
The Major Trump Question Left Unanswered at NATO Summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
One big question was left unanswered at NATO's biggest summit of the year, and only America's delegation could answer it.
But the U.S. did not discuss with its allies any plans to roll back the American troop presence in Europe, according to two European officials at The Hague gathering this week.
The U.S. has indicated a strong desire to pull resources from the continent as it pivots toward the Indo-Pacific and contends with the fallout of its strikes on Iran over the weekend. But when and by how much remains a mystery.
Matthew Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, said last month "nothing has been determined" on the potential pullback of U.S. troops in Europe, but serious conversations would happen after the alliance's summit in the Netherlands.
"We just need to work through the practical consequences," Whitaker said in May.
There was "not a single word" from President Donald Trump or Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about U.S. troops in Europe at official meetings in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday, a European defense official told Newsweek. He and another official were granted anonymity to speak freely about the diplomatic discussions.
U.S. troops, part of a NATO mission to enhance Poland's defense, are getting ready for an official welcoming ceremony in Orzysz, northeastern Poland, Thursday, April 13, 2017.
U.S. troops, part of a NATO mission to enhance Poland's defense, are getting ready for an official welcoming ceremony in Orzysz, northeastern Poland, Thursday, April 13, 2017.
AP Photo/Czarek Sokolowski
The silence on the future of U.S. troops in Europe was "intentional," and a decision to be taken by Washington alone despite strong European interest, the second official told Newsweek.
European countries have relied heavily on the U.S. for decades, and the prospect of America moving the tens of thousands of troops currently on the continent elsewhere has been, for many, an unwelcome thought.
The U.S. has major bases across Europe, providing some of the alliance's most expensive capabilities as well as a sending a strong signal of Washington's commitment to the defense of Europe in the face of Russia.
The Pentagon is in the middle of a review of its global forces, which is expected to be finished in the late summer or early fall.
Whitaker said ahead of the NATO summit that Washington would "work hand in glove" with other members of the alliance, including Canada, to make sure there are "no security gaps" if the U.S. moves its capabilities away.
The process for withdrawing U.S. troops from Europe would likely be lengthy and expensive. It would cost European countries $1 trillion over the next 25 years to replace all of the capabilities and equipment the U.S. currently provides for the continent, according to an estimate from the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), published last month. On the U.S. side, it's not clear where many additional troops would be housed
Even if European NATO members received no answers on U.S. troop presence, the gathering in The Hague appears to have placated Trump, who for months overtly criticized the rest of the alliance for failing to invest in defense.
The President, who had in the past suggested he would encourage Russian attacks on NATO members he felt weren't paying enough, told the alliance's other members he is "with them all the way."
NATO heads of state on Wednesday officially signed off on a new pledge to raise defense and related spending to 5 percent of GDP in the next decade. A 3.5 percent chunk of it will be for military capabilities, or "hard defense," while the remaining 1.5 percent will be funneled into defense-related infrastructure investment, from cyber capabilities to making sure strategic bridges can bear the weight of tanks and armored vehicles.
Even a few months ago, agreement on U.S. calls for NATO members to spend 5 percent had seemed impossible, despite European officials admitting they had not been paying enough.
Speaking at his highly anticipated press conference on Wednesday, Trump praised the "highly productive" summit while singling out Spain for a handful of pointed remarks.
Spain's government has said it will be able to fulfill the new capability targets without reaching 3.5 percent of GDP on core defense spending. Fresh capability targets were agreed by defense ministers at the start of June.
Rutte told journalists on Monday that the alliance was "absolutely convinced" Madrid could not meet these requirements without the extra spending.
"They want to stay at 2 percent—I think it's terrible," Trump said. "I don't know what the problem is. I think it's too bad."
