logo
‘I question it myself': South Dakota vaccination rates fall amid mistrust and misinformation

‘I question it myself': South Dakota vaccination rates fall amid mistrust and misinformation

Yahoo23-05-2025

A nurse readies an MMR vaccine at Sanford Children's Hospital in Sioux Falls. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)
Grant Vander Vorst is at the epicenter of vaccine hesitancy in South Dakota: Just 56% of incoming kindergartners in Faulk County, where he lives, were up to date on their measles, mumps and rubella vaccination during the 2023-24 school year, which was the lowest rate of any county in the state with available data.
Vander Vorst is the superintendent of Faulkton Area Schools. He said some parents are skeptical about the safety of administering multiple childhood vaccinations in a short window of time, 'and justifiably so.'
'I question it myself, and a lot of others do as well,' he said.
Vander Vorst said his views are influenced by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic whose statements about vaccines have been called false and misleading by medical professionals.
'I haven't looked into the research, but he obviously has,' Vander Vorst said.
Faulk County is not alone. Across South Dakota, vaccine hesitancy that took hold during the COVID-19 pandemic has expanded beyond skepticism of new vaccines to doubts about long-established ones, said Erin Tobin, a nurse practitioner and Republican former state senator from Winner.
Tobin said a growing number of parents are trusting web posts and social media influencers over local health care professionals.
'It used to be that I could start a discussion with a patient with the words 'the CDC recommends,'' Tobin said, referencing the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 'and now I'm cautious to use that because people don't trust the CDC.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
During the 2018-19 school year, before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of kindergarteners in South Dakota received all their required vaccinations. That number fell to 91% during the 2023-24 school year, the most recent year of available statewide data.
Public health advocates are sounding the alarm about declining vaccination rates as the United States experiences its most severe measles outbreak since 2000, with over 1,000 confirmed cases across 31 states, including 12 confirmed cases in North Dakota. South Dakota has not had a confirmed case of measles so far this year, but last July, it reported its first measles case in nine years.
According to the CDC, a measles vaccination rate of 95% is needed to achieve herd immunity and prevent outbreaks, given the highly contagious nature of the virus.
Ten years ago, only six South Dakota counties had MMR rates below 95%, with the lowest being 80%. Now, more than 40 counties in the state are below 95%, with 12 below 80% and five below 70%. The rates could be even lower than the numbers indicate, because kindergarten-age students being homeschooled or attending other forms of alternative instruction are not required to report their vaccination status. There were 431 alternative-instruction kindergarten students statewide last fall.
The MMR vaccine is a key indicator for public health, said Dr. Amy Winter, an epidemiologist at the University of Georgia College of Public Health. When MMR vaccination rates fall, it signals broader vulnerabilities.
'Where there is measles, there could be other outbreaks, other infectious diseases, depending on the dearth of vaccination that may be happening,' Winter said.
Mark Sternhagen, a retiree who formerly taught at South Dakota State University, knows those risks well. He was born soon after the polio vaccine came out in 1955. He contracted polio before his parents were able to get him vaccinated, and has used a wheelchair ever since.
'There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that if I got the vaccine, I would not have gotten polio,' he said. 'I look at these declining rates and it just makes me sick.'
Sternhagen said his mother carried guilt, but he doesn't blame her. He said vaccinations in South Dakota were less accessible, and parents were less informed, but modern parents who do have access to vaccines and valid information don't have those excuses.
'You're putting your children and others' children at risk, and there is no question about that,' he said.
The first laws requiring immunization appeared in the 1800s, coinciding with the development and spread of a smallpox vaccine. In 1922, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a local government's vaccination mandate as a prerequisite to attending public school, leading states to implement similar requirements.
