Miliband to block GB Energy from using solar panels linked to Chinese slave labour
Britain's state-owned energy company will not be allowed to use solar panels linked to Chinese slave labour following a Government U-turn, according to reports.
Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, will reportedly amend legislation to ensure slavery and human trafficking are not used in the supply chain of GB Energy.
It comes after Labour MPs last month blocked an amendment to the Great British Energy Bill to ensure solar panels used in Britain are free of slave labour.
No Labour MPs defied the Government by voting for the amendment, but several abstained, including prominent backbench critics such as Rachael Maskell and Alex Sobel, a member of the parliamentary joint committee on human rights.
The clean energy market is dominated by China, partly because key raw materials for solar panels are abundant in the Xinjiang region of the country.
The region's predominant Uyghur Muslim population has been subject to forced labour and other human rights violations.
Ministers are now set to order that solar panels, wind turbines and batteries must not contain material with links to slave labour.
The change could make it harder for the Government to reach its goal of clean energy by 2030.
A Government source told The Times, which first reported the reversal, that ministers recognised 'the strength of feeling' among colleagues.
The newspaper also said campaigners had presented case studies of solar panels which were linked to slave labour being installed on public buildings.
A government source told the newspaper: 'We are committed to ensuring Great British Energy is a sector leader in this area, developing resilient, home-grown supply chains free from forced labour, and will bring forward proposals shortly on this.'
Andrew Bowie, the acting shadow energy secretary, told The Times the move would lead to a 'real slowdown in the deployment of solar in the United Kingdom'.
He said: 'It's a belated realisation that the use of slave labour in the manufacturing of solar technology is real, but Labour really need to answer serious questions about whether their own self-imposed targets can be met without these solar panels, and what they're going to do to address this.'
John Flesher, deputy director of the Conservative Environment Network, said the change of policy was 'long overdue.'
But he went on to warn: 'The government must now act to ensure that this knee-jerk U-turn doesn't damage our environmental goals and the solar industry.'
Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham who had campaigned on the issue, told the newspaper: 'This is the only way to make sure our transition to net zero is not carried through on the backs of slavery and exploitation.'
Luke de Pulford, the executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), said he was 'delighted the government has listened and acted'.
He said: 'We cannot build a just transition on the backs of Uyghur slaves. Since the 2015 Modern Slavery Act there have been two major changes to primary legislation on forced labour in supply chains. Lord Alton [of Liverpool], supported by IPAC MPs and civil society, was responsible for the amendments that led to both of them.
'We now need to ensure that the law has teeth, and that GB Energy doesn't allow a single solar panel with slave-produced polysilicon, a single battery with slave-processed raw materials, or a wind turbine with slave-produced metals to reach our shores.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S., China reach "framework" to activate Geneva trade deal
The U.S. and China have agreed on a "framework" to implement a trade deal struck last month, pending approval from both countries' leaders, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday. Why it matters: Progress on trade peace with China, particularly if it resolves the issue of crucial Chinese rare earth minerals exports, would be a boon to an economy and markets that have struggled for months with the impact of President Trump's tariff program. Catch up quick: After a series of tit-for-tat retaliations in April, the world's two largest economies effectively had a trade embargo in place, with 145% U.S. tariffs crushing imports from China. The sides announced a trade deal that included a 90-day pause on most of those tariffs on May 12 after a weekend of high-level talks in Geneva. Only days later, the U.S. issued global restrictions on the use of certain Chinese chips from Huawei Ascend, saying they were developed in violation of U.S. export controls. The Chinese reacted furiously, and soon there were reports the government was restricting exports of the rare earth materials needed for hundreds of the world's most important high-tech products. The U.S. subsequently retaliated with a move to restrict and withdraw visas for Chinese students. Where it stands: Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke for 90 minutes last Thursday about trade issues, and agreed to high-level talks immediately. That led to this week's meeting in London. "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters in London Tuesday night after marathon trade talks, Bloomberg reported. The Wall Street Journal reported that Tuesday's deal would essentially get the May 12 deal back on track, including the lowered tariffs and the loosened Chinese restrictions on rare earths. Between the lines: The trade war is squeezing both economies.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Court documents: Trump administration calls for dismissal of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Maryland case
