logo
Major UK city to charge visitors £2 ‘tourist tax' for overnight stays in weeks

Major UK city to charge visitors £2 ‘tourist tax' for overnight stays in weeks

The Sun25-04-2025

VISITORS are set to have to pay a £2 tax to visit a major UK city in just weeks after hotel owners voted in favour of introducing one.
People staying overnight in Liverpool will have to pay the "tourist tax" - which could raise millions each year - after it's introduced in June.
3
The vote was passed during a ballot by Accommodation BID, which represents 83 hotels and a number of serviced apartment providers in the city.
Dubbed the £2 City Visitor Charge, the group predicts the levy could raise as much as £9.2 million over two years, of which around 73 per cent will go towards supporting Liverpool's visitor economy.
Liverpool BID Company, which manages Accommodation BID, said the tax would "turbo charge" the tourism and visitor economy in the UK's fifth largest city.
Accommodation providers and hotels will manage and administer the charge, making customers pay either when they check in or when their stay is over.
Money raised under the scheme will be administered by Accommodation BID, which includes two business improvement districts in the city centre and represents more than 800 companies.
Of the 83 hotels balloted about the charge, 59 per cent were in favour, from a turnout of 53 per cent - meaning just 26 of the establishments queried approved of the scheme, with 18 opposed.
Response to the news has been mixed from the public, with some warning it will deter much-needed visitors away from the city.
One person who disagreed with the scheme wrote on X: "This tourist tax might deter visitors when Liverpool's already struggling to attract tourists.
"Seems like a risky move for a city that could use the tourism boost."
Another added: "I love a break in Liverpool but that's me done with it now they're going to put a £2 tourist tax on visitors.
TRAVEL BLOW holidaymakers could be hit with new tourist tax when staying in UK campsires, hotels and B&Bs
"I live in the UK & shouldn't have to pay a tax to go to a UK city."
Liverpool was the fifth-most visited city in the UK in 2023, according to the most recently available data, attracting around 900,000 visitors.
Despite the backlash, some have praised the scheme, saying it should be extended to other cities and areas too.
Writing on X, one said: "These things help cities thrive, it's a bit of extra money in the pot for services.
"That's why I personally support it.
"Amsterdam's got one, Paris has got one - London should introduce one."
Marcus Magee, chair of Liverpool's Accommodation BID, said the tax would be "crucial to the vibrancy and economy of the city", adding it was a major step towards the city's hospitality sector having a say and influence on decisions about the visitor economy.
Bill Addy, chief executive of Liverpool BID Company, said Liverpool would attract bigger events with the levy, which would lead to more visitors and money coming into the city, reports BBC News.
He added: "We have always said the industry should have their say on whether they want this levy to come in, as they are administering it.
"The evidence of other European cities suggests this model will translate overnight stays into major investment, so that we can convert that into world-leading and world-beating events."
Hospitality bosses slam plans to introduce compulsory tourist tax across England
HOSPITALITY bosses have slammed plans to introduce a tourist tax across England.
Andy Burnham, Greater Manchester Mayor, in February suggested that an existing optional fee in some Manchester city centre hotels should be replaced with a compulsory charge for visitors.
Mr Burnham said he was pushing for the Government to introduce a 'proper levy', as European hotspots such as Spain's Barcelona and Italy's Venice have done.
But Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UKHospitality, fears it would be another blow to Britain's battered tourism industry.
She said: 'This isn't just about overseas visitors, it would mean extra charges for people staying in budget places including Travelodges, Premier Inns and seaside caravans.
'The risk is the industry is taxed out of existence.'
Manchester raised £2.8million last year from its city visitor charge of £1 in certain city centre hotels. Members of the Manchester Business Improvement District vote on how funds are used locally.
But a national levy would mean the Government would decide how funds are raised and spent.
Liverpool is not the first major city in the UK to announce a "tourist tax", as nearby Manchester did so in April 2023.
The City Visitor Charge there costs £1 per room per night, and raised around £2.8 million in its first year.
However, there have been fears a tourist tax could be placed nationwide on campsites, hotels and B&Bs.
The government was reportedly considering the move in January, as it could raise an estimated £1 billion for the UK's struggling economy.
Starting from £1 per person at a campsite, and escalating to £15 per person at a five-star hotel, the scheme could deter some tourists from visiting.
Both UK residents and holidaymakers from abroad would be required to pay the new tax, which will make staycations a little bit more expensive.
The government, though, hopes the tax will raise a significant amount of money for public spending.
According to the TaxPayer's Alliance, the move has the potential to raise an estimated £1 billion a year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade body wants Liverpool 'tourist tax' pause during appeal
Trade body wants Liverpool 'tourist tax' pause during appeal