States began allowing religious exemptions in the mid-20th century following advocacy from religious minorities, like the Christian Scientists. Adherents generally rely on prayer over medical care, and often decline to vaccinate children, according to the Harvard Divinity School.
South Dakota's immunization law requires children entering school or early childhood programs to be immunized against poliomyelitis, diphtheria, pertussis, rubeola, rubella, mumps, tetanus, meningitis and varicella.
There are two exemptions in South Dakota's law. One is a medical exemption for children with certification from a licensed physician that immunization would threaten their life or health. Those exemptions have remained steady over the past decade at 0.2% of kindergartners or less.
There's also a religious exemption, requiring a written statement from a parent or guardian that the child is an adherent of a religious doctrine whose teachings are opposed to immunization.
Religious exemptions are growing in South Dakota, where 5.4% of kindergarteners had them last school year, compared to 1.5% a decade ago. In raw numbers, that's a change from 181 kindergarteners to 636.
Tobin, the nurse practitioner and former legislator, said the claiming of a religious exemption is probably not religiously motivated in many cases.
'I do think they're using that as this all-encompassing exemption, and so it's probably something they just don't believe in, but not necessarily something that is against the religion,' she said.
One factor contributing to South Dakota's declining vaccination trend is falling rates among Hutterite people, members of a communal branch of the Anabaptist faith who have dozens of agricultural-based colonies in the state.
During the 2019-20 school year, six of the approximately 50 Hutterite colony elementary schools in the state reported vaccination rates of 0%. Thirty-two of them did so during the 2023-24 school year.
There are questions about the validity of the data. A state Department of Health dashboard shows some Hutterite colony schools with 0% of their kindergarten students vaccinated, but also shows some of those same schools with less than 100% of the students claiming a religious or medical exemption. South Dakota Searchlight asked the Department of Health and the Department of Education to explain the discrepancy but did not receive a full explanation from either department.
Searchlight followed-up by asking the departments what the state is doing to address the discrepancies.
'If any students are identified as neither vaccinated nor exempted (medical or religious), the accreditation team identifies that as a 'finding, which requires the school district to resolve the deficit,' Department of Education spokeswoman Nancy Van Der Weide said in written statement. 'If the school takes action to correct the situation within the allotted timeframe, the district receives accreditation. If they fail to do so, the school may be placed on probation or ultimately suspended.'
As of Friday, Van Der Weide had not identified which schools, if any, are currently on probation or facing suspension over vaccination exemption issues.
Upland Colony Elementary near Letcher, within the Sanborn Central School District, is one such school where the data does not add up. Laura Licht is an administrative assistant with the district. She said students at the colony have filed exemptions, and the data may not be getting pulled properly by the state.
Vander Vorst said his school district of 36 kindergarteners includes three Hutterite colony schools in its borders, and he said that likely contributes to the county's low vaccination rate. The numbers show that Faulkton Area School's kindergarten vaccination rate for required immunizations was 77% last year, while the rates for the three colony schools in the district ranged from zero to 50%.
Josh Oltmanns, CEO and elementary principal of Hanson School District, echoed that. The vaccination rate among kindergarteners at Hanson Elementary last year was 94%. The rates at the district's colony schools were as low as 50%.
'I'd bet, if you look, a lot of these lower school districts have colonies,' Oltmanns said. 'And that's within those peoples' rights.'
It's unclear why Hutterite people would be less supportive of vaccinations now than previously.
South Dakota Searchlight made multiple calls to Hutterite colonies and to educators who serve Hutterite students, but most were unwilling to speak about the potential reasons for vaccine hesitancy. An academic who studies the Hutterite faith said he doesn't know why vaccination rates at colonies would be falling.
At one colony, a member who declined to provide her name said hesitancy is driven by the number of vaccines now being given to children.
