logo
Will Dunleavy's freeze on new regulations affect paid sick leave for Alaskans?

Will Dunleavy's freeze on new regulations affect paid sick leave for Alaskans?

Yahoo2 days ago

The Alaska and American flags fly in front of the Alaska State Capitol on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Two weeks ago, Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy announced a hiring freeze for most state agencies, paused new state regulations, and restricted state workers' travel.
The governor's administrative order arrived amid growing concerns about state spending, and much of it is similar to orders issued during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency and the oil price shock of the mid-2010s.
But this order has a new wrinkle: a pause on new state regulations.
'In order for agencies to focus their attention on the State's core mission of providing essential services to Alaskans and maximizing operational efficiency, there is, effective immediately, a freeze on the promulgation of new regulations by all agencies. This freeze does not apply to regulations currently out for public notice,' the governor's new order states.
If laws enacted by the Legislature and governor are the building blocks of state government, regulations are the mortar that holds them together: Regulations, proposed by state agencies or boards and commissions, cover the details that laws don't, prescribing how state agencies should implement those laws.
'Governor Dunleavy issued Administrative Order 358 to ensure we are spending wisely and living within our means. This temporary pause on new regulations gives agencies time to evaluate priorities and reduce unnecessary regulatory growth,' said Jessica Bowers, a spokesperson for Dunleavy.
Since Dunleavy's order, the state's public records system shows only one new regulations package has been posted for public comment. In the same period last year, the online public records system shows seven. There were three during the same stretch of 2023 and five during that stretch of 2022.
This year, one of the biggest items affected by the governor's order is a packet of regulations that would fully implement last year's Ballot Measure 1, which requires paid sick leave and a minimum wage increase for workers starting July 1.
The measure, which was approved by 58% of participating Alaska voters last year, also forbids 'captive audience meetings,' in which employees must listen to an employer's views on religion, politics or unions.
New regulations require a 30-day comment period where the public can suggest changes to the final draft, and those regulations typically don't become effective until 30 days after the final version is signed by the lieutenant governor.
In March, Adam Weinert, a special assistant to state Department of Labor Commissioner Cathy Muñoz, said that 'the regulation packet is currently with the Alaska Department of Law, and we intend to have the packet out for a 30-day public comment in the near future.'
More than two months later, the packet still has not been published for public comment. The Department of Labor has not answered multiple requests for further information.
The delay has alarmed some of the measure's supporters, who think it could be part of a national pattern.
In Nebraska and Missouri, voters also passed paid sick leave ballot measures last year. In both places, state legislators proceeded to overturn those ballot measures this spring.
Here in Alaska, five Republican members of the state House introduced a bill that would roll back Alaska's voter-approved law.
'As those issues have won at the ballot box, really since 2016, we have seen an escalation of attacks to direct democracy and voter-approved initiatives,' said Chris Melody Fields, executive director of the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, a national progressive organization.
'We've seen that especially on the economic justice ballot measures that were passed in 2024,' she said.
The Alaska bill lacks the support needed to pass the House or Senate and may be unconstitutional, which leaves regulatory hurdles as the last obstacle before it becomes effective.
Bowers, in the governor's office, cited the text of the governor's administrative order and said that agencies 'can submit a waiver to move forward with paused regulations if the regulations are necessary to protect the safety of the public or to meet other essential State responsibilities.'
By email, she confirmed that the Department of Labor has submitted a waiver request and that it is under review.
The Alaska Department of Law, which has been examining the regulations package for more than two months, did not answer a question on Friday seeking information about the status of that review.
Joelle Hall, president of the Alaska chapter of the AFL-CIO, a federation of 63 national and international labor unions, said that regardless of what happens with the regulations, Ballot Measure 1 will become law on July 1.
She supported the measure and has been tracking its implementation with interest.
'Those regs need to have a 30-day comment period … they should have been out 90 days ago, so they could have taken in public comment,' she said.
Without regulations, Alaskans will still be entitled to sick leave and a higher minimum wage, but employers might not know how to keep track of that sick leave and report it properly, she said.
She noted that the Department of Labor has an FAQ about the measure.
Other organizations, including the Foraker Group and the law firm Landye Bennett Blumstein have also published detailed explanations on the new law going into effect.
Attorney Scott Kendall said that a regulations package could still go forward after the law becomes effective.
But Hall said that still leaves employers guessing.
'You're going to have a lot of employers who are confused about how they're going to track things,' she said.
Of the state's decision to wait on releasing regulations, she said, 'I'm not sure what they think they're doing aside from confusing people.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable
Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable

