logo
Alberta regulator says yes to Northback coal exploration project in Rocky Mountains

Alberta regulator says yes to Northback coal exploration project in Rocky Mountains

The Alberta Energy Regulator approved on Thursday a controversial coal exploration project on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains.
Northback Holdings Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was rejected in 2021, when a panel ruled likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed potential economic benefits.
The project, located on an inactive legacy coal mine site in the Municipal District of Ranchland, was revived two years later. Last year, it was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines, because Northback's application was considered an "advanced" proposal.
A written decision from the regulator says it determined approving the project is in the public interest and the project won't have negative effects on water quality or wildlife, which many at public hearings argued will happen.
The decision grants Northback permits to drill and to divert water to the site, which was also a concern raised by farmers in drought-ridden parts of southern Alberta.
The approved deep drilling permit will allow Northback to drill more than 150 metres underground on both public and private land in its search for coal deposits.
The company will only be able to draw water from a nearby end pit lake that it owns and that's not directly connected to other water bodies or rivers, the decision says.
The decision notes that it's possible there will be some runoff from the lake, but it had been determined the project won't have any effect on water quality or quantity downstream.
It also says the potential for the project to generate toxic selenium is unlikely, "because there will be no excavation, no coal-mining operations and no new waste rock piles created."
"If the existing waste rock piles are not elevating downstream selenium levels, it is reasonable to conclude that these exploration activities are unlikely to elevate selenium levels," the decision says.
The regulator also determined that potential harm to wildlife is unlikely, as no new roads are to be constructed as part of the project.
The regulator was satisfied overall with the project's public interest, saying as it would provide employment opportunities to nearby residents, including First Nations communities, while allowing the company to continue investing in the area.
"We assessed the social and economic effects of the exploration program and found it to be positive," the decision says, adding that Northback plans to spend at least $2.5 million locally as part of the exploration.
"While the magnitude of the economic impacts may appear modest, they are proportional to the program scale and duration."
The decision says the company has spent over $1 billion since 2015 trying to advance the project but that it wasn't a consideration for the regulator.
The project will also give Albertans additional information on the scale of the coal deposit at Grassy Mountain, says the decision.
"The exploration program will contribute to the ongoing evaluation of this coal resource and, based on our assessment, will do so in an orderly, efficient and environmentally responsible manner," it says.
Rita Blacklaws, a spokesperson for Northback, said in an email the company thanked the regulator for the decision.
"With this outcome, Northback continues our commitment to bring benefits to Albertans while adhering to the highest environmental standards," Blacklaws said.
Opposition NDP environment critic Sarah Elmeligi said the decision is wrong.
"Albertans have been clear they do not want coal mining on the eastern slopes," she said.
"What a horrible day for Alberta."
Energy Minister Brian Jean said the government respects the regulator's "carefully considered decision on this application," noting it isn't an application to mine. He said Northback will be responsible for reclamation related to the exploration work.
"We reiterate our commitment to protect Alberta's waters and ensure that any development in the eastern slopes is done to the highest environmental standards," Jean said in a statement Thursday.
The decision followed days of public hearings in December and January, as well as a non-binding vote last year in the nearby community of Crowsnest Pass. About 72 per cent of voters said they were in favour of the project.
The regulator notes that concerns were raised in the hearings that granting exploratory permits would lead to a full-blown coal mine. It says that possibility couldn't be factored into the decision-making process.
"Exploration is only one step taken by a resource company in the long and complex series of activities that may or may not lead to the development of a mine," the decision says. "Accepting the need for this exploration program does not constitute approval of a coal mine.
"If, in the future, Northback decides to proceed with mine applications at Grassy Mountain, it must follow a rigorous regulatory process that all resource development applications must follow."
Conditions attached to the exploratory permits require the company to dispose of drilling waste to the regulator's satisfaction, follow erosion control and weed management plans, and adhere to recommended environmental mitigation measures.
The company's permits are valid for five years, with the last three years to be set aside for reclamation work.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Funding changes harming Indigenous children in rural areas, Sault group warns
Funding changes harming Indigenous children in rural areas, Sault group warns

