logo
Army vet's memo to Senator Tillis: This is all your fault

Army vet's memo to Senator Tillis: This is all your fault

Yahoo27-03-2025

U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (left) and Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth (right) (Hegseth photo credit:. Tillis photo via Senate.gov)
Earlier this year, I penned an essay for NC Newsline entitled 'Trump cabinet nominee Pete Hegseth is completely unfit to lead.'
I wish I had been wrong. But given the stunning and maddening revelations about the now infamous Signal chat in which Secretary Hegseth discussed operational attack plans on the Houthi rebel group in Yemen, the accuracy of the piece has been confirmed faster than even I had imagined.
The main point of the essay was that Hegseth was arguably the least qualified cabinet secretary nominee in U.S. history, and that if he was confirmed it could have real and dangerous consequences for our troops in the field and for our country's national security. At the time, I was pleading with North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis and his colleagues to take their job of voting on Hegseth's nomination seriously and to recognize that such a character should never be allowed anywhere near a position of authority in the Pentagon. I have to confess though that I didn't think that Hegseth would prove me right so quickly and in such an egregious way.
The remarkable revelation that Secretary Hegseth and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently invited journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg from The Atlantic, to a text chain that also included Director of National Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard and Vice President JD Vance sounds like the beginning of a bad Saturday Night Live skit. It would be hilarious if the potential consequences hadn't been so dangerous.
Tragically, however, this disaster took place in real life, and because of the gross incompetence and complete lack of judgment by the Trump administration's entire national security team, the troops carrying out this mission could have been killed. The fact that the 'Bad News Bears' of national security officials were openly discussing specific target locations, time and date of the strike, and the specific ammunitions that would be used is beyond unforgiveable. This would be like if in World War II General Eisenhower was openly discussing the exact war plans for the D-Day invasion so the Germans could find out and prepare their defenses.
At a bare minimum, Pete Hegseth and Mike Waltz should be fired. Everyone that was on that chat should be held accountable because discussions like that must be held in what's known as a 'sensitive compartmented information facility,' and they all know that.
If it is even remotely possible to accidentally invite a journalist into a conversation about detailed attack plans, such a conversation should never take place on an app of that kind. It's common sense that even a fifth grader could understand. Unfortunately, Hegseth and crew are either too lazy or just don't care and think that they are all above the law. It is probably a combination of both.
Any military veteran can tell you that if we were ever caught being this incompetent in handling sensitive operational plans that could compromise our fellow soldiers in the field then we would almost certainly be kicked out of the military with a dishonorable discharge and face possible imprisonment at Fort Leavenworth.
Pete Hegseth likes to brag about how he removed DEI from the military and that soldiers will be judged only on their performance and nothing else. Well, now is the time for him to put up or shut up because he fouled up in a monumental way and made it crystal clear that he is completely unfit to lead our brave men and women in uniform. They deserve so much better than him and his lack of leadership.
And speaking of foul-ups, we must not forget Senator Tillis.
Tillis had the chance to show some real courage and backbone by doing the right thing and being the deciding vote to sink Hegseth's nomination. Sadly, and predictably, he chose the coward's way out because he thought it would help him in the Republican primary for next year's Senate election.
And maybe he is right that it will help him in the primary, but it is absolutely going to hurt him in the general election. If the Democrats are smart, then they will repeatedly remind voters that Hegseth's dangerously incompetent performance was only made possible by Tillis's cowardice.
And they'll also remind all voters of the sleazy predicate to Tillis's flipflop on the confirmation vote — the one in which he asked Hegseth's ex-sister-in-law to put her name and reputation on the line with testimony on Hegseth's years of extreme alcohol abuse. Tillis assured Danielle Hegseth that if she came forward that it would be enough to sway his vote and the votes of other senators and sink the nomination. And then after she put her own personal safety at risk by coming forward, he stabbed her in the back for the purpose of his own political expedience. These are the actions of a weak man who, just like Pete Hegseth, is completely unfit to lead.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AOC Brutally Bursts Trump World Bubble On Pete Hegseth's ‘No Leak' Praise
AOC Brutally Bursts Trump World Bubble On Pete Hegseth's ‘No Leak' Praise

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AOC Brutally Bursts Trump World Bubble On Pete Hegseth's ‘No Leak' Praise

