Man fined after his remote controlled plane crashed into MGS tennis court near coach
Man fined after his remote controlled plane crashed into MGS tennis court near coach
SINGAPORE – A man who lost control of a remote controlled plane before it crashed onto a Methodist Girls' School (MGS) tennis court mere metres from a coach, was fined $7,000 on May 20.
Ng Tchi Mun, 68, pleaded guilty to one count of operating the unmanned aircraft (UA) in a manner which could endanger another person's property.
His UA – a Hangar 9 Pulse 125 weighing around 3.7kg – broke into pieces upon impact, leaving part of the tennis court scratched and cratered. Specifications of this plane model found online state that it is 159cm in length, with a wingspan of 193 cm.
The crash, which happened on a Sunday morning on Aug 20, 2023, took place around 4m from a tennis coach who was preparing for a 12pm private class.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ariel Tan said the coach was 'completely taken aback' by the UA crashing onto the tennis court and 'began shaking in fear at the thought that he could have been harmed'.
'After he composed himself, he called the MGS facilities manager to report the incident before lodging a police report.'
The court heard that Ng was operating the UA from an open field in Old Holland Road around 250m away from the MGS sports complex. There were also residential homes in the vicinity.
Ng, a Singaporean, held an unmanned aircraft basic training certificate issued on Jan 31, 2021.
DPP Tan said: 'At about 10.15am, the accused noticed that the wind was getting stronger, so he decided to steer the UA back towards the open field.
'The accused estimated that the UA was about 50m away from the sports complex of MGS when he tried to manoeuvre it back to him. He ultimately failed to do so and the wind propelled the UA towards MGS.'
Ng then lost control of the UA, which crashed onto one of the tennis courts, located on the third floor of the school's sports complex.
The coach was walking across the court when it landed about 4m away. Ng arrived at the scene soon after and identified himself as the owner of the UA.
The DPP said: 'He (later) agreed to pay the repair cost of $410.40 when presented with the quotation from MGS's contractor.'
On Dec 1, 2023, MGS proceeded with the repairs under its facilities refurbishment plan, and Ng paid the contractor $410.40 a month later.
Without revealing details, the DPP said that the payment was later returned to him on Jan 9, 2025.
This was not the first case involving a UA that crashed near people in the vicinity.
A company was earlier fined $18,000 after a drone it was operating crashed into a building in July 2024 while flying towards One-North Residences near North Buona Vista Road.
The device fell to the ground just 1m away from two residents and caught fire.
The company was convicted on April 1 of operating a drone in a manner that could endanger lives or property.
Shaffiq Alkhatib is The Straits Times' court correspondent, covering mainly criminal cases heard at the State Courts.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
3 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
S'pore has no jurisdiction over Audrey Fang case, can't prosecute suspect if he's deported: MHA
S'pore has no jurisdiction over Audrey Fang case, can't prosecute suspect if he's deported: MHA Source: Straits Times Article Date: 30 May 2025 Author: Aqil Hamzah & Samuel Devaraj The Ministry of Home Affairs said on May 29 that it has communicated its position to its Spanish counterparts, and that the Singapore Government would assist them within the ambit of Singapore's laws. As the fatal stabbing of Singaporean Audrey Fang took place in Spain, Singapore has no jurisdiction over the alleged murder, and thus would not be able to investigate or prosecute Singaporean suspect Mitchell Ong if he were to be deported. This follows the news on May 28 that an attempt to deport the 44-year-old by Spanish immigration authorities had been rejected by a Spanish court. In response to queries, the Ministry of Home Affairs said on May 29 that it has communicated its position to its Spanish counterparts, and that the Singapore Government would assist them within the ambit of Singapore's laws. Law enforcement agencies there, meanwhile, have told the ministry that they are currently prosecuting Ong in Spain. News of the deportation request being blocked was first reported by Spanish daily La Opinion de Murcia on May 28. The deportation request was made by Spain's General Commissariat for Aliens and Borders, a national police agency that manages immigration and border control matters, and was supported by the lawyer representing Ms Fang's family. However, a judge ruled that Ong did not meet the criteria outlined in Spain's laws