GREENBELT, Md. () — The Trump administration filed a motion in Maryland's District Court on Tuesday, re-emphasizing its call for the dismissal of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case against them. This comes less than a week after Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S., having spent months of imprisonment in a Salvadorian facility. The Maryland husband and father now faces criminal charges stemming from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee. Lawyers have been petitioning for his return since his erroneous deportation to El Salvador back in March, with administration officials fighting state and Supreme Court orders directing the government to facilitate his return. RELATED COVERAGE: Kilmar Abrego Garcia accused of years-long conspiracy transporting undocumented aliens to the US In the latest move filed by the defendants in Greenbelt, Md., the government is calling for a stay of all case deadlines and the eventual dismissal of the case against them. Lawyers defending the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially filed a motion last week, arguing in a one-page notice that since Abrego Garcia has been returned to the U.S., the preliminary injunction should be dissolved. Abrego Garcia's team opposed this request for a stay, that the goverment arranged for Abrego Garcia's return — 'not to Maryland in compliance with the Supreme Court's directive' — but rather to Tennesee 'so that he could be charged with a crime in a case that the Government only developed while it was under threat of sanctions,' court documents read. 'Instead of facilitating Abrego Garcia's return, for the past two months Defendants have engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage Abrego Garcia,' his lawyers stated. His lawyers called the government's efforts 'chilling.' 'Two things are now crystal clear,' court documents state. 'First, the Government has always had the ability to return Abrego Garcia, but it has simply refused to do so.' 'Second, the Government has conducted a determined stalling campaign to stave off contempt sanctions long enough to concoct a politically face-saving exit from its own predicament,' they continued. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Abrego Garcia to return to US to face charges His team claimed the Trump administration has hidden behind 'questionable assertions' of government privileges and deliberately dragged their feet on discovery, stonewalling Abrego Garcia and the Court's efforts to 'get at the truth.' Even if his return to the U.S. resolved every claim made, the Maryland court still retains jurisdiction to find contempt and impose sanctions against the government, they argued. 093114932274Download In a , DHS lawyers re-emphasized their request for a stay of all case deadlines. Since being ordered on April 4 to 'facilitate … the return of Plaintiff Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States,' the administration said it has 'made diligent efforts to pull down domestic barriers preventing Abrego Garcia from entering our country.' This included 'appropriate diplomatic discussions' with Salvadorian officials to facilitate his release and return to the U.S., the government's attorneys argued in court documents. They called Abrego Garcia's team's response to his return to the U.S. and their fight to keep the Maryland case open 'desperate and disappointing.' INITIAL COVERAGE: Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador due to 'administrative error,' court filings say 'In the face of Abrego Garcia's return to the United States, they baselessly accuse Defendants of 'foot-dragging' and 'intentionally disregard[ing] this Court's and the Supreme Court's orders,' when just the opposite is true,' court documents read. The administration accused the plaintiffs of trying to 'stoke this [Maryland] Court's anger against' them, claiming there was no legal basis for their accusations and arguments. '[T]he proof is in the pudding—Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do. None of Plaintiffs' hyperbolic arguments change that or justify further proceedings in this matter,' the attorneys for the defendants wrote. The lawyers said they intend to file their motion for dismissal on mootness grounds by June 16. 093114938071-1Download In a statement shared with DC News Now after the government's filing on Tuesday, Abrego Garcia's attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg wrote: Two months ago, the Supreme Court ordered not just that Kilmar Abrego Garcia be released from custody in El Salvador and brought back to the United States, but furthermore that his case be handled 'as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.' That hasn't happened yet, and so there's still work to be done in this case. Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's Li says US-China reach framework on trade, will report back to leaders
LONDON (Reuters) -China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Tuesday that the Chinese and the U.S. negotiating teams had agreed a framework on trade after two days of talks, and would take that back to their leaders. "The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li told reporters.
