logo
The real work of nation building begins on the front line

The real work of nation building begins on the front line

News2420-05-2025

The budget should serve the people. Yet, in too many South African communities, the teachers, nurses, and doctors who are needed most are not in the classrooms or clinics – they are unemployed, fighting for the chance to serve. The question is not whether the state employs too many people but rather whether it employs them where and when they are needed. This is the real challenge behind the politically contested public sector wage bill discourse: how do we invest in a workforce that actually builds our nation?
As the third iteration of the 2025 budget is tabled during Workers' Month, we are presented with a timely opportunity to shift the national conversation towards real solutions. The discourse around the public sector wage bill has become needlessly divisive at a moment when our country needs unity, clarity, and a government that brings people together.
'Bloated' public workforce vs frontline staff shortages
The public sector wage bill – sometimes criticised as 'bloated' – has in recent years become one of the most politically charged aspects of our national budget and often a scapegoat for the deep challenges facing public service delivery. As it accounts for around 35-40% of government spending, critics have increasingly pressured National Treasury to reduce it in the name of budget restraint and efficiency.
However, when one walks into any public clinic or school, the story on the ground is different. No one is complaining about too many doctors for the patients or too many teachers for the learners. If anything, the opposite is true: long queues, overworked nurses, and overcrowded classrooms have all undermined the quality and reach of basic services.
The contradiction is even clearer when placed alongside the country's mounting teacher, nurse and doctor shortages. As of 2024, there were over 30 000 teaching vacancies, nearly 16 000 nursing vacancies, and 1 800 vacant doctor posts in our public health system.
However, when one walks into any public clinic or school, the story on the ground is very different. No one is complaining about too many doctors for the patients or too many teachers for the learners. If anything, the opposite is true: long queues, overworked nurses, and overcrowded classrooms have all undermined the quality and reach of basic services. The contradiction is even clearer when placed alongside the country's mounting teacher, nurse and doctor shortages. As of 2024, there were over 30 000 teaching vacancies, nearly 16 000 nursing vacancies, and 1 800 vacant doctor posts in our public health system.
Clearly, something is off. Thousands of trained professionals remain unemployed, while the public services that rely on them are under extreme strain. The tension remains, though spending on public employees is perceived as too high for the value it delivers, yet frontline shortages in schools and clinics remain impossible to ignore.
A chance to finally get the public workforce right
South Africa doesn't necessarily have too many public workers, we have too few in the right places. The real issue is not the absolute size of the public sector wage bill, but its composition and effectiveness. While some state-owned enterprises and government departments have faced legitimate scrutiny for top-heavy wage structures, this critique does not apply across the board. In fact, labour-intensive services like education and health face the opposite imbalance: they are under-resourced at the frontline, weakening the quality of public services South Africans rely on.
Put differently: South Africa doesn't need a smaller public sector; we need a smarter one. One that prioritises frontline staffing, corrects structural imbalances, and ensures that every rand spent translates into better services for all. Budget 3.0 is a powerful opportunity to make this a reality.
A Budget 3.0 that builds a functioning public sector
In a bid to contain the public sector wage bill, the government has been blunt with a response characterised by ceilings, freezes on posts, and limiting headcounts of frontline services. However, this approach has come at a high cost with little to show for it. Rather than eliminating inefficiency, the government has effectively eroded the very frontline capacity our public services depend on – teachers, nurses, and doctors, while delivering little in the way of long-term savings or improved outcomes. The finance minister's welcome course correction acknowledges that the austerity, characterised by blunt measures like hiring freezes and headcount limitations, has not been effective in building a public sector that works for all. Schools and healthcare facilities face greater constraints in delivering quality public services for all, while wasteful and irregular spending continues without much recourse.
Now is the opportunity for the finance minister to table a budget that pays more than lip service towards course correction, not with symbolic cuts, but with strategic investment. A budget that builds a nation must take seriously the need to absorb skilled, unemployed professionals into our public sector. Not only will this reduce joblessness, but it will also restore the functionality of services people rely on every day.
Reinvesting in public services, the right way
Rather than blanket cuts, Treasury must adopt a targeted approach that protects and expands frontline posts in education and health, where human resource shortages are well-documented and the returns to nation-building are immediate. Despite the deeply regressive proposal of a VAT hike, Budgets 1.0 and 2.0 showed early signs of promise on the expenditure side, with commitments to strengthen basic education and health care. That momentum must be reinforced rather than being reversed.
This investment is not only urgent, but possible without resorting to a VAT hike. The now-scrapped VAT increase would have raised an estimated R11.5 billion this year, after accounting for zero-rating, but that same revenue space can be secured through more progressive means. As part of the Budget Justice Coalition (BJC), we have proposed alternatives that include targeting illicit financial flows and tax evasion (estimated at up to R800 billion), sustainably drawing on available reserves such as the Gold and Foreign Exchange Contingency Reserve Account (GFECRA) (R150-250 billion), and temporarily freezing GEPF contributions (R15-30 billion) as a stopgap for 2025/26 while longer-term reforms are pursued.
A meaningful response to fiscal pressure must begin with a top-down efficiency review to reduce bloated management layers and redirect resources to where they are most needed. Treasury should also reform budget structures to enable departments to prioritise service delivery and report on outcomes, not just spending. Finally, greater transparency around staffing, vacancies, and absorption rates can help rebuild public trust and ensure that budget decisions reflect both fairness and value. Budget 3.0 can be a turning point if it focuses on restoring the state's capacity to serve and shifting the public wage bill debate from cost to value.
Budget 3.0 is a test, not just of Treasury's numbers, but of its nation-building vision. In a moment of contention and contradiction, the government has the chance to table a budget that restores frontline capacity, affirms public dignity, and builds the South Africa we all deserve to live in.
Lencoasa is a budget analyst at SECTION27 and chairperson of the Budget Justice Coalition.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's next for Elon Musk?
What's next for Elon Musk?