pertaining to the expulsion of foreigners, one of which states that immediate deportation can take place if an individual has been charged with a crime and is given a jail sentence of fewer than six years, or is given an alternate sentence, such as a fine. As the minimum jail sentence for Ong's potential murder charge is 15 years, the former insurance agent does not meet this criterion. Ong's lawyer, Ms Maria Jesus Ruiz de Castaneda, had told The Straits Times earlier in May that she is opposing the request. The Spanish immigration authority had also requested that Ong be banned from returning to Spain for 10 years, if the deportation had gone through. Ms Ruiz de Castaneda had earlier told Spanish media that an expulsion would be a violation of the rule of law and international treaties Spain has signed and ratified. 'He is involved in ongoing criminal proceedings in Spain, where he must be tried with due process,' she said. 'Expulsion would be contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, the principle of non-refoulement and Spain's commitments against the death penalty.' She had previously called for the case to be dismissed, saying that all necessary evidence had to be examined and that Ong 'firmly and consistently' insisted he did not kill Ms Fang. Ms Fang, a 39-year-old architect, was found dead near a parking space for lorries in the town of Abanilla on April 10, 2024. She left Singapore on April 4 to travel alone to Xabia in the Valencia region of Spain, and was supposed to return eight days later, but became uncontactable on April 10. Her body was found with knife wounds and head trauma. Ong was arrested six days later. Testimonies from two of Ms Fang's friends on June 26, 2024, said Ms Fang and Ong had met on a social dating network. Her family's lawyer said she had told her friends she was meeting Ong during her holiday in Spain. In March, La Opinion reported that DNA from two men was found on her clothes, raising the possibility that more than one person was involved in her death. Ong, meanwhile, was also found to have been nominated as the sole beneficiary of Ms Fang's Central Provident Fund savings, with the accounts reportedly containing about $498,000. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
CNA
12 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Big Shot: Secret Service agent leads Singapore team to fight cybercrime
CNA938 Rewind Play In May's edition of Big Shot, Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with a Secret Service agent who protected US President Donald Trump and now leads the Interpol's cybercrime unit in Singapore about life as an agent and his work fighting cybercrime. He's Neal Jeatton, Interpol's Cybercrime Director.
Online Citizen
a day ago
- Online Citizen
FT article describes Singaporeans as ‘rich and naive' amid S$1.1 billion lost to scams in 2024
An article published by the Financial Times (FT) has cast a harsh spotlight on Singapore's worsening online scam crisis, describing the Republic as being engulfed in a 'scamdemic'. According to the FT report published on 26 May 2025, Singapore's unique blend of affluence, high digital connectivity and strong social trust has made it a fertile target for international scam syndicates. The article, titled 'Rich and naive': why Singapore is engulfed in a 'scamdemic', was authored by FT Singapore correspondent Owen Walker. It portrays the situation as a national emergency, driven by complex factors deeply embedded in Singapore's social and economic fabric. Referencing figures from the Singapore Police Force's annual scam report released on 25 February 2025, the article noted that scam victims in Singapore lost a total of S$1.1 billion in 2024 — a staggering 70% increase from the S$651.8 million lost in 2023. Walker pointed out that Singaporeans were the most heavily scammed globally on a per-person basis, with each victim losing an average of US$4,031 — the highest reported figure among countries surveyed. Scam surge framed as 'national crisis' rooted in social and economic traits The FT article highlights that this is only a fraction of a massive global criminal enterprise, estimated to be worth US$1 trillion. Yet, it argues that Singapore's demographic and behavioural profile — described by one asset recovery professional as 'rich and naive' — leaves its citizens particularly exposed. A prominent example cited was veteran actor Laurence Pang, who lost nearly S$40,000 in a cryptocurrency-linked romance scam, despite his profile and awareness. The article uses this to illustrate how even cautious and educated individuals are vulnerable to today's sophisticated frauds. True scale of scam losses likely exceeds reported figures Crucially, the FT notes that many scams go unreported, meaning actual losses may be far higher than