Countries on NATO's eastern flank, close to Russia, have stormed ahead with steep hikes to defense spending, while western and southern Europe have lagged behind.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump's agenda bill hits a snag in Senate
Trump's agenda bill hits a snag in Senate President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" hit a significant roadblock in the Senate with a Senate rules referee striking down key provisions, saying they don't meet the chamber's strict budget rules. Senators are now scrambling to make changes that would allow the bill to be passed by the July 4th deadline. 01:30 - Source: CNN Trump's team credits him with creating a decades-old phrase White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt falsely claimed that President Trump came up with the phrase "peace through strength." CNN's Abby Phillip reports on how the phrase has been used for decades. 01:22 - Source: CNN 'Daddy's home:' Trump leans into NATO chief comment NATO Chief Mark Rutte got the world's attention after referring to President Trump as "daddy" after he used the analogy of two children fighting to describe the conflict between Iran and Israel. In a press conference, Rutte, explained his reason for using the term "daddy." Trump spoke about the moment at a press conference, and the White House leaned into the term in a social media post. 00:50 - Source: CNN Tapper responds to Trump's attack of CNN's coverage of US strikes on Iran CNN's Jake Tapper offers a harsh rebuke to President Trump's attack on media outlets for reporting on a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency report from the Pentagon which found US strikes likely may have only set Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon back by a matter of months. President Donald Trump and his administration has repeatedly said that the strikes 'obliterated' Iran's ability to produce a weapon. 04:04 - Source: CNN Analysis: Trump dominates NATO summit Thirty two world leaders attend this year's NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. But one leader dominated the discussions: President Donald Trump. CNN's correspondent Clare Sebastian offers her analysis from The Hague. 01:34 - Source: CNN Zohran Mamdani declares victory in NYC Democratic mayoral primary New York State assemblyman and democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani declared victory in a speech as he is poised to win the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, with his top challenger Andrew Cuomo conceding the race. According to CNN's projection, Mamdani, whose campaign focused on affordability, will garner less than 50% of the vote, meaning the race will formally be decided by ranked-choice votes. 02:35 - Source: WABC Mamdani camp electric after Cuomo concedes Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assemblyman and democratic socialist, moved to the brink Tuesday of a stunning win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, with his top challenger, Andrew Cuomo, conceding the race. 00:59 - Source: CNN Cuomo called Mamdani after conceding NYC mayoral primary New York state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani was on the brink of a stunning Democratic primary win Tuesday for New York City mayor, with his top challenger, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, conceding the race. 00:38 - Source: CNN Trump lashes out at Israel and Iran President Donald Trump condemned both Iran and Israel as the ceasefire he brokered between the two countries appeared to grow more fragile. Trump was critical of both sides, but reserved his harshest condemnation for Israel, who he said 'unloaded' on Iran 'as soon as we made the deal.' 02:01 - Source: CNN Reporter asks Trump if he wants regime change in Iran When questioned about Iran while aboard Air Force 1, President Trump addressed whether he desires a change in the countries' regime. 00:58 - Source: CNN Father of Marines detained by ICE Narciso Barranco, a father of three US Marines, was detained by federal agents while working as a landscaper in California. Video captured the moment he was confronted by the agents. 01:10 - Source: CNN 'Complete bait and switch': MTG calls out Trump over Iran strikes Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA) calls out President Donald Trump's for reversing course on "key promises" on the "MAGA agenda" after U.S. strikes on Iran nuclear facilities. 00:36 - Source: CNN Bernie Sanders reacts to US strikes on Iran during speech Sen. Bernie Sanders held a "Fighting Oligarchy" rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, when he received news of President Donald Trump's strikes on Iran. 01:38 - Source: CNN Trump announces air strikes on nuclear sites in Iran US President Donald Trump announced that the United States has completed a 'very successful attack' on nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. 00:38 - Source: CNN Trump's remarks on US strikes in Iran President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the White House after US strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran. 03:39 - Source: CNN Why Trump rebuked his own intel chief CNN's Kristen Holmes reports on how Tulsi Gabbard's standing inside the Trump administration has diminished in recent weeks. President Donald Trump has come to see the director of national intelligence as "off message" when it comes to the conflict in the Middle East, according to one senior White House advisor. 02:04 - Source: CNN Why Fareed Zakaria thinks Trump has 'FOMO' foreign policy CNN's Fareed Zakaria analyzes what may be motivating President Trump's foreign policy: a fear of missing out. 00:44 - Source: CNN Border patrol agents arrest US citizen standing up for detained maintenance worker A US citizen has been arrested after a physical altercation with immigration agents after they detained a maintenance worker at a shopping center in Pico Rivera, California. 01:33 - Source: CNN Jewish GOP Congressman says he was 'run off the road' GOP Rep. Max Miller said he was 'run off the road' on his way to work in Ohio by an individual who yelled "Death to Israel" and had a Palestinian flag. Miller is Jewish and describes himself as a staunch defender of Israel. 00:50 - Source: CNN


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asks Congress to strip ‘revenge tax' from Big Beautiful Bill
