Sean 'Diddy' Combs' used Cassie Ventura 'freak off' videos for blackmail, prosecutors claim
Cassie is at the center of opening statements in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex-crimes trial.
At the official start of Combs' trial May 12, Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson delivered the government's argument against Combs, who is facing five counts on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
But the prosecution painted an image of a controlling, powerful man who coerced a young artist into a complicated and at times violent romantic relationship. Cassie was 19 when she first met Combs, who was 17 years older than her, Johnson said. He allegedly promised her a 10-album deal, and although she recorded music constantly, he always had a final say on which music she was able to release, Johnson said.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers accuse prosecution of bias against Black jurors
What started as a professional music relationship quickly devolved, Johnson said. Cassie began dating Combs in 2007 and had an on-and-off relationship with him for more than a decade. Known for the hit track "Me & U," the lead single off her self-titled (and only) studio album, Cassie later sued Combs, alleging their professional and romantic relationship quickly changed as he coerced her into sex and physically beat her.
In court May 12, Johnson described one instance in 2009 where Combs allegedly threw Cassie on the floor of an SUV and "stomped repeatedly on her face."
Cassie will testify about another instance when she said Combs forced another escort to urinate in her mouth, Johnson said.
Cassie entered her first "freak off" reluctantly, but she "loved" Combs and "wanted to make him happy," Johnson said. Combs' "freak offs," the sometimes dayslong sexual performances he is accused of holding, involved illicit substances and commercial sex workers.
Johnson said jurors will hear testimony from some of the escorts, one of whom saw Combs drag Cassie by her hair at a "freak off."
She continued, saying "the defendant beat (Cassie) viciously," whether she was taking too long in the bathroom or missed his calls or left a "freak off" early. Combs had power over Cassie's career and livelihood, and he would threaten to release videos of her with "dozens and dozens of male escorts," Johnson said. He "had the power to ruin her life."
For Cassie, the videos are "souvenirs of the most humiliating nights of her life," Johnson said.
"Her livelihood and safety depended on keeping the defendant happy," Johnson said. The prosecution said Combs and Cassie "were unfaithful and jealous," but "only one had power."
This argument may factor heavily into the trial as the defense is expected to paint Cassie as equally violent against Combs.
Witnesses of Cassie's assaults and injuries will also testify, Johnson said, before asking jurors to "please use and trust your common sense."
In the defense team's opening statement, Combs' lawyer Teny Geragos argued that Cassie became jealous when she realized she would never be the music mogul's wife.
"Regret does not mean coerced," Geragos said, attempting to poke holes in the one of the prosecution's signature arguments. Every woman in this case had "free choice," she said, and argued that the "freak-off" videos were meant to be "intimate" and not intended "to be seen by people outside that room."
Geragos said the case is about his personal, private sex life, and admitted that he has sometimes been violent.
"Sean Combs has a temper," Geragos said. "My client is not proud of that."
Cassie's husband, Alex Fine, was spotted at the courthouse during the first day of opening arguments. Fine, who wed Ventura in 2019, shares two children with the singer, with a third on the way.
He is presumably there to support his wife, who will serve as one of the prosecution's key witnesses.
The hotel video from 2016 featuring Combs beating Cassie – which Combs' defense team failed to convince the judge to remove from the evidence list prior to trial – was a talking point in the prosecution's opening statement. Lawyers plan to show their own clips of the incident, separate from the recording, largely viewed by the public when CNN released it in 2024.
Combs' inner circle gave one of the security guards a bag of $100,000 in cash for the video, Johnson said.
In response, the defense team argued that Combs was "not trying to obstruct justice" but rather to protect both him and Cassie from "bad publicity."
Describing one violent episode, Johnson said Combs broke into the house of a man who was seeing Ventura with a gun and a bodyguard with the intent to kill. While no one was home, Combs later found Ventura and, "beat her brutally," flinging "her around like a rag doll," she argued.
Ventura sued Combs in November 2023, alleging she trafficked, raped and viciously beaten by her former partner over the course of a decade.
Combs and Cassie reached a settlement one day later.
The case was civil, rather than criminal, as part of a one-time legal loophole opened by the city of New York, a fact Combs' defense team seized upon, claiming it was a "money grab," since civil suits result in damages but not jail time.
