
Chicago father and daughter launch app to bridge political divides
A Carol Stream father and his Chicago daughter were often involved in family disagreements about politics, so they created a free app to help.
Why it matters: U.S. politics topped the list of stressors for adults in a survey last year from the American Psychological Association.
But only surrounding yourself with points of view that align with your own puts you in a political echo chamber.
Driving the news: Lee and Libby Prosch launched the Sandbox app earlier this month.
Flashback: During Thanksgiving in 2021, Libby, a self-described progressive, and her grandparents argued about the efficacy and necessity of the COVID vaccine. A full-blown fight ensued.
Then, over Christmas, the family argued about climate change.
The other side: Lee, who tells Axios he's straight down the center politically, tried to calm his kids' nerves by explaining the danger wasn't as imminent as they feared.
"I don't think I've ever been that rattled as I was on that night," Lee says.
They started talking about solutions for civil political conversations and came up with Sandbox.
How it works: Each Sunday, Sandbox users answer questions about a political topic, from vaccines to immigration to health care access.
Users are matched up with people who represent different points of view on that week's topic.
The users are fed an assertion each day about that topic, and each person explains why they agree or disagree with the statement.
At the end of the week, it's just an open chat between the users without prompts.
Between the lines: The Prosches say the structure of the app helps weed out some of the vitriol present on the internet when discussing politics.
"The fact that you have to take the time to explain your own response, and then see the other person's, means that you're not immediately just attacking them," Libby says. "It's a lot harder to be an asshole to one person when you know you're going to have to talk to them again."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
"White With Fear" film examines the "white fear industrial complex"
A new documentary investigates the long-running efforts by politicians and the media to stoke racial tensions and frame white Americans as victims. Why it matters: "White With Fear," set to begin streaming on Tuesday (June 3), examines the origins of white grievance in the U.S. and how it contributed to the rollback of decades of civil rights gains. The big picture: The film uses interviews with scholars, journalists, former Republican operatives, former and current right-wing influencers, Hillary Clinton and Steve Bannon to show how white grievance became a potent weapon. From former President Richard Nixon using crime as a racist dog whistle to racist Tea Party attacks on former President Barack Obama, the documentary follows the evolution to today's polarized politics. Director Andrew Goldberg tells Axios the idea for the film came during the pandemic and the aftermath of George Floyd's murder, when the nation appeared to be ready for a new conversation about race. "We set out to think about a film that would explore this concept of whiteness." That soon changed as the backlash to the Black Lives Matter movement retooled boiling white grievance that dismisses racial discrimination and was inflamed by conservative media, social media, and later Donald Trump, Goldberg said. Goldberg said it became clear with book bans, laws limiting the discussion of slavery in schools and the spreading of misinformation and racist material online that he had another project on hand. Zoom in: Operatives would use President Obama's middle name, Hussein, in mailers, rare crimes by immigrants would be highlighted and immigration reform would be dubbed as a demographic and economic threats CNN media critic Brian Stelter tells Goldberg that the buildup of the "white fear industrial complex" drove up wedges and sparked more racial tension. Katie McHugh, a former writer/producer at Breitbart, said she would write racist news stories for the website while getting cheered up by Trump supporters. Stuart Stevens, a former Romney 2012 campaign strategist and co-founder of The Lincoln Project, said the environment now isn't about solving problems but stirring racial animus for election victories. The intrigue: In the film, former Trump advisor Bannon offers an honest assessment of how he and others flooded the media ecosystem with far-right, conservative articles to influence opinion. "We kind of put a network together of people that just continue to put out more information," Bannon said. "If you put out information and you have force multiples that just drive it, people will start to sort it out themselves." Bannon said that involved stopping bipartisan immigration reform by publishing articles daily and targeting broadcast networks nonstop. The film shows clips of conservative commentators then repeating racist stereotypes about Latino immigrants. Case in point: McHugh said the film strategy was to take "reactionary, racist feelings" against non-white immigrants and show how the "elites" betrayed the working white man. McHugh said that after she wrote such pieces, prominent Trump officials would email her and flatter her as a young 20-something. State of play: The film comes as the Trump administration reinterprets Civil Rights-era laws to focus on " anti-white racism" rather than discrimination against people of color. Trump also has embarked on a systematic effort to unravel President Lyndon B. Johnson's civil rights legacy, rolling back protections that have shaped American life for nearly six decades. Bottom line: Goldberg concluded that white Americans have been manipulated for short-term electoral gains.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Poll: How tariffs are tanking Trump's approval rating
In 1992, Democratic political strategist James Carville famously distilled the presidential election down to one blunt catchphrase: 'It's the economy, stupid.' The results of a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggest that, more than three decades later, the start of President Trump's second term could be summed up the same way — particularly when it comes to tariffs and trade. The survey of 1,560 U.S. adults was conducted from May 22 to May 27, following months of global economic upheaval — all of it triggered by Trump. On-again off-again tariffs as high as 145%. Retaliatory measures from major allies and trading partners. Headlines about trade wars. Market nosedives. Market recoveries. Legal confusion. Stress among small-business owners. And rising prices for ordinary American consumers. At the same time, Trump's approval rating has steadily deteriorated. Before last November's election, a majority of Americans (51%) told Yahoo News and YouGov that they approved of the way Trump had handled his first term in office; fewer (43%) said they disapproved. But when asked again in March how they felt about the president's performance since returning to office, those numbers had flipped: more respondents now said they disapproved (50%) than said they approved (44%) of the job Trump had done during the first two months of his second term. A few weeks later, in April, the gap between Trump's disapproval (53%) and approval (42%) ratings had grown even wider (to 11 percentage points). And the latest Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows that gap is continuing