
The real work of nation building begins on the front line
The budget should serve the people. Yet, in too many South African communities, the teachers, nurses, and doctors who are needed most are not in the classrooms or clinics – they are unemployed, fighting for the chance to serve. The question is not whether the state employs too many people but rather whether it employs them where and when they are needed. This is the real challenge behind the politically contested public sector wage bill discourse: how do we invest in a workforce that actually builds our nation?
As the third iteration of the 2025 budget is tabled during Workers' Month, we are presented with a timely opportunity to shift the national conversation towards real solutions. The discourse around the public sector wage bill has become needlessly divisive at a moment when our country needs unity, clarity, and a government that brings people together.
'Bloated' public workforce vs frontline staff shortages
The public sector wage bill – sometimes criticised as 'bloated' – has in recent years become one of the most politically charged aspects of our national budget and often a scapegoat for the deep challenges facing public service delivery. As it accounts for around 35-40% of government spending, critics have increasingly pressured National Treasury to reduce it in the name of budget restraint and efficiency.
However, when one walks into any public clinic or school, the story on the ground is different. No one is complaining about too many doctors for the patients or too many teachers for the learners. If anything, the opposite is true: long queues, overworked nurses, and overcrowded classrooms have all undermined the quality and reach of basic services.
The contradiction is even clearer when placed alongside the country's mounting teacher, nurse and doctor shortages. As of 2024, there were over 30 000 teaching vacancies, nearly 16 000 nursing vacancies, and 1 800 vacant doctor posts in our public health system.
However, when one walks into any public clinic or school, the story on the ground is very different. No one is complaining about too many doctors for the patients or too many teachers for the learners. If anything, the opposite is true: long queues, overworked nurses, and overcrowded classrooms have all undermined the quality and reach of basic services. The contradiction is even clearer when placed alongside the country's mounting teacher, nurse and doctor shortages. As of 2024, there were over 30 000 teaching vacancies, nearly 16 000 nursing vacancies, and 1 800 vacant doctor posts in our public health system.
Clearly, something is off. Thousands of trained professionals remain unemployed, while the public services that rely on them are under extreme strain. The tension remains, though spending on public employees is perceived as too high for the value it delivers, yet frontline shortages in schools and clinics remain impossible to ignore.
A chance to finally get the public workforce right
South Africa doesn't necessarily have too many public workers, we have too few in the right places. The real issue is not the absolute size of the public sector wage bill, but its composition and effectiveness. While some state-owned enterprises and government departments have faced legitimate scrutiny for top-heavy wage structures, this critique does not apply across the board. In fact, labour-intensive services like education and health face the opposite imbalance: they are under-resourced at the frontline, weakening the quality of public services South Africans rely on.
Put differently: South Africa doesn't need a smaller public sector; we need a smarter one. One that prioritises frontline staffing, corrects structural imbalances, and ensures that every rand spent translates into better services for all. Budget 3.0 is a powerful opportunity to make this a reality.
A Budget 3.0 that builds a functioning public sector
In a bid to contain the public sector wage bill, the government has been blunt with a response characterised by ceilings, freezes on posts, and limiting headcounts of frontline services. However, this approach has come at a high cost with little to show for it. Rather than eliminating inefficiency, the government has effectively eroded the very frontline capacity our public services depend on – teachers, nurses, and doctors, while delivering little in the way of long-term savings or improved outcomes. The finance minister's welcome course correction acknowledges that the austerity, characterised by blunt measures like hiring freezes and headcount limitations, has not been effective in building a public sector that works for all. Schools and healthcare facilities face greater constraints in delivering quality public services for all, while wasteful and irregular spending continues without much recourse.
Now is the opportunity for the finance minister to table a budget that pays more than lip service towards course correction, not with symbolic cuts, but with strategic investment. A budget that builds a nation must take seriously the need to absorb skilled, unemployed professionals into our public sector. Not only will this reduce joblessness, but it will also restore the functionality of services people rely on every day.
Reinvesting in public services, the right way
Rather than blanket cuts, Treasury must adopt a targeted approach that protects and expands frontline posts in education and health, where human resource shortages are well-documented and the returns to nation-building are immediate. Despite the deeply regressive proposal of a VAT hike, Budgets 1.0 and 2.0 showed early signs of promise on the expenditure side, with commitments to strengthen basic education and health care. That momentum must be reinforced rather than being reversed.
This investment is not only urgent, but possible without resorting to a VAT hike. The now-scrapped VAT increase would have raised an estimated R11.5 billion this year, after accounting for zero-rating, but that same revenue space can be secured through more progressive means. As part of the Budget Justice Coalition (BJC), we have proposed alternatives that include targeting illicit financial flows and tax evasion (estimated at up to R800 billion), sustainably drawing on available reserves such as the Gold and Foreign Exchange Contingency Reserve Account (GFECRA) (R150-250 billion), and temporarily freezing GEPF contributions (R15-30 billion) as a stopgap for 2025/26 while longer-term reforms are pursued.