'They've added so many more,' she said. 'It's a risk we don't want to take.'
Medical professionals say those fears are unfounded.
The CDC says vaccines contain weakened or killed versions of germs that cause a disease. These elements of vaccines, and other molecules and micro-organisms that stimulate the immune system, are called 'antigens.'
Dr. Allie Alvine, founder of South Dakota Families for Vaccines, said children encounter more antigen exposure during 'one play session in a sandbox' than during an entire vaccine schedule.
'And the ones we expose a child to via vaccination are proven to be good for them,' Alvine said. 'What we expose them to is targeted and saves lives.'
Dr. Ashley Sands, a specialist in pediatric infectious diseases with Sanford Health, said parents are more frequently asking questions about the efficacy of vaccinations. She finds herself debunking some of Kennedy's claims, like rumored links between vaccines and autism.
The claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism originated from a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield, which was discredited due to serious methodological flaws, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and ethical violations. Multiple large-scale studies since then have found no credible evidence supporting the claim. Wakefield lost his medical license, and his paper was retracted.
'The medical community can read the research it conducts,' Sands said. 'Is it not far more likely Kennedy, who has never done medical research nor formally studied medicine, is misinterpreting or misrepresenting the data?'
Sands emphasized that vaccination recommendations are built on decades of peer-reviewed and replicated research.
'A good doctor is keeping up with the medical journals pertinent to their field and adjusting patient recommendations as our shared science evolves,' Sands said. 'Meanwhile, Kennedy is using his position to push conspiracies.'
Sands also hears parents romanticize 'natural immunity' over vaccination. She warns that natural infection with diseases like measles can be deadly. Plus, infants and immunocompromised people rely on those around them to be immune, blocking the disease's spread. If enough people are vaccinated, the disease can't reach those most at risk.
'A child with cancer should have the freedom to go to school without being exposed to illnesses that are easily preventable,' Sands said.
Alvine said vaccine misinformation has taken hold in South Dakota politics. She cited recent failed legislation targeting vaccines, including bills promoting 'conscience exemptions' to vaccination mandates and separating blood donations based on COVID-19 vaccination status — all based on misinformation, Alvine said.
'They prey on parents' fears,' Alvine said. 'Once you instill fear, it's hard to fix that.'
Republican House Majority Leader Scott Odenbach of Spearfish voted for the conscience exemptions bill. He said 'the 'trust the science' phase of COVID' is why people are more vaccine hesitant.
CONTACT US
'I think wisdom is needed to make the distinction between true public health emergencies and those situations, more often, where personal bodily autonomy has to remain inviolate,' Odenbach said.
Alvine said she's trying to educate people to accept vaccines, not force them against their will.
'Anytime we can save a child's life, to grow up and live, it's worth it,' she said. 'It's not, 'Most kids will get through it and be fine.' They will be miserable. A portion will get lifelong, deadly diseases stemming from measles, and some will even die.'
Nearly every child in the U.S. caught measles before the vaccine became available in 1963. In 2000, health officials declared measles eliminated in the U.S. thanks to nearly universal vaccination.
The South Dakota Department of Health declined an interview for this story but provided a statement noting the downward trend in childhood vaccinations is concerning. The department highlighted ongoing marketing efforts, refreshed ad campaigns, and 1,700 more total immunizations – combined among children and adults – administered in 2024 than 2023.
'We can have a positive impact on all health outcomes, including childhood vaccination rates, by addressing access to care, social drivers of health care outcomes, and public awareness campaigns,' the department said.
President Donald Trump's federal spending cuts have included $1.7 million in reduced or eliminated grants to the department, including $83,500 labeled as being for immunizations and vaccines for children.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here's a guide to the latest.
What's going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here's a guide to the latest.