The following content is brought to you by PCMag partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. If you'd like to streamline your image game, for work or fun, Imagiyo is a powerful AI image generator built for creators, marketers, designers, and anyone who needs stunning visuals on demand. For a limited time, you can get lifetime access to the Imagiyo AI Image Generator Standard Plan for just $39.97 (reg. $495) through July 20. Imagiyo uses Stable Diffusion and FLUX AI to generate high-quality images from simple text prompts. Whether you're designing ad creatives, book covers, social posts, or custom artwork, Imagiyo delivers impressive results. The platform supports multiple image sizes, advanced models, and commercial use rights, giving users full flexibility and ownership over their content. The user interface is clean and responsive across all devices, making it easy to generate and download images in seconds. Using privacy mode, you can even create NSFW content. Skip the subscriptions and pay once to generate limitless visuals. Whether you're outfitting a small business with creative content or just tired of using generic stock images, Imagiyo is a one-time investment that delivers value immediately—and for years to come. Get access to the Imagiyo AI Image Generator Standard Plan for just $39.97 (reg. $495). Prices subject to change. PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through StackSocial affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Ircon International shares rise over 2% after bagging Rs 1,068 crore railway bridge contract
Ircon International shares rise over 2% after bagging Rs 1,068 crore railway bridge contract

Business Upturn

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Ircon International shares rise over 2% after bagging Rs 1,068 crore railway bridge contract

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 2, 2025, 10:17 IST Shares of Ircon International Ltd gained over 2% to ₹194.94 in Monday's session following the company's announcement of a major order win. The stock rose after the company disclosed that it has received a Letter of Acceptance (LoA) from East Central Railway, Indian Railways, for the construction of a major railway bridge project across the Ganga river. According to the disclosure submitted under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, the contract is for engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) of a new broad-gauge (BG) rail bridge consisting of a 2×32.086m and 33×122.0m Open Web Steel Girder span. The bridge will feature a sub-structure for double-line tracks and a superstructure for a single-line track between Bikramshila and Katareah stations. The total contract value stands at ₹1,068.35 crore and the project is expected to be completed within 1,460 days. This is a domestic works contract and does not involve any related party transactions. As of 10:13 AM, Ircon shares were trading at ₹194.94, up 2.11% from the previous close of ₹190.91. The stock hit an intraday high of ₹198, with a market cap of ₹183.26 billion. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Stock market investments are subject to market risks. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes
ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes

Medscape

time31 minutes ago

  • Medscape

ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes

In a recent study, emergency nurses and physicians in approximately half of the study hospitals disagreed on the quality of the work environment. An environment rated "unfavorable" by both groups was significantly associated with worse clinician and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional analysis included emergency department (ED) clinicians (1190 nurses and 414 physicians) from 47 Magnet hospitals who completed the 2021 US Clinician Wellbeing Study. Researchers classified hospitals into profiles according to the level of agreement between nurses and physicians regarding the hospital work environment. Researchers assessed clinician job outcomes (burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave), patient safety, and quality-of-care metrics. TAKEAWAY: Hospital profiles revealed three distinct patterns: "Agree, Unfavorable Environment" (10 hospitals); "Agree, Favorable Environment" (15 hospitals); and "Disagree, Less Favorable Environment Among Nurses" (22 hospitals). Compared with hospitals where clinicians agreed on a favorable environment, hospitals where clinicians agreed on an unfavorable environment had significantly higher rates of burnout (β, 25.8), job dissatisfaction (β, 32.5), intent to leave (β, 31.7), and unfavorable patient safety grades (β, 29.1), after adjustment for hospital characteristics ( P < .001 for all). < .001 for all). Hospitals where nurses rated the environment less favorably than physicians demonstrated increased burnout (β, 15.4; P < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; P < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. Compared with physicians in hospitals with an "Agree, Favorable" profile, those in hospitals rated as having an "Unfavorable" work environment showed significantly higher rates for all outcomes except burnout and patient-care quality. Similarly, nurses in hospitals with a "Disagree, Less Favorable Among Nurses" profile experienced higher rates across all job-related and patient-care outcomes. IN PRACTICE: "This cross-sectional study found that ED nurses and phy­sicians in close to half of study hospitals disagreed on the quality of their work environment. Clinician job and patient outcomes were worse when both clinicians rated their work environment unfavorably and when nurses only reported their work environments as unfavor­able," the authors wrote. "The implication of these findings is that, if two essential partners in emergency care within the same institution do not agree on the deficiencies in ED work environments, significant interdisciplinary research is needed to bridge these gaps and disparate experiences," they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Jane Muir, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. It was published online on May 16, 2025, in BMC Health Services Research . LIMITATIONS: The study included only Magnet hospitals, which are known for favorable work environments and good physician-nurse collaboration, suggesting the findings may have underestimated the variation in clinician work environment agreement across all hospitals. The cross-sectional design prevented causal inference, and the sample had more nurses than physicians. DISCLOSURES: The research was funded by the Clinician Well-being Study Consortium and the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, it was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National Clinician Scholars Program, and the Emergency Medicine Foundation/Emergency Nurses Association Foundation. The authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store