Tauranga Councillor Slams Congestion Charge As ‘Dirty Cash Grab'
Article – Alisha Evans – Local Democracy Reporter
Tauranga City councillor Steve Morris said he was not convinced supporting time-of-use charging was in the best interest of residents.
Congestion charging is a 'dirty cash grab from central government', a Tauranga City councillor claims.
Steve Morris made the comment on Monday as the council discussed its submission on the Government's Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill.
The bill would enable local authorities to work with the New Zealand Transport Agency to design schemes charging motorists to use roads in high-congestion zones in peak hours, for transport minister approval.
It is before Parliament's Transport and Infrastructure Committee for public submissions, with the Government intending to pass the legislation this year.
The council's draft submission said it supported the general intent of the bill, but some councillors opposed this position.
Morris said he was not convinced supporting time-of-use charging was in the best interest of residents.
'People are living week to week, pay cheque to pay cheque, we are in a cost-of-living crisis, and paying for time-of-use charging is just another naked, dirty cash grab from central government, in my view.'
Morris said this was because it was not clear in the bill if the revenue from congestion charges on local roads would be used locally or elsewhere.
'This bill enables money to go into Government coffers from our residents, some of whom are struggling.'
Councillor Glen Crowther said the council should take a neutral position on congestion charging.
He said if it were introduced, alternative transport options had to be provided, meaning Government funding for public transport would be needed.
Councillor Rick Curach said congestion charging would be a 'real burden' for people who did not have easy access to public transport.
He was concerned the Government could impose time-of-use charges focused on revenue generation rather than congestion reduction.
Curach wanted assurances congestion reduction would be quantified by a percentage and that the charges would be removed if the target was not met.
Council principal strategic transport planner Sarah Dove said the bill was silent on congestion reduction targets, but this was probably because these would vary hugely between regions.
The bill was clear that the charges were to encourage better use of existing networks through congestion reduction, she said.
Councillor Rod Taylor said the council was only submitting on the legislation, and any discussion on whether Tauranga should implement congestion charging would come in the future.
The council's submission requested local authorities be involved in any decision to proceed with a charging scheme, rather than a minister directing the New Zealand Transport Agency to make and implement that decision.
It asked that all revenue from the scheme be managed by the relevant local authority and used in the area of charging.
The submission was adopted by the councillors after the wording was changed to say the council acknowledges, rather than supports, the bill's intent.
The submission said projections showed without substantial investment in transport infrastructure, congestion in Tauranga could significantly worsen in the next decade.
The funding required for transport infrastructure over the next 20 years was estimated at $10 billion, with current funding estimates at $3.5b, leaving a $6.5b gap.
This shortfall has previously led to discussions about alternative funding mechanisms.
In March last year, the commission running Tauranga City Council scrapped its plans to investigate congestion charging options after strong community opposition.
Of 1099 submissions in consultation, 81% had opposed congestion charging.
When the Government bill passed its first reading in Parliament in March, Transport Minister Chris Bishop said it would reduce travel times, increase efficiency and help boost economic growth and productivity.
'Modelling shows that successful time-of-use charging — charging motorists to travel on certain roads at peak times — will encourage people to change the time or mode of travel, and could reduce congestion by up to 8-12% at peak times.'
He said it required the transport agency to lead the design of schemes in partnership with councils — 'enabling local solutions within a nationally consistent framework'.
'The legislation is not about raising revenue but maximising the efficiency of the roading network. Any revenue that is collected will first be used to pay for the scheme's costs and then reinvested to improve transport in the region.'
– LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
The House: Parliamentary week achieves two out of three goals
Still, two out of three isn't bad. Photo: 123RF While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber - the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi moved the vote on his own punishment. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. "Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country." That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately. - RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Making it easier to build a granny flat makes sense - but it's no solution to a housing crisis
First published on Building a basic 70-square-metre granny flat will cost between NZ$200,000 and $300,000. Photo: 123rf As part of its resource management reforms , the government will soon allow "super-sized granny flats" to be built without consent - potentially adding 13,000 dwellings over the next decade to provide "families with more housing options". This represents genuine progress in reducing regulatory barriers. But the scale of the housing crisis means we have to ask whether incremental reforms can deliver meaningful change. The numbers provide important context. Against current consenting rates of 40,000 to 50,000 new dwellings per year, those projected 70-square-metre granny flats represent a 2.6 percent increase in housing supply. In Auckland, where housing pressure is most acute, 300 additional units might be built annually. For some, that's likely to be useful. But for a country already facing a housing crunch, it's insignificant. The numbers also reveal who can participate in this proposed solution. Building a basic 70-square-metre granny flat will cost between NZ$200,000 and $300,000. Add site works, utility connections and mandatory licensed building practitioner supervision, and total project costs will be closer to the upper end of that range. At current interest rates, financing $250,000 requires approximately $480 weekly in loan payments. While rents of $500-$600 per week are achievable in urban markets, these thin margins assume optimal conditions. For property owners with existing equity, this presents a viable investment. For those seeking affordable housing - young families, essential workers, recent immigrants - the benefits remain largely theoretical. This dynamic illustrates a persistent challenge