Contributing: Aysha Bagchi, Anika Reed, Anna Kaufman
If you are a victim of domestic violence, The (thehotline.org) allows you to speak confidentially with trained advocates online or by the phone, which they recommend for those who think their online activity is being monitored by their abuser (800-799-7233). They can help survivors develop a plan to achieve safety for themselves and their children.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Diddy trial: Cassie Ventura 'freak off' videos used for blackmail

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NAACP lawsuit accuses Missouri AG of illegally withholding info on police vehicle stops
Attorney General Andrew Bailey speaks during a 2024 news conference in the Missouri House Lounge, flanked by House Speaker Dean Plocher, left, and state Rep. Justin Sparks (Tim Bommel/Missouri House Communications). A new lawsuit filed by the Missouri NAACP accuses Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey of failing to follow state law last year when the annual vehicle stops report omitted data that shows whether minority motorists are being stopped more frequently than white drivers. Filed Tuesday in Cole County, the lawsuit also accuses Bailey and the University of Missouri of violating the state Sunshine Law by withholding documents showing why the information called a disparity index was left out of the report on stops during 2023 and whether it was calculated at all. The lawsuit was filed just days before the report for stops in 2024 is due on Sunday. The disparity index is a ratio of stops among an identifiable group compared to their share of the population of driving age. If the ratio is one, it means that traffic stops in that particular group align with their share of the whole. Bailey 'has an absolute, statutory and ministerial duty, pursuant to (state law), to include a 'disparity index,' that is a comparison of the percentage of stopped motor vehicles driven by each minority group and the percentage of the state's population that each minority group comprises, in his annual report,' the lawsuit states. In the executive summary of the report issued June 1, 2024, the omission was explained as a decision to stop using a data point of questionable value and sometimes incorrect interpretation. A disparity index of two for any minority group, the summary states, means very different things in a community where 10% of the population are members of that group compared to a community where 50% of the population are members of that group. 'The (vehicle stops report) already provides detailed information on traffic stops and rates relative to subgroup population, so no new objective information is provided by calculating the index,' the summary states. But Rod Chapel, president of the Missouri NAACP and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said questions about the usefulness of a data point are not enough to excuse ignoring the law that requires it. 'The requirements of the statute are clear, there shall be a disparity index that is produced by the attorney general,' he said. 'Last year, Attorney General Bailey recognized that, I think, in his summary, and chose not to do it.' For the state as a whole, the report for 2023 shows, 538 police agencies made almost 1.4 million traffic stops, issued almost 570,000 citations and made 57,713 arrests. White motorists accounted for 77% of the stops, another 17.3% of the motorists were Black and 3.1% were Hispanic. The Independent calculated a disparity index that showed the index for white drivers was 0.97 while the index for black drivers was 1.59. For Hispanic drivers, the disparity index was 0.8, indicating stops in smaller numbers than their portion of the population. Those figures are similar to what past reports showed. In the lawsuit, the NAACP is asking for an order directing Bailey to publish the disparity index calculations for the state as a whole and for the 538 police agencies that submitted reports on their traffic stops. The lawsuit also asks for an order stating he has a statutory obligation to include it in future reports and to turn over records requested last year regarding the decision to omit the index. The Sunshine Law violations alleged in the lawsuit state that the last communication from the attorney general's office regarding a Nov. 13 request for records was Feb. 26. Bailey's office said records would be ready in a week but has not delivered them, the lawsuit states. The University of Missouri performed calculations presented in the report, and the NAACP sought records regarding those calculations and the decision not to include the index. On May 16, the university, after taking six months, delivered 443,000 documents. But it also said, according to the lawsuit, that 'many of the records identified in response to your search criteria have been withheld' under Sunshine Law provisions allowing records to be closed. One of the exemptions cited is that the withheld records were related to legal actions or litigation or confidential or privileged communications with attorneys. In the court filing, the NAACP says that claim is a ruse because, other than the lawsuit filed Tuesday, the University of Missouri is 'not involved in legal actions, causes of action or litigation involving the requested documents.' Bailey's office said it would not comment on the lawsuit. University of Missouri spokesman Christopher