Door-to-door salesman, 'enamored' with knives, gets 20 years in Jackson man's death
TOMS RIVER - Despite a door-to-door salesman's continued claims he was defending himself during an altercation with a Jackson homeowner in 2022, a judge sentenced him May 29 to 20 years in prison for plunging an unlawful, double-sided dagger with serrated blades through the victim's carotid artery, killing him.
In imposing the prison term on Michael Tsamas for the aggravated manslaughter of Joseph Delgardio, Superior Court Judge Guy P. Ryan noted Tsamas, 35, of Laurence Harbor, admitted that he regularly armed himself with two daggers for protection.
Tsamas used one of the unlawful weapons as a first rather than last resort during a physical altercation with Delgardio, 44, who was unarmed and smaller than the younger Tsamas, Ryan said.
"It's a weapon of last resort, when you're literally on the brink of death," the judge said of the dagger.
Tsamas, despite his claims of self defense, "resorted to it first," Ryan said.
Tsamas would have been justified in shoving or punching Delgardio, but not using deadly force, the judge said.
"If someone pushes or shoves you, you can't shoot him, you can't stab him in the neck,'' Ryan said.
Tsamas stood trial before Ryan in March. The jury rejected his claim of self-defense and found him guilty of aggravated manslaughter and weapons offenses
The deadly scuffle occurred on May 26, 2022, after Tsamas paid a sales call to Delgardio's home on West Veterans Highway in Jackson as the victim, his wife and two of their three daughters were having dinner.
Jaime Delgardio, the victim's wife, testified during the four-day trial that Tsamas told them he worked for Verizon and offered them a $100 gift card and a discount on their monthly electric bill.
Jaime Delgardio testified she became suspicious that Tsamas was trying to scam them, so she and her husband asked the salesman to leave. Tsamas did, but not before the Delgardios gave him their Jersey Central Power & Light Co. account number, Jaime Delgardio testified.
Minutes later, she said her husband went out to look for Tsamas in order to retrieve their account number.
When she went to look for her husband, Jaime Tsamas said a police officer intercepted her and informed her he had died in a fatal altercation up the street.
Key evidence introduced at the trial was a 19-second video of the incident at West Veterans Highway and Conor Road that an unidentified person recorded and posted to SnapChat.
It showed Tsamas, instead of defending himself with two hands during the scuffle with Delgardio, reaching one hand behind his back to grab the dagger and remove it from its sheath before plunging it into the victim's neck, Ryan noted.
Tsamas did not testify at the trial, but the jury viewed a police body-camera video on which Tsamas told an officer Delgardio had threatened to kill him.
Before Tsamas was sentenced, he described "being trapped and having someone tell me multiple times they were going to kill me.
"I felt my life was in danger, there was nothing more to it than that,'' Tsamas said.
"I'm deeply sorry for how all this ended,'' he said.
Ryan clarified that Tsamas told police during a taped interview after the altercation that Delgardio said he would kill him if he got a bill in the mail.
"That's not an immediate threat of death or serious injury,'' Ryan said.
"It wasn't a death threat,'' the judge said. "It was at best the type of thing people do when they get frustrated.
"The defendant is the architect of this situation,'' Ryan said. "The defendant is the one who caused this to escalate to deadly force.''
Tsamas, in addressing the judge before sentencing, reiterated he regularly carried the two daggers for protection.
In a 10-page letter to the judge, Tsamas expressed interests in the Second Amendment right to bear arms, survival and emergency preparedness, Ryan said.
He also expressed concerns about "violence in society and the need to protect himself,'' the judge said.
In the letter, Tsamas told the judge he preferred double-edged blades "to give my life the greatest fighting chance to survive,'' Ryan said.
"You're not camping in the woods, you're not fighting off bear,'' Ryan told the defendant. "You're walking door-to-door.''
The judge told Tsamas a small can of pepper spray would have been the appropriate thing for him to carry for self defense.
"This defendant is enamored with these bladed instruments and resorted to them far too fast,'' Ryan said.
