keir said: 'On the question of hotels, what I want to do is to reduce the number of hotels and get rid of the use of hotels. 'I'm absolutely clear why we're in this problem – it's because the last government didn't process the claims. So it left people in limbo where they couldn't be removed because they hadn't been processed, so they couldn't leave the country or be removed from the country. There were tens of thousands of people in a pool that was ever-expanding. 'That's not good – certainly not good for the taxpayer – and I intend to change that. And that's why we're working so hard on processing the claims as quickly as we can. Because when you process the claims you can then remove people who shouldn't be here hence the 30,000 that have been removed which is the highest number for the best part of a decade now. That's the way to drive this down.' He went on: 'We are determined to get those hotels shut, and properly shut, and not massaging the figures. I'm not interested in that. Shutting the hotels is what I'm absolutely focused on.' The prime minister also revealed that he planned an unofficial mini-summit at the G7 with French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Mertz and Ms Meloni over the continued issue of illegal migration across Europe. A readout from his Sunday evening meeting with Ms Meloni noted: 'They had a lengthy discussion on migration, confirming that they would continue working together on innovative solutions to break the criminal model of irregular migration. 'The Prime Minister raised the UK's world-leading work on people smuggling sanctions, adding that he looked forward to working with other European countries on this approach.' On the flight over he insisted that he was not frustrated with the French over their failure to prevent thousands of migrants from getting into small boats to cross the Channel. This comes despite anger expressed on the issue by defence secretary John Healey over French inaction despite the UK paying £400m to France to help tackle the problem. Sir Keir said: 'One of the things we've worked hard at is improving the relations with the French in relation to the work we both need to do to stop these boat crossings, which I'm determined we will absolutely bear down on. Nobody should be making that journey. 'As a result of that we are seeing a much greater cooperation in northern France - I want to see more cooperation in northern France, and it's an issue that I have raised and will raise again with President Macron. We have good relations between the Home Secretary and the Interior Minister now that we're working on jointly. 'It's one of the issues I'll be discussing - not just with Macron, actually, but discussing it with Georgia Meloni, Freidrich Merz, and others.'