Family of Halifax shooting victim breathes sign of relief following sentencing
For more than five years, Myra Johnson has been waiting for this day.
Two men charged with first-degree murder in the death of her son, Anthony Johnson, have been sentenced — and now with both behind bars, she says her family can finally begin to heal.
'Justice's been served for Anthony,' Johnson said Monday at the Supreme Courthouse on Mellor Avenue.
View image in full screen
Anthony and his daughter Keona. Myra Johnson / Submitted
Anthony was shot in a drive-by shooting just before midnight on Jan. 26, 2020, at the intersection of Chisholm and Connaught avenues in Halifax.
Story continues below advertisement
He spent nearly two weeks in a coma, before eventually passing away in hospital.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Two men — Shondell James Ogden and Justin Gregory Miller — were charged with first-degree murder in his death, respectively.
Miller went to trial first, in 2023, and was found guilty, receiving life in prison, with no chance of parole for 25 years.
'Miller's trial was a bit easier to deal with because he was… the mastermind, and the other one there, he did the shooting,' Myra said. 'So, I felt pretty confident, I knew he was going to be found guilty.'
Back in March, Ogden was also convicted on his murder charges, and on Monday, Justice Denise Boudreau handed him a life sentence as well.
In her address, she said, 'It's clear, Mr. Ogden, that you have chosen, at many times in your life, a life of violence,' adding,
'You've now taken a life. You've heard the victim impact statements this afternoon, and I'm sure you heard the pain in the voices of the people who have spoken today. You have taken someone's son; you have taken someone's father…'
'This is where your life choices have brought you, Mr. Ogden. I can only hope, I suppose, that you will spend some time reflecting on your life and your life choices and come to the realization of what you've done to this family.'
Story continues below advertisement
Myra says this sentence will finally give her family peace.
'I was hoping he would have said something, said why or shown some remorse but he didn't – and it's okay,' Myra said. 'We can now move forward and move on, and my granddaughter can get some healing from this. So, I'm happy with the justice we received today.'
Watch the video above for the full story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Diddy's lawyers request acquittal on all counts after prosecution rests case
The prosecution rested Tuesday at Sean 'Diddy' Combs ' sex trafficking trial, capping a more than six-week-long presentation of evidence against the hip-hop maven that confronted him with former employees and two former girlfriends who expressed regret at his treatment of them over the past two decades. After the prosecution rested, Combs' lawyers asked U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian to halt the trial immediately and throw out the charges, arguing the charges weren't proven. The government rested after defence lawyer Teny Geragos finished questioning the prosecution's final witness: Joseph Cerciello, a Homeland Security Investigations agent. Prosecutors have cited the 'freakoffs' as proof of the sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges that resulted in Combs' arrest last September. Defence lawyers, though, say they were consensual sexual encounters consistent with the swingers lifestyle. Story continues below advertisement Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty and has remained incarcerated without bail in a federal lockup in Brooklyn after multiple judges concluded last fall that he was a danger to the community. The government's case consisted of 34 witnesses, including former employees of Combs' Bad Boy Entertainment companies, but the bulk of its proof has come from the testimony of two former girlfriends: Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a model and internet personality known to jurors only by the pseudonym 'Jane.' Ventura, 38, testified for four days during the trial's first week, saying she felt pressured to engage in hundreds of 'freak offs' because the encounters would enable her to be intimate with Combs after performing sexually with male sex workers while he watched them slather one another with baby oil and sometimes filmed the encounters. Story continues below advertisement Jane testified for six days about the sexual performances she labeled 'hotel nights,' saying that she was putting them into perspective after beginning therapy three months ago. She said she felt coerced into engaging in them as recently as last August, but did so because she loved and still loves Combs. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Ventura was in a relationship with Combs from 2007 to 2018, while Jane was frequently with him from 2021 until his arrest, which cancelled her plan to meet him at the New York hotel where he was taken into custody. The Associated Press doesn't generally identify people who say they are victims of sexual abuse unless they come forward publicly, as Ventura has done. After prosecutors rested Tuesday, the jury was sent to lunch. When they return, a defence presentation was expected to be completed by the end of the day without any witnesses. Throughout the trial, defence lawyers have made their case for exoneration through their questioning of witnesses, including several who testified reluctantly or only after they were granted immunity from any crimes they may have committed. Combs has been active in his defence, writing notes to his lawyers and sometimes helping them decide when to stop questioning a witness. He was admonished once by the judge for nodding enthusiastically toward jurors during a successful stretch of cross-examination by one of his lawyers. Prosecutors complained that his gestures were a form of testifying without being subject to cross-examination. The judge warned that he could be excluded from his trial if it happened again. Story continues below advertisement In the past week, prosecutors and defence lawyers have shown jurors over 40 minutes of recordings Combs made of the 'freak offs' or 'hotel nights.' Several jurors occasionally seemed squeamish as they viewed and listened to audio of the encounters, but most did not seem to react. In her opening statement, Geragos had called the videos 'powerful evidence that the sexual conduct in this case was consensual and not based on coercion.' Closing arguments were tentatively scheduled for Thursday.