CTV News

time24 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Funding changes harming Indigenous children in rural areas, Sault group warns

Alana Macintyre and her staff at the Spark Rehabilitation Centre in the Sault say a lack of funding is forcing layoffs and harming service to clients. Alana MacIntyre, owner of Spark Rehabilitation in the Sault, is up in arms over changes to Jordan's Principle that have forced layoffs of nearly half of her staff. MacIntyre said the vast majority of those layoffs are for workers in rural areas, whose clients will soon no longer have services close to home. Spark Alana MacIntyre, owner of Spark Rehabilitation in the Sault, is up in arms over changes to Jordan's Principle that have forced layoffs of nearly half of her staff. Jordan's Principle is a human rights principle established by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to ensure First Nations children do not face gaps, delays or denials in accessing government services because of their identity as First Nations children. Half of the clients at Spark for services through Indigenous Services Canada's Jordan's Principle. Now, those applications are being stalled, as the government states they can only be approved by a national review committee. 'Last week I sent an email asking, you know, when will this file be adjudicated?' MacIntyre said. 'I have a family asking, we can't give you we can't give you timelines. And yet on the website, it says five days. We've been waiting for over a year.' 'The suffering that we see on a day-to-day basis with our families, I wish that the people in Ottawa could see it and understand that when they don't adjudicate a file, it's not an ISC number.' — Alana MacIntyre, owner of Spark Rehabilitation She said the 224 stalled applications relate to nearly 175 Indigenous clients, mostly for speech pathology, occupational therapy and behaviour supports that MacIntyre said should fall under the new parameters for funding. The centre has had to lay off 30 staff from Pic Mobert to Sturgeon Falls who work with clients in their communities. That means those clients will be without the services they require. 'The suffering that we see on a day-to-day basis with our families, I wish that the people in Ottawa could see it and understand that when they don't adjudicate a file, it's not an ISC number,' MacIntyre said. 'It's a child, it's a family.' MacIntyre said that the federal government told her last Friday that she would not be paid retroactively for clients on Jordan's Principle contracts. She said that her business is owed roughly $300,000 from Indigenous Services Canada. 'It's so unethical to these children and families,' MacIntyre said. 'The government is now saying they're not going to pay me for a contract that they approved and provided me, you know, written emails stating that I could continue until the file was depleted. I don't know how somebody is allowed to do that.' Indigenous Services Canada did respond to requests from CTV News to comment on this story.

Price of beef in Alberta keeps rising, cost linked to cow supply: economist
Price of beef in Alberta keeps rising, cost linked to cow supply: economist

Global News

time4 hours ago

  • Global News

Price of beef in Alberta keeps rising, cost linked to cow supply: economist

The rising cost of groceries is something all Albertans are experiencing whether they eat meat or not, but for people in the province who consume beef, the price increase is likely particularly noticeable. In a post on ATB Financial's website this week, the financial institution's deputy chief economist said the increased costs faced by beef consumers are linked to high consumer demand coupled with the decreasing number of cows across the country. He added that because rebuilding the herd will take time, 'beef prices are likely to stay elevated for some time to come.' 'According to Statistics Canada, the Canadian cattle herd hasn't been as small as it was at the start of 2025 since 1988 (1994 in Alberta),' Rob Roach wrote. 'In the United States, the cattle herd is the smallest it has been in 73 years.' Story continues below advertisement View image in full screen Cattle stand in a pasture on a farm in Alberta Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh Roach noted Statistics Canada data reveals that the average price of cattle for slaughter in Alberta was 14 per cent higher in April compared to the same time last year, while the price of cattle for feeding was 26 per cent higher. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'In both cases, the monthly price was the highest it has ever been,' he wrote. The finance chair of a non-profit that represents Alberta beef producers told Global News on Thursday that the people her organization represents have been dealing with the challenges of inflation, drought and wildfires in the last few years. Brenda Rosadiuk of Alberta Beef Producers said some farmers' pastures have burned in wildfires. 'You don't have the forage for your cattle (if it burns),' she explained. 'Your hay land isn't producing. Story continues below advertisement 'It affects your feed (because) you still cover the same amount of land to make your hay. You still have those input costs but you're not getting the production.' Rosadiuk said while Alberta producers are grateful when beef prices are up, they realize there are 'difficult decisions for shoppers now when they go to the grocery store.' 'You have to make good budget decisions,' she acknowledged of the challenges facing consumers. 'The high prices are a boon for the cow/calf sector but can be challenging for the feedlot and packing sectors,' Roach wrote. For people still wanting to eat beef but on a budget, Rosadiuk recommended buying cheaper cuts of beef and then slow cooking them to make them more tender. — with files from Global News' Erik Bay