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What's next for Elon Musk?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Elon Musk is retreating from Washington D.C., with his sights now set as far away as Mars. After announcing his departure from the Trump administration this week, the South African-born tycoon is "ready to get obsessed with his companies again", said The Wall Street Journal. And just in time: when it comes to his business ventures, Musk has "a lot to contend with". A return to politics seems unlikely; in Trump's "rapidly evolving" second presidency, Musk's "monopoly" on the political news cycle "seems to have broken", said Politico, particularly as polling suggests that's he's "increasingly unpopular" – in fact, "far more so" than Trump. Musk "met his political Waterloo" in Wisconsin's supreme court race, said David Smith in The Guardian, where despite his spending at least $3 million (£2.2 million) and making personal appearances on the campaign trail, the Republican candidate he backed lost by 10 percentage points. The writing was on the wall: Musk and his "chainsaw" task force have become a "political liability" for Republicans. Politics has been "central to Musk's identity over much of the past year", said Trisha Thadani and Elizabeth Dwoskin in The Washington Post, but he's become "disillusioned" with the impact that his money can make in politics and would now prefer to "spend his time and fortune elsewhere". That means a return to his businesses. At Tesla, the "backlash" over Musk's political activities has "sparked concerns" among investors, said Gregory Korte in Bloomberg. Vehicle sales fell to a nearly three-year low and the stock price "plummeted" as he became a key figure in Trump's regime. Tesla showrooms were picketed by protesters, while its vehicles and charging stations became targets for vandalism. Musk sees autonomous technology as the future of Tesla, and the company is "counting on" that sector for a "new wave of growth", said The Wall Street Journal. It intends to launch an autonomous ride-hailing service next month, followed in the next few years by the rollout of Cybercab, a self-driving taxi that Musk describes as a $30,000 (£22,000) "lounge on wheels". Musk "hasn't been shy" about how tough it will be to meet his "goals" at SpaceX, either, said The Wall Street Journal. The company is "racing" to develop Starship, the rocket that he wants to send on an un-crewed test mission to Mars next year, when Earth and the red planet will be closer to each other, but a series of technical "setbacks" is making this goal seem increasingly unlikely. The future of his chainsaw department is less clear. He and Trump have declined to "lay out a succession plan" for Doge, said Korte, a project that was Musk's "brainchild". Doge is a "way of life, like Buddhism", he once quipped of its future continuation if he left. "Buddha isn't alive any more," he said. "You wouldn't ask the question: 'who would lead Buddhism?'" The "aggressive cost-cutting efforts", led by a staff appointed by Musk, are expected to "continue" even after he formally leaves his role, said Politico. Musk wrote on X this week that the Doge "mission" will "only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government". Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Bannon Wants Special Counsel Probe Into Musk's Contracts and Drug Use
Bannon Wants Special Counsel Probe Into Musk's Contracts and Drug Use

