Most workers can't afford homes in metro Phoenix. These cities are the most affordable
Single women and essential workers cannot afford to buy a median-priced home in most Arizona cities, according to a recent study.
Rapid population growth in the metro Phoenix area has driven up housing prices, making homeownership increasingly difficult for many — despite it being for many a key part of the so-called American dream.
The report, produced by the home improvement brand and TV show This Old House, analyzes homebuying affordability across U.S. cities and states by occupation and household type.
Another recent study from This Old House noted that Phoenix's home construction industry is growing faster than the national average, likely due to the city's rapid population increase. However, this growth has contributed to decreased housing affordability, disproportionately impacting single women and some essential workers, such as educators, in multiple Arizona cities.
Here's everything you need to know about what occupations and household types could most likely afford a median-priced house in Arizona cities.
Housing affordability also varies widely by occupation. Among essential workers, there is not a single city where homeownership costs fall within the recommended affordability range for educators, while health care professionals have the most affordable homeownership options.
Scottsdale consistently ranks as the least affordable Arizona city for most essential occupations. Tucson routinely ranked among the most affordable. Here's how much of their income essential workers would need to spend on homeownership in Arizona cities:
Community and service workers: Scottsdale 182%, Gilbert 121%, Tempe 118%, Chandler 118%, Glendale 115%, Peoria 110%, Mesa 106%, Phoenix 103%, Tucson 89%
Educators: Scottsdale 174%, Gilbert 121%, Chandler 114%, Peoria 112%, Tempe 111%, Mesa 103%, Glendale 100%, Phoenix 98%, Tucson 84%
Health care professionals: Scottsdale 96%, Tempe 75%, Gilbert 72%, Chandler 71%, Peoria 63%, Mesa 60%, Glendale 60%, Phoenix 58%, Tucson 53%
Law enforcement: Scottsdale 107%, Tempe 104%, Glendale 100%, Chandler 85%, Gilbert 80%, Phoenix 77%, Tucson 72%, Mesa 70%, Peoria 63%
Firefighters: Scottsdale 198%, Glendale 144%, Tempe 127%, Peoria 112%, Phoenix 112%, Gilbert 110%, Mesa 100%, Tucson 90%, Chandler 75%
Lawyers: Peoria 86%, Scottsdale 77%, Glendale 76%, Gilbert 73%, Mesa 71%, Chandler 65%, Tucson 62%, Tempe 57%, Phoenix 53%
Metro Phoenix: homes are significantly newer than most US cities. Is that good or bad?
Income disparities play a major role in the financial strain of homeownership across different household types, according to This Old House analysts.
This Old House analyzed data from Zillow and the U.S. Census and found that the average annual cost of homeownership in the U.S. is $45,643. However, how this expense affects households varies widely by income:
Married couples, with a median household income of $115,507 (U.S. Census), spend about 40% of their income on homeownership costs.
Single men, earning a median income of $67,890, spend 67% of their income on these costs.
Single women, with a median income of $49,821, face the greatest burden, needing to spend a staggering 92% of their income on homeownership — leaving little or no room for savings or emergencies.
In many cities, the total housing costs for single women exceed their annual earnings, making homeownership nearly impossible without additional income or financial assistance. This stark imbalance underscores how income inequality affects single earners, particularly women.
The study found no cities nationwide where homeownership costs fall below 30% of a single woman's income. In Arizona, the share of income single women would need to spend to afford a median-priced home is especially high:
Scottsdale: 147% of income
Tempe: 109% of income
Mesa: 105% of income
Chandler: 105% of income
Glendale: 105% of income
Tucson: 104% of income
Phoenix: 103% of income
Peoria: 98% of income
Gilbert: 88% of income
Despite the rising costs, there are also homebuying assistance programs available that can help Arizonans secure loans, find affordable housing and navigate homeownership.
Here's a list of resources for finding affordable places to live and navigating homeownership in Arizona from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development website. You can find the full list on the website.
Get help finding affordable places to live: Speak to a HUD Approved Housing Counselor for advice on your specific housing needs. Search online for a HUD Approved Housing Counselor near you or call 800-569-4287. You can also contact your local Public Housing Authority for information about public housing programs like Housing Choice Vouchers. Arizona's Public Housing Authority phone number is 602-771-1000, or you can call 800-955-2232 for help to find your local Public Housing Authority.
Information about becoming a homeowner: Learn more about homebuying from HUD's website or the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Information about Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans and programs: Visit the Federal Housing Administration Website. You can also call the Federal Housing Administration toll-free at 800-CALL-FHA (800-225-5342) or email the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development at answers@hud.gov.