Boston Globe

time28 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

What's going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here's a guide to the latest.

Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT Measles outbreaks. A canceled effort to develop a bird flu vaccine. An infectious new COVID variant and changing federal guidance about who should get boosted. In recent weeks, drama in D.C. has buried several vaccine-related developments. Today's newsletter explains what's new and what it means. COVID What's changed: Last month, health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. What it means: The administration has tried to narrow the pool of people it says should get boosted. But where some of the changes reflect reasonable readings of the science, others do not. Advertisement Dr. Nirav Shah, a top CDC official during the Biden administration, said experts debate whether younger children should get boosted. When Shah was in government, he recommended it. But many other countries don't, noting that most young children have a low risk of serious illness. The mRNA technology used in some COVID shots can also have side effects, including a condition called myocarditis that mostly affects boys and young men. Advertisement But Shah, who previously led Maine's CDC and is now at Colby College, says the evidence is much less debatable in the case of pregnant women. Not only are boosters safe and effective for them, but getting them protects babies in utero and up to 6 months old The way Kennedy made the changes has also troubled experts. Normally, health agencies gather outside advisers' input before making new recommendations. But Kennedy seems to have acted unilaterally. His announcement, made in a minutelong social media video, 🎁 ). 'What it suggests is that some of the conclusions are foregone,' Shah said. Kennedy argues that health experts made mistakes that undermined public trust during the pandemic. Shah acknowledges that, to a point. Some experts, he said, tried to squelch dissenting views or didn't effectively communicate that scientists' understanding of COVID would evolve, causing confusion when public health guidance changed. Other experts overstated 🎁 ). But the administration's approach risks sowing further confusion. Kennedy's announcement conflicts with an article that two Trump-appointed FDA officials published days earlier, which listed pregnancy as one factor that puts women ' 'What worries me is that when we get into another emergency situation, if trust in federal health authorities has waned, that's a problem,' Shah said. Advertisement Meanwhile, COVID keeps evolving. A variant called NB.1.8.1 has recently driven up cases in China and elsewhere. But for now, Shah isn't hugely concerned. NB.1.8.1 descended from Omicron, a variant that swept the United States in late 2021 and early 2022. So even if cases rise, existing vaccines and antibodies from prior infection will likely help protect against severe illness. The World Health Organization says the new variant ' Bird flu What's changed: A few months ago, bird flu was spreading rapidly among cows and chickens, What it means: Bird flu may be seasonal, which Given the uncertainty, some experts have faulted the administration for Advertisement Measles What's changed: Cases of the highly contagious virus continue to rise nationwide, but slowly. The largest outbreak, in West Texas, seems to be abating. Three Americans have died this year, all unvaccinated. What it means: A slowing case rate is good news, although many more people could have gotten sick than the official numbers reflect. The measles vaccine is safe, highly effective, and decades old, but Kennedy was slow to full-throatedly recommend it as the outbreak grew. 🧩 3 Down: 90° POINTS OF INTEREST Bob Lamb, who operates his gunsmithing business out of his garage in Cheshire, Mass., says the area has a "hunting culture." Erin Clark/Globe Staff Boston War of words: The US attorney for Massachusetts accused Boston Mayor Michelle Wu of making ' Dueling claims: Democratic activists asked a state agency to investigate Josh Kraft's mayoral campaign for allegedly Secret proceedings: A closed hearing begins in Boston today to determine whether a former Stoughton police deputy chief should lose his ability to work as an officer Evolving: A Boston nonprofit that launched after George Floyd's murder is navigating a backlash to Massachusetts and New England Karen Read retrial: The defense called a snowplow driver, who testified that he Market Basket case: Who's who in the latest Proxy fight: Representative Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts is running to become the top Democrat on an important House committee. His challengers Gun rights: Massachusetts has one of the country's strictest gun-control laws. But guns are ubiquitous in some towns — including Mount Katahdin deaths: Rescuers Trump administration One big bill: Trump's tax cut legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, a nonpartisan congressional agency found. Trump has Latest salvo: Elon Musk urged Republican lawmakers Weaponizing government: Trump directed his administration to investigate Joe Biden and his aides, alleging they hid Biden's decline and that some of his actions weren't legally valid. ( Russia-Ukraine war: Trump spoke with Vladimir Putin and said the Russian leader had pledged to retaliate against Ukraine's drone attack on Russian airfields last weekend. ( Israel-Hamas war: The United States vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. ( The Nation and the World Trans rights: Nebraska's governor signed a law banning transgender athletes from girls' sports. About half of states have similar bans. ( Overstaying their welcome: About 400,000 tourists who stayed in the United States longer than their visas allow — like the suspect in the Boulder, Colo., attack did — Explosive find: Officials in Cologne, Germany, temporarily evacuated 20,000 residents after construction work unearthed three unexploded US bombs from World War II. Experts defused them in about an hour. ( BESIDE THE POINT By Teresa Hanafin 💧 More rain this weekend: Either Boston is in 🎵 Rick Astley has the last laugh: 'Never Gonna Give You Up' has hit 1 billion streams on Spotify. 🦈 Films inspired by 'Jaws': From asthmatic sharks to 18-foot bears, here are some of the 🐔 Chicken wars: Mickey D's is bringing back the Snack Wrap after nine years because of demand — and the success of similar wraps from Burger King and Wendy's. ( 🏠 3 summer home rehabs: In downtown Burlington, Vt., Advertisement ⛱️ Beach etiquette: Don't encroach, block views, shake sand, disrespect wildlife, or do other things that are hallmarks of an obnoxious beachgoer. ( Thanks for reading Starting Point. NOTE: A 🎁 emoji indicates a gift link. A $ is a subscription site that does not offer gift links. This newsletter was edited and produced by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