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
BC Conservative staff won't give statement on ‘blackmail' allegations, Rustad says
BC Conservative Leader John Rustad says party staff who alleged they were being blackmailed do not want to provide a written statement to police who are assessing their claim. Rustad, whose leadership of the Opposition is under review in a months-long process that got underway last weekend, has faced questions over his handling of the allegations against a group of former Conservative MLAs he accused in a letter to his caucus. RCMP confirmed the allegations are 'under review and assessment' after they were asked to investigate by the governing NDP's caucus chair last week. 1:55 BC NDP caucus chair writes to RCMP about blackmail allegations Rustad said in an interview that after consultations with party lawyers, the Conservative staff who made the blackmail claims were asked to provide 'a written statement to present to the RCMP the information.' Story continues below advertisement 'It was felt by the staff involved that they did not want to do that, and so I've got to respect their will, respect their rights to do what they want to do,' he said. 'They would much prefer this whole issue just to go away and they'll carry on with their lives.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The three former Conservative MLAs, Dallas Brodie, Tara Armstrong and Jordan Kealy, have all denied the accusations which they said were meant to distract from questions about Rustad's leadership. Brodie, who now leads the OneBC party that she formed with Armstrong, said on social media platform X last week that Rustad had 'painted himself into a corner' with a 'big lie' about blackmail that he could not substantiate. 2:20 John Rustad takes aim at former BC Conservative MLAs NDP caucus chair Stephanie Higginson wrote to RCMP Deputy Commissioner Dwayne McDonald last week to ask police to investigate, after Premier David Eby said that Rustad needed to take the claims to police, and if he didn't, then the NDP would. Story continues below advertisement Rustad's letter to his caucus said the former BC Conservative MLAs were trying to take over the party by threatening to release compromising information unless other MLAs and party staff joined them and did as they wished. His handling of the blackmail allegations comes under scrutiny as the party votes on his leadership in a marathon process that could last about six months. The party's executive director Angelo Isidorou said in-person voting took place in three ridings last weekend, and Rustad said he expected the ballot to be completed in December, once members in all 93 B.C. ridings have taken part. 2:02 3 former B.C. Conservative MLAs speaking out Under rules set by the party's constitution, members are being asked if they 'favour the current leadership' and if Rustad's approval is 50 per cent or less, the board of directors will arrange a leadership election. Story continues below advertisement Rustad said he was 'pretty optimistic' about the outcome of the vote, adding that he was not hearing a lot of negativity except from what he called a 'very small group of dissidents.' He said he had 'to laugh' about names of alternative leaders that were being floated on social media. BC Conservative Gavin Dew said MLAs were confident in Rustad's leadership, but 'are also continuing to have important conversations' about how to strengthen and grow the party. BC Conservative MLAs are scheduled to meet for their regular caucus meeting on Wednesday in Surrey, B.C. Rustad said he expected the blackmail allegations to come up at the meeting, although he was not anticipating any 'significant issues.' According to the party, voting in the leadership review has already taken place in three Kootenay-area ridings. If Rustad's support fails to surpass 50 per cent, he will have to step down, with the board appointing an interim leader. Under the party's constitution approved at its most recent annual general meeting in Nanaimo, a party leader can only be removed from office after voluntary resignation, death, incapacitation or a leadership review.