Information about HUD homes: Use the HUD Home Store to find HUD homes for sale.
This Old House experts also gave the following tips to improve homeownership chances:
Consider smaller cities or urban areas.
Carefully search for homebuyer assistance programs in your state.
Shop around for mortgages; do not settle for the most available program.
Capitalize on market opportunities.
Seek the assistance of a trusted realtor advisor.
Know your financial limits to avoid defaulting on your home.
To estimate the annual homeownership cost, This Old House utilized data on property taxes and income from the U.S. Census American Community Survey and home values for single-family residences from Zillow. For the overall annual cost, they considered the following:
Annual property tax rates were from the U.S. Census.
Annual mortgage costs was calculated based on home values from Zillow and assumed an 8% down payment and a 6.93% mortgage rate.
Annual home maintenance was estimated as 4% of the home value to account for potential high maintenance or repair costs that homeowners may incur due to unforeseen circumstances.
Annual homeowner's insurance estimates were sourced from Quadrant.
Analysts then compared the annual homeownership cost to state and city-level incomes for married couples, single male householders, and single female householders to determine if their incomes could cover annual home costs. Lastly, they examined individual occupational income from the U.S. Census to learn if certain essential occupations could afford home costs in these cities.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: The most affordable cities for home prices in Arizona
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal
(Bloomberg) -- Nippon Steel Corp. won conditional US approval for its $14.1 billion purchase of United States Steel Corp., capping a lengthy saga in a tie-up that will create one of the world's largest steel companies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space In a release Friday, the companies said they've committed to a national security agreement proposed by the Trump administration, which earlier cleared the deal subject to those terms. As part of the $55-per-share deal, the Japanese company will invest an additional $11 billion by 2028, including an initial commitment in a greenfield project that would be completed after 2028. Nippon had previously raised its pledged additional investment in an effort to win President Donald Trump's approval. Nippon Steel will also spend an extra $3 billion after 2028 for a new steel mill, according to people familiar with the matter. That would push the total additional investment — on top of the purchase price — to $14 billion. Earlier Friday, Trump formally opened the door to approving the sale of US Steel by submitting the agreement to the companies and amending former President Joe Biden's move to block the agreement in an executive order. The president's action cleared the sale so long as the companies comply with the government's terms. 'President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs — and he has delivered on that promise,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a written statement. 'Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' Nippon Steel and US Steel in the release said they had received regulatory approvals and that 'the partnership is expected to be finalized promptly.' The deal is expected to close by June 18, the merger agreement deadline, Japan's Nikkei reported on Saturday, without saying where it got the information. Trump earlier this week said the US would receive a so-called golden share in the post-transaction company, though it's not clear what that would entail. The companies confirmed that the US would get a golden share but didn't elaborate. The terms of the security agreement include significant and unprecedented US control measures, as well as certain control over some board seats and requirements that some leadership roles go to American citizens, according to a person familiar with the pact, speaking on condition of anonymity. The golden share does not include an equity stake in the company, the person said. Earlier: Nippon Steel Plans $6 Billion Investment in Its Japanese Mills 'The Japanese government believes that this investment will strengthen the ability of the Japanese and US steel industries to generate new innovation and lead to the strengthening of the close partnership between Japan and the US,' Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yoji Muto, said in a written statement. 'We welcome the decision of the US government.' Trump and Biden as well as former Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned against the deal, before the former president blocked it in January. Trump has since reversed his position, insisting that the agreement would preserve steel jobs in the US. The text of the security agreement hasn't been released. Trump and others have previously announced other elements of the deal, including bonuses to steelworkers, a requirement to keep existing blast furnaces running for a decade, and government veto power to retain control over the board of the US Steel subsidiary. Trump has also hailed the accord as vindication of his trade policies, which have seen the administration levy tariffs in a bid to pressure companies to shift more manufacturing to the US. Japan has been engaging in negotiations with the US over trade in a bid to avoid higher levies Trump has threatened. Trump's decision to champion Nippon Steel's bid offers to provide fresh momentum for those talks. Trump held a rally in Pennsylvania two weeks ago, at US Steel's iconic Mon Valley facility, celebrating the deal with a crowd of steelworkers, even though it had not yet been finalized. Earlier: US, Mexico