logo
28 May 2025: Kamal Haasan's Rajya Sabha Entry, US Visa Ban, Justice Varma Impeachment

28 May 2025: Kamal Haasan's Rajya Sabha Entry, US Visa Ban, Justice Varma Impeachment

India Today5 days ago

India Today Podcasts Desk
UPDATED: May 28, 2025 19:00 IST
In this episode of News at 7, host Prateek Lidhoo breaks down today's biggest headlines from India and beyond. Actor and Makkal Needhi Maiam leader Kamal Haasan is likely heading to the Rajya Sabha after a political deal with the DMK. Meanwhile, the Trump-era student visa crackdown returns, with the US halting interviews and adding new social media vetting measures. Back home, a top judge from the Allahabad High Court faces possible impeachment over unaccounted cash. We also cover the Anna University sexual assault verdict from a Mahila Court in Chennai and a nationwide mock drill amid India-Pakistan border tensions.
Produced by Prateek Lidhoo
Sound mix by Rohan Bharti

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary
Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary

India Today

time26 minutes ago

  • India Today

Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has expressed strong optimism regarding the imminent finalisation of a trade deal between India and the United States, saying that an agreement could be reached in the "not-too-distant future".Secretary Lutnick highlighted that both nations have found a common ground that "really works for both countries," suggesting a breakthrough in long-standing negotiations.'You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future... When they put the right person in India, put the right person on the other side of the table, and we've managed (that), I think," Lutnick said at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum's Leadership Summit in The two countries intensified trade deal discussions after US President Donald Trump recently announced reciprocal tariffs on nations accused of causing trade imbalances, including India. However, the tariffs were later paused for 90 days, except for remarks, delivered at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) in Washington, underscore a significant push by the Trump administration to expedite trade US Commerce Secretary's remarks came just days after reports suggested that India is seeking a complete exemption from the additional 26 per cent tariff imposed by the United States on its goods, as both sides race to finalise an interim trade deal before July 8. The remarks also follow President Trump's claim that India had offered the US a tariff-free trade deal, a statement New Delhi rejected, clarifying that discussions are still ongoing to reach a win-win Monday, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said India and the US desire to give preferential market access to each other's businesses and teams of both countries are working together on the proposed bilateral trade agreement."Both countries are committed to work together, both countries desire to give preferential access to each other's businesses and we are working towards the bilateral trade agreement," Goyal said. In February, US President Trump and Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi announced plans to negotiate the first tranche or phase of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) of 2025. It is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the current level of USD 191 billion.

Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs
Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs

Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The Justice Department's request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs , known as " reductions in force ," in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration. The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others. Controlling the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in the filing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente Acabe com o Fungo Undo "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential authority. The Supreme Court requested a response by the plaintiffs in the case to the administration's filing by June 9. Live Events Trump directed federal agencies in February to "promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force" as part of his administration's restructuring plans. Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston wrote. Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration 's request to halt the judge's ruling. The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit. "The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations." Trump's administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'

Mint

time31 minutes ago

  • Mint

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: 'No one needed to persuade us' "We have enormous respect for the American presidency, and we will speak with that respect in mind. But broadly speaking, our understanding is a bit different... No one needed to persuade us to stop. We had already said to stop. If there was any persuasion by the American president or his senior officials, it would have been persuasion of the Pakistanis. They would have had to be persuaded. We don't need to be persuaded because we don't want war. We want to focus on development. That's the basic message," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, as the delegation he is leading will be in the US for its last leg of the visit. More details are being added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store