Iranian Jewish Leader Denounces Israel's 'Savage' Attacks on Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An Iranian Jewish leader denounced Israel's "savage" attacks against Iran as tensions remain high in the region this week.
Newsweek reached out to the Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
The Iran-Israel conflict has continued to escalate after Israel launched strikes at Iran last week with the goal of diminishing its nuclear capabilities amid concerns that Tehran was working to build a nuclear weapon.
Israel and Iran have since fired strikes back-and-forth over recent days as President Donald Trump weighs whether the U.S. should become involved to help Israel. The conflict could reshape affairs in the region and across the globe for years to come.
What To Know
Khodadad Goharian, a leader of a small Jewish community in Yazd, Iran, condemned Israel's attacks as "savage deeds" that have "deeply wounded the hearts of all Iranians," reported The Jerusalem Post, citing local media. Goharian raised concerns that the strikes have killed civilians, including children.
He also backed Iran's call for a military response to the strikes, according to the outlet.
Lior Sternfeld, associate professor of history and Jewish studies at Penn State University, told Newsweek the statement is not surprising.
"They live in Iran, and they are part of the Iranian society. There is, of course, some level of expectation from them to issue such a statement, but we shouldn't assume that they do it under pressure. The Israeli attacks affect them, too. They live in those same spaces. Who wouldn't go against foreign powers bombing their homes?" Sternfeld said.
Smoke billows over Tehran, Iran, amid Israeli attacks on June 17, 2025.
Smoke billows over Tehran, Iran, amid Israeli attacks on June 17, 2025.
ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images
Approximately 9,000 Jewish people live in Iran, primarily concentrated in major cities such as Tehran and Shiraz, according to the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS) earlier this year. Prior to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, up to 100,000 Jewish Iranians were living in the country.
Judaism is one of four religions recognized in Iran, and there are dozens of synagogues in the country, according to JNS.
The Iranian Jewish community has a "complicated" relationship with Israel, Sternfeld said.
"Of course, supporting Israel openly is not an option. It is perilous for anyone to support Israel publicly, especially while being Jewish, and especially now," he said.
Tensions between the two nations remained high on Thursday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday condemned an Iranian strike that damaged Soroka Hospital in Beersheba. The Israel Defense Forces reported a new launch of ballistic missiles from Iran.
Meanwhile, Israel launched airstrikes on Iran's Arak heavy water reactor, a facility linked to plutonium production. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed the site was inactive and contained no nuclear material, but Israel said the strike was aimed at preventing future weapons development.
Trump continued to consider U.S. involvement, stating, "I may do it, I may not do it." He has said he believes Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
What People Are Saying
The Jewish Association and Community of Isfahan wrote in a statement reported by The Jerusalem Post: "The Zionists' brutality, which is far from any human morality and has caused the martyrdom of a number of our beloved compatriots, including innocent children, has hurt all of our hearts."
Homayoun Sameh, the Jewish representative in Iran's parliament, said, per Ynet: "Israel is committing war crimes — crimes against humanity. Iranian Jews are part of the Iranian people. I offer condolences to the families of the victims."
Israeli Health Minister Uriel Busso told The Jerusalem Post following the strike on a hospital: "This is a terrorist act...a red line."
What Happens Next
Busso told The Jerusalem Post that Israel will exact a heavy price for the latest attack on the Israeli hospital.