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth received praise from President Donald Trump's supporters for not leaking U.S. plans to bomb Iranian nuclear sites ahead of time, prompting ridicule from critics at what they saw as a laughably low bar for congratulations. Newsmax host Todd Starnes was among those who applauded the former Fox News personality, who earlier this year was embroiled in the so-called Signal-gate scandal after The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to a group chat discussing strikes in Yemen. 'Not a single leak. Well done, @SecDef,' Starnes wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Not a single leak. Well done, @SecDef — toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) June 22, 2025 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) led the mockery of such applause. 'This is like applauding a grown man for being able to wipe their behind,' she wrote on X. 'Not exactly a vote of confidence.' This is like applauding a grown man for being able to wipe their exactly a vote of confidence — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 22, 2025 Others echoed the sentiment: This is such an embarrassing new standard to try to celebrate. — Isaac Saul (@Ike_Saul) June 22, 2025 MAGA is seriously out hear praising Hegseth for not leaking military plans in advance. Does he get a cookie for a rare moment of competence?These people are dumb af. — ForeverBlessed (@4evaBlessed23) June 22, 2025 MAGA praising Pete for not leaking war plans again is like giving a toddler a medal for not eating glue—congratulations, he finally did the bare minimum. — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) June 22, 2025 Kayleigh McEnany's 'Every Dictator' Take On Trump Iran Strike Draws Online Fire Critics Point Out Glaring Contradiction In Trump's Iran 'Regime Change' Post JD Vance Roasted For Line That Inadvertently Seemed To Insult Trump Marjorie Taylor Greene Rages Against Trump Iran Strike With Chilling Warning

Live updates: Iran says it launched missiles at U.S. military bases in Qatar and Iraq
Live updates: Iran says it launched missiles at U.S. military bases in Qatar and Iraq

CNBC

time26 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Live updates: Iran says it launched missiles at U.S. military bases in Qatar and Iraq

Traces are seen in the sky after Iran's armed forces say they targeted The Al-Udeid base in a missile attack, in Qatar, June 23, 2025. Stringer | Reuters Iran's armed forces said Monday they carried out missile strikes on U.S. military bases in Qatar and Iraq in response to the U.S. bombings against key Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. This is developing news. Please check back for updates. President Donald Trump in the situation room on June 21st, 2025. Source: The White House Trump is meeting with his national security team this afternoon. A White House official told NBC News the national security team was already meeting in the Situation Room when Iranian missiles were fired at U.S. military bases in Iraq and Qatar. Trump is joined by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine and other top officials. — Christina Wilkie

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran

time29 minutes ago

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran

The war between Israel and Iran has raised concerns that Iran could retaliate by trying to close the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil chokepoint due to the large volumes of crude that pass through it every day. The U.S. military's strike on three sites in Iran over the weekend has raised questions about how its military might respond. The Strait of Hormuz is between Oman and Iran, which boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines as well as missiles that it could use to make the strait impassable, at least for a time. Iran's main naval base at Bandar Abbas is on the north coast of the strait. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea. About 20 million barrels of oil per day, or around 20% of the world's oil consumption, passed through the strait in 2024. Most of that oil goes to Asia. Here is a look at the waterway and its impact on the global economy: The strait connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It's only 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide at its narrowest point, but deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers. Oil that passes through the strait comes from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, and Bahrain, while major supplies of liquefied natural gas come from Qatar. At its narrowest point, the sea lanes for tankers lie in Omani waters, and before and after that cross into Iranian territory. While some global oil chokepoints can be circumvented by taking longer routes that simply add costs, that's not an option for most of the oil moving through the strait. That's because the pipelines that could be used to carry the oil on land, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, they don't have nearly enough capacity. 'Most volumes that transit the strait have no alternative means of exiting the region,' according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. If Iran blocked the strait, oil prices could shoot as high as $120-$130 per, at least temporarily, said Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analyst at Kpler, in an online webinar Sunday. That would deal an inflationary shock to the global economy — if it lasted. Analysts think it wouldn't. Asia would be directly impacted because 84% of the oil moving through the strait is headed for Asia; top destinations are China, India, Japan and South Korea. China gets 47% of its seaborne oil from the Gulf. China, however, has an oil inventory of 1.1 billion barrels, or 2 1/2 months of supply. U.S. oil customers would feel the impact of the higher prices but would not lose much supply. The U.S. imported only about 7% of its oil from Persian Gulf countries through the strait in 2024, according to the USEIA. That was the lowest level in nearly 40 years. Closing the strait would cut off Iran's own oil exports. While Iran does have a new terminal under construction at Jask, just outside the strait, the new facility has loaded oil only once and isn't in a position to replace the strait, according to Kpler analysts. Closure would hit China, Iran's largest trading partner and only remaining oil customer, and harm its oil-exporting Arab neighbors, who are at least officially supporting it in its war with Israel. And it would mean blocking Oman's territorial waters, offending a country that has served as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran. Any price spike would probably not last. One big reason: Analysts expect that the U.S. Navy would intervene to keep the strait open. In the 1980s, U.S. warships escorted Kuwaiti oil tankers through the strait to protect them against Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq war. A price spike 'wouldn't last very long' and the strait would likely be reopened 'very fast,' said Kpler's Falakshahi. U.S. use of force to reopen the strait would likely be supported by Europe and 'even unofficially by China,' he said. 'Iran's navy would probably get destroyed in a matter of hours or days.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store