Ave, in an email, said 'we deny liability for the violation alleged in this case and plan to present our defenses in court.' The vehicle stops report has been published since 2000 under a law intended to detect and prevent racial profiling of motorists. The data reported has been refined over the years, including the disparity index. The most recent version of the disparity index, before it was discontinued, was calculated based on total stops within a jurisdiction and for stops of motorists who reside within that jurisdiction. That is an improvement in the data, Chapel said, because it shows whether minority visitors to tourist areas are being stopped in greater numbers than the resident population. The NAACP travel advisory for Missouri issued in 2017 used data from the vehicle stops reports to state that 'African Americans are 75 per cent more likely to be stopped and searched based on skin color than Caucasians.' The allegation is supported by data on stops that result in discovery of contraband, Chapel said. 'If you look at most of the data, it says that black and brown people get stopped more than anybody else, but the rate at which they're found with contraband is lower,' Chapel said. 'So that would say that we are misusing community resources in a way that is not effective.' In 2023, 25.5% of white drivers stopped had contraband, compared to 20.5% for Black drivers and 16.3% for Hispanic drivers. Black and Hispanic drivers were, however, much more likely to receive a citation after the stop, with 38.2% of white drivers stopped receiving a ticket, compared to 55.2% for Black drivers and 50.4% for Hispanic drivers. Don Love of Columbia, who has been analyzing the annual vehicle stops reports for more than a decade, said that he dislikes the disparity index because it is an imprecise measure of officer motives for a stop. He's argued for a new method to replace it. 'What they did wasn't replace it, but just to leave it out entirely,' Love said. 'It wasn't good, but it's illegal for them not to have it in there.' The use of ratios to analyze the data should be expanded, he said, to cover other data in the report, including the number of drivers searched, the contraband found and the arrests made, as well as whether drivers get a citation or just a warning. Breaking the stop data into resident and non-resident stops added a new dimension to the data, Love said. 'If you look at what happens for Black drivers when they leave their home jurisdictions and go someplace else, there's something more than two times the white rate,' he said. Omitting the disparity index was not done without thought, Chapel said. The lawsuit is intended to discover the motive and prove that the law requires it as part of the report, he added. 'There's any number of things that the attorney general is supposed to do,' Chapel said, 'and if he's just making the decision not to do it, we deserve to know.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE


Atlantic
31 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Diddy's Defenders
America is riveted by the Diddy trial for many reasons: celebrity, kink, drugs, violence, guns, baby oil. You can almost hear Ryan Murphy calling FX now to pitch American Crime Story: Diddy Do It? Influencers are staking out the courthouse, live-updating X with witnesses' testimony, and providing TikTok updates that one creator calls 'Diddy-lations.' And people are eating it up. Diddy—whose legal name is Sean Combs—has pleaded not guilty to the charges he faces of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Many Americans have taken to the comment sections to offer their full-throated belief in his innocence. Despite the video evidence of domestic violence, the photos of Combs's guns with serial numbers removed, and the multiple witnesses testifying that Combs threatened to kill them, this group insists that Diddy's biggest sin is nothing more than being a hypermasculine celebrity with 'libertine' sexual tastes. The trial is estimated to take eight to 10 weeks; we've made it through just two. No one can predict the outcome. But why do so many men—and a surprising number of women—feel the need to defend this man? The jury has already watched the now-infamous surveillance footage of Combs dragging Cassie Ventura, the prosecution's star witness, by the collar of her sweatshirt through a hotel—and that's not even one of the things he's on trial for. I can't look away from the Diddy trial, because it feels like the trial not of one man, but of something much larger. The jury—made up of eight men and four women—will decide whether to convict Combs, but the broader culture, in its response to this trial, is deciding whether #MeToo was a movement or a moment. Sophie Gilbert: The movement of #MeToo At the center of the trial is the question of coercion. Did Ventura participate in hundreds of drug-fueled sexual encounters with strangers for Combs, who liked to watch, because she enjoyed them? Or did Combs use his power over her to force her? When they met, she was 19, an eager and ambitious singer. He was 17 years older, and arguably the most powerful man in the music industry. His label, Bad Boy, signed her to a highly unusual, long-term 10-album deal. He was her boss and, soon, her boyfriend. The evidence presented by both sides serves as a Rorschach test. How you see it says a lot about how the #MeToo movement did—or did not—alter your vision. The