Farage's Reform UK Appoints Murdoch TV Station Anchor as Chair
Television presenter David Bull will become the new chairman of Nigel Farage's Reform UK, after his predecessor Zia Yusuf quit the party and then rejoined days later following a disagreement about whether burqas should be banned in Britain.
Bull, a former medical doctor and long-time ally of Farage who previously served as Reform's deputy leader between 2021 and 2023, was unveiled as chairman by Yusuf in a press conference on Tuesday. He is a presenter on TalkTV, an online channel run by Rupert Murdoch's News UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy: Putin exploits peace talks to avoid sanctions
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that the Russian leader Vladimir Putin is using the topic of talks with Ukraine to avoid tougher sanctions and believes that "Russia is lying" to US President Donald Trump. Source: Zelenskyy in an interview with German tabloid Bild Details: Zelenskyy noted that it is important for Moscow "to show Trump that there is a diplomatic bridge between Ukraine and Russia". "So that sanctions are not imposed against Russia" while talks are ongoing, he added. Quote from Zelenskyy: "Because Putin could always say: 'But we are talking to each other! There will be no more talks if sanctions are imposed.'" Details: Zelenskyy is convinced that "Putin does not want peace". However, in his opinion, the Russians are also pursuing another goal. They want "dialogue without Europeans and without Americans" in order to isolate Ukraine. Quote from Zelenskyy: "A prolonged war without support from our partners would be the perfect scenario for Putin. He cannot withstand a long war with partners and sanctions." Details: Zelenskyy also believes that Trump "sees Putin for who he really is". Quote from Zelenskyy: "President Trump sees that the Russian side is not being fully open and honest about the war. I think Russia is simply lying to Trump." Details: Zelenskyy said he will take Trump's criticism of him "in my stride", if it brings "an end to the war" closer. Quote from Zelenskyy: "In my opinion, Putin understands nothing but strength. And the US has that strength. And I really hope that the US sees and understands this." Details: "Trump must impose sanctions so that Putin immediately says: 'Let's talk about ending the war.' There is no other way," Zelenskyy added. On the topic of sanctions, he believes they were introduced too slowly. Quote from Zelenskyy: "This has given Putin the opportunity to adapt." "Putin feels that his economy is now suffering. But he wants to buy more time before tough sanctions are imposed, because he can hold on a little longer. That is exactly why tough sanctions need to be introduced now." Details: Zelenskyy believes that "the more support there is, the fewer Ukrainians will die". Quote from Zelenskyy: "People are not firewood that we throw on the fire. We do not treat our people the way the Russians do." Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs
The UK economy shrank by 0.3% during April after Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on foreign imports, official numbers show. It's a blow to Rachel Reeves, who tried to splash the cash for government departments in her spending review yesterday. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) found the economy declined by more than was expected – economists had predicted a 0.1% contraction. It pointed to a 0.4% fall in services output across April – having recorded a 0.4% growth in the sector the previous month – and was the largest contributor to the decline in gross domestic product (GDP) in the month. Production output fell by 0.6% too, but construction output did increase by 0.9%. The decline follows Trump's so-called liberation day, where the US imposed 10% tariffs on all UK goods going into the States. The government's planned tax hikes – including an increase to employers' national insurance contributions – also came in during the same month. The update is particularly embarrassing for Labour who have promised to put economic growth at the heart of their government. But the ONS's director of economic statistics said that the wider picture was still positive. Liz McKeown said: 'The economy contracted in April, with services and manufacturing both falling. However, over the last three months as a whole GDP still grew, with signs that some activity may have been brought forward from April to earlier in the year. 'Both legal and real estate firms fared badly in April, following a sharp increase in house sales in March when buyers rushed to complete purchases ahead of changes to stamp duty. Car manufacturing also performed poorly after growing in the first quarter of the year. 'In contrast April was a strong month for construction, research and development and retail, with increases in these only partially offsetting falls elsewhere.' Responding to the figures, Reeves said: 'Our number mission is delivering growth, and putting more money into people's pockets through our plan for change. 'While these numbers are clearly disappointing, I'm determined to deliver on that mission.' Reeves gave large sums to the NHS, the defence department, and transport, as well as housing and schools in her spending review while also pledging to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers by 2029. However, the shadow chancellor Mel Stride hit out at the government over the stats. He said: 'Before the election Labour promised 'growth, growth, growth' but today's fall in GDP lays bare the disappointing consequences of Rachel Reeves' economic vandalism. 'Yesterday, the chancellor should have taken corrective action to fix the problems she has caused. But instead her spending review has all but confirmed what many feared: more taxes are coming. 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hardworking people will pay the price.' Donald Trump's Tariffs Blamed As Experts Make Grim Forecast About UK Economy Keir Starmer Warns Nigel Farage's 'Mad Experiment' Would Ruin Economy Like Liz Truss Trump's Actual Economy Is Tanking 100 Days In, So He Is Fantasising A Great One
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, the UK and US?
A multi-billion dollar submarine deal between long-standing allies - Australia, the UK and the US - has come under the spotlight after the Trump administration said it was reviewing how the deal fits in with its heavily-touted "America First" agenda. The Aukus security pact, Australia's biggest ever defence project, is set to play a key part in the country's ability to replace its ageing Collins-class submarine fleet - and, crucially, its military standing in the region. The 30-day review will be led by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus. In a speech last year, he questioned why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". A US defence spokesperson said the review is about ensuring "this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda". Fears the review may torpedo the deal have been downplayed by the UK and Australia, with both saying the review is a normal process when a new government takes power. Billed as a trilateral security partnership, the Aukus deal - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) over 30 years - involves two so-called pillars. Pillar 1 is about the supply and delivery of nuclear-powered attack submarines. Australia will buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US from 2032 with options to purchase two more. After that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian navies. This attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three countries. Pillar 2 is about the allies collaborating on their "advanced capabilities". This involves sharing military expertise in areas such as long-range hypersonic missiles, undersea robotics and AI. At its core, the deal is believed to be about countering China's growing presence in the Indo-Pacific region, and its role in rising tensions in disputed territories such as the South China Sea. While none of the allies have directly pointed at China as a reason for the deal, the three countries have spoken about how regional security concerns have "grown significantly" in recent years. China condemned the agreement as "extremely irresponsible" when it was first announced. Foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said it "seriously undermines regional peace and stability and intensifies the arms race". The deal was unveiled in September 2021 by three former leaders: Australia's Scott Morrison, the UK's Boris Johnson and the US's Joe Biden. The UK reviewed the security pact last year after Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government won the general election. For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country is set to become just the second to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology, after the UK. Such submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet. They would also mean Australia would be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first time. Under the deal, sailors from the Royal Australian Navy are due to be sent to US and UK submarine bases to learn how to use the nuclear-powered submarines. From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western Australia. It will also create about 7,000 jobs in Britain, with the design and construction of the new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines set to take place in the UK. The benefits for the US are less obvious - but sharing its defence technology could give the nation an opportunity to grow its presence in Asia-Pacific. Arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region that is far from their own.