What patients can expect from the new leader of a South Florida hospital system
What patients can expect from the new leader of a South Florida hospital system

Miami Herald

time29 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

What patients can expect from the new leader of a South Florida hospital system

The University of Miami Health System has a new leader. Dr. Dipen Parekh, a surgeon who led the hospital system through the COVID-19 pandemic, will now serve as UHealth's chief executive officer and UM's executive vice president for Health Affairs. As UHealth CEO, Parekh will oversee the more than 17,500 employees who work across the hospital system at more than 100 facilities, including Bascom Palmer Institute, the nation's top hospital for opthalmology, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, the only National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in South Florida. The urologic oncologist wants UM to 'push the frontiers of research.' That goal may be challenging at a time when more than 1,000 research grants in the country have been terminated by the federal government, according to a database created by two scientists documenting the terminations and as reported by STAT News. Parekh also sees more AI in the future of healthcare in South Florida. 'The demand for our services is increasing every day, and our responsibility is to meet that demand without compromising the excellence that defines UHealth,' Parekh told the Miami Herald Wednesday in an email. 'To do so, we must continue to improve how patients access our care—whether that's through new locations, more efficient systems, or advanced technologies. Artificial intelligence will play a key role in this effort. 'AI holds tremendous promise in helping us make smarter decisions, improve outcomes, and enhance the experience for both patients and providers.' UM's Board of Trustees unanimously agreed this week to promote Parekh, UHealth's chief operating officer and a longtime urology chair at UM's medical school, to CEO. The surgeon will takes over the top job from Joseph Echevarria, who since 2024 has juggled the jobs of UM and UHealth president and UHealth CEO. Echevarria will remain president. Parekh considers expansion to be one of the health system's greatest challenges — and opportunities — and has played a key role in UHealth's recent push into North Miami-Dade and Doral, one of South Florida's hottest growing medical hubs. Like other health systems, UHealth is trying to bring care closer to patients, a strategy to not only improve access to care, but to also attract and retain patients and employees. 'Dipen has played a pivotal role each step of the way as the University of Miami Health System has grown into one of the top academic medical centers in the country,' Echevarria said in a statement. 'He understands the mission —from the operating room to the classroom to the boardroom — and he embodies the excellence we strive to deliver for our patients, students, and community.' Who is UHealth's new CEO? UHealth is now the second hospital system in South Florida to be currently led by a physician. The veteran surgeon, one of UM's highest paid employees, has performed more than 6,000 robotic urologic cancer surgeries and has published more than 200 peer-reviewed publications, including a 'groundbreaking trial, published in The Lancelet in 2018, which established the efficacy of robotic-assisted surgery for bladder cancer,' according to the university. Parekh joined UM's medical school in 2012 as the chair of urology and is also the founding director of the Desai Seithi Urology Institute. He became chief clinical officer, his first system-wide administrative role, in 2017, before becoming chief operating officer in 2020, when COVID struck and hospitals became overwhelmed with sick patients. Besides being tasked with overseeing UHealth's day-to-day operations, Parekh in 2021 was also made executive dean for clinical affairs at UM's Miller School of Medicine. Becker's Hospital Review named him among the top 60 academic health system COO's to know in 2024. The private university declined to reveal is new salary. For years, UHealth has been the only academic health system in South Florida although that will change once Baptist Health South Florida finalizes the process of becoming the future teaching hospital of Florida International University. FIU has tapped Nicklaus Children's Health System to be its pediatric teaching hospital. UHealth's teaching hospital is Jackson Memorial, part of Miami-Dade's public hospital network. At UM's medical school and health system, researchers have long tackled infectious diseases, cancer treatments and therapies, Alzheimer's, dementia, genetic diseases and many other conditions. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis is working with Elon Musk's startup company Neuralink to test whether its brain chip can give people who are paralyzed the ability to use mind to wirelessly control computers, smartphones and other electronic devices. 'Our role as an academic health system is not just to care for patients, but to lead in innovation, discovery, and training the next generation of healthcare leaders,' said Parekh, who plans to keep caring for patients while serving as CEO. 'That's what sets us apart — and that's what we'll continue to build on.'