Meanwhile, debate continues about whether the U.S. should join the conflict. While some have argued it is strategic to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon, others have said the U.S. should not get involved in a war on Israel's behalf. Members of Congress are pushing to limit Trump's ability to join the conflict without their authorization.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
10 minutes ago
Rep. Mark Alford says US ‘did not draw first blood in this fight'
Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., joins ABC News Live to discuss the U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear capabilities and congressional approval.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
US strikes on Iran could hit American economy at a fragile time
The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend could ratchet up the pressure on an American economy that's turned increasingly fragile as a weekslong global trade war takes a toll. America's entry into what had been attacks between Israel and Iran is most likely to impact oil prices, investors said, which could ripple through the economy by causing higher transportation and gas prices, just as overall inflation throughout the economy has seemed to be contained. Energy analyst Rachel Ziemba told USA Today on June 22 oil prices may not trade much higher until and unless there's a sustained supply shock, like Iran deciding to block the crucial Strait of Hormuz. Iran's parliament on June 22 reportedly approved a measure endorsing exactly that, though whether it happens comes down to Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Ziemba calls that a 'low probability, high impact' risk – and one that commodities traders will likely struggle to price. That means energy prices may be volatile until conditions settle down – even as summer vacations start in earnest and a massive heat wave grips the central and eastern parts of the country. Any shock to financial markets and disruption of American consumers' expectations for the summer months comes as the overall economy is weakening quickly. "The world economy is not in a strong position to absorb another energy shock," warned Nigel Green, chief executive of deVere Group, a financial advisory firm. The U.S. joining the conflict between Israel and Iran raises the risks of a "sharp, global reaction," Green added. 'Investors are currently positioned for rate cuts, stable energy prices and an orderly global outlook," he said in a June 18 note. "A sudden and serious expansion of this conflict would force a violent repricing of risk across all major asset classes.' On June 18, the Labor Department reported that claims for unemployment insurance continued to rise. 'Uncertainty is leading companies to trim staff ahead of what could be a downturn in the economy. Batten down the hatches is what company executives are saying as the trade war and rumors of real war are starting to take a toll on the business outlook,' said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist with market research firm FWDBONDS LLC, in an email. Analysts at Oxford Economics take a more benign view. 'Rising Middle East tensions represent another adverse shock to an already weak economy,' they wrote on June 18. Their models suggest that oil prices at about $130 a barrel would pressure inflation to 6%. Post-pandemic inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022. That would put the Federal Reserve in a difficult position. The Fed raises interest rates to tame inflation, and cuts them to support borrowing and economic growth. So far this year, the central bank has held rates steady as it waits to see more information about how tariffs are playing out in the economy, but that may change. Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, speaking after the central bank held interest rates steady for the fourth consecutive meeting on June 18, told reporters the Fed is watching the situation in the Middle East, "like everybody else is." "What's tended to happen is when there's turmoil in the Middle East, you may see a spike in energy prices," Powell said prior to the U.S. strikes. "Those things don't generally tend to have lasting effects on inflation, although of course in the 1970s, they famously did, because you had a series of very, very large shocks. But, we haven't seen anything like that now." The U.S. economy is far less dependent on foreign oil than it was back in the 1970s, Powell added.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Protests erupt calling for Trump, U.S. to say out of war in Middle East
Americans are taking to the streets to protest U.S. military involvement in Iran. Protestors expect their numbers to swell this week. WASHINGTON — Protests against the U.S. military involvement in Iran, including some in New York and outside the White House June 22, are expected to continue throughout the week in communities across the country. The protests come on the heels of President Donald Trump ordering attacks on three nuclear facilities in Iran. Demonstrations were underway Sunday, June 22 in Washington, D.C., New York and Boston, according to social media posts. 'The people of the United States don't want another forever war. The people of the United States want money for people's needs!'' the Party for Socialism and Liberation posted on X. The protests, some organized in part by ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) Coalition, an anti-war group, call for Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop the war on Iran. ANSWER is a left-wing group that has organized protests against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other U.S. military actions, including some that have drawn hundreds of thousands of participants. Earlier this year, the organization was part of a coalition of groups across the country protesting in the days after Trump's inauguration. Other protests are planned in the coming week, including a national ''Stop the War on Iran'' march slated for June 28 in Washington, D.C. Others protested across the globe, including in Japan and Iran. Trump administration officials defended the attacks Sunday morning, and President Trump threatened possible further actions. "If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speech and skill," Trump said Saturday at the White House. More: Not what 'MAGA wanted to hear': Tensions within GOP remain about Trump's Iran strike Congress is scheduled to return to Washington this week. Many Republican lawmakers applauded Trump's move. 'President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated,'' Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, said in a statement. 'That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity.'' Some Democrats, however, blasted Trump 'unilateral decision' to attack Iran without Congressional approval, calling it illegal. 'This move, a rash sequel to his withdrawal from the nuclear deal, puts our nation, our troops, and innocents at grave risk,'' Rep. James Clyburn said in a statement. 'Trump promised to be a peacemaker and vowed to avoid plunging the U.S. into more wars in the Middle East. This attack is inconsistent with his promise to the American people.' Contributing: Sarah Wire ###