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asked Republicans in Congress on Thursday to remove the so-called 'revenge tax' from President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill. The provision would grant Trump the authority to tax foreign holdings of US investments as a way to retaliate against countries imposing new taxes on US companies operating overseas. Bessent argued that the provision, known as Section 899, was no longer necessary after the Trump administration reached a deal with G7 nations at last week's summit to exempt US companies from a 15% global corporate minimum tax championed by the Biden administration. Advertisement 'After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests,' the Treasury secretary wrote on X. 'President Trump paved the way for this historic achievement.' Tax writers on Capitol Hill welcomed Bessent's announcement and said the tax would be taken out of the bill. REUTERS 'OECD Pillar 2 taxes will not apply to U.S. companies, and we will work cooperatively to implement this agreement across the OECD-G20 Inclusive Framework in coming weeks and months,' Bessent added. 'I want to thank my G7 counterparts for their partnership and collaboration towards achieving this historic outcome.' Advertisement 'Based on this progress and understanding, I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill.' The massive piece of legislation is currently working its way through the Senate. Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said the revenge tax provision would be stricken from the bill. 'At the request of @SecScottBessent and in light of this joint understanding to preserve US tax sovereignty and allow US tax laws to co-exist with the Pillar 2 regime, we will remove proposed tax code Section 899 from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and we look forward to active engagement with Treasury on these important issues,' Crapo wrote on X. Advertisement House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-Mo.) called the deal a 'major victory for American workers.' Some on Wall Street feared that the provision would discourage global investment in the US. The Senate's version of the revenge tax had been projected to raise more than $50 billion in revenues over 10 years, which would've helped defray the cost of other spending in the bill. Trump has urged Congress to pass the bill by July 4. Advertisement Trump wants Congress to pass his 'big, beautiful' bill by July 4. AP Bessent said the agreement struck with G7 partners ' provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond.' 'By reversing the Biden Administration's unwise commitments, we are now protecting our Nation's authority to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers,' he added. 'We are also preserving our tax base, preventing the loss of over $100 billion in American taxpayer dollars according to Treasury estimates and the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation.' 'The Trump Administration remains vigilant against all discriminatory and extraterritorial foreign taxes applied against Americans. We will defend our tax sovereignty and resist efforts to create an unlevel playing field for our citizens and companies.'


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
America's controversial Iran airstrike: Letters to the Editor — June 27, 2025
The Issue: The US military's airstrike against Iran, destroying three nuclear sites. Just as you wouldn't allow a child to play with matches, one shouldn't allow a fanatical regime made up of religious zealots to play with atomic bombs ('Nuke site blasting is long lasting,' June 25). Iran has always acted irresponsibly — and with atomic weapons, it would act even more irresponsibly. Iran's rulers have shown no regard for how many innocent people they kill to achieve their twisted goals. President Trump has made the world much safer by eliminating an existential threat that would have caused havoc had he not taken action. Seymour Srulowitz Englewood, NJ Trump has entered the fray by bombing Iran's nuclear facilities, a tactic that has little chance of destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities, but every possibility of complicating matters further. Diplomats and intelligence analysts on all sides have their thankless work cut out for them now that Trump has driven his clown car into the Middle East house of mirrors. Mike Barrett Ashburn, Va. Thank you, President Trump, for the success of Operation Midnight Hammer. Your exemplary military and national security advisers successfully planned and executed a massive strike necessary to assist the continued existence of the state of Israel as well as America. Iran's obsession with obliterating Israel and America is not a secret by any means. Unfortunately, our past presidents just chose to ignore Iran's threats and actions and appease its leadership. Our military has risen to the occasion and will continue to do so under this new administration. We, as Americans, know that we will be protected no matter what, because we have a president who loves America. Alice Daly Mahopac Kudos to Trump for his 'peace through strength' military action in obliterating Iranian nuke sites. However, if he showed that same strength with regard to his favorite dictator, Vladimir Putin — instead of abandoning Ukraine and letting the kids fight it out in the playground — the daily bombardment of Ukraine would cease. Stefa Charczenko Manhattan Provocation is not the answer to global peace. We should not gloat about our success. Unfortunately, our leaders have not learned to behave for peace. Peter Sena Naples, Fla. Trump's hammer might have actually worked: No American casualties, no boots on the ground — and, hopefully, no endless quagmire. It was a coordinated strike so efficient it looked like a Steven Spielberg film — epic, surgical and with just enough suspense to keep you from blinking. Democrats have started spinning the impeachment wheel again. Their new gripe: He didn't consult them first. Right — because US military strategy should work like a town zoning meeting. Where was this righteous outrage when former President Barack Obama bombed Libya, Syria and Pakistan without so much as a group e-mail? Trump drops a hammer, stops a war and suddenly Democrats are filing articles of impeachment. Alan Webber Cave Creek, Ariz. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Iran is not a strong country. It has been bombed by Israel, and its offensive and defensive ability is poor. It is no North Korea or Russia. I doubt President Trump would have been so aggressive toward other countries. North Korea was experimenting with nuclear bombs, and Trump did nothing but call Kim Jong-un 'rocket man,' go see him and write letters. He bombed a weaker country, unable to respond, and is now labeled a 'tough leader.' One could compare it to attacking an elderly person not really able to defend themselves. Raymond Mangano Brooklyn It only took Trump five months to put the nuclear capabilities of Iran into its place. The contrast between former President Joe Biden and Trump is like night and day. The catering to and appeasement of the enemy can no longer be tolerated. Ron Zajicek Cortlandt Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.