logo
Man guilty of trying to defraud Covid wage subsidy of millions

Man guilty of trying to defraud Covid wage subsidy of millions

auckland_district_court.png
Auckland District Court. File photo: RNZ
A man who tried to fraudulently claim millions of dollars through Covid-19 wage subsidy schemes has been found guilty at the Auckland District Court.
Hun Min Im faced 91 charges related to his attempts to claim $1.88 million from the Covid-19 wage subsidy scheme (WSS), the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Covid-19 Support Payments and Resurgence Support Payments.
In total, Im attempted to claim $2.3 million and received almost $624,000.
He was found guilty of 18 charges of obtaining by deception and 16 charges of using a forged document while Im pleaded guilty to 54 charges of dishonestly using a document.
Three obtaining by deception charges were still yet to be determined.
Serious Fraud Office director Karen Chang said Im's offending was deliberate and wide-reaching.
"He created a complex web of fake companies and forged documents which our expert teams spent many hours piecing together. He stole the personal information of his tenants and applicants who responded to fake job ads he placed online, to use as shareholders, directors and employees in his companies.
"Mr Im took advantage of public money that was intended to support people and businesses during a time of significant stress and uncertainty. Any money he received was used to fund his personal lifestyle, including an apartment and luxury vehicle," she said.
Im submitted 42 WSS applications on behalf of eight companies and four sole traders, none of which were trading in New Zealand or had any staff.
He forged signatures and used forged documents when incorporating companies, filed GST returns to claim refunds his companies were not entitled to.
Im also sought a further $172,800 in Covid-19 subsidies from Inland Revenue that he was not entitled to.
The Serious Fraud Office was alerted to this case by the Ministry of Social Development after its own initial investigations, Chang said.
"We want to recognise the cooperation and support provided by Inland Revenue, Police and the Companies Office to our investigation."
"This includes the Police Asset Recovery Unit, which restrained a property and vehicle following a referral from the SFO. The investigation was a great example of agencies working together to investigate abuse of public funds."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home detention for tax evasion
Home detention for tax evasion

Otago Daily Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Home detention for tax evasion

A tax-evading Southland school caterer has left a $2 million trail of debt after her company went bust. Debra Lee Monteith appeared in the Invercargill District Court on Tuesday and was sentenced to 11 months' home detention on a single representative charge of aiding and abetting her company in failing to account for PAYE between March 2021 and February 2024, Inland Revenue said in a release. That just added to her troubles after her company, Lee 19, was put into liquidation in March last year, with questions over third-party loans and operating a lawnmowing business under the company's name, which was running contracts while in liquidation. Her company stopped paying PAYE tax for nearly three years and defaulted on a debt repayment scheme. Inland Revenue had applied to put her in liquidation last year, which was granted. All up, the company had assets of $99,899 and liabilities of $2,048,785. Lee 19 was primarily involved in food catering, including the Ministry of Education's Ka Ora, Ka Ako Healthy School Lunches Programme and catering at the Alliance Lorneville meat processing plant. The latest liquidators' report said Inland Revenue was one of the preferential creditors, who were collectively owed $1,106,877, unsecured creditors were owed $843,336, while secured creditors were owed $181,482. In the latest liquidators report, published in April this year, the director of the company advised the company was operating two businesses: a catering business and a canteen. The director also advised the company had been used to operate her ex-partner's lawnmowing business. Initially, the director advised of an intention to purchase some of the company's assets. Due to the valuations the liquidators received, those purchases were declined by the liquidators. All remaining company assets were sold to one party. The liquidators were also considering a claim for an unrelated third party which had a contract with the lawnmowing business in the name of the company. The contract was still operating after the liquidation, with questions about who was receiving payments. A claim was also issued for an overdrawn current account against the previous director. No response was received. A claim was also made on a third-party loan but no-one could be located and it became uneconomic to pursue. Inland Revenue said in its statement that in 2019, Lee 19 registered as an employer and began paying its workers. The next year, several employees phoned Inland Revenue stating their KiwiSaver deductions were not being paid. No PAYE returns were filed until 2020, when returns for seven PAYE periods were made all at once with $82,894.86 (excluding penalties and interest) immediately due and payable. Monteith entered into an instalment arrangement in 2020 for the debt, but this was cancelled in 2022 because of missed payments. Then the company stopped paying PAYE entirely from March 2021 until February 2024. The PAYE not accounted for over the period totalled $801,928.79. Monteith told Inland Revenue the PAYE was used to keep the company afloat and pay for food costs. Her personal expenses were paid out of the company's finances and her groceries were taken from the company's pantry. Monteith benefited by just over $300,000 between 2020 and 2024, although she was not otherwise taking a salary from the company. Lee 19 also applied for and received more than $780,000 in Covid-19 support money from various schemes. The company, at Monteith's direction, was receiving significant taxpayer support while at the same time not meeting its own tax obligations. Monteith, who ran four other companies since the late 1980s, was made bankrupt in 2013.

Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000
Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000

1News

time9 hours ago

  • 1News

Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000

The University of Auckland has been ordered to pay scientist Siouxsie Wiles $205,059.94. The payout – revealed in an Employment Court decision today – is towards Wiles' legal costs, after a three-week hearing in the Employment Court last year. In that case, the court found the university breached its contractual obligations to protect Wiles as harassment against her intensified during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it did not find the university had breached Wiles' academic freedom, or claims related to Te Tiriti. In her decision today, Judge Joanna Holden said the parties were encouraged to agree to costs, but due to the university's response Wiles found it necessary to return to court. ADVERTISEMENT Wiles had said she spent $349,450.67 to fight her case last year but would accept $175,000 from the university towards costs. "The University's response was that it considered it was entitled to claim significant costs from Associate Professor Wiles … which would likely be in excess of $500,000 plus GST. It initially offered, on a without prejudice save as to costs basis, to settle costs on the basis that they lay where they fell, but later offered $65,000 (plus GST) as a contribution to Associate Professor Wiles's costs." The key issue appeared to be whether Wiles won her case last year or not. She claimed she had been the successful party. The university said there had been 'no winning party' last year, and that Wiles conduct of her case had increased costs. Judge Holden agree that there was significant time and effort spent on the issues of academic freedom and Te Tiriti at the hearing last year, which would have contributed to the $349,450.67 Wiles spent. However, on balance, the judge was satisfied that the starting costs figure of $176,182.30 was a fair one for costs in the circumstances of the case. In the end, Judge Holden awarded $180,582.30 for costs and $24,477.64 for disbursements.

Cameron Road Changes To Remain At Seventh And Twelfth Avenues
Cameron Road Changes To Remain At Seventh And Twelfth Avenues

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

Cameron Road Changes To Remain At Seventh And Twelfth Avenues

Roading improvements at Seventh Avenue and Twelfth Avenue made as part of the 2021-2024 upgrade of Cameron Road will remain in place it was decided yesterday. Tauranga City Council's City Delivery Committee was presented with options for the future of the two city centre intersections following concerns raised by local businesses about the improvements limiting their customers' ability to reach them. For Seventh Avenue, there was also concern that reduced access was affecting leasing opportunities. Councillors acknowledged that the feedback received from the community did not give this outcome unanimous support but they were making decisions for the future. They recognised that businesses had already suffered from long delays on Cameron Road Stage 1, and they felt that the roading improvements already made were the best option. A vote was carried to maintain the status quo of the Seventh Avenue cul de sac because reopening the intersection with Cameron Road would result in a loss of parking on Cameron Road which a recent survey identified was of high value to local businesses and had implications for the future form and function of Cameron Road. Parking concerns raised by both residents and businesses as part of the survey also identified the need to provide more parking in the area, so a vote was also carried to add additional on-street parking on Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Avenues. While there was real concern expressed for the challenges experienced by the businesses on Twelfth Avenue, a decision was made to keep the 'no right turn' from Cameron Road into Twelfth Avenue in place due to safety concerns with vehicles having to cross two traffic lanes, a bus lane and a cycleway when making a right turn into Twelve Avenue. Head of Transport Mike Seabourne told the committee that because the Cameron Road improvements had been designed to accommodate future growth in the city, particularly in Te Papa and Tauriko West, it was a very 'future-like' design which he acknowledged was 'awkward' for the community to understand and get behind. Councillor Kevin Schuler said it was important to address the parking issues identified in the Seventh Avenue area so he believed that should be done now and if there was still ongoing disquiet about the cul de sac that a decision about reopening it could be revisited later. Councillor Marten Rozeboom said reinstating a right turn into Twelfth Avenue from Cameron Road would affect the flow of traffic between Fifteenth Avenue and Elizabeth Street, and while some people were always disaffected or disadvantaged by change, it was working well for most of Tauranga. Councillor Rod Taylor said while the rush of the Cameron Road project and the impact of COVID-19 meant that consultation at the time 'wasn't 100%' there has now been an opportunity for the community to be heard. 'The result isn't going to be what everyone is wanting but the fact we've looked at it again is good for the community and a lot of people now understand the design of the road and long-term intention.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store