BBC News

time3 days ago

  • BBC News

Trade body wants Liverpool 'tourist tax' pause during appeal

A trade body which represents the hospitality industry said a so-called "tourist tax" on hotel guests in Liverpool should not be levied while an appeal against the plan is being £2-per-room per-night charge was introduced on Sunday after it was approved in a ballot by hotels which are part of the city's Accommodation Business Improvement District (ABID).The aim of the fee, which is officially known as a "visitor charge", is to raise money to support Liverpool's visitor scheme is facing a challenge from Whitbread plc, which owns the Premier Inn chain of hotels. Whitbread has not publicly revealed the reasons for its opposition to the charge. Trade body UKHospitality said it had written to Liverpool's ABID to suggest the introduction of the charge be paused for eight weeks, pending the appeal outcome.A spokesperson said: "UKHospitality is clear that as these decisions are made, the ballot process must be fair, timely and transparent."We have been made aware of an appeal against the Liverpool Accommodation BID and we have therefore written to the BID with a suggested eight-week delay to its introduction to allow for the appeal to run its course." 'Not a tax' Bill Addy, chief executive of the Liverpool BID Company, which manages the Accommodation BID, suggested using the phrase "tourist-tax" was not helpful. He said: "This is not a tax. Local authorities raise taxes, central government raises taxes. "This visitor charge is an industry-led effort to boost the visitor economy, to have a say in how the hospitality sector is supported, and tackle the challenges it faces. "This has been a process entirely guided by the private sector board of hoteliers – who are using Business Improvement District legislation to make a difference for their industry and their city."Mr Addy added: "It's in the very DNA of Business Improvement Districts to support business and make cities thrive, and this is at the heart of this. "It isn't a political issue, it's far more important than that." The government has told the BID there was no requirement to pause the collection of the levy while the appeal process is considered. Were the Secretary of State to declared the results of the earlier ballot void, money raised would be returned to everyone who paid it. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Long queues and flight delays at Stansted airport after ‘IT issue'
Long queues and flight delays at Stansted airport after ‘IT issue'

The Guardian

time11-05-2025

  • The Guardian

Long queues and flight delays at Stansted airport after ‘IT issue'

Passengers flying out of London Stansted airport on Sunday morning experienced large queues, delays and some missed flights after an IT problem affected check-in, baggage and security systems. Images posted on social media showed long queues and although the issue was said to have been resolved, passengers were advised to stay in touch with their airlines as some flights faced possible delays. In a statement published on X, the airport said: 'Our teams are working hard to fully restore operations following the IT issue that impacted our systems earlier this morning. 'While the issue has been resolved, some flights may still be subject to delays. We apologise for the inconvenience this may cause and advise passengers to check the status of their flights with their airlines before travelling to the airport. 'We hope to have all systems fully resolved soon and will provide another update shortly.' A spokesperson for Stansted told PA Media: 'All systems have now been fully restored and no flights have been cancelled as a result of the IT issue. We are investigating the cause of the earlier issue so nothing confirmed at this stage but, for background, it looks like it was related to internet access for some systems.' One passenger, who did not wish to be named, told BBC News she had been stuck in queues at the terminal for hours and had missed her flight to Greece. She said she arrived at the Essex airport at 4.45am and passengers were queueing 'out the door'. 'I spoke to one woman who had already been standing for an hour and we were getting nowhere near the entrance,' she said. 'The queue for security was out the door and around the corner.'