A meaningful response to fiscal pressure must begin with a top-down efficiency review to reduce bloated management layers and redirect resources to where they are most needed. Treasury should also reform budget structures to enable departments to prioritise service delivery and report on outcomes, not just spending. Finally, greater transparency around staffing, vacancies, and absorption rates can help rebuild public trust and ensure that budget decisions reflect both fairness and value. Budget 3.0 can be a turning point if it focuses on restoring the state's capacity to serve and shifting the public wage bill debate from cost to value.
Budget 3.0 is a test, not just of Treasury's numbers, but of its nation-building vision. In a moment of contention and contradiction, the government has the chance to table a budget that restores frontline capacity, affirms public dignity, and builds the South Africa we all deserve to live in.
Lencoasa is a budget analyst at SECTION27 and chairperson of the Budget Justice Coalition.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'
Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far' Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, says he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president (Kevin Dietsch) (Kevin Dietsch/GETTY IMAGESvia AFP) Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said Wednesday he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on his social media platform X, in a message that was received favorably by the White House. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with "serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public since Thursday last week -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. ADVERTISEMENT Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. Trump also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." But after Musk's expression of regret, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump was "appreciative," adding that "no efforts" had been made on a threat by Trump to end some of Musk's government contracts. "The president acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning, and he is appreciative of it," Leavitt said. ADVERTISEMENT According to the New York Times, Musk's message followed a phone call to Trump late on Monday night. Vice President JD Vance and Chief of Staff Susan Wiles had also been working with Musk on how to broker a truce with Trump, the report said. - 'Wish him well' - In his post on Wednesday, Musk did not specify which of his criticisms of Trump had gone "too far." The former allies had seemed to have cut ties amicably about two weeks ago, with Trump giving Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days, with Musk describing the spending bill as an "abomination" that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back at Musk's comments in an Oval Office diatribe and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. ADVERTISEMENT Trump later said on his Truth Social platform that cutting billions of dollars in subsidies and contracts to Musk's companies would be the "easiest way" to save the US government money. US media have put the value of the contracts at $18 billion. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both already appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." Trump had spoken to NBC on Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sex trafficking. bur-arp/aha


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Bessent says report he called Musk ‘a fraud' is ‘fake news'
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent addressed his reported clashes with Elon Musk during a congressional hearing on Wednesday, rejecting claims that he called Musk a 'fraud' as 'fake news.' After Musk's explosive fallout with President Trump last week, longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon told The Washington Post that the tech billionaire and Bessent had a physical altercation, which the White House denied, and that Bessent called Musk 'a total fraud' in a heated exchange about the Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)'s efforts to cut government spending. Bannon helmed the conservative outlet Breitbart News for several years until his ouster from the site in 2018, following a brief stint in Trump's first administration. 'I know Elon Musk body checked you at the White House,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) said to Bessent during Ways & Means hearing on the Treasury Department. 'You know that?' Bessent shot back. 'You believe what you read on Breitbart, that's what you are telling this Congress.' Coincidentally, Bessent recently quoted a Breitbart article on the social platform X in response to mass protests in Los Angeles against Trump's immigration crackdown. Gomez continued in the hearing, 'If it's too sensitive for you, I won't ask that question,' prompting a retort from the South Carolina native with an apparent strike at South African-born Musk. 'I'll take South Carolina over South Africa any day,' Bessent said. Trump confirmed that Musk and Bessent had 'a little bit of a shouting match' but denied it turned violent. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' the president told reporters at the White House on Monday.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
"They went too far": Elon Musk expresses "regret" for posts attacking Trump
Elon Musk is walking back his attacks against President Donald Trump. Just days after a furious barrage of posts on X, the Tesla CEO is trying to make amends. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week," the former director of DOGE wrote in a late-night post on X. "They went too far." On June 5, as part of an ongoing feud between him and Trump, Musk made a post on X alleging that the president was listed in the so-called Epstein files. "That is the real reason they have not been made public," the South African billionaire said. Trump responded by saying that Musk was "upset" over canceled mandates for electric vehicles. "We took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said. "They're having a hard time with electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidies," he said, later adding that he was considering cancelling Musk's government this response, Tesla stock initially fell 8% before bottoming out at 14.3% at the end of the day. The drop saw Tesla lose $150 billion in market value. The economic hit to Musk was staggering, as $34 billion disappeared from his personal wealth. This might be Musk's second olive branch. On June 8, Musk shared a post from Trump on X, in which the president declared an "invasion" in Los Angeles, proclaiming that it will be "set free." Musk added two American flag emojis to his repost.