Risks, Uncertainty Cloud Future of Ksi Lisims LNG Facility: IEEFA
Risks, Uncertainty Cloud Future of Ksi Lisims LNG Facility: IEEFA

Canada Standard

time5 hours ago

  • Canada Standard

Risks, Uncertainty Cloud Future of Ksi Lisims LNG Facility: IEEFA

The Indigenous-owned Ksi Lisims liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in British Columbia faces major local risks and global market uncertainty that could derail its success, a new report warns. With these challenges factored into financial projections, it is "highly unlikely" that the floating gas liquefaction and export terminal can be delivered on budget, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) writes in the report. Planned for B.C's northern coast, Ksi Lisims would export 12 million tonnes of liquified natural gas per year, supplied by the approved-but not yet built-Prince Rupert Gas Transmission line. It is located on Nisga'a land and backed by a partnership between the Nisga'a Nation, Texas-based Western LNG, and Alberta's Rockies LNG. The project is undergoing environmental assessments and seeking regulatory approvals ahead of a final investment decision expected later this year. But Ksi Lisims has faced opposition from the start. Last November, Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs declared plans for an Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area (IPCA) to block the pipeline's route over environmental concerns. The pipeline also crosses rugged terrain and sensitive marine areas, adding engineering and regulatory hurdles, says IEEFA. View our latest digests Challenges like these significantly affect Ksi Lisims' financial prospects, suggests IEEFA's analysis. The project's dependence on the Prince Rupert pipeline for feed gas is a key risk, the report states. B.C. has just recently confirmed that the pipeline permit is viable after it expired last November, but some First Nations have legally challenged it, alleging inadequate consultation and environmental review. Protests led by the Gitananyow Hereditary Chiefs could add more costs, as with past megaprojects like the Coastal GasLink pipeline, writes IEEFA. Ksi Lisims' developers say they will reduce emissions by powering the facility with renewable hydropower from the B.C. grid, and are targeting net-zero operations. But IEEFA cites uncertainty about securing BC Hydro's electricity supply as another layer of risk, imperilling the facility's net-zero ambitions and thus its regulatory compliance. "Without hydroelectricity, Ksi Lisims LNG will have to rely on gas-powered turbines which increase project capital costs by approximately C$2 billion," adds IEEFA. The project partners have yet to finalize an agreement with BC Hydro to connect the facility to the North Coast Transmission Line. Meanwhile, other upcoming LNG projects in the province are competing for the same grid capacity. Net revenue is also questionable given the lack of LNG takers, IEEFA writes, estimating that about 70% of planned production has no dedicated buyer. The twin floating LNG barges planned for the terminal face higher operating costs in harsh marine environments, are largely "unproven in Canadian waters," and will provide few local jobs. And by the time Ksi Lisims would start supplying LNG-its targeted completion date is in 2029-many similar projects are due to come online across the world, creating a global glut, IEEFA writes. This oversupply could align with weakening demand-as expanding clean energy capacity and tighter emissions regulations lead to structural declines in LNG use. Evolving domestic markets could also undermine success, as competition for gas as a feedstock within Canada limits the volumes available for export. "While project developers praise its potential economic benefits, the viability of the Ksi Lisims project depends on its ability to overcome cost pressures, secure firm purchase commitments, and navigate a highly competitive global LNG market amid uncertainties about demand trends," writes IEEFA. "At this point, both the project and Canada's broader LNG ambitions remain vulnerable to formidable headwinds." Source: The Energy Mix

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store