facts seem clear. Ventura was a legal adult, but barely, when her career was effectively handed over to Combs in 2006. Today, musical artists such as Chappell Roan and Sabrina Carpenter invent their own persona. But in the mid-2000s, many artists were strictly controlled by their labels. Particularly when the artists were women. The people paying the bills didn't just dictate what these women sounded like—they dictated their hair color, their weight. You have to watch only one episode of Combs's MTV show Making the Band to get a taste of the climate he created. He made artists compete in singing battles to earn a bed to sleep in and ordered them to walk miles from Manhattan to Brooklyn to get him a specific slice of cheesecake. Behind the scenes, things were worse. One singer said Diddy controlled every aspect of her appearance ' down to my toenails.' Sure, maybe Ventura loved him. But sometimes hostages fall in love with their captors. Even the ones who beat them. Sure, women have an array of sexual tastes, just like men. But it's hard to imagine a woman enjoying having intercourse while, as Ventura said in her testimony, suffering from a painful urinary tract infection. It's hard to imagine feeling aroused after your partner threw a glass bottle at you, as a male sex worker said he witnessed Combs do to Ventura. And when people are having a consensual good time, they don't usually try to sneak out of the room, barefoot—as Ventura was seen doing in the hotel surveillance footage —only for their partner to catch them, grab them by the back of the neck, throw them to the ground, and kick them. Repeatedly. Ventura said that the sex acts made her feel ' worthless.' But, as the video showed, attempting to extract herself came with a price. It's been almost eight years since the Harvey Weinstein story broke and the #MeToo movement forced a reassessment of abuse and power. In the future, I remember thinking, we will not just speak out against bad actors; we will refuse to participate in the systems that protected them. Going forward, everyone would understand that, in a world of power imbalances, the difference between what a woman chooses and what happens to her can be very big indeed. Danielle Bernstein: #MeToo has changed the world—except in court Instead, something else happened over the subsequent years. American women have seen our rights eroded and our access to lifesaving health care curbed. An accused sexual abuser is president of the United States, and his administration is hard at work on schemes to persuade more women to stay home and have kids. Many men have fought hard to undermine the progress of the #MeToo movement. Like Combs running after Ventura in that video, they have tried to drag women back into the past, where they could do as they liked.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Watch: Beyoncé fulfills fan's request with onstage gender reveal at New York stop
Watch: Beyoncé fulfills fan's request with onstage gender reveal at New York stop Beyoncé Knowles-Carter devoured a drenched stage during her fourth New York-area stop on her "Cowboy Carter" tour, and she ended the night with a sweet surprise: a gender reveal for a fan, live onstage. The Grammy-winning singer kicked off her fourth show at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, on May 28. Toward the end of the night, fans were pleasantly surprised when she did a gender reveal onstage for a fan. Early in her performance, Beyoncé spotted a fan's sign asking for a gender reveal. She told the fan, "I'll be back. I'm going to do it later." And she delivered on that promise toward the end of the concert. As the performance wrapped, Beyoncé circled back to the fan saying, "I had to come back to you. I didn't want to rush this, because this is important. A once-in-a-lifetime gender reveal. I had to take my time." Beyoncé then knelt down, carefully unraveling the envelope to reveal baby Carter's gender. The entire crowd leaned into the moment, cheering as Beyoncé showed off the paper that read 'Cowboy.' With a warm smile, she turned to the fan and confirmed, 'It's a boy,' as the stadium roared with celebration. beyoncé doing yet another gender reveal on tour, this is truly iconic😭🥹 — 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘆🫧💚 (@beyoncegarden) May 29, 2025 Wednesday's concert was her fourth of five times performing in the New York area on her Cowboy Carter and Rodeo Chitlin' Circuit Tour. The final show at MetLife is scheduled for May 29. Beyoncé first debuted her "Cowboy Carter" tour at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles on April 28 with 39 songs on the set list. She performed a total of five shows there, putting on a revolutionary show filled with family, fashion, different music genres, and most notably country music and cultural commentary. As fans know, Beyoncé first released the 27-track project in March 2024. It has since made history and broken multiple records. As Beyoncé's first country album, she deliberately featured country legends and emerging Black country artists alike. She became the first Black woman to win best country album at the 2025 Grammys and also took home album of the year. The nine-city tour will span the U.S. and Europe with the grand finale taking place in Las Vegas on July 26. Follow Caché McClay, the USA TODAY Network's Beyoncé Knowles-Carter reporter, on Instagram, TikTok and X as @cachemcclay.