Near Deal to Cut Steel Duties and Cap Imports Trump also used that event to announce he was doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising them to 50% from 25%. Since that rally, government officials, company executives and deal advisers worked to hammer out the finer details and get the final signatures. The deal creates a combined company that will be the world's second-largest steelmaker. It will become a formidable domestic competitor to Nucor Corp., which for a generation has dominated the American steel industry. The acquisition also clears the way for enhanced steelmaking in areas the US has lagged in recent years, including the type of steel critical to bolster ailing electric grids across the country. The Japanese steelmaker's takeover became a political lightning rod after the leadership of the United Steelworkers – based, like US Steel itself, in Pittsburgh – staunchly opposed the tie-up. Biden sided with them, as did Trump. The deal has taken a winding path with extensions, a Biden block, a legal fight, and then Trump's decision to reexamine it before ultimately clearing it. Nippon Steel and US Steel have steadily tried to address worries, with Vice Chairman Takahiro Mori making repeated visits to the US to clinch the deal. Divisions within the union were laid bare through the process, with local union leaders expressing support for the deal and breaking with their national leadership. Trump's reversal was a few months in the making. In February, he surprised the parties by blessing some kind of a minority stake — an announcement they hadn't been privy to and didn't understand. The deal, then and now, was built on Nippon Steel buying US Steel entirely. The question was mitigation measures. The president said he supported a 'planned partnership' between the companies on May 23, without providing details of an announcement that appeared to bless the original deal with additional mitigation measures. --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Meghashyam Mali and Yoshiaki Nohara. (Updates with potential closing timeframe in eighth paragraph.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
18% of Las Vegas home deals fell through in April — but is it a sign the market is turning in buyers' favor?
Home buyers in Las Vegas are walking away from contracts in increasing numbers. High interest rates, financial anxiety and an oversupplied market are pushing many to rethink their purchases before closing. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) A recent Redfin report found 14.3% of U.S. homes under contract in April were canceled, marking the second-highest April cancellation rate on record, behind only the pandemic-era spike in April 2020. In Las Vegas, the rate was even higher: 18.6% of purchase agreements fell through, placing the city eighth among major U.S. metros for canceled deals. Here are two of the main reasons for the growing trend. Higher mortgage rates and skyrocketing home prices are driving many to the brink. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate hit 6.85% in June, more than double what it was during pandemic lows. That kind of increase can add hundreds — even thousands — to monthly payments when taxes and insurance are included. 'Groceries have been high, gas has been high, utilities have been high,' said Jillian Batchelor, a Southern Nevada realtor, in an interview with 8 News Now. 'So buyers are more payment-conscious or payment-savvy than they really ever have been.' And with inflation still weighing on American households, some prospective buyers are having trouble securing final approval. Others are rethinking whether they can afford the total cost once they see the final numbers — including homeowners association (HOA) fees and insurance premiums. Redfin agents nationwide are also seeing buyers hesitate due to broader economic and political instability — including layoffs, tariffs and federal policy uncertainty. Another recent Redfin survey found that nearly 1 in 4 Americans scrapped plans for a major purchase this year due to tariffs. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it The housing market in Las Vegas is also experiencing a surge in listings. '[A] buyer goes under contract,' Batchelor told 8 News Now. 'And all of a sudden a week later they see, 'oh there's five more homes available in that neighborhood, this one might be nicer, this one might have more upgrades.'' With inventory now at a five-year high nationally, according to Redfin, this scenario is becoming increasingly common — especially in states like Nevada, Texas and Florida, where new home construction has surged. Buyers feel less pressure to settle, knowing there may be better deals just around the corner. That confidence is reshaping buyer behavior. According to Redfin's report, five of the 10 metros with the highest cancellation rates are in Florida — which is a sign that growing supply can tip the scales in favor of consumers. While Las Vegas may be an extreme case, the underlying issues — affordability and market saturation — are national in scope. From Riverside, California to Atlanta, Georgia (which led the country with a 20% contract cancellation rate), buyers are hitting the brakes. This shift may suggest that while the housing market may be cooling, affordability is still out of reach for many Americans. Still, Redfin economists predict some relief later in 2025, with home prices expected to drop modestly as demand softens. In the meantime, buyers are urged to do their research, stay flexible and be ready to walk if the numbers don't add up. As Batchelor put it, 'All of this is just an adjustment to probably (…) equalize the playing field — maybe a little bit more.' Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
No More Student Visas? No Problem.