in market-based housing solutions: policies intended to improve affordability often primarily benefit those with capital to deploy . Each granny flat requires full residential infrastructure - water, wastewater and stormwater connections. The development contributions - fees councils charge on new builds to fund infrastructure - will help fund network upgrades. But New Zealand already faces a $120-185 billion water infrastructure deficit over the next 30 years, just to fix existing systems. The challenge is particularly acute in established suburbs where these units are most likely to appear. Parts of Christchurch serviced by vacuum sewers already operate at capacity. Auckland's combined sewer areas face overflow risks during heavy rainfall. Wellington's ageing pipes struggle with current demand. Adding thousands of dispersed infill units to stressed networks poses genuine engineering challenges that funding alone cannot solve. Transport infrastructure faces similar pressures. With minimum parking requirements axed across the nation, these new granny flats will likely increase on-street parking demand and local traffic. While some granny flat residents may rely on public transport or active modes, New Zealand's car ownership rates - 837 vehicles per 1,000 people - suggest most will own vehicles. International experience offers instructive parallels. California's 2017 Accessory Dwelling Unit legislation provides the closest comparison. After removing similar regulatory barriers, California saw permits increase from 1,000 in 2016 to 13,000 in 2019. However, construction costs and infrastructure constraints limited actual completions to roughly 60 percent of approved units. Australian cities report similar patterns. Despite permissive regulations in many areas, only 13-23 percent of suitable properties actually added secondary dwellings. High construction costs and infrastructure limitations proved more binding than regulatory constraints. Closer to home, Auckland's experience with minor dwellings under the Unitary Plan suggests cautious optimism. Since 2016, the city has averaged 300-400 secondary dwelling consents annually where permitted. The number of units actually constructed is unknown. Allowing one-storey detached 70-square-metre units without building consent may increase this modestly. But they are unlikely to dramatically accelerate production given persistent cost and capacity constraints. The policy's benefits flow primarily to existing property owners. They will gain new development rights without competitive tender or public process. While perhaps justified by broader housing benefits, it's worth acknowledging this is a form of wealth transfer. Granny flats typically add roughly their construction cost to property values, providing capital gains alongside rental income potential. For renters, benefits depend on how many units actually materialise and at what price point. Secondary units often rent at 20-30 percent below comparable standalone houses due to their size and backyard location. This could meaningfully expand options for singles and couples. But families requiring larger accommodation will see limited benefits. The policy's design constraints also tell us what kind of urban density is acceptable. Single-storey height limits, two-metre boundary setbacks and standalone requirements essentially mandate the least efficient form of intensification. Units could share walls and services, and two-storey designs that use less land could be permitted. Instead, the granny flat exemption favours the one configuration that maintains suburban aesthetics while delivering minimal extra housing. The granny flat exemption exemplifies New Zealand's approach to housing challenges: acknowledging a crisis while implementing modest responses. Despite severe shortfalls in housing supply, the medium-density development common in comparable countries remains largely unrealised. An estimated 180,000 households could be accommodated through comprehensive densification. There are genuine benefits worth acknowledging, of course. The exemption reduces bureaucratic barriers, enables some additional housing and gives property owners new options. The question isn't so much whether the new policy should be embraced. But rather whether the government is willing to complement it with larger changes the housing crisis demands. This story originally appeared in the Conversation .
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Petition To Bring Back The Southerner Passenger Train Launched
A petition has been launched in the South Island calling for the restoration of The Southerner regular passenger train, running from Christchurch to Invercargill, via Dunedin. The passenger rail service would also stop at key towns and cities such as Ashburton, Timaru, Oamaru, Balclutha and Gore, and possibly other stops such as Temuka, Palmerston, Mosgiel (for bus connections to Dunedin Airport) and Milton, should demand warrant. The petition will be presented to a cross-Party group of South Island MPs at Parliament in early July, and calls on the 'House of Representatives [to] urge the Government to restore The Southerner Train, from Invercargill, via Dunedin to Christchurch, as a regular public transport service, supporting South Island towns and cities along the route' Save Our Trains Southern spokesperson Dave Macpherson said 'there are 750,000 New Zealanders living along the rail route between Christchurch and Invercargill who are starved of reasonable public transport links between their communities.' 'Rail is a preferred choice of travel for large numbers of them, judging by the very positive early reaction we are getting to our petition out in the streets and on the airwaves. We are starting to collect signatures in the streets of Oamaru, Dunedin, Balclutha and Milton already, and are adding volunteers for that task in Invercargiull, Ashburton, Christchurch, Gore and Timaru.' 'We have today launched the petition online as well, and are making that available to people around the country.' [see Petition link: ] Mr Macpherson said 'we are being told by tertiary students, retired people, families, businesspeople, and especially disabled people that rail will provide them affordable, safe and comfortable links to friends, relatives, study and work activities that are not well served - if at all - by expensive airliinks, unsafe car journeys and slow, uncomfortable private coach links.' 'The North Island already has three Government-supported long distance rail links, but the South Island has nothing. It is about time that this part of NZ Inc. received some transport support.' He pointed out that, 'unlike new highways, the rail route is already in place; the Hillside (Dunedin) and Waltham (Christchurch) KiwiRail workshops are in place to support passenger rail services, rail-enabled ferries are being bought, and tourist trains in the South Island are a roaring success. Everything points to passenger rail being successful in the South Island.' "Local people need passenger trains providing affordable local services.'