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
2 men who intervened in Toronto Jack Astor's bar fight not guilty of manslaughter
Alexander Campbell and Tyler Josling, two men who intervened in a bar fight at a Scarborough Jack Astor's restaurant nearly three years ago, have been found not guilty of manslaughter. Superior Court Justice Michael Dineen ruled the two friends were 'responding to a sudden situation of real peril' on the night of July 11, 2022. Dineen also found that if Campbell and Josling had not intervened, it is entirely possible that Frank Harbalis, the man they were trying to restrain and who later died, would have caused serious injury to himself and others. When Dineen finished reading his 45-minute judgment and said 'not guilty,' a dramatic scene played out inside the fourth-floor courtroom. From the rows in the gallery, where friends and family of Harbalis sat, a number of expletives were yelled out. Campbell and Josling began to cry, and shrieks of relief could be heard from friends and family who had stood by the two friends throughout the trial. Story continues below advertisement On the night of the altercation, 911 was called for an assault in progress at the Jack Astor's at Scarborough Town Centre. When first responders arrived, 32-year-old Harbalis was found face down on the floor and appeared unresponsive. Harbalis was rushed to hospital and paramedics successfully revived him, but he died in hospital two days later. At trial, court heard from witnesses and saw video surveillance showing Harbalis, a customer, suddenly attack a restaurant manager named Trevor Jaijairam. Harbalis, who had been in the bar for a few hours before leaving the restaurant and was captured on video scaling a seven-foot-high glass wall on the patio, returned to ask for his cellphone, which he'd left behind. Video surveillance appeared to show Harbalis calmly talking to Jaijairam before Harbalis suddenly punched Jaijairam in the face with considerable force. Jaijairam, who appeared to be unprepared for the blow, called for backup on his radio system. The next part of the physical altercation can only be seen in the background of the video and is much harder to see. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Harbalis is seen chasing Jaijairam before other staff members can be seen running toward the altercation. Harbalis then picks up a chair and strikes another staff member, Imzam Ali, in the head. Immediately after the blow to Ali, Campbell and Josling can be seen running in before tackling Harbalis to the floor as Harbalis appears to attempt to swing the chair. Story continues below advertisement A prolonged struggle ensued between Harbalis, Jaijairam, Ali, Campbell and Jostling. It ended approximately ten minutes later with Harbalis unconscious with no vital signs. None of this struggle was captured on video surveillance. Jaijairam and Ali gave evidence of how Harbalis continued to resist the struggle. Ali testified that Campbell had his left arm wrapped around Harbalis' neck, while Ali used the word 'chokehold' in an initial interview with police. At trial, he did not adopt this characterization. Jaijairam testified he has since come to believe from watching UFC fights that a 'chokehold' capable of rendering someone unconscious would require Campbell to have linked his hands together. A pathologist who testified at trial said Harbalis's cause of death was neck compressions, but could not conclude how those neck compressions caused his death. One possibility was that it resulted from the application of blunt force. The second, since Harbalis had an abnormally enlarged heart and apparent chronic heart disease from uncontrolled high blood pressure, he would have been vulnerable to rhythmic abnormalities in the electrical system of the heart that could lead to sudden cardiac arrest. As a result, the apparent neck compression or injury may simply have been a contributing factor, combined with the stress on the heart from the ongoing struggle, in triggering Harbalis's pre-existing heart condition to stop his heart. Story continues below advertisement Dineen concluded that the role of the defendants in the incident was 'the laudable one of trying to protect others from serious harm' and that the defendants were acting as 'Good Samaritans.' 'This does not give carte blanche to employ disproportionate force in response to a violent situation, but it militates in favour of a more forgiving standard when assessing the reasonableness of their decisions,' Dineen added. Dineen said he also considered the limited time Campbell and Josling had to respond to the situation when a customer named Adrian Raghubeer saw the chokehold applied. This was within about 80 seconds of the onset of the struggle, a struggle that included Harbalis casting off all four men at one point and getting to his knees and significant initial grappling to try to get him under control. Dineen found that Campbell and Josling were not professionals and were completely unprepared to deal with a sudden, violent and frightening attack by a very large man. He said that was evident from some of their decisions and inferred that these men must have reasonably been afraid and did not know exactly what to do. 'I find that the most that has been proven is that the defendants may have made a brief misjudgment about the amount of force necessary and appropriate to get Harbalis under control,' Dineen said. Story continues below advertisement 'They were making decisions in the face of a real threat of harm to others and with little time for careful consideration. They were trying to help. I do not believe that they meant to cause serious harm to Harbalis. I also do not believe that it can be said that this brief misjudgment rose to the level of being unreasonable in all of the circumstances, making criminal liability appropriate. This arguable misjudgment, in combination with Mr. Harbalis's heart condition, contributed to very sad consequences. I do not know what came over Mr. Harbalis to cause his sudden, violent behaviour that night, but it is tragic that he was not able to receive the help he clearly needed.' Outside court, lawyers for Campbell and Josling expressed their relief that the trial is finally over and said their clients are grateful for the judge's careful consideration of the evidence in the case. 'Mr. Josling, as you can see from the reaction in the courtroom when the verdict was read out, was really, really relieved,' Josling's lawyer, Marco Sciarra, said outside court. 'These gentlemen got themselves in a situation of trying to assist and, as a result, faced a prosecution. It was a very stressful time for them over the past few years and the result was just in my opinion,' Campbell's lawyer Peter Thorning said, 'It could not be proven that they did not act reasonably in the circumstances that they were facing, which was one of what he described as imminent peril.'