Hiltzik: Study finds removing school mask mandates contributed to 22,000 U.S. COVID deaths in a year
Hiltzik: Study finds removing school mask mandates contributed to 22,000 U.S. COVID deaths in a year

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hiltzik: Study finds removing school mask mandates contributed to 22,000 U.S. COVID deaths in a year

Someday we Americans may stop quarreling over our response to the COVID-19 pandemic — lockdown orders, social distancing and so forth — but one category of debate may never become immune to second-guessing. That's the impact of anti-pandemic measures on schools and schoolchildren. According to popular opinion, these were almost entirely mistaken or ineffective. A newly published study from data scientists at Michigan State University knocks one pillar out from under this claim. It finds that the abrupt removal in 2022 of mandates that children wear masks in school contributed to an estimated 21,800 COVID deaths that year — a shocking 9% of the total COVID deaths in the U.S. that year. COVID-19 is less of a threat to children than accidents or the common flu. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya (2022) gets an assessment of child health dead wrong "We were surprised by that too," says Scott A. Imberman, a professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State and a co-author of the paper. On reflection, he says, given the mixing of children and staff in the close quarters of a classroom, "it's pretty easy to see how COVID could propagate to the wider community." In February 2022, about 50% of public school children, or more than 20 million pupils, were in districts with mask mandates; then, over a period of six weeks, almost all those districts rescinded their mandates. "You can see how that would create a pretty substantial surge in infections." Most of the surge, Imberman told me, was a "spillover effect" in the communities outside the schools themselves. The Michigan State finding undermines several myths and misrepresentations about COVID spread by the right wing. These include the claim that children are virtually impervious to COVID, which has been refuted by the injury and death toll among children. A related misrepresentation was that children can't pass on the infection to adults. In fact, because many children didn't show symptoms of the infection or had only mild, flu-like symptoms, they functioned almost like an undetected fifth column in spreading the virus to adults. Read more: Hiltzik: Stanford throws a party for purveyors of misinformation and disinformation about COVID Among those who vociferously promoted these myths is Jay Bhattacharya, the former Stanford medical professor who is now director of the National Institutes of Health, a subagency of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services. In a July 2022 op-ed originally published in the Orange County Register, for example, Bhattacharya and a co-author asserted that "COVID-19 is less of a threat to children than accidents or the common flu"; that's debatable, and irrelevant, since those are themselves major threats to child health. The article advocated discontinuing mask-wearing for all children, regardless of their vaccination status. But it was self-refuting, since it also acknowledged that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that mask mandates in school had produced "a roughly 20% reduction in COVID-19 incidence." The authors also acknowledged that masking in schools could help to shield adults from COVID. But they asked, "Since when is it ethical to burden children for the benefit of adults?" That was the wrong question. Reducing COVID infections for children was certainly not a "burden" on them, but a sound public health goal. How heavy was that "burden," anyway? Bhattacharya and his co-author posited that "masking is a psychological stressor for children and disrupts learning," and "it is likely that masking exacerbates the chances that a child will experience anxiety and depression." This sounds like guesswork derived from pop psychology, since the authors didn't point to any actual research to validate their conclusions about masking. Nevertheless, they argued that the drawbacks of masking exceeded the benefits. Yet the Michigan State estimate that the removal of mask mandates in the schools contributed to 21,800 deaths in 2022 alone turns the balance of costs and benefits on its head. I asked Health and Human Services for Bhattacharya's response to the study but received no reply. Read more: Hiltzik: These 'experts' sold the U.S. on a disastrous COVID plan, and never paid a professional price Much of the mythmaking about our pandemic response — indeed, the global pandemic response — is rooted in the absurd conviction that everything we now know about COVID was self-evident from the outset. But COVID was a novel human pathogen. As I wrote in 2022, there was little consensus about how it spread, at what stage of sickness it was most contagious, or who was most susceptible. As a result, most anti-pandemic policies in 2020-22 arose from an excess of caution. Mitigation measures were uncertain, but it did make sense to limit gatherings in small spaces, i.e., classrooms. Many such steps turned out to be effective, including social distancing and, yes, mask-wearing. The subsequent hand-wringing over school closings, accordingly, has the unmistakable smell