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bannon Wants Special Counsel Probe Into Musk's Contracts and Drug Use

Steve Bannon has called for a special counsel investigation into Elon Musk's lucrative federal contracts and the extent of his drug use. The MAGA civil war between the two former Trump administration figures continued over the weekend on Sunday Night with Chuck Todd, with Bannon—who already suggested deporting the South African-born tech billionaire—saying Musk should face further consequences. 'I think there have to be formal investigations,' Bannon told the former Meet the Press anchor during a discussion about SpaceX and Starlink, Musk's satellite Wi-Fi service. SpaceX should be nationalized, Bannon reiterated, adding that he shared the White House's reported security concerns about Starlink being installed there. When Todd asked who would be leading such investigations, Bannon replied that 'the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything.' 'Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily. Investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon replied. In May, The New York Times reported that Musk's drug use, which Trump speculated had a role in their blow-up last week, frequently involved ketamine, as well as Adderall, ecstasy and mushrooms. Musk, The New York Times also reported, was alerted to drug tests at SpaceX ahead of time. The White House has refused to say whether Musk was drug tested during his time as de-facto head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. On Sunday, Bannon agreed with Todd when he said that Musk 'never would have passed a security clearance as must a mid-level staffer.' Also on Todd's show, Bannon took issue with a March report that Musk, who has extensive business interests in China, was expected to receive a briefing about potential U.S. military action in that country. 'Why would you need a briefing at a highly classified level, in the tank, at the Pentagon on the China war plan?' asked Bannon, who called Musk an 'agent of influence.' For his part, Musk has described Bannon as a 'communist r-tard' and a 'criminal.' Bannon spent four months in prison last year for defying a Jan. 6 House Committee subpoena. In February, he pleaded guilty in state court to one felony count of scheming to defraud donors to his We Build the Wall fundraising campaign. Four years prior, Trump had pardoned Bannon amid his indictment in federal court over that campaign.

Elon Musk Flexes SpaceX Advantage In Feud With Trump: 'We Have Got The Spaceships And They Do Not' — Gets Support From This Republican
Elon Musk Flexes SpaceX Advantage In Feud With Trump: 'We Have Got The Spaceships And They Do Not' — Gets Support From This Republican

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Flexes SpaceX Advantage In Feud With Trump: 'We Have Got The Spaceships And They Do Not' — Gets Support From This Republican

SpaceX and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk flexed the company's rockets amid a war of words with President Donald Trump on Happened: On Sunday, Musk took to X, formerly Twitter and said, "Whatever happens, we have got the spaceships, and they do not."Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Notably, Musk's comments came after the tech mogul conducted a poll on X, where he asked his over 220 million followers about forming a new political party in the U.S. An overwhelming 80.4% responded in favor. Responding to Musk's post, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) replied, "I don't know if I'm part of 'we' but I would like to formally disassociate myself from the group herein referred to as 'they.'" Musk quickly said, "You're definitely not 'they' and are welcome to be part of 'we'," to which Massie responded with, 'Count me in."Why It's Important: On Friday, the Tesla CEO floated a possible name, "The America Party," following the poll results. The rift between Musk and Trump could have serious implications for Musk's companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, the billionaire's space technology company, particularly if threats to revoke federal contracts and subsidies are carried out. Tesla's market capitalization dropped by a record $152 billion, knocking the company out of the $1 trillion club following Musk's public criticism of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Adding to the pressure, former White House official Steven Bannon has called for a federal investigation into Musk's immigration status, even suggesting that the South African-born U.S. citizen should be deported. He also called on Trump to seize control of SpaceX. He said that he is not asking for the nationalization of SpaceX, but the administration should make sure that the company is not spearheaded by someone who has drug issues. Over the weekend, it was reported that two White House officials have confirmed that the public dispute between Trump and Musk has been temporarily paused. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo Courtesy: RKY Photo on UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elon Musk Flexes SpaceX Advantage In Feud With Trump: 'We Have Got The Spaceships And They Do Not' — Gets Support From This Republican originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store