Just how mad is Beijing about President Donald Trump's decision to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals? Not as mad as it says, and not as mad as one might expect. Publicly, China's leadership will likely complain that Trump's action is yet another attempt to thwart the country's rise. But in reality, Beijing would probably just as soon keep its smartest kids at home. Late last month, the U.S. State Department announced that it would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,' and that it would 'enhance scrutiny' of the applications it received in the future. The new visa policy, a spokesperson said, is meant to prevent China from exploiting American universities and stealing intellectual property. A spokesperson for the foreign ministry quickly registered Beijing's objection to the new policy. But when Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke with Trump by phone last week, either he didn't raise the new visa policy or his foreign ministry didn't regard his comments on the matter worth including in its official summary of the call, which suggests that the issue is not a top priority in Beijing's negotiations with Washington. One reason for this underwhelming response may be that re-shoring its university students serves Beijing's current agenda. China first opened to the world in the 1980s; in the decades that followed, securing a Western education for its elite helped the country bring in the technology and skills it needed to escape poverty. China was 'sending people out, learning from other places, finding the best quality wherever it was, and bringing that quality back to China,' Robin Lewis, a consultant for U.S.-China education programs and a former associate dean at Columbia University, told me. Now that period has given way to one of nationalism and self-reliance, which means promoting China's own companies, products, technologies—and universities. Rose Horowitch: Trump's campaign to scare off foreign students Xi has consistently stressed the importance of education in sustaining China's rise. His government has invested heavily in China's schools and lavished resources on science and technology programs, with some success. Some of China's top institutions, such as Tsinghua University in Beijing, have gained international recognition as serious competitors in scientific research. China would like to have its own Harvards, rather than sending its elite students to the United States, for political and cultural reasons as well as economic ones. Chinese authorities have long worried that the hundreds of thousands of students it exports to America will absorb undesirable ideas about democracy and civil liberties—and that they will access information about China that is suppressed at home, such as the story of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. In fact, many young Chinese who study in the United States seem to enjoy American freedoms and seek to stay rather than return to serve the motherland. Beijing has tried to deal with this in part by monitoring the activities of its students in the U.S. and attempting to hold them firmly to the party line, including by harassing the families back home of those who stray. Within China, authorities can more easily confine students inside the government's propaganda bubble, which in recent years has become more airtight. Domestic media seek to portray the U.S. as unsafe, especially for Asians, by highlighting incidents of racial discrimination, violence, and disorder. One story published last year by the state news agency Xinhua, under the headline 'Chinese Students' Dreams Turned Into Nightmares at U.S. Doorstep,' tells the harrowing tale of a Chinese student detained and deported at an airport and claims that others had suffered the same fate. China's top spy agency, the Ministry of State Security, warned Chinese students at universities abroad against being recruited as foreign agents, and told of one such unfortunate national who was discovered and punished. Even before Trump's announcement, this climate of mutual distrust had led to a drop-off in Chinese students enrolled in American universities. The number had reached an all-time high during the 2019–20 academic year, topping 372,000, according to the Institute of International Education. But that figure has fallen since—by a quarter, to 277,000, in the 2023–24 academic year. Now India, with more than 331,000 enrolled, sends more students to American institutions than China does. The Trump administration appears to believe that curtailing Chinese access to American technology, money, and, in this case, education will give the U.S. the edge over its closest competitor. In some areas, this might work: Restricting the export of advanced U.S. semiconductor technology to China seems to have helped hold Beijing's chip industry back. So why not do the same with higher education? A case can be made that keeping Chinese students out of some of the world's top research institutions will hold back their skills acquisition and, with it, the country's progress. Adam Serwer: Trump is wearing America down In practice, though, the effect of this policy could be hard to gauge. The engineers behind the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which wowed Silicon Valley by developing a competitive chatbot on the cheap, were mainly locally trained. And the skills that Chinese students can't find at home they can seek in any number of places. There may be only so many Harvards, but Chinese students can receive a good education—and a warmer reception—in countries other than the United States. Universities in Japan and Hong Kong are already trying to capitalize on Trump's harassment of international students to lure them. The idea that any American policy can effectively dampen Chinese ambition may be far-fetched. 'People wake up in the morning and it's all about education here. There is nothing more important,' James McGregor, the chair for China at the consulting firm APCO, told me. 'You're going to stop Chinese people from learning the top skills in the world? No. They'll just deploy them somewhere else.' For now, the Trump team can't seem to decide whether it wants to get tough on China or make deals with China, and the new student-visa policy reflects this confusion. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem,' Trump said in a briefing after his call with Xi. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly.' China's leadership surely knows that many Chinese families still aspire to send their young-adult children to American universities. But Beijing is much more single-minded than Washington about the future of relations between the two countries: Xi appears to see Washington as the primary impediment to China's rise, and ties to the U.S. as a vulnerability best eliminated. From that viewpoint, relying on Harvard to train China's most promising students is a national-security risk. That means that Trump may be doing Xi a favor.