of hindsight. Not 20/20 hindsight, mind you, but hindsight clouded by ideology, partisan politics and persistent ignorance. For example, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican champion of letting COVID-19 freely rip through his population, crowed that the results 'prove that we made the right decision' to keep schools open. Is that so? When Florida reopened its schools in August 2021 and banned remote teaching, child COVID deaths in the state more than doubled. One month into the reopenings, the heightened spread of COVID prompted districts across the state to shut down schools again and impose quarantines affecting thousands of pupils. This is how manifestly deadly decisions get redefined as "the right decision" in the partisan narrative. The Michigan State team documented the speed at which school mask mandates were dropped. The timeline begins in July 2021, when the CDC recommended universal masking in schools to enable a return to in-person instruction rather than fully remote or hybrid classes. The CDC's guidelines, the Michigan State study says, applied to all students whether they were vaccinated or not and all school districts, whatever the levels of COVID infection and transmission within their community. In the fall of 2021, about 65% of all students were subject to a state or local mask mandate. The mask mandates were highly controversial: "Many schools encountered pushback from politicians, parents, and community members" who questioned the efficacy of masking, the study relates. The districts that rejected the mandates tended to be "less urban, less diverse, and more likely to have voted for Trump in the 2020 election." On Feb. 25, 2022, the CDC eliminated its recommendation for universal school masking. Its rationale was that the exceptionally contagious Omicron variant of COVID had passed its peak and thus immunity had increased. But many districts had removed their mandates starting several weeks before the CDC revised its guidance, suggesting that the CDC was following, rather than leading, state and local preferences. The removal of mask mandates ran counter to scientific evidence that masks did indeed reduce the spread of COVID. Indeed, a study from Boston and Chelsea, Mass., found that the removal of mask mandates resulted in an increase of 45 COVID cases per 1,000 students and school staff — nearly 12,000 new cases — over the following four months. But in this particular, as in others related to pandemic policies, politics and ideology trumped the hard evidence, warping the public health response. Bhattacharya's record as an authority on pandemic measures is not encouraging. He was one of the original three authors of the 'Great Barrington Declaration,' a manifesto for herd immunity published in October 2020. The core of the declaration was opposition to lockdowns. Its solution was what its drafters called 'focused protection' — allowing 'those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk,' chiefly seniors. Read more: Hiltzik: COVID deniers claim a new study says mask mandates don't work. They should try reading it Focused protection, the drafters wrote, would allow society to achieve herd immunity and return to normality in three to six months. The declaration was essentially a libertarian fantasy. It contemplated sequestering seniors at home, without addressing how they would be kept fed and healthy. Nor did it address multigenerational households, in which millions of vulnerable elders live. Older family members, the declaration authors wrote, 'might temporarily be able to live with an older friend or sibling, with whom they can self-isolate together during the height of community transmission. As a last resort, empty hotel rooms could be used for temporary housing.' These never sounded like credible options. In his op-ed, Bhattacharya engaged in hand-waving about the toll of COVID on children, nearly 1,700 of whom died of COVID, according to the CDC. Bhattacharya calculated that school masking "might prevent one child death ... a tiny fraction of the approximately 900 deaths of children 5 to 17 years old in 2019. If the aim is to save children's lives, other interventions — like enhanced pool safety — would be much more effective." Yet death is not the only serious outcome from COVID. More than 14,000 children were hospitalized for COVID during the pandemic, according to the CDC. An untold number of them may suffer from long COVID or other lifelong manifestations of the disease. That should have given Bhattacharya pause before dismissing the efficacy of mask-wearing in schools, but there's no evidence that it has done so. The most important question raised by the Michigan State study is what it tells us about pandemic policies for the future. School closures and more general pandemic effects wreaked havoc on learning in the U.S. "The politics of masking got conflated with school closures," Imberman says. But masking was a "much lower-cost intervention than closing the schools." In fact, it was "a way out of closing the schools." So lumping it in with school closures is a mistake. Will we learn from the experience? Considering the current level of policymaking at Kennedy's Health and Human Services, sadly, there's reason to be doubtful. Get the latest from Michael HiltzikCommentary on economics and more from a Pulitzer Prize me up. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store