Delgardio bled to death from the neck wound, which severed his carotid artery and cut into his vertebrae, Ryan said.
"Because of this man, I can never have my father back,'' Gabriella Delgardio, one of the victim's three daughters, told the judge.
"This man stole every moment of time I can have with my dad,'' she said. "Why should he get off with a light sentence when he stole a father from his family?''
The victim's widow described her husband as "a hard-working, simple man'' and "someone you could count on.''
She said he was peaceful and did not deserve to die.
"Joe was a good man, a loyal husband and I can't begin to tell you how amazing he was to our kids,'' Jaime Delgardio said.
Victoria Veni, an assistant Ocean County prosecutor who tried the case with Assistant Prosecutor Meghan O'Neill, asked the judge to sentence Tsamas to 25 years in prison.
Defense attorney Chip Dunne asked the judge to impose the minimum sentence of 10 years.
The maximum term for aggravated manslaughter is 30 years.
In sentencing Tsamas to 20 years in prison, Ryan ordered that he serve 85 percent of the term before he can be considered for release on parole, under the state's No Early Release Act.
Ryan also rejected a motion for a new trial, put forth by the defense attorney.
"This is the epitome of self-defense,'' Dunne argued. "The jury misinterpreted the facts. They missed the ball on this case.''
Dunne also said a new trial was warranted because one of the jurors fell asleep during the case.
Ryan said that should have been brought to his attention during the trial so that the juror could be questioned and possibly replaced with an alternate.
The judge also said he kept a close watch on the jurors during the trial and did not see any of them fall asleep.
Kathleen Hopkins, a reporter in New Jersey since 1985, covers crime, court cases, legal issues and just about every major murder trial to hit Monmouth and Ocean counties. Contact her at khopkins@app.com.
This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: Salesman gets 20 years in Jackson man's stabbing death
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
30 minutes ago
- Fast Company
From immigration law to business success: Navigating the challenges for foreign business in the U.S.
As a U.S. business immigration attorney and founder of Grape Law Firm PLLC, I have worked with many foreign entrepreneurs who have achieved lasting success in the United States. Establishing and scaling a company here requires time, effort, and strategic planning to navigate a complex web of immigration regulations and compliance requirements. COMMON LEGAL HURDLES IN SECURING EMPLOYEE VISAS The primary challenge faced by businesspeople is securing a legal presence in the United States. This means obtaining the appropriate visa or status for both entrepreneurs and their essential personnel. However, the process of business immigration to the U.S. is often a challenging adventure. According to the 2024 CIS Ombudsman Annual Report, from initial market entry to business expansion—and even to permanent establishment—the complexities of business immigration affect entrepreneurs at every stage of their U.S. journey. They face significant challenges in documenting the viability of their enterprises to immigration officials while managing their immigration status to meet the changing needs of the business ecosystem. NAVIGATING VISA PATHWAYS FOR BUSINESS GROWTH As business immigration attorneys, one of our primary duties is to help our clients choose the most suitable visa for their business vision and goals. The selection of the appropriate visa is the foundation on which a successful application strategy is built and is an investment in the company's long-term growth. It is imperative for entrepreneurs to understand that various options exist for starting new businesses in the United States or expanding existing operations. Each visa category has its own distinct advantages and considerations based on differing business needs. For instance, the E‑1 Treaty Trader and the E‑2 Treaty Investor visas are viable options for entrepreneurs. These visa categories cater to foreign traders and investors who are citizens of treaty countries—countries that have treaty agreements with the U.S. Traders must engage in continuous trade with the United States, and the U.S. must be their primary trading partner. Conversely, investors must make substantial investments through new or existing enterprises. Both the E‑1 and E‑2 visas can support long-term, sustainable business ventures in the United States (each is valid for up to five years and can be extended indefinitely), provided that they spur economic progress in their respective industries and investment areas. Furthermore, the L‑1 Intracompany Transferee visa is an ideal choice for international companies planning to expand to the U.S. The L‑1 visa allows foreign companies to transfer their managerial or executive employees for new office openings, thereby facilitating the establishment of operations in the United States. However, a potential downside is that the L‑1 visa requires rigorous application preparation—a thorough case file must be compiled, followed by consistently detailed documentation of organizational development and business growth metrics, especially during the first three years