Global energy firm to cut 250 jobs in Scotland
Global energy firm to cut 250 jobs in Scotland

Scottish Sun

time08-05-2025

  • Scottish Sun

Global energy firm to cut 250 jobs in Scotland

Trade leaders have said they fear that it is 'the tip of the iceberg' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HUNDREDS of employees at a global energy firm in the North Sea face losing their jobs. Harbour Energy is the UK's biggest oil and gas producer and is based in Aberdeen. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Around 230 jobs are set to be cut at Harbour Energy's Aberdeen base Credit: Handout But bosses have now revealed that they are expecting to cut 250 jobs, which is around a quarter of the firm's workforce in the city. The cuts come after the company launched a review of its UK operations and said it had to take "difficult steps". Harbour Energy blamed the job losses on "punitive" government measures and regulations, according to BBC News. They explained that they were necessary due to lower investment, which is a result of the UK government's policies towards the fossil fuel industry. The news comes as a "devastating blow" after the firm previously announced the loss of 350 onshore jobs back in 2023. Harbour Energy has often hit out at UK ministers for crippling firms with windfall taxes. This is a devastating blow for the 250-plus families directly affected - and I fear it is just the tip of the iceberg Russell Borthwick Rishi Sunak introduced the Energy Profits Levy while Chancellor in 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It was increased from 25 to 35 per cent the following year. Then Rachel Reeves raised the rate to 38 per cent in her first Budget as Labour Chancellor in October. At the time, the government said it implemented the changes to make sure oil and gas producers in the North Sea contributed their fair share towards the energy transition. Major Scots university to axe 632 jobs as staff left 'in tears' However, Harbour Energy claimed it has caused them to have been heavily taxed, adding that this has caused them to have little profit. They also claimed that this has caused an undermining of investment in its operations in the North Sea. Scott Barr, managing director of the firm's UK business, said: "The review is unfortunately necessary to align staffing levels with lower levels of investment, due mainly to the government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment." Russell Borthwick, chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said he feared that this is "the tip of the iceberg". He said: "This is a devastating blow for the 250-plus families directly affected - and I fear it is just the tip of the iceberg." That's 250 jobs in my constituency gone in the blink of an eye... They blame the policies of the Labour Party SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn Back in March, Mr Borthwick slammed ministers for the windfall taxes. He said: "Every other nation in Europe that briefly introduced windfall taxes very quickly took them away. "It's limiting confidence, investment and stopping activity happening in the UK.' The Harbour Energy job losses were raised at Prime Minister's Questions by both SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. Mr Flynn accused Sir Keir Starmer of "destroying jobs in Scotland" as he defended the job losses in Aberdeen. OIL-D FIRM THE news of the job losses comes two momths after we revealed that business chiefs complained that Harbour Energy makes less money than Celtic The Hoops' 2023 pre-tax profits of £40.7million outstripped Harbour Energy's £25million. Trade leaders hit out at UK ministers and accused them scoring an own goal by crippling firms with windfall taxes. Russell Borthwick, chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: 'There are no windfall profits being made. 'Celtic made more profit than Harbour Energy because the windfall tax stripped revenue.' Tory MSP Douglas Lumsden said: 'Celtic fans used to moan about their board's 'biscuit tin' financial mentality. 'Times change but they will be stunned to learn that the Hoops are now more profitable than the biggest North Sea oil and gas producer.' He said: "That's 250 jobs in my constituency gone in the blink of an eye and do you know who they blame, Mr Speaker? They blame the policies of the Labour Party." Mr Starmer stressed that "nobody wants to see job losses" but hit back at the two ministers. Responding to Mr Flynn, he accused the SNP of using the issue to "distract from their disastrous record" after nearly 20 years in government. He also accused Ms Badenoch of being a "climate defeatist". The UK government told BBC News that it will "support workers and communities" in the wake of the job cuts. A spokesperson said: "Our thoughts are with any workers affected by this commercial decision, and we will do everything in our power to support workers and communities. "The government has reformed the Energy Profits Levy to support investment and give industry certainty and stability."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store