to expand. Today only 41% of Americans approve of Trump's job performance, while 54% disapprove, putting him 13 points underwater. Those are some of the president's worst numbers since the latter stages of his first term. Digging deeper, more Americans disapprove than approve of how Trump is handling each major issue included in the survey: immigration (by a two-point margin); government spending (by an eight-point margin); the war between Russia and Ukraine (by an eight-point margin); diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI (by a nine-point margin); and democracy (by a 13-point margin). But the biggest gaps between Trump's approval and disapproval ratings emerge when Americans are asked about economic issues. According to the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, the president is now 19 points underwater on the economy in general (37% approve to 56% disapprove); 22 points underwater on trade and tariffs (35% approve to 57% disapprove); and 27 points underwater on the cost of living (32% approve to 59% disapprove). To put those numbers in perspective, Trump's average approval rating on the economy was 49% in the middle of 2020 — at the height of the COVID-19 crash. His average disapproval rating was 45%. Similarly, a full 57% of Americans think Trump has 'gone too far 'in "raising tariffs on imported goods' — significantly more than the share who think he's gone too far in 'cutting the federal workforce" (51%), 'arresting and deporting immigrants' (49%) or "investigating his political opponents" (45%). Just 4% of Americans say Trump's approach to raising tariffs has 'not gone far enough.' As a result, 40% of U.S. adults now rate the economy as 'poor' — a five-point increase since April. Among independents, that same number has jumped a full 10 points — from 35% to 45% — over the last month. All told, nearly three quarters of Americans (72%) now say the economy is either fair or poor. Just 25% consider it excellent or good. Earlier this month, House Republicans passed Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' — a package of tax cuts, social safety net reductions and increased border and military spending meant to deliver the bulk of his legislative agenda. But assuming that some version of the bill survives the Senate — a big if at this point — it is unlikely to reverse the president's economic standing. In the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked whether they 'approve or disapprove of the federal budget just passed by the U.S. House of Representatives' — with no additional information provided. Twenty-eight percent said they approved, 41% said they disapproved and 31% said they weren't sure. That's hardly a ringing endorsement. But what happens when Americans learn more about Trump's budget bill? To test this dynamic, the other half of respondents read a detailed description of the legislation before answering the same question: The U.S. House of Representatives just passed a federal budget that extends and expands the 2017 tax cuts for Americans of all incomes, at a cost of $3.8 trillion, while partially paying for those cuts by reducing Medicaid and food stamp benefits for lower-income Americans and ending some clean energy programs. The House budget also increases military and border spending and raises the debt ceiling from $36 trillion to $40 trillion. Among this second, more informed group of respondents, approval of Trump's budget bill stayed roughly the same (31%). But uncertainty fell by 17 points (to 14%) — and disapproval shot up by nearly as much (to 55%). __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,560 U.S. adults interviewed online from May 22 to May 27, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
B.J. Penn arrested for 3rd time in 6 days, judge denies his restraining order request
B.J. Penn was arrested for the third time in six days on Friday before being released on bail. This latest arrest stems from Penn failing to appear in court, which was a violation of his previous bail agreement when he was taken into custody on two separate occasions for abuse of a family or household member. That led to a bench warrant being issued for his arrest. Penn was hit with two bail violations from those two arrests and ultimately released from custody after paying a $2,000 bond. According to a separate report from KHON2 in Hawaii, Penn requested that the bench warrant be recalled because he claimed he missed court due to him being sick with COVID. Obviously, the judge disagreed and Penn was arrested again. A judge also denied Penn's request for a restraining order against his mother Lorraine Shin based on allegations that 'do not establish a basis for relief.' This is the second time a judge has denied Penn seeking a restraining order against his mother after making several disturbing posts on social media that several members of his family have been killed and replaced with imposters. While Penn's request was denied, his mother was granted a temporary restraining order against her son that requires him to stay at least 100 feet away from her at all times after she detailed how he inflicted 'extreme psychological abuse' on her. In the initial filing, Shin claimed that Penn lashed out against her several times in recent weeks including allegations that he put glue in a lock on her door to prevent her from gaining entry into her bedroom and also allegedly stole her mail, which led to an altercation that ended with him being arrested. In her statement to the court, Shin claimed that Penn blinded her with a bright flashlight to prevent her from calling police after she saw her mail in the backseat of a vehicle being driven by one of her son's friends. When she attempted to get the mail, Shin claims that Penn allegedly grabbed her arms and shoved her against the car, which led to his mother screaming for help from her son Reagan Penn. 'I believe my son [B.J. Penn] is suffering from Capgras delusional syndrome (a psychiatric disorder in which a person holds a delusion that a friend, spouse, parent, other close family member has been replaced by an identical imposter),' Shin told police when filing for the restraining order. 'He believes I'm an imposter who has killed his family to gain control of the family assets. 'In the best interest for my safety, I ask the court for a six month [temporary restraining order] and have my son ordered to get medical treatment or other source of therapy.' The judge granted the restraining order with the next court date set for June 10. Penn, 46, has raised concerns about his mental health after making numerous posts about his family being murdered and replaced by imposters. The UFC legend also posted a video showing his initial arrest this past Sunday as police took him into custody for the first of three times in less than a week. More from Tom Aspinall teams up with Craig Jones to troll Jon Jones; Jones responds UFC Vegas 107 weigh-in results: Maycee Barber misses weight, 1 other fight canceled due to injury UFC 316 loses welterweight bout after fighter withdraws due to health issues Kayla Harrison's head coach responds to Julianna Peña's steroid accusations ahead of UFC 316 Jake Paul vs. Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. pay-per-view price revealed ahead of June fight UFC hit with 2 new antitrust lawsuits filed by former fighters Sean O'Malley discusses quitting weed ahead of rematch with Merab Dvalishvili at UFC 316