official statistics indicate. The piece also turns its focus to where these scams originate. It identifies sprawling scam centres operating from Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar — often staffed by individuals who are themselves victims of human trafficking. Nick Court, assistant director of financial crime at Interpol, was quoted as saying that Southeast Asia is now a major hotbed for romance, impersonation and phishing scams. These call centres, he added, are responsible for much of the fraudulent activity impacting victims globally. In Singapore, while most scams result in losses below S$2,000, thousands of victims have been tricked into handing over their life savings. Scammers often pose as bank representatives, government officials, or even law enforcement officers. The most common scam categories include ecommerce fraud, job scams, romance scams, impersonation of government officials, malware attacks, and business email compromises. In over 80% of reported Singaporean cases, the victims are persuaded — or psychologically manipulated — to transfer money or crypto assets themselves. The rising use of artificial intelligence by fraudsters has added further complexity. In March 2025, the Monetary Authority of Singapore warned that AI-generated content, including deepfake videos, was increasingly being used to impersonate officials and solicit fraudulent transfers. The report noted that the country's rapid adoption of digital banking, though efficient, allows for money to be moved out of the system with alarming speed — typically within 30 minutes. This makes recovery efforts extremely difficult. Emotional manipulation leaves victims powerless at final stage of scam Loretta Yuen, chair of the fraud committee at the Association of Banks in Singapore, told FT that victims are often 'under such a heavy spell' by the time they reach the bank, that halting the transfers is nearly impossible — especially in scams involving romance, investments, or impersonation. Authorities said that most scam contacts are initiated via Meta-owned platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Meta has claimed it is actively tackling the issue, stating that over 7 million scam-linked accounts — mostly based in Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, and the Philippines — have been identified and removed in 2024 alone. Ironically, even anti-scam initiatives have been hijacked. The FT reported that scammers have impersonated Singapore's own Anti-Scam Centre, calling victims while pretending to be police officers. In 2024, more than 1,500 such impersonation scams were reported to the police. During Parliament sitting in March, then-Minister of State for Home Affairs and Social and Family Development, Sun Xueling, announced that Singapore would consider imposing caning in severe scam cases, noting the immense financial and emotional harm inflicted. She also announced heightened efforts to crack down on money mule activity and enforce stronger deterrents through expanded investigative capabilities. Even Singapore's elite fall victim to sophisticated investment scams The recent surge in scams serves as a stark reminder that even Singapore's legal and corporate elite are not immune to complex financial fraud, highlighting that wealth and status offer no safeguard against deception. Among the most prominent cases is that of Pek Siok Lan, general counsel for Temasek Holdings, who was reportedly cheated of S$5.5 million. She was one of several victims named in fresh charge sheets filed against Singaporean businessman Ng Yu Zhi in 2021. Ng stands accused of orchestrating a S$1 billion investment fraud through his companies under the Envy Group. He allegedly lured hundreds of investors with claims of lucrative nickel-trading deals — which were later revealed to be fictitious. Other high-profile victims include criminal lawyer Sunil Sudheesan and former Law Society president Thio Shen Yi, who were allegedly defrauded of S$1 million and S$87,000 respectively. Senior figures in the investment world were also targeted: Vickers Capital Group chairman Finian Tan was allegedly swindled out of US$19.2 million, while Chuan Hup Holdings CEO Terence Peh reportedly lost S$3 million. The scale of deception prompted at least four lawsuits against Ng and Envy Global Trading, with investors seeking to recover some S$50 million. Authorities seized about S$100 million worth of Ng's assets in 2021. The fraudulent activities took place between 2016 and 2021. In April 2025, a court-appointed liquidator testified that the nickel trades never existed and characterised Ng's business as a Ponzi scheme in layman's terms. Ng is accused of using investor funds to bankroll a lavish lifestyle, including over S$21 million spent on nearly 20 luxury cars.