of operations. A CASE IN POINT One case from our L‑1 visa practice perfectly illustrates these complexities. As a seasoned professional in the scaffolding industry, our client's initial L‑1 New Office visa application succeeded through careful preparation and a comprehensive five‑year business plan. However, the real challenges emerged during the extension phase. When she sought to extend her L‑1 visa with different legal counsel, she faced a rigorous Request for Evidence (RFE) from USCIS that scrutinized every aspect of her business operations. The RFE questioned not only the structure, but also its growth trajectory and staffing decisions—common challenges that many foreign businesses face in proving the legitimacy and sustainability of their operations. The industry's unique characteristics, including its project‑based nature and specialized staffing requirements, made it particularly challenging to conform to USCIS's traditional expectations for business development. Her case is a stark reminder for prospective entrepreneurs that experienced immigration counsel can provide needed guidance throughout the ups and downs of their U.S. immigration journey. Entrepreneurs must acknowledge that deciding on the right visa type is more than an entry ticket to the United States—a visa is the key to legal rights, business investments, and financial aspirations that influence one's life in the U.S. BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR LONG-TERM SUCCESS The U.S. business immigration ecosystem is ever-changing and demands legal acumen in business planning—integrating proactive immigration solutions from the very beginning. To achieve lasting success, entrepreneurs need expert legal guidance to navigate the complex steps of immigration and adapt to any changes or updates in the immigration system. Beyond legal counsel, success often hinges on comprehensive preparation and strategic planning. Maintaining detailed business documentation from day one proves crucial for immigration success. Successful immigrant entrepreneurs often distinguish themselves through meticulous record-keeping of business transactions, employee contracts, and market analyses that demonstrate their enterprise's viability. Early strategic planning should include developing detailed business projections, establishing clear organizational structures, and creating systems for tracking achievements and metrics. These elements strengthen visa applications and create a foundation for sustainable growth. Networking within industry associations and chambers of commerce can provide valuable insights into immigration processes and business development. Furthermore, entrepreneurs who actively participate in their industry's ecosystem often find themselves better positioned to demonstrate their legitimacy to immigration authorities. This comprehensive approach, combining thorough documentation with strategic foresight, guarantees that immigration planning aligns with business goals while maintaining strict compliance with U.S. regulations. As we look to the future, business expansion into the United States and immigration to the country will only become more interlinked. In that regard, the aforementioned success story of our entrepreneur client is an excellent example—showcasing that viewing immigration not as a hurdle but as a strategic tool is essential for success. Always remember: proper planning, combined with expert guidance, can transform potential obstacles into opportunities for growth in the American market. The key to sustainable success lies in developing a nuanced understanding of how immigration pathways can support business objectives while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.


Washington Post
31 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The Latest: Trump's tax cuts and tariff hikes spark concerns
President Donald Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package. The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical. Meanwhile, Trump's doubling of tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum could hit Americans in an unexpected place: grocery aisles. The announcement Friday of a staggering 50% levy on those imports stoked fear that big-ticket purchases from cars to washing machines to houses could see major price increases.


E&E News
31 minutes ago
- E&E News
Meet the youth challenging Trump on climate
Eva Lighthiser, 19, lives in Livingston, Montana, and is accustomed to milelong coal trains rumbling through town and blowing coal dust across the city. In 2023, she was a plaintiff in a youth-led lawsuit that sought to force her state to tackle climate change. Now, she's the lead challenger in Lighthiser v. Trump, a new climate lawsuit that accuses President Donald Trump of violating the Constitution by issuing a trio of executive orders that fast track fossil fuel development. 'Every place is going to be affected by this administration and it's very concerning to see what that will look like moving forward,' Lighthiser said in an interview. Advertisement The case, filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, argues that Trump's executive orders will worsen climate change and increase health dangers by declaring a 'national energy emergency' and directing the government to 'unleash American energy.'